Home       Top Rated       Submit Article     Advanced Search     FAQ       Contact Us       Lawyers in India       Law Forum     RSS Feeds     

Register your Copyright Online

We offer copyright registration right from your desktop click here for details.

Latest Articles | Articles 2014 | Articles 2013 | Articles 2012 | Articles 2011 | Articles 2010 | Articles 2009 | Articles 2008 | Articles 2007 | Articles 2006 | Articles 2000-05

Search On:Laws in IndiaLawyers Search

Mutual Consent Divorce in Delhi
We provide fast, cost effective and Hassle free solution.
Contact us at Ph no: 9650499965 (Divorce Law Firm Delhi)
File Caveat in Supreme Court
Contact Ph no: +9650499965

Main Categories
 Accident Law
 Animal Laws
 Aviation Law
 Bangladesh Law
 Banking and Finance laws
 Case Laws
 Civil Laws
 Company Law
 Constitutional Law
 Consumer laws
 Contracts laws
 Criminal law
 Drug laws
 Dubai laws
 Educational laws
 Employment / Labour laws
 Environmental Law
 family law
 Gay laws and Third Gender
 Human Rights laws
 Immigration laws
 Insurance / Accident Claim
 Intellectual Property
 International Law
 Juvenile Laws
 Law - lawyers & legal Profession
 Legal Aid and Lok Adalat
 Legal outsourcing
 Media laws
 Medico legal
 Real estate laws
 Right To Information
 Tax Laws
 Torts Law
 Woman Issues
 Workplace Equality & Non-Discrimination
 Yet Another Category

More Options
 Most read articles
 Most rated articles

Subscribe now and receive free articles and updates instantly.


Published : July 02, 2017 | Author : AVijayalakshmi
Category : Miscellaneous | Total Views : 2122 | Rating :

I am Vijayalakshmi took Master's degree in law with Mercantile law as specialisation in the year 1998 from Osmania university, Hyderabad. Joined in MG law college in 2001 and stick continuing as Asst.Professor.

Constitutional perspective of uniform civil code

India a fastest emerging global power in the world but unfortunately half of its population, the women across the country, struggle to live life with human dignity and respect. Women, irrespective of their class or caste becoming victims in the hands of this societysocially, politically, economically and morally. Daily number of incidents as to the violations of their rights are reported in social media but still the solution to unravel the issue appears to be a mirage.

Our constitution provided certain strong safe guards in Part III for the protection of individual rights irrespective of their differences as to caste, creed, religion, race, sex and place of birth. It has put strong fetters on the state not to make any laws in such a way which may create discrimination on any of the aforesaid grounds. Under the basic feature of Secularism, the state extends its respect to all religions equally. Every religion is left free with a discretion to frame their own personal laws in such away keeping them away from judicial clutch. Though in the beginning of incorporation of these fundamental freedoms in our constitution especially in the domain of religion might have appeared good and reasonable. But the time is drastically changed, women are getting enlightened in all fields and occupying most respectful and demanding positions in all sectors and coming aware of their rights and are in a position to challenge their validity. Therefore they are able to find out the snowball effect slowly in this regard. Of course, anything may continue to happen though it is illogical until it is countered.

It is undisputable and universally accepted principle that one has to give prime importance to one’s religion, tradition, culture and customs. This provision enshrined under Articles 25-28 of our constitution providing religious freedom to all religions. It paved the way to frame personal laws as suiting to one’s religion and culture. But under the guise of this religious freedoms, personal laws come in frequent conflict with other fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14-15,and Article 21. Almost all personal laws in one way or the other clearly manifesting certain gender discriminatory provisions.

If we analyze the Articles in our constitution like 14, 15, 21which act as a watchdog against any inequality, discrimination, inhuman treatment and violations of our basic rights based on gender bias. Yet in practical instances we proved ourselves a failure in achieving the satisfactory outcome. India is developing at a rapid speed technologically, scientifically, economically and intellectually. Recently India bagged the credit as a first country in the world history by launching 104 satellites in a single rocket on Feb.15 2017 which is a tremendous success. It is such a great achievement in which women astronauts (Ritu karidal, Nandini Harinath, Anuradha TK etc.,) played significantly a vital role.., despite these achievements women in India continue to be discriminated. The declining sex ratio in India amply portrays the discrimination shown towards women at the stage of birth itself. It is realized that the long run supremacy of male over female in all respect in the patriarchal society in India is highly responsible for arresting the empowerment of women. India a cosmopolitan country with a mosaic of faiths, cultures, customs and usages maintain unity in diversity. But still if we analyze closely the internal structure as to certain laws and their application since long time shows a stigma on the position of women. The objective of my paper is to focus the status of women and their rights in the light of constitutional perspectives.

I. Personal laws in conflict with Fundamental rights

II. Enforcement of uniform civil code to the entire nation as to the areas of marriage, divorce, maintenance, adoption and inheritance irrespective of one’s religion, custom or practice.

I. Fundamental rights enshrined in part III of our constitution is heart of our constitution. Since it guaranteedCivil liberties such as equality before law and equal protection of laws, freedom of speech and expression, religious and cultural freedom, freedom to form assembly, practice religion and finally the rights to constitutional remedies in the form of writs and also at the same time providing severe punishments in IPC or other special laws.It imports the meaning that everyone is equal before the law that is right from king down to slave without any discrimination as to caste, creed, religion, race, sex and place of birth. Our country is seat of so many religions since it incorporated the feature of Secularism in 42nd amendment, 1976 and also given fundamental freedom as per Article 25 to 28 to profess, practice and propagate one’s religion. Under this grab of cultural and religious freedom, many legislations such as Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Hindu succession Act, 1956, Hindu Maintenance and adoption Act etc., were legislated with the insertion of a clause if custom permits. It means through one side statutory law support appears to be given significance but the other side letting the society to continue their practices under customary law by adding a clause that if custom permits. It means any provision may be ignored if there is any corresponding customary principle in force.

Certain provisions in the said legislations appear to be quite gender discriminatory, confusing and conflicting. The provisions such as triple talaq under Muslim law, giving no right of adoption to Muslim communities, providing no family status and also no chance for claiming maintenance to second wife under Hindu marriage Act while allowing polygamy under Muslim law (all Indian nationals only) appear to be very conflicting and confusing. If we see Sec.5 (i), it speaks about the condition of valid marriage and declaring it as void under section 11 if the condition is broken. This is very much appreciable. But again contradicting provision under Section 16 of Hindu Marriage Act provides a cushion for conferring of legitimacy on the illegitimate children who are begotten out of void marriage. To what extent this provision is justifiable? It may be said that children should not be ignored for the mistakes committed by their parents. Then is it correct to ignore the rights of women of second marriage? Again here also a discrimination between children and women. When law is recognizing the children of void marriages, is it not validating void marriage as a valid one by conferring legitimacy? It means what we are not accepting directly, accepting it indirectly. When both children and women are considered as vulnerable sector, why again there is difference? So my contention is that there must not a provision for conferring legitimacy on illegitimate children. Unless such rigid provision is inserted, the bigamous situation cannot be curbed. The situations of bigamous and polygamous are very high among Hindus only as per some of the survey reports. But it is going uncontrolled, where the women victims are exposed without proper redress. Of course there are number of cases left unexplored.

Article 14 prohibits class legislation but reasonable classification is allowed but it paved the way for making personal laws as per one’s whims and fancies under the grab of cultural freedoms given under Art.25-28. It draws a conflicting opinion that under one guaranteed freedom, we are allowed to frame and regulate our personal laws at the same time leading to conflicts to the other fundamental right guaranteed in Articles 14-15. Therefore it is a high time to judge what is reasonable classification? I strongly feel that under the grip of religious culture and customs framing personal law in such a manner keeping the female gender to suppression and torture is clear cut violation of our fundamental right as guaranteed under Article 14. And again keeping those laws beyond judicial review is abhorrent.

The center's categorical approach that is personal laws must be in conformity with constitution is very appreciable since it will assist Supreme court in determining the validity of certain practices like triple talaq , polygamy because these practices directly hit the rights of women to their life and dignity.

My fundamental argument is whether constitutional protection extends even to those laws which are not in conformity with other fundamental rights given in the constitution.

Every religion or community may be at liberty to preserve their most essential integral part of their custom. But it should not extend to complete area covering it under propagation of their religion by encroaching upon with one’s fundamental rights. Article 25 though provides fundamental freedom to practice and propagate one’s religion however that should not go against the concepts of equality and dignity which are fundamental rights and the courts do have the power to adjudicate whether those practices are in violation of fundamental rights or not.

There is a strong protest from Muslim women that the practice of triple talaq must be invalidated. Earlier occasions also, the courts have adopted the view that Islam does not sanction divorce without reason or any attempt of reconciliation. Even for adopting divorce based on triple talaq some conditions are to be fulfilled. There are many contentions that triple talaq procedure has to be spread over a specified period of time during which there are two opportunities to revoke it. Only the final one is making it irrevocable. But in reality it is not happening.

The Bombay High court expressed its opinion it may be good in law but bad in theology. It is not recognized in the rest of the Muslim countries but only recognised in India. It is clear cut violation of Article 14 right to equality before law.

Even Articles25-28 are not absolute in their nature and the same is subjected to certain restrictions on the basis of public order, morality and health. Maintaining the status and respect of woman falls under morality and the announcement of talak and thereby obtaining divorce is against ethics and morals therefore it is strongly condemned and at the same time seeking for implementation of UCC by harmonising all the personal laws. It is a high time to seek that India must have Uniform civil code dealing with marriage, divorce, succession, inheritance and maintenance. If it is implemented it fetches so much benefit for women folk not only domestically but also internationally.

The Shah Bano begum’s case 1985 2 SCC556, which was a leading case, where the woman claimed maintenance from her husband under Sec.125 Cr.p.c after she was given triple talaq drawn the attention of entire nation where Supreme Court directed Parliament to frame UCC. The Supreme Court clearly provided that the Muslim women are entitled to maintenance from her husband under Section 125 Cr.p.c even after she has already received dower, when her economic position is so weak and at the same time the husband’s financial position is sound that is nothing wrong to claim for maintenance under this provision. In this case the court held that Article 44(3) is remained as dead letter in the constitution and Justice Y.V.Chandrachud made following observation in this connection that is “A common civil code will help the cause of national integration by removing desperate loyalties to law which have conflicting ideologies”. At this juncture the then Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, Congress led government could drive the parliament to frame Muslim women (protection on divorce) Act,1986 which diluted the judgement of the Supreme court as to the claim of maintenance under Section 125 of Cr.p.c. It is also opined by the government that it is only Supreme Court direction to frame UCC which is not binding either on executive or on legislature since it involves personal laws, no one can interfere with it unless a protest comes from within.

For the second instance in SarlaMudgal Vs Union of India, 1995 3 SCC635 the Supreme Court again called for implementation of UCC and it also detailed how personal laws of different religions are in conflict with each other. Under Hindu marriage Act, bigamous marriages are void marriages and also attracts punishment under Section 494 of IPC but whereas under Muslim law polygamous are recognised. Secondly under Hindu law adoption is recognized and under Muslim law it is not recognized. Inheritance or maintenance rights are not given to second wife under Hindu law whereas all the four wives are entitled to maintenance. So if we see like this there are number of varied provisions under personal laws. In SarlaMudgal case it is held that solemnizing second marriage during subsistence of first marriage not a valid one and mere conversion to other religion does not itself dissolve the first marriage. Under such occasions what about the fate of second wife if her marriage is adjudicated as void and what about her status in the society? Is it not violation of her basic fundamental right guaranteed under Article 21 of our constitution?

So I wish to place my point that, leaving the sensitive and most integral part of any religion or custom in one’s personal law and leaving the rest of the area under public law and at the same time keeping the personal laws subject to judicial review to check their validity of practices in the light of constitutional guaranteed framework in the interest of general public based on public order and morality.

II. Enforcement of Uniform civil code to the entire nation without any discriminations as to any religion especially in the areas of marriage, divorce, adoption, maintenance and inheritance. It provides a sort of security to all women so that they need not take up an individual battle to fight for their rights by closely going through their respective personal laws and again preparing a ground to face a counter attack from their personal law boards under the colour of their customs and culture.

If UCC is adopted and legislated in its true spirit, it draws a lot of benefit to women within the country and also beyond the country. If there are differences to one religion and the other within the country itself it is becoming a tough task to enforce our basic fundamental rightsin spite of thosebeing clear cut violations of fundamental rights guaranteed, still, no one is daring to touch it even the judiciary since they are within the ambit of personal law. At this struggle, it is highly impossible to expect a satisfactory result within the country and beyond thecountry to win the battle. It really becomes a nightmare. So, let us have one uniformity in certain basic principles which are common to all individuals irrespective of their caste, creed, religion or place of birth. We have to frame the code which is applicable to all beings considering themas human beings but not being a man or woman and also not on the basis of one religion or the other.

There is high need to bring uniformity in personal law aspects without taking into consideration the gender discrimination and religious discrimination. It is possible only through Article 44 of constitution i.e. Uniform civil code. Since till today it remained less significant in part IV of the constitution which is only directory in nature yielding little purpose. Therefore, UCC must be given a legislative form by harmonising all personal laws in such areas which are not so sacred to one’s religion so as to be effective for the benefit of all general public living in one territory. One territory one law will draw more benefits rather one territory with multiple laws with conflicting provisions in the same area. Law is dynamic therefore we all should welcome reformation in relevant areas.

With regards
B. Vijayalakshmi, Asst. professor, M.G. Law College
Mail id: lakshminath1@yahoo.co.in

1 2 3 4 5
Rate this article!     Poor

Most viewed articles in Miscellaneous category
Indian Partnership Act,1932
Law on Parking Spaces
Shops & Establishment Act of Punjab & Haryana
Role Of Election Commission
Restrictive & Extensive Definitions
Judicial Review in India And USA
Doctrine of Permissible Limits Under Delegated Legislation
Tribal Laws & Customs in India
Conversion and Reservation: Christian Dalits and the obstacles to social mobility
Enabling Statute: Rules of Interpretation
Is Poverty A Cause of Corruption
Triple Talaq Explained
Factory in The Factories act,1948
Whistleblowers and their Protection in India
Indian Legal Metrology System
Administrative law
Most recent articles in Miscellaneous category
20th Sri SC Javali Memorial Karnataka University Moot Court Experience
Female Genital Mutilation
Doctrine of Res Gestae
Does Section 375 of IPC Include Marital Rape
Cognizance by a Magistrate: Meaning and Concept
Social Context Adjudication: Relevance for Trial Courts
Logical Relevancy And Legal Relevancy of Facts
Aliens In The Mist, Seeking The Legality of Undocumented Identities
Decoding: Article 35-A
Universal evolution of consumer protection
The Role of Central Board of Film Certification
the pros and cons of reservation system
Non Bailable Warrant: Preventive Measure not Ultra Virus
The Juvenile Justice Care and Protection of Children Act, 2000 and The Juvenile Justice Care and Protection of Children Act, 2015
Rule Against Perpetuity
Extreme Nationalism Defying Real Nationalism

Article Comments

there are no comments...

Please login or register a new free account.

Random Pick
Impact on Society and on Victim. She is Already a Victim and Victimized During Prolonged Delays.

» Total Articles
» Total Authors
» Total Views
» Total categories

Law Forum

Legal Articles

Lawyers in India- Click on a link below for legal Services

lawyers in Chennai
lawyers in Bangalore
lawyers in Hyderabad
lawyers in Cochin
lawyers in Pondicherry
lawyers in Guwahati
lawyers in Nashik

lawyers in Jaipur
lawyers in New Delhi
lawyers in Dimapur
lawyers in Agra
Noida lawyers
lawyers in Siliguri

For Mutual consent Divorce in Delhi

Ph no: 9650499965
For online Copyright Registration

Ph no: 9891244487
Law Articles

lawyers in Delhi
lawyers in Chandigarh
lawyers in Allahabad
lawyers in Lucknow
lawyers in Jodhpur
Faridabad lawyers

lawyers in Mumbai
lawyers in Pune
lawyers in Nagpur
lawyers in Ahmedabad
lawyers in Surat
Ghaziabad lawyers

lawyers in Kolkata
lawyers in Janjgir
lawyers in Rajkot
lawyers in Indore
lawyers in Ludhiana
Gurgaon lawyers


India's Most Trusted Online law library
Legal Services India is Copyrighted under the Registrar of Copyright Act ( Govt of India) 2000-2017
 ISBN No: 978-81-928510-1-3