Home       Top Rated       Submit Article     Advanced Search     FAQ       Contact Us       Lawyers in India       Law Forum     RSS Feeds     

Register your Copyright Online

We offer copyright registration right from your desktop click here for details.

Latest Articles | Articles 2014 | Articles 2013 | Articles 2012 | Articles 2011 | Articles 2010 | Articles 2009 | Articles 2008 | Articles 2007 | Articles 2006 | Articles 2000-05

Search On:Laws in IndiaLawyers Search

Mutual Consent Divorce in Delhi
We provide fast, cost effective and Hassle free solution.
Contact us at Ph no: 9650499965 (Divorce Law Firm Delhi)
File Caveat in Supreme Court
Contact Ph no: +9650499965

Main Categories
 Accident Law
 Animal Laws
 Arbitration
 Aviation Law
 Banking and Finance laws
 Case Laws
 Civil Laws
 Company Law
 Constitutional Law
 Consumer laws
 Contracts laws
 Criminal law
 Drug laws
 Dubai laws
 Educational laws
 Employment / Labour laws
 Environmental Law
 family law
 Gay laws and Third Gender
 Human Rights laws
 Immigration laws
 Insurance / Accident Claim
 Intellectual Property
 International Law
 Juvenile Laws
 Law - lawyers & legal Profession
 Legal Aid and Lok Adalat
 Legal outsourcing
 Media laws
 Medico legal
 Miscellaneous
 Real estate laws
 Right To Information
 Tax Laws
 Torts Law
 Woman Issues
 Workplace Equality & Non-Discrimination
 Yet Another Category

More Options
 Most read articles
 Most rated articles

Subscription
Subscribe now and receive free articles and updates instantly.

Name
Email




Published : October 03, 2013 | Author : vishalcnlu
Category : Company Law | Total Views : 2980 | Rating :

  
vishalcnlu
LL.M from CNLU
 

Dual Listing of the Companies
There are 23 stock exchange in India, the first being the Bombay stock Exchange, which began formal trading in 1875, making it one of the oldest in Asia.

In most of the cross border merger / acquisition cases, one company “buys” the assets and operations of another company and pays the shareholders of the other company in terms of its own securities or cash or as happens most often, in a combination of the two. The constituent companies are of different nationality, often both listed. These are the real “mergers between equals”. The companies agree to combine their operations and cash flows, but retain separate shareholder registries and identities.

Dual listing is a process by which a company would be allowed to be listed and traded on the stock exchanges of two countries. Dual listing system precludes the need for a merger. In the case of two companies operating in two different countries entering into an equity alliance, the dual listing system would allow these companies to retain their separated legal identities and continue to be listed and traded on the stock exchanges of the two countries. Tata motors is India’s largest automobile company, is a dual listed company and traded on both the Bombay Stock Exchange, as well as on the New York Stock Exchange. Infosys is also listed on NASDAQ along with Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE). Wipro is a dual listed Indian technology giant on Bombay Stock Exchange and New York Stock Exchange and many more like Larsen and Turbo, ITC Limited.

Put simply, it is a process that allows a company to be listed on the stock exchanges of two different countries. The company’s shares, which enjoy voting rights, can be traded on both the bourses. When two companies in two countries enter into an equity alliance without an outright merger, dual listing means continued listing of the firms in both the countries. The key point is that the shareholders can buy and sell shares of both the companies on bourses in the two countries.

We need to understand that ‘dual listing’ and ‘multiple/cross listing’ are two different things. Dual-listed companies should not be confused with cross listed companies. In cross / multiple listing, a company’s securities are listed on more than one stock exchange within the same country. For example, Hero Honda is listed on BSE as well as NSE. Dual listing may be thought of when two cross border companies decide to do business together, with or without a merger / acquisition.

In a typical merger or acquisition, the merging companies become a single legal entity, with one business buying the other. However, “a dual-listed company or DLC is a corporate structure in which two corporations function as a single operating business through a legal equalization agreement, but retain separate legal identities and stock exchange listings. Virtually all DLCs are cross-border, and have tax advantages for the corporations and their stockholders.”

The two companies agree to share all risks and rewards of the ownership of all their operating businesses in agreed proportion, through a contract called an "equalization agreement." In case of Bharti Airtel and MTN, dual listing will help Bharti Airtel shares to be traded on the stock exchange in Johannesburg and MTN shares to be traded on NSE and BSE currently.

Popularity of Dual Listing
Dual listing does not have widespread global support, due to legal complexities. However, there have been cases to show that dual listing works quite efficiently and has been resorted to by some, globally. Some major dual-listed companies are: -

1. Tata Motors (India/US)

2. BHP Billiton (Australia/UK 2001)

3. Unilever (UK/Netherlands 1930)

4. Hewlett-Packard (HP), (NYSE and NASDAQ)

5. Royal Dutch Shell (UK.Netherlands)

6. Rio Tinto Group (Australia/UK)

Pros and cons of Dual listing
Dual listing also seems to increase the liquidity of the majority of the counters. First and foremost, the company should have robust business fundamentals. If not, it is unlikely to acquire a strong and sustainable support from institutional funds. As a result, even if the share price shows an upwards blip upon announcement of the dual listing intention, this appreciation is likely to be short term. Smart money is unlikely to stay in the counter for long if the company fundamentals are poor.

By seeking a listing in the country where it has significant business presence, it increases the ease in targeting suppliers, customers and investors. This is because they are likely to take assurance from the knowledge that the company that they are dealing with is a listed company on their stock exchange. However, this kind of benefit is likely to accrue over long term. Depending on the type of dual listing, companies may have to issue new shares which would result in earnings dilution.

There are several costs involved in doing a dual listing. Examples of such costs are legal costs, compliance costs and the potential opportunity costs as top management attention is diverted from their core businesses during the lengthy preparatory work for dual listing. These costs may have a significant impact to those companies with little profits.

In a nutshell, investors should weigh the pros and cons before jumping on the “buy the dual listing shares” bandwagon. Investors have to do their due diligence to pick out those companies whose business and valuation would improve by dual listing and these benefits should outweigh the costs involved in dual listing.

Impact on stock markets
As mentioned earlier, the major advantage is that the shareholders can buy and sell shares of both the companies on bourses in the two countries. That means, when a company's securities are listed on more than one exchange for the purpose of adding liquidity to the shares and allowing investors greater choice in where they can trade their shares. Dual listing contributes to the liquidity of the shares listed. This enables investors to have a greater choice as to where and when they can trade their shares. A significant apparent advantage of a dual-listed structure for companies is the benefit of scale and access to foreign capital.

Dual listing is not a widely used technique, although it is thought to improve the spread between the ‘bid and ask’ price which helps investors obtain a better price for their securities.

A dual listing structure would also remove the time-consuming requirement for the companies to take regulatory approvals from the various countries in which they operate should they go in for a conventional merger. If dual listing is allowed, an Indian company share can be sold on a foreign Stock Exchange and vice-versa, leaving a part the trading of private investors in foreign markets directly.

Some problems, for example, the shares may trade at a discount in one market and/or the shares may be less liquid in one market cannot be ruled out. The complex legal aspects of the structure may add to bureaucracy. However, is dual listing is allowed, Indian Stock Markets can truly compete with other foreign stock markets.

Significance of dual listing
Dual listing generally refers to the concept of listing a company’s securities on more than one exchange for the purpose of adding liquidity to the shares and also allowing investors greater choice as to where they can trade their shares. Simply put, it is a process that enables a company to be listed on the exchanges of two different countries. The company’s shares that enjoy voting rights can be traded on both the bourses. Though dual listing is an effective option to improve the spread between the bids and ask prices, yet this technique is not a widely used one. Examples of dual listing are: Hewlett-Packard (HP), which is listed on both the NYSE and NASDAQ; the Royal Dutch Shell in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands; the BHP Billiton and the Rio Tinto Group both in Australia and the UK; and the Unilever in the UK and the Netherlands.

Dual listing of a company ensures that the company has two equal listings in two different markets. A dual listed company is also thus referred to as Siamese twins. An ownership structure of two holding companies are created, each of which is listed in a different market. Both companies continue to exist but each with a separate set of shareholders. An equalization agreement ensures that these two separate bodies agree to share all the risks and rewards of the ownership of the entire operating business in a fixed proportion. This equalization agreement also ensures equal treatment of the shareholders of both of these companies in voting and cash flow rights. Contracts are signed covering issues determining the distribution of legal and economic rights between the twin parents including the issues related to dividends, liquidation and corporate governance. Usually, the twins share a single board of directors and have an integrated management structure.

Dual listing is a process that precludes the need of a merger. In a situation where two companies in two countries enter into an equity alliance without a merger, dual listing would imply continued listing of the firms in both the countries. Through dual listing these companies would be able to retain their separate legal identities and continue to be listed and traded on the stock exchanges of the two countries. This serves in protecting the national identities of the companies too. However, dual listing is not a very common phenomenon on account of the numerable complexities associated with the process.

When tax considerations come in the way of a regular merger, dual listing company structure is adopted. In case of a merger, capital gains tax could be owed but no such tax consequence arises in case of dual listing. On the contrary, differences in tax regimes might just favour dual listing, based on the fact that cross-border dividend payments are minimized.

Dual listing might prove beneficial to companies that are already listed in their home country and are growing bigger. Such companies find it useful to have access to larger amounts of money they can raise in larger markets. In the interests of the existing shareholders in the home country, these companies need to retain their original listing.

Dual listed companies have special corporate governance requirements. The interests of the shareholders in each of the listed companies are in the similar lines. Guaranteeing equal rights in all respects ensures this. By equal rights we mean voting rights and dividends.

In spite of all measures there might arise certain complexities out of dual listing. There might be problems such as shares may trade at a discount in one of the markets or shares may be less liquid in one of the markets. Of late the importance of dual listing has diminished a bit as it has now become easier and cheaper for private investors to trade in foreign markets.

Advantages to investors/ shareholders
Advantages of dual listing
1. Poor liquidity and a low profile in one market can be offset by a better performance in another market. The share prices in each market will always be the same.

2. Companies gain access to a larger investor base with a larger pool of capital available for investment.

3. Visibility and profile can be increased by obtaining press coverage in two different countries.

Disadvantages of dual listing
1. The listing requirements of both markets must be complied with. Despite the apparent convergence of standards between markets, there will be greater expense and more compliance work involved.

2. It may be necessary to produce accounts under two different sets of accounting rules, possibly leading to the reporting of different results in different markets.

3. Domestic investors must have access to the same information as international investors. All published information could therefore need to be produced in two languages. Evidence of a company’s ability to attract overseas investors must therefore be sufficiently compelling to outweigh the burden that a dual listing brings.




1 2 3 4 5
Rate this article!     Poor
Excellent    

Most viewed articles in Company Law category
Globalization & its impact on Indian Economy: Developments and Challenges
Winding Up of a Company
Retrenchment under Industrial Dispute Act, 1947
Dissolution of partnership firm
Articles of Association & Alteration of Articles
ADR Mechanism in India
Which employees do not fall under the ambit of Industrial Dispute Act, 1947
Demerger under Company Law
Directors & Their Liabilities
Corporate Personality
Prevention of oppression & mismanagement
Position of a promoter in establishing a Company
Appointment, Disqualification And Liabilities Of Directors of A Company: A Legal Perspective
Remuneration of Directors
Minority Rights on Oppression and Mismanagement Under Companies Act, 1956 And Companies Bill, 2011
Corporate Social Responsibility
Most recent articles in Company Law category
Payment of compensation for loss of office of MD or WTD or Manager
Appointment of a director other than a retiring director in the General Meeting
Principle of Lifting the Corporate Veil
Banking Ombudsman Scheme 2006
Articles of Association
Distinction between Companies Act 1956 and Companies Act 2013
Role of Proxy Advisory Firms In Corporate Governance
Need For Corporate Social Responsibility
Fast Track mergers
Corporate Social Responsibility
Winding up of a Private Limited Company under Companies Act, 2013
Various Committees and provisions under Companies Act, 2013
Incorporation of A Public limited Company
Competition Law and Role of merger
Incorporation of A Private limited Company Under Companies Act 2013
One Person Company

Article Comments

there are no comments...


Welcome!
Please login or register a new free account.

Random Pick
Property is one of the fundamental elements of the life of an individual. The Transfer of Property Act was enacted in order to provide definite statutory laws that regulated the transfer of property. The preamble clearly defines that the Act deals specifically in cases of transfer made through the act of parties. Therefore, in cases where the transfer is made under certain other laws, the Act would not be applicable. The Act also is not applicable to cases where the provisions of a special legislation are in conflict with the provisions of the Act. This was held in the case of Harish Chandra Hegde v. State of Karnataka. After the judgement passed in this case, it has been the authority in cases reflecting conflicts between special laws and the Transfer of Property Act.

Statistics
» Total Articles
1529
» Total Authors
4546
» Total Views
19956123
» Total categories
41

Law Forum


Legal Articles

Lawyers in India- Click on a link below for legal Services

lawyers in Chennai
lawyers in Bangalore
lawyers in Hyderabad
lawyers in Cochin
lawyers in Pondicherry
lawyers in Guwahati
lawyers in Nashik

lawyers in Jaipur
lawyers in New Delhi
lawyers in Dimapur
lawyers in Agra
Noida lawyers
lawyers in Siliguri

For Mutual consent Divorce in Delhi

Ph no: 9650499965
For online Copyright Registration

Ph no: 9891244487
Law Articles

lawyers in Delhi
lawyers in Chandigarh
lawyers in Allahabad
lawyers in Lucknow
lawyers in Jodhpur
Faridabad lawyers

lawyers in Mumbai
lawyers in Pune
lawyers in Nagpur
lawyers in Ahmedabad
lawyers in Surat
Ghaziabad lawyers

lawyers in Kolkata
lawyers in Janjgir
lawyers in Rajkot
lawyers in Indore
lawyers in Ludhiana
Gurgaon lawyers

TOP

India's Most Trusted Online law library
Legal Services India is Copyrighted under the Registrar of Copyright Act ( Govt of India) 2000-2017
 ISBN No: 978-81-928510-1-3