Home       Top Rated       Submit Article     Advanced Search     FAQ       Contact Us       Lawyers in India       Law Forum     RSS Feeds     

Register your Copyright Online

We offer copyright registration right from your desktop click here for details.

Latest Articles | Articles 2014 | Articles 2013 | Articles 2012 | Articles 2011 | Articles 2010 | Articles 2009 | Articles 2008 | Articles 2007 | Articles 2006 | Articles 2000-05

Search On:Laws in IndiaLawyers Search

Mutual Consent Divorce in Delhi
We provide fast, cost effective and Hassle free solution.
Contact us at Ph no: 9650499965 (Divorce Law Firm Delhi)
File Caveat in Supreme Court
Contact Ph no: +9650499965

Main Categories
 Accident Law
 Animal Laws
 Arbitration
 Aviation Law
 Banking and Finance laws
 Case Laws
 Civil Laws
 Company Law
 Constitutional Law
 Consumer laws
 Contracts laws
 Criminal law
 Drug laws
 Dubai laws
 Educational laws
 Employment / Labour laws
 Environmental Law
 family law
 Gay laws and Third Gender
 Human Rights laws
 Immigration laws
 Insurance / Accident Claim
 Intellectual Property
 International Law
 Juvenile Laws
 Law - lawyers & legal Profession
 Legal Aid and Lok Adalat
 Legal outsourcing
 Media laws
 Medico legal
 Miscellaneous
 Real estate laws
 Right To Information
 Tax Laws
 Torts Law
 Woman Issues
 Workplace Equality & Non-Discrimination
 Yet Another Category

More Options
 Most read articles
 Most rated articles

Subscription
Subscribe now and receive free articles and updates instantly.

Name
Email




Published : April 17, 2014 | Author : Umang Raj
Category : Banking and Finance laws | Total Views : 10105 | Rating :

  
Umang Raj
Bangalore Institute of Legal Studies
 

A Legally Enforceable Debt u/s. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, can be said to be falling either in the class of acts which are not criminal in a real sense but are acts which in the public interest are prohibited under the penalty or those where although the proceedings may be criminal in form, they are really only a summary mode of enforcing a civil right. Enactment of sections 138 to 142 has been made to meet creditors' concern in a growing and developing country with a liberal economic policy and opening of more avenues for trade, commerce and industry. Creation of strict liability is an effective measure by encouraging greater vigilance to prevent the usual callous or otherwise attitude of drawers of cheques in discharge of debts or otherwise. The legislative object and purpose of section 138 is clearly to regulate financial promises in growing business, trade, commerce and Industrial activities of the country and the strict liability under section 138 promotes greater vigilance in the matters covered by it. The incorporation of the said provision is designed to safeguard the faith of the creditor in the drawer of the cheque, which is essential to the economic life of a developing country like India. Its purpose would be defeated if in the prosecution of an offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the accused is permitted to raise the defence that he had no reason to believe when he issued the cheque that the cheque may be dishonoured on presentment. Monetary blood flow in the arteries of trade and business heart cannot be permitted to be calcified by the dishonour of cheques drawn by a debtor. If by the legal fiction, introduced by section 138 the dishonour of the cheque drawn by a person on an account maintained by him with a banker for payment of any amount of money to another person from out of that account for the discharge in whole or in part of any debt or liability either because the amount of money standing to the credit of that account is insufficient or that it exceeds the amount arranged to be paid from the account by an agreement with that bank, is to be deemed as an offence, it is obvious that for that absolute liability full effect must be given to the legal fiction.

Mere dishonour of a cheque for the reasons stated in section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, is sufficient for commission of crime under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and it is not material whether he had reason to believe when he issued the cheque that the cheque may not be dishonoured on presentment. For an offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, ‘mens rea’ is not essential, which is clearly spelt out from a reading of section 138. The said provision clearly rules out ‘mens rea’ as a constituent part of the crime. The position of law is that section 138 brings into operation the rule of strict liability and, therefore, there is nothing unreasonable, if it is provided in section 140 that certain defences may not be allowed in any prosecution under section138. The rigour of section 138 which creates dishonour of cheque for insufficiency, etc., of funds in the account as an absolute offence by legal fiction, is further maintained by making the provision in section 140 that it shall not be a defence in a prosecution for an offence under section 138 that the drawer had no reason to believe when he issued the cheque that the cheque may be dishonoured on presentment for the reasons stated in that section and, therefore, cannot be said to be unreasonable or arbitrary.

The state of mind of the accused person, his knowledge or reasonable belief are not the necessary Ingredients of an offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and, therefore, the provision contained in section 140 of the Act that it shall not be a defence in a prosecution for an offence under section 138 that the drawer had no reason to believe when he issued the cheque that the cheque may be dishonoured on presentment, cannot be said to be unreasonable and violative of article 14 of the Constitution of India.




1 2 3 4 5
Rate this article!     Poor
Excellent    

Most viewed articles in Banking and Finance laws category
Amendment of 2013 of The Securitization And Reconstruction of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002
The Reserve Bank of India and its functions
Protection of the interest of the investor
Applying the Usurious Loans Act of India
Reduction Of Capital, Does It Reduce Only Capital Or Even Minorities?
Legally Enforceable Debt u/s. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Intellectual Property
Working of Capital Market in India
Money Laundering
Indian Foreign Direct Investment Policy
Role of NGO in the WTO system
socio economic survey of the Project Affected Families of Kakinada SEZ Private Limited
Regionalism & Regional Trade Regulation
Recovery of Debts in Ancient India
Latest Financial Statement
Banking Frauds in India
Most recent articles in Banking and Finance laws category
Tips to Revise A/C into NRO/NRE/ FCNR Prior to Immigration
History of Banking institution in India
Demonetization-Challenges In Cash Less Economy
Working of Capital Market In India
Money Laundering: An Insight
Algorithmic Trading
A case against system markets-automobile industry of India
Bank and Borrower a Relationship of Trust and Understanding
Futures and forward contracts
Debt Recovery Tribunal
Prohibition of Insider Trading Regulations, 2015
Working of Capital Market in India
Analysis of regulations governing IFSCs in India
Banking Frauds in India
The Reserve Bank of India and its functions
Private Equity Investments - A Brief Overview

Article Comments

Posted by pavan kumar on December 29, 2014
Very informative.Sir I like to known,if accused like to appeal in higher court for cheque bounce case,how much money he has to pay challan to court.
Kindly advise.


Welcome!
Please login or register a new free account.

Random Pick
Related to women issues and legal rights - Tempted away from grey complexity to the drama of stark contrast one could title our land as the historical volumes of sexual discrimination of Indian feminism from violence to desire...

Statistics
» Total Articles
1529
» Total Authors
4546
» Total Views
19960689
» Total categories
41

Law Forum


Legal Articles

Lawyers in India- Click on a link below for legal Services

lawyers in Chennai
lawyers in Bangalore
lawyers in Hyderabad
lawyers in Cochin
lawyers in Pondicherry
lawyers in Guwahati
lawyers in Nashik

lawyers in Jaipur
lawyers in New Delhi
lawyers in Dimapur
lawyers in Agra
Noida lawyers
lawyers in Siliguri

For Mutual consent Divorce in Delhi

Ph no: 9650499965
For online Copyright Registration

Ph no: 9891244487
Law Articles

lawyers in Delhi
lawyers in Chandigarh
lawyers in Allahabad
lawyers in Lucknow
lawyers in Jodhpur
Faridabad lawyers

lawyers in Mumbai
lawyers in Pune
lawyers in Nagpur
lawyers in Ahmedabad
lawyers in Surat
Ghaziabad lawyers

lawyers in Kolkata
lawyers in Janjgir
lawyers in Rajkot
lawyers in Indore
lawyers in Ludhiana
Gurgaon lawyers

TOP

India's Most Trusted Online law library
Legal Services India is Copyrighted under the Registrar of Copyright Act ( Govt of India) 2000-2017
 ISBN No: 978-81-928510-1-3