Home       Top Rated       Submit Article     Advanced Search     FAQ       Contact Us       Lawyers in India       Law Forum     RSS Feeds     

Register your Copyright Online

We offer copyright registration right from your desktop click here for details.

Latest Articles | Articles 2014 | Articles 2013 | Articles 2012 | Articles 2011 | Articles 2010 | Articles 2009 | Articles 2008 | Articles 2007 | Articles 2006 | Articles 2000-05

Search On:Laws in IndiaLawyers Search

Mutual Consent Divorce in Delhi
We provide fast, cost effective and Hassle free solution.
Contact us at Ph no: 9650499965 (Divorce Law Firm Delhi)
File Caveat in Supreme Court
Contact Ph no: +9650499965

Main Categories
 Accident Law
 Animal Laws
 Aviation Law
 Bangladesh Law
 Banking and Finance laws
 Case Laws
 Civil Laws
 Company Law
 Constitutional Law
 Consumer laws
 Contracts laws
 Criminal law
 Drug laws
 Dubai laws
 Educational laws
 Employment / Labour laws
 Environmental Law
 family law
 Gay laws and Third Gender
 Human Rights laws
 Immigration laws
 Insurance / Accident Claim
 Intellectual Property
 International Law
 Juvenile Laws
 Law - lawyers & legal Profession
 Legal Aid and Lok Adalat
 Legal outsourcing
 Media laws
 Medico legal
 Real estate laws
 Right To Information
 Tax Laws
 Torts Law
 Woman Issues
 Workplace Equality & Non-Discrimination
 Yet Another Category

More Options
 Most read articles
 Most rated articles

Subscribe now and receive free articles and updates instantly.


Published : June 25, 2010 | Author : drpremnath
Category : Law - lawyers & legal Profession | Total Views : 6350 | Rating :

Dr Prem Nath Associate Professor Deptt. of Laws Panjab University Chandigarh

Justice Delayed Justice Denied

I agree that people are losing faith in judiciary. It is mainly because of long delays at all points, the reluctance of all the judges to give the judgments and the inevitable adjournments. That is why people are approaching the mafia which believe in out summary justice.[1]

Law is a noble profession. Lawyers and Courts have always been the last refuse for the helpless and the harassed litigants. But for late there is erosion of people’s, trust and faith in the Indian judicial system. The main cause for such erosion is corruption and delays. The allegation of corruption is the first cause for the deteriorating functioning of the judiciary.

The foremost reason of delay is corruption within the judiciary. For several years there had been murmurs of discontent with functioning of the superior judiciary. There had been heard coming from the authentic sources and even from seats of authority. For example, a former Hon’ble Chief Justice of India, Justice Venkataramiah, after retirement, talks of High Courts judges going to their lawyer friends or to embassies in search of drinks. Another former Hon’ble Judge of the Supreme Court, mentioned various methods of judicial corruption also it is alleged that occasionally costly gifts are given to the Hon’ble judges of the Higher Judiciary by Learned advocates and lavish parties are arranged for Hon’ble judges.

A retiring Hon’ble Chief Justice of the Patna High Court indicated the judiciary in a sweeping manner. The Haryana Chief Minister applied for the transfer of a case, in which he was a party, from a particular Division Bench among the judges. Sometime ago, an unedifying fired raged in the Madhya Pradesh High Court, with the Hon’ble judges pitted against their Hon’ble Chief Justice. It had to be quad by the Apex Court. Not only this also the judges of the Punjab and Haryana High Court pitted against the Chief Justice of the High Court and 25 judges of the High Court went on one day casual leave to protest against the Chief Justice.

A few years ago the Law Ministry inundated with complaints of corruption among four judges, felt compelled to propose a 15 point model code of conduct for judges. In 1995 four judges of the Bombay High Court were transferred on the complaint of Bar Association there. At a meeting of the Bar Association at Chandigarh, held in 1993 with the Hon’ble Chief Justice of India and other judges attending it, allegation of corruption identifiable judges were forcefully made and the Chief Justice announced soon that one third of the Hon’ble judges in a High Court should be from outside the State and ordered the transfer of dozen of judges, at that time the Chief Justice contended, that would finish the corruption. It is submitted with respect that all the newly appointed Hon’ble judges appointed in the Punjab and Haryana High Court are working in the High Court of Punjab and Haryana. Also kins and spouse of the Hon’ble Judges[2] practice in the same Court. “Cash at Judge door step” of the Punjab and Haryana High Court corruption case 2008 is still touching the headlines of media. The Panjab University Teachers in which the Hon’ble Court issued a small order and but on the next day the whole judgment was published in the newspapers. A question which was unanswered. The whole judgment was delivered months after and the copy of the same was made available to the litigant about four months later. This put a question mark on the impartiality of the judiciary.

In Sheilu Barse’s case, the court had repeated, in his own words, what five judges of the Supreme Court had said on the very narrow of independence: “If the allegations are true, obviously it would be to the benefit of public to bring these matters into light”.[3]Many questions are raised on the verdict of Bhopal Gas Leakage the answer of which lies with the Judiciary.

Judgment of the Supreme Court recognizing, though only indirectly, that things were amiss at the level of High Courts, a two judges Bench, deciding a public interest petition, laid down once “in house procedure” for the disposal of the complaints of Bar Associations against High Court judges. The petitioner had prayed for a restraint on the Bar Association’s demand for the resignation of the Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court because the facts had not been verified by the association before making the demand.[4] In citing the petition, the Apex Court laid down guidelines for the Bar Associations in the matter of their complaints against the judges and Chief Justice of High Courts. Bombay High Court in a case held that truth is no defence in contempt of Court cases. The Court observed that complaints against judges should be made by Bar Association after due verification of facts: the complaint should be made to the Chief Justice of the High Courts concerned and not through the press. Also, the association making the complaint should await the Chief Justice’s decision in the matter. If it is the Hon’ble Chief Justice of a High Court whose conduct is unacceptable, for any reason, the complaint should go to the Chief Justice of India, the symbol of the country’s judiciary and his decision in the matter should be similarly awaited.

With due respect, the judgment has to be fulfilled for its inadequacies. It dealt only with the complaints that the Bar Association may have to make. But citizen’s right to complaint was not considered, much less conceded its citizen may well have bona fide concerned for the health of the judiciary and may like to point out its failings. Also, Article 51A (agrejoin) on citizens the duty of upholding, the ideals of the Constitution and respecting its institutions Lord Donning has said in one of his famous judgments that:

“Even the Supreme Court has spoken in a similar opine in some of the judgments, which have not been suppressed”.

The judgment under comment has not touched the problem in its full dimensions. It deals only with the High Court Hon’ble Judges. What about the judges of the Apex Court? A former Solicitor-General who should know, recently referred to the lapses of some Hon’ble judges of the Supreme Court. The conduct of Hon’ble Justice Ramaswami, for example, was a national scandal. It also well known that some functioning judges of the Apex Court undermine the prestige of the judiciary by paying Court to the Chief Minister of the States they themselves came from. Judges are appointed from the ruling class said Justice V.R. Krishnan Iyer.

The judgment may also be faulted for not taking into account the strong possibility of erring judges laughing away the “in house procedure” they knew that constitutionally no body control them without being impeached by the Parliament, however improper their conduct may be. Hon’ble Justice Ramaswami highly contentious attitude towards the enquiry committee composed of eminent judges, must serve as warning in this connection.

Parliament’s failure to Justice Ramaswami in 1992, the Bombay resignations of 1995, the continuing mystery of the Mysore High Court’s Hon’ble Judge’s sex-scandal with the Supreme Court refusing to release the report, Hon’ble Justice Arun Madan’s resignation from RajasthanHigh Court and the arrest and release of Hon’ble Justice Mukherjee in the Delhi Development scandal have divasting effect. Recently charges of corruption have been leveled against Dina Karn Hon’ble Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court on his appoint to the Apex Court of has left many questions unanswered for those who level the allegation why these allegations are made at the time when he was going elevate Apex Court.

Another reason for the delay is also conduct of thehonourable judges. The judges took the files to their home which either did not returns to Court or returned after a long time. Also some times difference of the judges come into light even on the Bench. Also some time Judges show their inability to sit with their colleagues when the date of hearing is on the next date. The example is Reliance caseJudge of of the Apex Courtshow its inability when is the date of hearing was the next day.

The decline in the ambit of judges true remarried, by and law unchecked since then, political, regional and commercial factors have a role even now once in a while, a few deserving appointment made consideration other than merit have generally come to prevail in many cases. Many fingers are raised on the refusal of elevation to the apex Court to Honourable Chief Justice of Delhi High Court.

A judge of the Gujarat High Court slaps on the face of his colleague while sitting on the bench and the Apex Court have to interfere by transferring on one of them to other states. Also some time the judge show their inability to sit on the bench. Recently in Reliance case one of the judge of the Apex Court showed its inability to sit on the bench with his colleague when the hearing of the case was on the next date. It has been seen that in more than 60% cases the cause of action is frustrated due to non-delibery of judgement in time.

Generally, for making appointments to the High Courts, the Chief Justice of a High Court initiates the recommendation and sends it to the Governor, the Chief Minister is consulted. There is the recommendation is sent to Government of India, the Law Ministers send it to the Chief Justice of India.

One of the most talked about judicial issues to present in the appointment of the Supreme Court and High Court judges. I feel it was a retrograte steps to have conferred the power appointing judge to the Court only to the judiciary. Also many questions are raised on. the refusal to appoint Hon’ble Shaw Chief Justice of Delhi High Court to the Apex Court. For all its during the time when the executive had primacy of the judiciary on the issue, is a step in the wrong direction it is a unhealthy development.

The other reason for the delay in justice is the century old procedure adopted by the judiciary of this country. Procedure resulted in lakhs of pending cases, in the higher judiciary and cross in the subordinate judiciary. Further, judicial officer of the subordinate judiciary alleged that there is a nexus of learned advocate and lower staff of the Court Judges transfer after every three years but there is no transfer of the lower staff. So, the lower staff charges from the litigants through the learned advocate. Further, in criminal cases due to this delay the witness hostiles and justice could not be delivered. In the high profile cases. For example, in the Badal Corruption Case 20 witness hostile and public prosecute showed his inhabits to argue the case and the judge dealing with case harassed by withdrawing the security . Delay in handingover the house to the judge on the transfer as the accused wore, Chief and Deputy Chief Minister of the state. Advocate Genral is seen looking after the Badals case. It is pertinent to mention that the Criminal Procedure Code allows bail and also put the condition that the accused will niether influence the witness nor in the document relating to the case.[5] Gujrat Roit Case is also one example of it. In Ruchika case victim commit suiside while waiting for justice as it took 19 years even to enter F.I.R. as also High profile was the accuse.

Also, it is alleged that there is a nexus of Hon’ble judges and politicians. Generally, only throse Hon’ble judges are appointed on commission who favour them. Also judges on commissions are appointed on their retirement. So they are more interested in their extension of the term rather than submitting their reports. The commission of the demolition of Babari Masjid at Ayodhya has set a record in the matter of extending their terms.

Bar has not lag behind in the delay of judgements. In the lower courts the learned advocate charges from the litigants on every hearing. So they are more interested in dates rather than delivery of the judgment. Strikes by the Bar Association are the rule of the day. There is also the possibility of Bar Association, contemptuously violating the guidelines. They are composed of learned lawyers of different ages and temperaments. Some Associations have been known to have run berserk in the past. Some years ago furious learned advocates danced on the tables in the Court room of the Chief Justice of Delhi High Court, and disrupted the functioning of all other judges. In the present ambience of in discipline, repeat of such rondism cannot be rule out and it cannot be expected the early deliver of the judgements in these conditions. Even the “striking arm” of the judiciary supplied by the contempt of Court Act may not be able to control wide spread hooliganism.

Time and again inadequacy in the number of judges in the courts also connected upon as a reason for the delay in justice. Not only the Law Commission the standing committee to Parliament made observations in this regard, even the Chief Justice of India has done so on more than one occasions. Even the power committee Punjab and Haryana High Court in 1997 in Ved Paul Gupta case observed:

Justice cannot continue to the low priority. After all, it is a perambulatory promise to the people.

The Court directed the states to create more posts of and fill. Only the facts can tell how far the states has comply the order of the Hon’ble High Court.

Unwept and unsung, India’s sub-ordinate courts are the cinderellas of its judicial system. A top heavy obsession with Supreme Court and High Courts has led to total neglect of the subordinate courts, which represent the real face of Justice for the common man. The conditions of work in the subordinate Court are simply appalling and it is a miracle that they continue to dispense with Justice nonetheless. This is also the reason for the delay in Justice.

“In the final third of the century we are still trying to operate the courts with fundamentally the same basic methods, the same procedures and the same machinery Rusco Pound said were not good enough in 1906. In the super marked age we are going to operate the courts with Cracker Barrel Coiner Grocel methods and equipment vintage 1900”.[6] Also, on the condition of anonymity it is alleged by Hon’ble judicial magistrates that whenever the Hon'ble Judges of the High Court visit for inspection, they accompanied their wives , huge shopping is made by the wives and the bills are left with the magistrates for payment though they tried to pass the bill to the SHO of the area. But seeing, the amount high the concerned SHO also show their inability to the bill and the magistrate have to pay the bill from their own pocket.

That things were amiss the High Courts and the judiciary below the Apex Court should be accountable was judicialy recognized, the judgment has not received adequate attention from the quarters concerned; either from Bar associations nor from those interested in the citizens freedom of speech.

Now the feeling has started to develop that except for dates, you get nothing from the courts. This is because Justice is being delayed and denied due to heavy pendency and workload in the Court. The ultimate reason for any type of judicial discipline is to maintain public confidence in the judiciary. The logic behind this principle is simple. A legal system can function only as long as the public accepts and abides by decisions rendered by the courts; the public will accept and abide by these decisions only if it is convinced that the judges are fair and impartial; anything that tends to weaken that conviction should be avoided. In other words, justice must not only be done, but must also appear to be done. For this regard, judges are commanded to avoid not only actual impropriety but also the appearance of impropriety in all of their activities.
[1] Justice B. Kanwar Lentip. Former siniormost Judge of the Bombay High Court.
[2] Punjab and Haryana High Court has 16 “uncle judges”, The Tribune, May 23, 2010.
[3] AIR 1952 SC 148.
[4] The Tribun, December 14, 1995.
[5] Sessions Judge Basu victimization by administration – had earlier heard cases against adals. The Tribune, March 16, 2010.
[6] Justice at the Crossr road, Iyer V.R., Krishna.

Authors contact info - articles The  author can be reached at: drpremnath@legalserviceindia.com

1 2 3 4 5
Rate this article!     Poor

Most viewed articles in Law - lawyers & legal Profession category
• Professional Misconduct by lawyers in India
• Professional misconduct of lawyers in india
• Judicial Process in India
• Restriction on Advocates
• Power of Attorney
• Basic Principles & Rules of Law of Evidence
• The Legal system in ancient India
• Judicial Accountability in India
• Development of Adalat System during the time of Warren Hastings
• Natural Law
• Review of National Education Policy from Student
• Interpretation of Statutes
• Judiciary system in India
• Judges of Supreme Court and High Court can be Impeach - A Controversy
• Mesne Profit
• Theory of Relationship between Law and Morality
Most recent articles in Law - lawyers & legal Profession category
• How to Identify Best Criminal Lawyers
• Qualities to Look for Divorce Lawyers
• Empowering Aspiring Advocates is necessary
• How to get Real Time Experience of solving Legal Issues
• Representation of Women in the Legal Profession In India
• Freedom of Business, Trade and Profession
• Legal Profession in India
• Law Firm Document Management Software
• Theory of Relationship between Law and Morality
• Role of Lawyers in Social Transformation
• National Judicial Appointment Commission Act
• Tribunalization of Justice
• Role of Judiciary In Strengthening PIL
• Theory of Justice by John Rawls: its criticism by Martha C. Nussbaum and Amartya Sen
• Lets Be Defiant
• Litigation: An Inherited Proletarianism

Article Comments

Posted by Jaspal Sawhney on March 12, 2017
Hello Everyone,
This is especially for the people who are suffering due to the Delay in Justice by our Honourable courts, the Small Causes Court, City Civil Court and mostly the same scene is at the High Court. Not sure about the Supreme court.
A few questions:
Why do we need lawyers to fight a case. Since the evidence is given a the start of a case why can’t the Judges look at the Papers and give Justice in a weeks’ time.
The matter of fact is only 1 Person can have the right documents. There should be no 2 ways about it and the person who has the right documents shall be given Justice immediately.
Lawyers are wasting everyone's time including the courts by purposely delaying the matter for years on end.
The Surprise part is the Judges are not interested in looking at the papers but keep on giving half judgements giving right to the wrong person as well and delaying the matter/s for years on end.
It is also a fact that most of the Police is Highly Corrupt and help the person/s who are influential and who Bribe them.
If ever in India there is a department who can check on the Police then I am sure that the entire Police will be removed on one case or the other.
Another important fact is The Indian Laws need to be changed and made simple.
For example: If a person owns a Flat then for no reason what so ever any other person will obtain any right in that flat Period.
Instead Indian Laws are so confusing they just give right to everyone and hence Justice is not done and we have People who have Political Influence to whom the Police bow down.
Then people go the wrong way like the local Thugs or Goons or people who have Political backing.
If the courts can’t give Justice to its own people then Indians should be given the right to Own a Gun Just like the Americans. The People should have a right to Defend their hard Earned Property and Defend against all the wrong people.
The Police (Mumbai and all other states) are 200% Corrupt and don’t follow even the courts order nothing is done in this country correctly.
India has become a Land of Lawlessness.
I have seen the real face of the Mumbai Police.

What happens when the Sr. Police Officer in our case Mr P P Boparai (Sr of Basant Park Police Station, Chembur East in 2007) helped my dad’s brother Trespass in our shop.
He Got Influenced by Mr Manjit Singh Abrol Owner of Many Dance Bars and hotels in Chembur, Now one of the main influential Persons in the BJP Party and in Chembur. The Sr. Inspector openly threatened my father to give 50% of our shop to the other brothers.
We met Mr. P S Pasricha Then DGP of Maharashtra who again did not help us but kept prolonging the process.
We met. DGP P S Pasricha, Mr. Niketh Kaushik then ACP of Chembur, Mr Hemant Nagrale (Addl DCP) who told us that he comes to do his work and not help people like us and threw our file without even looking at it. We even met Meeran Borwankar again no use at all.
The Entire Police Department (in our case the MUMBAI POLICE) only makes the right people run from pillar to post and nothing else while they enjoy with the Bribe Money.
It clearly shows the ground reality.

Posted by lokesh on March 18, 2011
very good site for legal advice

Posted by hitender on March 17, 2011
supreme court guidline if any person gives bribes to govt employee for any work but employee is not authorise for this work so no corruption case will filled against him(please provide me view of supreme court of india )

Please login or register a new free account.

Random Pick
Cloning is a very interesting and new concept developed with the huge technological advancements made in the field of science. The cloning of the animals is becoming common. Dolly, a cloned sheep was the first cloned animal....

» Total Articles
» Total Authors
» Total Views
» Total categories

Law Forum

Legal Articles

Lawyers in India- Click on a link below for legal Services

lawyers in Chennai
lawyers in Bangalore
lawyers in Hyderabad
lawyers in Cochin
lawyers in Pondicherry
lawyers in Guwahati
lawyers in Nashik

lawyers in Jaipur
lawyers in New Delhi
lawyers in Dimapur
lawyers in Agra
Noida lawyers
lawyers in Siliguri

For Mutual consent Divorce in Delhi

Ph no: 9650499965
For online Copyright Registration

Ph no: 9891244487
Law Articles

lawyers in Delhi
lawyers in Chandigarh
lawyers in Allahabad
lawyers in Lucknow
lawyers in Jodhpur
Faridabad lawyers

lawyers in Mumbai
lawyers in Pune
lawyers in Nagpur
lawyers in Ahmedabad
lawyers in Surat
Ghaziabad lawyers

lawyers in Kolkata
lawyers in Janjgir
lawyers in Rajkot
lawyers in Indore
lawyers in Ludhiana
Gurgaon lawyers


India's Most Trusted Online law library
Legal Services India is Copyrighted under the Registrar of Copyright Act ( Govt of India) © 2000-2017
 ISBN No: 978-81-928510-1-3