Home       Top Rated       Submit Article     Advanced Search     FAQ       Contact Us       Lawyers in India       Law Forum     RSS Feeds     

Register your Copyright Online

We offer copyright registration right from your desktop click here for details.

Latest Articles | Articles 2014 | Articles 2013 | Articles 2012 | Articles 2011 | Articles 2010 | Articles 2009 | Articles 2008 | Articles 2007 | Articles 2006 | Articles 2000-05

Search On:Laws in IndiaLawyers Search

Mutual Consent Divorce in Delhi
We provide fast, cost effective and Hassle free solution.
Contact us at Ph no: 9650499965 (Divorce Law Firm Delhi)

E-mail login                       Password

Free Email Sign Up

Main Categories
 Accident Law
 Aviation Law
 Banking and Finance laws
 Case Laws
 Civil Laws
 Company Law
 Constitutional Law
 Consumer laws
 Contracts laws
 Criminal law
 Drug laws
 Dubai laws
 Educational laws
 Employment / Labour laws
 Environmental Law
 family law
 Gay laws and Third Gender
 Human Rights laws
 Immigration laws
 Insurance / Accident Claim
 Intellectual Property
 International Law
 Juvenile Laws
 Law - lawyers & legal Profession
 Legal Aid and Lok Adalat
 Legal outsourcing
 Media laws
 Medico legal
 Real estate laws
 Right To Information
 Tax Laws
 Torts Law
 Woman Issues
 Workplace Equality & Non-Discrimination
 Yet Another Category

More Options
 Most read articles
 Most rated articles

Subscribe now and receive free articles and updates instantly.


Copyright Registration

To Copyright Your Books, Videos, Songs, Scripts etc
Call us at: 9891244487 / or email at: admin@legalserviceindia.com
Top Law Colleges

Law Updates:

# Income-Tax
# Family law
# Company Law
# Constitutional Law
# Partnership firms
# Immigration Law
# Cyber Law
# Lok Adalat, legal Aid & PIL
# Forms
# Trademarks
# Woman issues
# Medico Legal
# Consumer laws
# Criminal laws
# Supreme Court Judgments

Published : July 20, 2011 | Author : laksheyender@gmail.com
Category : Tax Laws | Total Views : 12927 | Rating :

Laksheyender Kumar. I am pursuing B.A.,LL.B.(H) 5th year from Jamia Millia Islamia. I want to share some my research work with intrested peoples.

Assessment of Income From House Property

Section 4 of the Income tax Act 1961 (Act hereinafter) provides for charge of income tax. However, this section by itself does not create any liability. It has been observed by the Supreme Court in CIT Vs. K. Srinivasan (1972) 83 ITR 346-351 that although section 4 is the charging section, yet income tax can be charged only when the central Act, which normally is the Finance Act, enacts that income tax shall be charged for any assessment year at the rate or rates specified therein.

Every money receipt by a person is not chargeable to tax. Section 14 of the Act specifies five heads of income on which tax can be imposed under the Income tax Act. In order to be chargeable, an income has to be brought under one of these five heads. The heads are (i) salaries (ii) Income from House property (iii) profits and gains of business or profession (iv) capital gains and (v) income from other sources. In the discussion to follow, the relevant provisions of the Act relating to Income from House Property would be considered and how the computation of income from this source is to be made, namely, how the income is to be worked out and what are the deductions to be given for mcomputing the taxable income shall be explained. Sections 22 mto 27 of the Act deal with the subject of taxation of income from house property.

Property-the common view
In common parlance, property is understood in wide sense. It is not only the thing which is the subject matter of ownership but is taken to mean ‘dominon’ or right of ownership or even partial ownership. Lord Longdale inJohn v. Skinner (1836) 5Lg 67-90 (Ch) has described it as the most comprehensive of all the terms which can be used in as much as it is indicative and descriptive of every possible interest which a person can have. However, for purposes of taxation under sections 22 to 27 of the Act, such wider definition of property is not relevant. The income to be taxable should be “Income from House Property”.

Section 22 of the IT Act 1961
Section 22 provides for taxation of ‘annual value’ of a property consisting of any buildings or lands appurtenant thereto, of which the assessee is owner, under the head “income from House Property”. Tax imposed under section 22 is a tax on `annual value’ of house property and is not a tax on “House Property”. However, if a house property is occupied by a taxpayer for the purpose of business or profession carried on by him (the profits of which are chargeable to income tax), annual value of such property is not chargeable to tax under the head 'Income from House Property'.

In the earlier discussion, the phrase ‘lands appurtenant thereto’ has also been used. It needs to be clarified in this context that income from letting of vacant plots of land when there is no adjoining building will not be taxed under this head (but will be taxed as income from other sources). The existence of a building is, therefore, an essential prerequisite. Building will, of course, include residential house (whether let out or self occupied), office building, factory building, godowns, flats, etc. as long as they are not used for business or profession by owner. And the purpose for which the mbuilding is used by the tenant is also immaterial. Thus, mincome from letting out godowns will be taken as income from house property. It does not make any difference at all if the property is owned by a limited company or a firm.

These are:

# The property should consist of any building or land appurtenant thereto

# The assessee should be the owner of the property

# The property should not be used by the owner for the mpurpose of any business or profession carried on by him, the profits of which are chargeable to tax.

Unless all the aforesaid conditions are satisfied, the property income cannot be charged to tax under the head ‘Income from House property’.

‘Owner’-concept explained
For the purpose of section 22, the concept hitherto munderstood even in court decisions has been that the owner has to be a legal owner. Annual value of property is assessed to tax under section 22 in the hands of owner even if he is not in receipt of income or even if income is received by some other person. For instance, if a person makes gift of rental income to a friend or a relative, without transferring ownership of the property, annual value of property is taxable in the hands of the donor, even if rental income is received by the donee-S. Kartar Singh v. CIT (1969) 73 ITR 438 (Delhi). In other words, for the purpose of section 22, the owner must be that person who can exercise the rights of the owner, not on behalf of the owner but in his own right-RB. Jodha Mal Kuthiala v. CIT [1971] 82 ITR 570 (SC). However, there has been some refinement in the concept of ownership after the decision of the Surpeme Court in the case of CIT v. Podar Cement (P) Ltd. (1997) 92 Taxman 541 (SC)/226 ITR 625 (SC). In this case, the Supreme Court has expressed the view that under common law ‘owner’ means a person who has got valid title generally conveyed to him after complying with the requirements of law such as the Transfer of Property Act, Registration Act etc. But in the context of Section 22 of the Income tax Act, having regard to the ground realities and further having regard to the object of the Income tax Act, namely, “to tax the income’’, ‘owner’ is a person who is entitled to receive income from the property in his own right. The requirement of registration of the sale deed in the context of section 22 is not warranted. In view of this, where a property is handed over to a purchaser to enjoy fruits of that property by the builder, the purchaser is to be treated as ‘owner’ of that property even though no registered document has been executed in his favour.

Ownership is relevant for the previous year
As tax is levied only on the income of previous year, annual value of property, owned by a person during the previous year, is taxable in the following assessment year, even if the assessee is not owner of the property during the assessment year.

Deemed ownership

In the following situations the ownership shall be deemed for taxing income from house property in view of section 27 of the Act:

# When house property is transferred to spouse (otherwise than in connection with an agreement to live apart) or minor child (not being a married daughter) without adequate consideration (Section 27(i))

# In the case of holder of an impartible estate (Section 27(ii))

# A member of a cooperative society, company etc. to whom a building or part thereof has been allotted or leased under a house building scheme (Section 27(iii)). Thus, when a flat is allotted by a cooperative society or a company to its members/shareholders who enjoy the flat, technically the co-operative society/company may be the owner. However, in such situations the allottees are deemed to be owners and it is the allottees who will be taxed under this head.

# A person who is allowed to take or retain possession of any building (or part therof) in part performance of a contract of the nature referred to in section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, is deemed as the owner of that building (or part thereof) [Sec. 27 (iiia)].

# A person who acquires any rights (excluding any rights by way of a lease from month to month or for a period not exceeding one year) in or with respect to any building (or part thereof) by virtue of any such transaction as is referred to in section 269UA(f) [i.e. if a person takes a house on lease for a period of 12 months ormore, is deemed as the owner of that building or part thereof] [Sec. 27 (iiib)].

Persons who purchase properties on the basis of Power of Attorney and under long term leases (12 months & more) are also deemed to be owners. The concept of deemed owner is introduced to prevent misuse like transferring properties in the name of spouse or minor child etc. and for assessment of income in the hands of beneficial owner.

Section 26 concerns properties which are owned by coowners. This section provides that where property consisting of building or buildings and land appurtenant thereto is owned by two or more persons and their respective shares are definite and ascertainable such persons shall not, in respect of such property, be assessed as an association of persons, but the share of each such person in the income from the property as computed in accordance with sections 22 to 25 shall be included in his total income. In such an eventuality, the relief admissible under section 23(2) shall also be separately allowable to each such person [Explanation to Section 26].

The determination of ‘Annual Value’ is important in the context of taxation of income from House Property because though the tax under the head ‘Income from house property’ is tax on income, yet it is not in that sense a tax on income but upon inherent capacity of such property to yield income and for this ‘annual value’ is the yardstick. The inherent capacity has been defined as the sum for which the property might reasonably be expected to be let from year to-year. It is not necessary, that the property should be actually let. It is malso not necessary that the reasonable return from property should be equal to the actual rent realized when the property is, in fact, let out. Where the actual rent received is more than the reasonable return, it has been specifically provided that the actual rent will be the annual value. Where, however, the actual rent is less than the reasonable rent (e.g. in case where the tenancy is affected by manipulation, emergency, close relationship or such other consideration), the latter will be annual value. The municipal value of the property, the cost of construction, the standard rent if any under the Rent Control Act, the rent of similar properties in the same locality are relevant factors for the determination of the annual value. However, if a property is let and was vacant during any part or whole of the year and due to such vacancy, the rent received is less than the notional rent, such lesser amount shall be the Annual Value. For example, in case of a house, whose municipal valuation is Rs. 24,000/- and actual rent received is Rs. 36,000/- the annual lettable value will be taken at Rs.36,000/-. If the actual rent received is Rs. 18,000/- and municipal valuation is Rs.24,000/-, the annual value would be Rs. 24,000/- for the purpose of the Income-tax Act. Here, if the property was vacant for six months and the rent received is Rs. 18,000/- for six months the Annual Value shall be Rs. 18,000/-.

Where the property is subject to Rent Control Act, its annual value under section 23(1) cannot exceed the standard rent (fixed or determined) under the Rent Control Act unless it is actually let out for a higher amount. Such a view has been expressed by the Supreme Court in the cases of Dewan Daulat Rai Kapoor v. NDMC (1980) 122 ITR 700 (SC); Amolak Ram Khosla v. CIT (1981) 131 ITR 589 (SC) & Mrs. Shiela Kaushik v. CIT (1981) 131 ITR 435 (SC).

Determination of Annual Value of Self-occupied property

In case of one self-occupied house property which has not been actually let out at any time, the annual value is taken as ‘nil’. If, one is having more than one house property using all of them for self-occupation, he is entitled to exercise an option in terms of which, the value of one house property as specified by him will be taken at nil. The annual value of the other self occupied house properties will be determined on notional basis as if these had been let out.

Annual Value of one house away from work place
A person may own a house property, say in Bangalore, which he normally uses for his residence. He is transferred to Chennai where he does not own any house property and stays in a rental accommodation. In such case, the house property in Bangalore cannot be used for self-occupation and notional income therefor would normally have been chargeable although he derives no benefit from the property. To save the taxpayer from hardship in such situations, it has been specifically provided that the annual value of such a property would be taken to be nil subject to the following conditions:

# The assessee must be owner of only one house property.

# He is not able to occupy the house property because of his employment, business etc. being away from place where the property is situated.

# The property should not have been actually let.

# He has to reside at the place of employment in a building not belonging to him [Section 23(2)(b)].

# He does not derive any other benefit from the property not occupied.

Determination of Annual Value of Let out house properties
In respect of a let out house property, the rent received is usually taken as the annual lettable value. When, however, the rent is not indicative of the actual earning capacity of the house, the notional annual value will have to be found and adopted. The standard rent would be the Annual Value in the case of properties, subject to Rent Control Legislation, as mentioned earlier. However, when the actual rent received or receivable is higher than the notional value as calculated above, the higher figure will be taken for the purpose of Income-tax. From the annual value as determined above, municipal taxes are to be deducted if the following conditions are fulfilled:

# The property is let out during the whole or any part of the previous year (There is no such deduction in respect of a self-occupied house property).

# The Municipal taxes must be borne by the landlord. (If the municipal taxes or any part thereof are borne by the tenant, the same will not be deductible).

# The municipal taxes must be paid during the year. (Where the municipal taxes have become due but have not been actually paid, these will not be allowed. The municipal taxes may be claimed on payment basis i.e., only in the year they were paid even if the taxes belonged to a different year).

Amount left after deduction of municipal taxes is net annual value.

Other Permissible Deductions from Annual Value in cases of let out properties (Section 24)

The following deductions are permissible:
# deduction equal to 30% of the annual value, irrespective of any expenditure incurred by the taxpayer (S.24(a)). No other allowance for repairs, maintenance etc. would be allowable.

# interest on borrowed capital (S. 24(b))

Interest on borrowed capital is allowable as deduction on accrual basis (even if account books are kept on cash basis) if capital is borrowed for the purpose of purchase, construction, repair, renewal or reconstruction of the house property.

The following aspects concerning claim for deduction of interest are to be kept in view:

# The interest is deductible on ‘payable’ basis i.e. on accrual basis. Hence it should be claimed on yearly basis even if no payment has been made during the year.

# For claiming interest, it is not necessary that the lender should have a charge on the property for the principal amount or the interest amount.

# In Shew Kissan Bhatter v. CIT (1973) 89 ITR 61 (SC) the Supreme Court has decided that interest payable for outstanding interest is not deductible.

# Taxpayer cannot claim deduction for any brokerage or commission paid for arranging loan either as a one time arrangement or on periodical basis till the loan continues.

# In terms of circular No. 28 dated 20th August 1969, if an assessee takes a fresh loan to pay back the earlier loan, the interest on the fresh loan would be deductible.

# Interest on borrowing can be claimed as deduction only by the person who has acquired or constructed the property with borrowed fund. It is not available to the successor to the property (if the successor has not utilized borrowed funds for acquisition, etc). In other words, the relationship of borrower and lender must come into existence before it can be said that any amount or any other money is borrowed for the purpose of construction, acquisition, etc., of house property by one person from another and there must be real transaction of borrowing and lending in order to amount to any borrowing.

# In case of Central Government employees, interest on house building advance taken under the House Building Advance Rules (Ministry of Works and Housing) would be deductible on the basis of accrual of interest which would start running from the date of drawal of advance. The interest that accrues in terms of rule 6 of the House Building Advance Rules is on the balances outstanding on the last day of each month - Circular No. 363, dated June 24, 1983.

# Any interest chargeable under the Act, payable out of India on which tax has not been paid or deducted at source, and in respect of which there is no person in India who may be treated as an agent, is not deductible, by virtue of Section 25, in computing income chargeable under the head “Income from house property”.

Interest for pre-construction period
Money may be borrowed prior to the acquisition or construction of the property. In such a case, interest paid/ payable before the final completion of construction or acquisition of the property will be aggregated and allowed for five successive financial years starting with the year in which the acquisition or construction is completed. This deduction is not allowed if the loan is utilized for repairs, renewal or reconstruction.

Example:- The assessee took a loan of Rs. 3,00,000/- in April, 1999 from a Bank for construction of a house on a piece of land which he owns at Meerut. The loan carried interest @ 15% p.a. The construction is completed in April 2001 and the house is given on rent from May 2001. Meanwhile he has already incurred liability of interest of Rs. 90,000/- for F.Y. 1999-2000 and 2000-01. Because of the above provision, the assessee can claim a deduction in respect of this interest of Rs. 90,000/- (Over and above the yearly interest) in five equal instalments of Rs. 18,000/- each starting from the assessment year 2002-03.

Benefit for vacancy for the period when the property remains vacant (in cases of let out proporties).

If due to vacancy, the annual rent received is lower than the expected rent, then the annual rent realized is taken as the gross annual value. However, this rule will be applicable only, if the decline is only because of the vacancy.

Exclusion of unrealised rent from annual value (Expl. to Section 23(1))

Unrealised rent (which the owner could not realize) shall be excluded from rent received/receivable only if the following conditions are satisfied:

# the tenancy is bona fide;

# the defaulting tenant has vacated, or steps have been taken to compel him to vacate the property;

# the defaulting tenant is not in occupation of any other property of the assessee;

# the assessee has taken all reasonable steps to institute legal proceedings for the recovery of the unpaid rent or satisfies the Assessing Officer that legal proceedings would be useless.

Unrealised rent subsequently recovered would be taxable in the year of receipt. It has been mentioned earlier that basic requirement for assessment of property income is the ownership of the property. However, in the cases where unrealised rent is subsequently realised, it is not necessary that the assessee continues to be the owner of the property in the year of receipt also. (Section 25AA)

Arrears of Rent (Section 25B)

When the owner of a building receives arrears of rent from such a property, the same shall be deemed to be the income from house property of the year of receipt irrespective of whether or not the assessee is the owner of the property in that year. 30% of the receipt shall be allowed as deduction towards repairs, collection charges etc. (prior to the A.Y. 2002-03, the rate of deduction was 25%). No other deduction will be allowed.

Set off and carry forward of loss in cases of house properties

This matter can be examined under two heads namely:
(A) Where the property has been let out
# In the matter of set off of and carry forward loss from let out properties, two sections are relevant. Sections 70 and 71 provide that loss from one house property can be set off against the income from another house property. The remaining loss, if any, will be set off against incomes under any other heads like salary, business etc. In case the loss does not get wiped out completely, the balance will be carried forward.

# In regard to carried forward losses, Section 71B is to apply. This section provides that where the assessee incurs any loss under the head “Income from house property” and such loss is not fully adjusted under other heads of income in the same assessment year, then from the assessment year 1999-2000 the balance loss shall be allowed to be carried forward and set off in subsequent years (subject to a limit of 8 assessment years) against income from house property. However, only losses pertaining to the assessment year 1999-2000 onwards can be carried forward.

(B) Where the house is self occupied

In so far as income from self occupied property is concerned, the same is to be taken as Nil. The only deduction permissible against this Nil income is interest on borrowed capital which can be upto Rs. 30,000 or Rs. 1,50,000 (see discussion in chapter III). No other deduction for self occupied property is permissible. Hence only the interest claim would be available for set off or carry forward, if the conditions mentioned earlier are satisfied.

As mentioned earlier, where a person has occupied more than one house for residential purposes, only one house, as chosen by him will be treated as ‘self occupied’ and all other houses will be deemed to be let out and the income from such houses would be computed as indicated earlier. In regard to one house treated as used for own residential purposes throughout the year, Section 23 (2) (a) prescribes that annual value of such house shall be taken to be nil, if the conditions mentioned below are satisfied:

# the property (or part thereof) is not actually let during whole (or any part) of the previous year; and

# no other benefit is derived therefrom

Interest on borrowed capital for self occupied property
The maximum amount of interest permissible in cases of self-occupied property is Rs.1,50,000 (in respect of funds borrowed on or after 01.04.1999). Interest upto Rs.1,50,000 is deductible if the following conditions are satisfied:
# capital is borrowed on or after April 1, 1999 for acquiring or constructing a property;
# the acquisition/construction should be completed within 3 years from the end of the financial year in which capital was borrowed; and
# the person extending the loan certifies that such interest is payable in respect of the amount advanced for acquisition or construction of the house or as refinance of the principal amount outstanding under an earlier loan taken for such acquisition or construction.

In the above context the following further aspects have to be kept in view:
# If capital is borrowed for any other purpose (e.g. if capital is borrowed for reconstruction, repairs or renewals of a house property), then the maximum deduction on account of interest is Rs.30,000 (and not Rs.1,50,000).

# There is no stipulation regarding the date of commencement of construction. Consequently, the construction of the residential unit could have commenced before April 1,1999 but, as long as its construction/ acquisition is completed within 3 years, the higher deduction of Rs.1,50,000 would be available. Also, there is no stipulation regarding the construction/acquisition of the residential unit being entirely financed by the loan taken on or after April 1, 1999. It may be so in part. However, the higher deduction upto Rs.1,50,000 can be taken for the loan which has been taken and utilized for construction/acquisition after April 1, 1999. The loan taken prior to April 1, 1999 will carry deduction of interest upto Rs. 30,000 only (CBDT’s circular No. 779, dated September 14, 1999).

Rs. 1,50,000 maximum deduction will not be available in the following situations:

# if capital is borrowed before April 1, 1999 for purchase, construction, reconstruction, repairs or renewals of a house property;
# if capital is borrowed on or after April 1, 1999 for reconstruction, repairs or renewals of a house property; and
# if capital is borrowed on or after April 1, 1999 but construction is not completed within 3 years from the end of the year in which capital was borrowed.

In the above situations only deduction upto Rs. 30,000 can be claimed.

Authors contact info - articles The  author can be reached at: laksheyender@legalserviceindia.com

1 2 3 4 5
Rate this article!     Poor

Most viewed articles in Tax Laws category
Renting of Immovable Property - Service Tax
Export of Services- An analysis

Interpretation of taxing statute as strict construction and exemption
Deductions Under Section 80d & 80e Of The Income Tax Act
Assessment of Income From House Property
Carry Forward and Set off of Losses
The Bhopal Gas Tragedy: On Whether and How the Indian Companies Act, 1956 can be used to make a case for imposing social responsibility on corporations?
Regulatory Aspects of Venture Capital In India
The Double Tax Avoidance Agreement between India and Mauritius
Vodafone vs. Union of India
Leviability of Sales Tax to Actionable Claim
General Anti Avoidance Rule GAAR - An Indian and International Perspective
Custom Valuation & Transfer Pricing
Anti-Dumping Regime in Indian Scenario
Comparables and Transfer Pricing
Most recent articles in Tax Laws category
SEZ Eligibility under SEIS Scheme
Goods and Service Tax (GST) Working In India
Silent Features of GST Bill 2016
Why Tax Practitioners Bill Required For India
Non Resident Indian under Income Tax Act, 1961
Fearlessness of the Judiciary
Tax Implications on Business Reorganization Schemes
General Anti Avoidance Rule GAAR - An Indian and International Perspective
Comparables and Transfer Pricing
Interpretation of taxing statute as strict construction and exemption
Feasibility of GAAR for removing the practice of Tax Avoidance
Tax chages in Nepal by Finance Act 2067
Carry Forward and Set off of Losses
The Double Tax Avoidance Agreement between India and Mauritius
Custom Valuation & Transfer Pricing
Tax privileges for import of energy-saving equipment into Ukraine

Article Comments

Posted by makkavenkataramana on June 21, 2012
writeartical pgbpof incometax

Please login or register a new free account.

Random Pick
Excessive executive remuneration, not linked with performance, is a growing problem in companies in India. Data show that even when the companies are not performing well and the share value is declining constantly, the remuneration of executives is still touching skies. However the bigger problem with respect to Indian companies is that there is a huge gap between the salary of top executives and the other employees. Though supporters explain it to be a result of dearth of talent at top level but even then way too much difference cannot be justified. Drastic difference in pay levels are themselves evidence of some tricks in play in the governance of companies.

» Total Articles
» Total Authors
» Total Views
» Total categories

Law Forum

Legal Articles

Lawyers in India- Click on a link below for legal Services

lawyers in Chennai
lawyers in Bangalore
lawyers in Hyderabad
lawyers in Cochin
lawyers in Pondicherry
lawyers in Guwahati
lawyers in Nashik

lawyers in Jaipur
lawyers in New Delhi
lawyers in Dimapur
lawyers in Agra
Noida lawyers
lawyers in Siliguri

For Mutual consent Divorce in Delhi

Ph no: 9650499965
For online Copyright Registration

Ph no: 9891244487
Law Articles

lawyers in Delhi
lawyers in Chandigarh
lawyers in Allahabad
lawyers in Lucknow
lawyers in Jodhpur
Faridabad lawyers

lawyers in Mumbai
lawyers in Pune
lawyers in Nagpur
lawyers in Ahmedabad
lawyers in Surat
Ghaziabad lawyers

lawyers in Kolkata
lawyers in Janjgir
lawyers in Rajkot
lawyers in Indore
lawyers in Ludhiana
Gurgaon lawyers


India's Most Trusted Online law library
Legal Services India is Copyrighted under the Registrar of Copyright Act ( Govt of India) 2000-2017
 ISBN No: 978-81-928510-1-3