Home       Top Rated       Submit Article     Advanced Search     FAQ       Contact Us       Lawyers in India       Law Forum     RSS Feeds     

Register your Copyright Online

We offer copyright registration right from your desktop click here for details.

Latest Articles | Articles 2014 | Articles 2013 | Articles 2012 | Articles 2011 | Articles 2010 | Articles 2009 | Articles 2008 | Articles 2007 | Articles 2006 | Articles 2000-05

Search On:Laws in IndiaLawyers Search

Mutual Consent Divorce in Delhi
We provide fast, cost effective and Hassle free solution.
Contact us at Ph no: 9650499965 (Divorce Law Firm Delhi)
File Caveat in Supreme Court
Contact Ph no: +9650499965

Main Categories
 Accident Law
 Animal Laws
 Arbitration
 Aviation Law
 Banking and Finance laws
 Case Laws
 Civil Laws
 Company Law
 Constitutional Law
 Consumer laws
 Contracts laws
 Criminal law
 Drug laws
 Dubai laws
 Educational laws
 Employment / Labour laws
 Environmental Law
 family law
 Gay laws and Third Gender
 Human Rights laws
 Immigration laws
 Insurance / Accident Claim
 Intellectual Property
 International Law
 Juvenile Laws
 Law - lawyers & legal Profession
 Legal Aid and Lok Adalat
 Legal outsourcing
 Media laws
 Medico legal
 Miscellaneous
 Real estate laws
 Right To Information
 Tax Laws
 Torts Law
 Woman Issues
 Workplace Equality & Non-Discrimination
 Yet Another Category

More Options
 Most read articles
 Most rated articles

Subscription
Subscribe now and receive free articles and updates instantly.

Name
Email




Published : April 18, 2014 | Author : Umang Raj
Category : Constitutional Law | Total Views : 8584 | Rating :

  
Umang Raj
Bangalore Institute of Legal Studies
 

A landmark Judgment in MOHD. AHMED (MINOR) versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS , Delhi High Court on 17th April, 2014 expressed Government of NCT of Delhi, to release its constitutional responsibility and provide a minor boy aged 7 years who is undergoing from a rare genetic disease called Gaucher Disease, with enzyme replacement treatment at AIIMS free of charge as and when he needs it.

Justice Manmohan, who delivered the Judgment held that “Just because someone is poor, the State cannot allow him to die. In fact, Government is bound to certify that poor and weak sections of society have right to use the treatment for rare and chronic diseases, like Gaucher particularly when the projection is good and there is a probability of the patient leading a normal life. After all, health is not a comfort and should not be the sole ownership of a privileged few”

The concern that comes up for consideration in the Case was whether a minor child born to parents belonging to economically weaker section of the society suffering from a chronic and rare disease, gaucher, is entitled to free medical treatment costing about rupees six lakhs per month especially when the healing is known, diagnosis is good and there is every likelihood of petitioner leading a normal life.

Emphasizing Right to health is a fundamental right originating from Article 21 of the Constitution of India, the Court held that “In the opinion of this Court, Article 21 of the Constitution clearly imposes a duty on the Government to take whatever steps are necessary to ensure that everyone has access to health facilities, goods and services so that they can enjoy, as soon as possible, the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. By virtue of Article 21 of the Constitution, the State is under a legal obligation to ensure access to life saving drugs to patients. A reasonable and equitable access to life saving medicines is critical to promoting and protecting the right to health. This means that Government must at the bare minimum ensure that individuals have access to essential medicines even for rare diseases like enzyme replacement for Gaucher disease. Availability of a very expensive drug virtually makes it inaccessible.”

The Court also opined that Government needs to seriously think about expanding its health budget if their right to life and right to equality as enumerated in Articles 14 and 21, are not to be rendered illusionary. If poor patients can get pleasure from recent innovations in the medical field, like robotic surgery, genome engineering the Government must immediately think of streching its investment in the health sector.

The Court issued the following suggestions relating to the issue
i. All government hospitals could have a separate CSR/ Charitable entity/account wherein donations can be received. The donations could be subject to an audit.

ii. Each hospital could have a designated officer, to whom applications for assistance can be made by patients in need. The decision to whom financial assistance could be provided, be left to the Medical Superintendent/CEO of the hospital along with Head of the Departments. Delhi could be adopted as the first model state.

iii. The Ministries of Corporate Affairs and Finance could consider providing extra credit (for instance increased credit) for donations in certain sectors, such as health.

iv. The Government could adopt a holistic approach to facilitate donations, so that the tax regime supports the said efforts.

v. All donations in cash and kind must be accounted for, with complete transparency to ensure no misuse or misappropriation of donations.

vi. Government hospitals could put up list on the State Department of Health website of the drugs, implants and devices they require for EWS/BPL patients. This way people would donate as per the need of each hospital. This could be revised on a monthly basis.

vii. The State Government may put up a list of drugs, implants and devices which are excluded from its budget for which donations would be welcome.

viii. Both the Central and State Governments could create a revolving fund to take care of recurring expenditure of patients suffering from chronic and rare diseases.

ix. The Government could constitute a High Powered Inter-disciplinary Committee to:

-Develop and update a list of guiding principles/best practices in the area of donations in healthcare.

-Develop a policy for tackling rare diseases and promoting the development of orphan drugs.

-Evolve new and innovative methods for attracting spending in the area of healthcare.

This Committee could have representatives from various State and Central Government departments, private and government hospitals, non-governmental organizations working in the area of \healthcare, representatives of patient’s rights groups, and representatives of pharmaceutical and other companies in the healthcare sector.




1 2 3 4 5
Rate this article!     Poor
Excellent    

Most viewed articles in Constitutional Law category
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, The Father of Indian Constitution
Position of Fundamental Rights during Emergency
Principles of Natural Justice In Indian Constitution
Right To Privacy Under Article 21 and the Related Conflicts
Prospective Vs. Retrospective
Reasonable Classification under article 14
Concept of Welfare State and Its Relevance in Indian Scenario
Vulnerable Groups in India - Status, Schemes, Constitution of India
Doctrine of Pleasure as under the Indian Constitution
Emergence of Article 31 A, B and C and its validity
Maneka Gandhi
Three types of emergencies under the Indian Constitution
Election Commission of India
Critical Analysis on Reservation Policy in India
Hart
Relation Between Part III And Part IV Of Constitution Of India-Changing Trends
Most recent articles in Constitutional Law category
Central State Relation - Legislative, Administrative and Financial
Freedom of expression - Democracy
Right To Privacy A Fundamental Right-Uidai Violative of Individuals Right To Privacy
Debate over Sitting or Standing at Cinema Hall Whether Violation of Right to freedom of Speech and Expression
Voting Rights in India to Non-Resident Indians
Right to Privacy is a Fundamental Right - A Study
Freedom of Religion
Article 44 of Constitution: A Dead Letter to be Retrieved
Fundamental Right of The Child To Education in Andaman And Nicobar Islands
Transfer Petition in India
Role of Writs In Administrative Law
The Importance of Article 370
Judicial Activism and Judicial Restraint
Fundamental Duties Under Article 51-A
Is Preamble a Part of Constitution
Writs In Indian Constitution

Article Comments

there are no comments...


Welcome!
Please login or register a new free account.

Random Pick
Maternity Leave is basically the period when a new mother takes off from her work for the birth of the baby. All the female employees are legally entitled to this right and they cannot at any cost be deprived of the same.

Statistics
» Total Articles
1483
» Total Authors
4401
» Total Views
18909010
» Total categories
41

Law Forum


Legal Articles

Lawyers in India- Click on a link below for legal Services

lawyers in Chennai
lawyers in Bangalore
lawyers in Hyderabad
lawyers in Cochin
lawyers in Pondicherry
lawyers in Guwahati
lawyers in Nashik

lawyers in Jaipur
lawyers in New Delhi
lawyers in Dimapur
lawyers in Agra
Noida lawyers
lawyers in Siliguri

For Mutual consent Divorce in Delhi

Ph no: 9650499965
For online Copyright Registration

Ph no: 9891244487
Law Articles

lawyers in Delhi
lawyers in Chandigarh
lawyers in Allahabad
lawyers in Lucknow
lawyers in Jodhpur
Faridabad lawyers

lawyers in Mumbai
lawyers in Pune
lawyers in Nagpur
lawyers in Ahmedabad
lawyers in Surat
Ghaziabad lawyers

lawyers in Kolkata
lawyers in Janjgir
lawyers in Rajkot
lawyers in Indore
lawyers in Ludhiana
Gurgaon lawyers

TOP

India's Most Trusted Online law library
Legal Services India is Copyrighted under the Registrar of Copyright Act ( Govt of India) 2000-2017
 ISBN No: 978-81-928510-1-3