Home       Top Rated       Submit Article     Advanced Search     FAQ       Contact Us       Lawyers in India       Law Forum     RSS Feeds     

Register your Copyright Online

We offer copyright registration right from your desktop click here for details.

Latest Articles | Articles 2014 | Articles 2013 | Articles 2012 | Articles 2011 | Articles 2010 | Articles 2009 | Articles 2008 | Articles 2007 | Articles 2006 | Articles 2000-05

Search On:Laws in IndiaLawyers Search

Mutual Consent Divorce in Delhi
We provide fast, cost effective and Hassle free solution.
Contact us at Ph no: 9650499965 (Divorce Law Firm Delhi)
File Caveat in Supreme Court
Contact Ph no: +9650499965

Main Categories
 Accident Law
 Animal Laws
 Aviation Law
 Bangladesh Law
 Banking and Finance laws
 Case Laws
 Civil Laws
 Company Law
 Constitutional Law
 Consumer laws
 Contracts laws
 Criminal law
 Drug laws
 Dubai laws
 Educational laws
 Employment / Labour laws
 Environmental Law
 family law
 Gay laws and Third Gender
 Human Rights laws
 Immigration laws
 Insurance / Accident Claim
 Intellectual Property
 International Law
 Juvenile Laws
 Law - lawyers & legal Profession
 Legal Aid and Lok Adalat
 Legal outsourcing
 Media laws
 Medico legal
 Real estate laws
 Right To Information
 Tax Laws
 Torts Law
 Woman Issues
 Workplace Equality & Non-Discrimination
 Yet Another Category

More Options
 Most read articles
 Most rated articles

Subscribe now and receive free articles and updates instantly.


Published : November 01, 2010 | Author : nidhikhare.11
Category : Criminal law | Total Views : 9519 | Rating :

Nidhi Khare. I am student of III year of B.A.LL.B. (Hons) at National Law University Bhopal, M.P.

Gender Biasness in the Law of Adultery in India

The Indian Penal Code was framed by the Britishers in 1860 which was the time when women in India were considered the property of the men, and the offence on adultery given under s 497 is a clear reflection of this. Adultery is basically an act of having sexual relations outside marriage.[1] This article aims to critically analyze the gender biasness in the definition of adultery given under s 497 keeping in view the changing circumstances and the now legalized homosexuality. The author finally proposes an unbiased definition of adultery which could be introduced under s 497.

The Law of Adultery in India:
S 497 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 states that:
“Whoever has sexual intercourse with a person who is and whom he knows or has reason to believe to be the wife of another man, without the consent or connivance of that man, such sexual intercourse not amounting to the offence of rape, is guilty of the offence of adultery, and shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years, or with fine, or with both. In such case the wife shall not be punishable as an abettor.”

The Judicial Pronouncements on Validity of the Law:

The constitutional validity of the law of adultery in India has been challenged a number of times but the court has upheld its validity and also the ‘classification’ made under it.

In the case of Yusuf Aziz v. State,[2] the Court ruled that the immunity granted to women from being prosecuted under section 497 was not discriminatory but valid under Article 15 (3) of the Constitution. It does not offend articles 14 and 15 of the Constitution of India.

In case of V. Revathi v. Union of India and Ors,[3] the court held that that Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code is so designed that a husband cannot prosecute the wife for defiling the sanctity of the matrimonial tie by committing adultery. Thus the law permits neither the husband of the offending wife to prosecute his wife nor does the law permit the wife to prosecute the offending husband for being disloyal to her. Thus both the husband and the wife are disabled from striking each other with the weapon of criminal law.

In case of Sowmithri Vishnu v. Union of India and Anr,[4] the court held that the contemplation of the law, evidently, is that the wife, who is involved in an illicit relationship with another man, is a victim and not the author of the crime.

Analysis of the definition:
Now on analyzing the definition from beginning to end, we find the very second line of this section mentions the phrase ‘wife of another man.’ And here appears the very first point of gender discrimination. This phrase gives an idea that a married man having sexual relations with an unmarried woman will not be guilty of committing adultery.

The offence of adultery has been kept under the chapter titled ‘offence relating to marriage’ because this offence hits at the very root of the institution of marriage destroying the sanctity of a marital relation. And to preserve the sanctity of the marriage is not the duty of just one spouse rather both husband and wife.

But the language of this section gives a feeling that if the husband of the lady, with whom the person convicted of adultery had sexual intercourse, had given his wife his consent to have relation outside marriage then her wife’s relation with a third man will not destroy the sanctity of their marital relationships which is not true. Also, this discriminates between husband and wife as partners to a marriage since it does not include ‘husband of another woman’ exonerating the female partner in the extra-marital relation of the charge of adultery.

The next phrase mentions ‘without the consent or connivance of that man’ which clearly indicates that adultery is not an offence per se but is an offence only when the husband of the adulterer did not consent to it and also that the consent of the wife of person convicted of adultery is not considered in deciding whether her husband has committed adultery or not. This once again discriminates between the two sexes by not considering the consent of the wife of the person convicted of adultery in deciding whether her husband who had had sexual relations outside marriage is guilty of the offence of adultery or not.

The argument generally given in favor of this definition is that the inheritance of children of marriage is altered when wife beget children from a man other than her husband. Firstly if that is the case then even if husband consents, the inheritance will be altered and secondly if it actually about begetting children, a wife can also consent to extra marital relation of her husband to allow the other women to beget a child for her and her husband. And so, even the consent of this woman should be taken into consideration.

Also as far as the opinion of the court that ‘the law permits neither the husband of the offending wife to prosecute his wife nor does the law permit the wife to prosecute the offending husband for being disloyal to her’[5] is concerned then why the consent of the husband and not of the wife is given importance in deciding the offence.

Now today when even the courts have discussed matters like live in relationships and have secured the rights of the female partner in a live in relationship to property of her male partner and also discussed the matter of homosexuality and have decriminalized consensual non-vaginal sexual acts between adults[6] the Legislature should come up with a definition which even punishes a man who has had sexual relation with a married man because the current definition fails to do so.

The last line of this section mentions ‘in such case the wife shall not be punishable as an abettor’. In support of this the Supreme Court held that woman is neither the seducer nor the author of the crime but the victim.[7]. But this view does not hold correct in the present time.

But at the same time the allegation, put forth by many critics, that this act only holds the male partner to sexual intercourse guilty of adultery is not true as even where a female is having sexual relation with ‘wife of another man’, even she will be guilty. And so it cannot be said that this definition discriminates between men and women in holding them guilty of adultery.

Proposed amended definition:
When the Legislature comes up with an amended version of s 497 it should necessarily take all the above mentioned points into considerations. The author, after keeping in mind all the above lacunas of the law, has come up with a modified definition of adultery which is as follows:

“Whoever voluntarily has sexual intercourse with a person, who is and whom he knows or has reason to believe to be the spouse of another person, such sexual intercourse not amounting to the offence of rape, is guilty of the offence of adultery, and shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years, or with fine, or with both.

Explanation: the word ‘spouse’ here would mean a husband or wife.”

The need to amend the law on adultery in India has not been felt in a few years rather jurists and lawyers have been pressing the need for amendment since decades. The courts have held that they cannot strike down a section on the ground that it is desirable to delete it.[8] But the paper proposes an amendment to and not a deletion of the section. Therefore the Legislature should, with immediate affect, bring an amendment into the law of adultery and remove the gender biasness of this law.
[1] M. Alavi v. T.V. Safia, AIR1993Ker21.
[2] AIR1951Bom470
[3] AIR1988SC835
[4] AIR1985SC1618
[5] V. Revathi v. Union of India (UOI) and Ors., AIR1988SC835.
[6] Naz Foundation v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Others, 2010CriLJ94
[7] Sowmithri Vishnu v. Union of India (UOI) and Anr., AIR1985SC1618.
[8] Sowmithri Vishnu v. Union of India (UOI) and Anr., AIR1985SC1618.

Authors contact info - articles The  author can be reached at: nidhi.11@legalserviceindia.com

1 2 3 4 5
Rate this article!     Poor

Most viewed articles in Criminal law category
The Power of The Magistrate Under Section 156 (3) of Cr.P.C
The Elements and Stages of a Crime
Dying Declaration-Section 32(1) of Indian Evidence Act
Confession under Indian Evidence Act
Duty of The Public Prosecutor In The Criminal Justice System
Whether Section 324 Of IPC Is Bailable Or Non-Bailable
Experts Opinion and its admissibility and relevancy - Law of Evidence
Rape Laws In India-Appropriate or not?
Change in definition of Rape in India
Mens Rea in Statutory Offences
Anti - terrorism laws in India
Section 91(1) CrPc: An analysis of Constitutional Validity
Common Intention And Common Object Under The Indian Penal Code 1860
Need on capital punishment in the context of rape
Rights of Arrested Person
Secondary Evidence
Most recent articles in Criminal law category
The Fugitive Offenders Bill
How to quash 498A
Bail conditions
is rope an answer for crime?
Formation of Special Courts in Rape Cases for Speedy Trial: A Necessity
Quash 498a -Vague allegations in Fir
Quashing of False FIR registered under 498A and 406 of the Indian Penal Code
Unsophisticated Arena of Criminal Investigation: Loopholes and Repercussions
Terrorist and their Tactics:-Need of Creative Criminology
How a Defendant Grand Jury Testimony Can Be Used at Trial
Yakubs Death Punishment
Framing of a Law or Enforcement of a Law
Compensation: A Ray of Hope
Evidential Value of Private Reports in Court of Law
Intention an Integral Part of Crime
Nature and Scope of Plea Bargaining

Article Comments

there are no comments...

Please login or register a new free account.

Random Pick
A competitive nature is as necessary to human well-being as is food, sleep & exercise. It is the driving force that situations us to generate the power necessary to satisfy our intrinsic needs. The fact cannot be denied that without some level of internal competitive drive, our very survival would be at risk. The idea of harmony co-existing with competitiveness seems to be the ultimate contradiction. Yet, a healthy level of competitiveness is the very thing that drives an individual to achieve greatness. At the same time, an unhealthy level of competitiveness engenders devastation and conflict, which allows for only negligible short-term gains...

» Total Articles
» Total Authors
» Total Views
» Total categories

Law Forum

Legal Articles

Lawyers in India- Click on a link below for legal Services

lawyers in Chennai
lawyers in Bangalore
lawyers in Hyderabad
lawyers in Cochin
lawyers in Pondicherry
lawyers in Guwahati
lawyers in Nashik

lawyers in Jaipur
lawyers in New Delhi
lawyers in Dimapur
lawyers in Agra
Noida lawyers
lawyers in Siliguri

For Mutual consent Divorce in Delhi

Ph no: 9650499965
For online Copyright Registration

Ph no: 9891244487
Law Articles

lawyers in Delhi
lawyers in Chandigarh
lawyers in Allahabad
lawyers in Lucknow
lawyers in Jodhpur
Faridabad lawyers

lawyers in Mumbai
lawyers in Pune
lawyers in Nagpur
lawyers in Ahmedabad
lawyers in Surat
Ghaziabad lawyers

lawyers in Kolkata
lawyers in Janjgir
lawyers in Rajkot
lawyers in Indore
lawyers in Ludhiana
Gurgaon lawyers


India's Most Trusted Online law library
Legal Services India is Copyrighted under the Registrar of Copyright Act ( Govt of India) 2000-2017
 ISBN No: 978-81-928510-1-3