Home       Top Rated       Submit Article     Advanced Search     FAQ       Contact Us       Lawyers in India       Law Forum     RSS Feeds     

Register your Copyright Online

We offer copyright registration right from your desktop click here for details.

Latest Articles | Articles 2014 | Articles 2013 | Articles 2012 | Articles 2011 | Articles 2010 | Articles 2009 | Articles 2008 | Articles 2007 | Articles 2006 | Articles 2000-05

Search On:Laws in IndiaLawyers Search

Mutual Consent Divorce in Delhi
We provide fast, cost effective and Hassle free solution.
Contact us at Ph no: 9650499965 (Divorce Law Firm Delhi)
File Caveat in Supreme Court
Contact Ph no: +9650499965

Main Categories
 Accident Law
 Animal Laws
 Aviation Law
 Bangladesh Law
 Banking and Finance laws
 Case Laws
 Civil Laws
 Company Law
 Constitutional Law
 Consumer laws
 Contracts laws
 Criminal law
 Drug laws
 Dubai laws
 Educational laws
 Employment / Labour laws
 Environmental Law
 family law
 Gay laws and Third Gender
 Human Rights laws
 Immigration laws
 Insurance / Accident Claim
 Intellectual Property
 International Law
 Juvenile Laws
 Law - lawyers & legal Profession
 Legal Aid and Lok Adalat
 Legal outsourcing
 Media laws
 Medico legal
 Real estate laws
 Right To Information
 Tax Laws
 Torts Law
 Woman Issues
 Workplace Equality & Non-Discrimination
 Yet Another Category

More Options
 Most read articles
 Most rated articles

Subscribe now and receive free articles and updates instantly.


Published : December 05, 2017 | Author : shrivatsav.n
Category : Intellectual Property | Total Views : 273 | Rating :



Infringement of Patents

Patent infringement means the violation of the exclusive rights of the patent holder. As discussed earlier, patent rights are the exclusive rights granted by the Government to an inventor over his invention for a limited period of time. In other words, if any person exercises the exclusive rights of the patent holder without the patent owner's authorization then that person is liable for patent infringement. Sections 104-114 of the Patents Act, 1970 provide guidelines relating to patent infringement.

Unlike the Design law, the Patents law does not specify as to what would constitute infringement of a patented product or process. However, the following acts when committed without the consent of the patentee shall amount to infringement:

(i) making, using, offering for sale, selling, importing the patented product;
(ii) using the patented process, or using, offering for sale, selling or importing the product directlyobtained by that process

Types of Infringement
There are two kinds of infringement : 
Direct Infringement
Direct patent infringement is the most obvious and the most common form of patent infringement. Basically,direct patent infringement occurs when a product that is substantially close to a patented product or inventionis marketed, sold, or used commercially without permission from the owner of the patented product or invention.

Indirect Infringement

Indirect patent infringement suggests that there was some amount of deceit or accidental patent infringementin the incident. For instance, A holds a patent for a device and B manufactures a device which issubstantially similar to the A’s device. B is supplied with a product from another person C to facilitatemanufacturing of the B’s device. If the device so manufactured by B infringes upon A’s patent, then theperson C indirectly infringes A’s patent. Further, if such a product is knowingly sold or supplied, it may lead to“contributory infringement”. In the above example, if the person C knowingly supplies the product to B thenthe infringement is construed as contributory infringement.

Exclusion From Infringement
The law however enumerates certain exceptions to infringement:
(a) Experimental and Research: Any patented article or process can be used for the following purposes:
• Experiment
• Research
• Instructing the pupils
It is also permitted to make, construct, use, sell or import a patented invention solely for the uses reasonablyrelated to the development and submission of information required under any law for the time being in force,in India, or in a country other than India, that regulates the manufacture, construction, use, sale or import ofany product. All such acts, if within the bounds as created above, cannot be challenged as infringing therights of the patentee.

(b) Parallel Importation under certain conditions: Patented article or article made by using the patented process can be imported by government for its own use. Also a patented process can be used by the government solely for its own use. Moreover the government can import any patented medicine or drug for the purposes of its own use or for distribution in any dispensary, hospital or other medical institution maintained by the government or any other dispensary, hospital or medical institution notified by the government. [Section27 & 47]

Burden of Proof
The traditional rule of burden of proof is adhered to with respect to patented product andaccordingly in case of alleged infringement of a patented product the ‘onus of proof’ rests on the plaintiff.However, TRIPS-prompted amendment inserted by way of Section 104 (A) has ‘reversed burden of proof’ incase of infringement of patented process. Under the current law, the court can at its discretion shift the burdenof proof on the defendant, in respect of process patent if either of the following two conditions is met:
(a) the subject matter of the patent is a process for obtaining a new product; or
(b) there is substantial likelihood that an identical product is made by the process and plaintiff hasmade reasonable efforts to determine the process actually used but has failed. [Section 104 (A)]
While considering whether a party has discharged the burden imposed upon him under Section 104(A), thecourt shall not require him to disclose any manufacturing or commercial secrets, if it appears to the court thatit would be unreasonable to do so.

Doctrine of Equivalents And Doctrine of Colourable Variation

Patent infringement generally falls into two categories: literal infringement and infringement under the doctrine of equivalents. The term "literal infringement" means that each and every element recited in a claim has identical correspondence in the allegedly infringing device or process.

However, even if there is no literal infringement, a claim may be infringed under the doctrine of equivalents if some other element of the accused device or process performs substantially the same function, insubstantially the same way, to achieve substantially the same result. The doctrine of equivalents is a legal rule in most of the world's patent systems that allows a Court to hold a party liable for patent infringement even though the infringing device or process does not fall within the literal scope of a patent claim, but nevertheless is equivalent to the claimed invention.

This "expansion" of claim coverage permitted by the doctrine of equivalents, however, is not unbounded. Instead, the scope of coverage which is afforded the patent owner is limited by (i) the doctrine of "prosecution history estoppel" and (ii) the prior art.

An infringement analysis determines whether a claim in a patent literally "reads on" an accused infringer's device or process, or covers the allegedly infringing device under the doctrine of equivalents.
The steps in the analysis are:
• Construe the scope of the "literal" language of the claims.
• Compare the claims, as properly construed, with the accused device or process, to determine whether there is literal infringement.
• If there is no literal infringement, construe the scope of the claims under the doctrine of equivalents.

The doctrine of equivalents is an equitable doctrine which effectively expands the scope of the claims beyond their literal language to the true scope of the inventor's contribution to the art. However, there are limits on the scope of equivalents to which the patent owner is entitled.


1 2 3 4 5
Rate this article!     Poor

Most viewed articles in Intellectual Property category
• Advertising
• Bajaj Auto Limited
• Trademark Infringement and Remedies
• Copyright Societies
• Passing off under trademark
• Plagiarism
• Infringement of trademark and what constitutes honest practice in relation to trade and bussiness
• Trade Mark Law in India & Its Violation
• Originality Under Copyright Law-Is There Any Definite Standard?
• Patenting of Micro-Organisms in India: An Overview
• Competition Law and Intellectual Property Rights: Confronting Paradigms
• Product Patent & Exclusive Marketing Rights
• Section 25 of The Trade Marks Act, 1999
• Indian Copyright Software
• Author's moral Right
• Competition Law vis-a-vis IPR rights
Most recent articles in Intellectual Property category
• John Locke’s Labour Theory: A Justification of IPRs
• Infringement of Patents
• Novelty under the Designs Act,2000
• Major changes brought about by the Trademark Rules,2017
• Semiconductor Integrated Circuit-Prevent Chip Pirates
• Semi conductor integrated circuit lay out design protection
• Patent for technological companies
• International Commercial Arbitration
• Trademark infringement and passing off Indian pharmaceutical industry
• Protecting Tradition And Culture In India Development of A Sui Generis System
• De Jure Mobile Applications under the IP Law
• Sports and IPR
• Protecting Tradition and Culture in India: Development of A Sui Generis System
• The Effectiveness of the Remedies for Copyright Infringement
• National IPR Policy 2016
• Trademark Law in Music and Film Industry

Article Comments

there are no comments...

Please login or register a new free account.

Random Pick
Character means the collective qualities or characteristics especially mental and moral that distinguishes a person or thing. Character is the estimation of a person by his community. The general rule is that character evidence is inadmissible. Since it is very difficult to assess the character of the person, evidence of character is rendered inadmissible...

» Total Articles
» Total Authors
» Total Views
» Total categories

Law Forum

Legal Articles

Lawyers in India- Click on a link below for legal Services

lawyers in Chennai
lawyers in Bangalore
lawyers in Hyderabad
lawyers in Cochin
lawyers in Pondicherry
lawyers in Guwahati
lawyers in Nashik

lawyers in Jaipur
lawyers in New Delhi
lawyers in Dimapur
lawyers in Agra
Noida lawyers
lawyers in Siliguri

For Mutual consent Divorce in Delhi

Ph no: 9650499965
For online Copyright Registration

Ph no: 9891244487
Law Articles

lawyers in Delhi
lawyers in Chandigarh
lawyers in Allahabad
lawyers in Lucknow
lawyers in Jodhpur
Faridabad lawyers

lawyers in Mumbai
lawyers in Pune
lawyers in Nagpur
lawyers in Ahmedabad
lawyers in Surat
Ghaziabad lawyers

lawyers in Kolkata
lawyers in Janjgir
lawyers in Rajkot
lawyers in Indore
lawyers in Ludhiana
Gurgaon lawyers


India's Most Trusted Online law library
Legal Services India is Copyrighted under the Registrar of Copyright Act ( Govt of India) © 2000-2017
 ISBN No: 978-81-928510-1-3