Home       Top Rated       Submit Article     Advanced Search     FAQ       Contact Us       Lawyers in India       Law Forum     RSS Feeds     

Register your Copyright Online

We offer copyright registration right from your desktop click here for details.

Latest Articles | Articles 2014 | Articles 2013 | Articles 2012 | Articles 2011 | Articles 2010 | Articles 2009 | Articles 2008 | Articles 2007 | Articles 2006 | Articles 2000-05

Search On:Laws in IndiaLawyers Search

Mutual Consent Divorce in Delhi
We provide fast, cost effective and Hassle free solution.
Contact us at Ph no: 9650499965 (Divorce Law Firm Delhi)
File Caveat in Supreme Court
Contact Ph no: +9650499965

Main Categories
 Accident Law
 Animal Laws
 Aviation Law
 Bangladesh Law
 Banking and Finance laws
 Case Laws
 Civil Laws
 Company Law
 Constitutional Law
 Consumer laws
 Contracts laws
 Criminal law
 Drug laws
 Dubai laws
 Educational laws
 Employment / Labour laws
 Environmental Law
 family law
 Gay laws and Third Gender
 Human Rights laws
 Immigration laws
 Insurance / Accident Claim
 Intellectual Property
 International Law
 Juvenile Laws
 Law - lawyers & legal Profession
 Legal Aid and Lok Adalat
 Legal outsourcing
 Media laws
 Medico legal
 Real estate laws
 Right To Information
 Tax Laws
 Torts Law
 Woman Issues
 Workplace Equality & Non-Discrimination
 Yet Another Category

More Options
 Most read articles
 Most rated articles

Subscribe now and receive free articles and updates instantly.


Published : July 29, 2015 | Author : bhanwaradityajadon
Category : Law - lawyers & legal Profession | Total Views : 1819 | Rating :

have done LLB from Campus law center, university of Delhi , LLM from Indian Law institute, supreme court , New Delhi,CS(F) from ICSI, new Delhi, PGD in IPR from Indian Law institute, New Delhi, Practicing in Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, M.P.High Court, bench at Gwalior, CAT, Consumer Commissions and other Tribunals including M.P. Revenue Board at Gwalior.

Litigation: An Inherited Proletarianism

This Article is a contemplation of what could have been thought by a Litigant

Aghast it felt then and aghast it feels now; hallucinated it felt then and aberrated it feels now. I was legal toddler then, I am no better-off now. I can recall those hurly days when my peer group used to wait eagerly for me to make a jest but now look at me, I am waiting in an apprehension of getting justice at least this time but let alone leave justice, I, instead, got another date. On every adjournment, I am recollected of the movie called Damini where an advocate in the movie becomes so disgruntled on dates being given in a perpetual succession in a routine affair compelling an Advocate to assert ”my lord, we have only received dates after dates but justice was never given”. The aforesaid assertions has bestowed upon me an incumbency to nurture the Hypothesis i.e. Judicial procrastination is an antithesis to the theory of Jural Correlativeness and the same be put to test in order to prove its veracity. As I was petrified due to such procrastination, I entered in the premises along with my attorney who readily noticed the stress lines at my forehead. Hardly anyone knew that my neurons are racing among themselves in order to knockdown the Hypothesis which is the brain child of the racing neurons itself and obviously a ramification of all pervasive procrastination.

Good morning your lordship; I am the petitioner before this Hon’ble Court since generations. My father had been bowing down before your Lordship since ages and the same trait of proletarianism have been inculcated in me under an illusion that one day, justice might prevail. My father, in a perpetual succession, kept on chanting and sobriquetting this court as a pious place, similar to any other place of worship. Probably; I visited this court more than any other temples of worship and with each visit, I often wonder as to the change of my character which, as per my earlier apprehension, was of a mere litigant but due to generational efflux of time, has transformed into and inherited proletariat.

According to Marx: there are two types of people living in a society; first being the Bourgeoisie i.e. the ‘Ruler’ and the other being the Proletariat i.e. the ‘Ruled’. This is not just an elaboration of any maxim but a reality to reckon with. A reality whereby the litigants are the puppets in the hands of the legal hierarchy. An inculcation of fear psychosis in the nouminal hemisphere of the litigant like me is the trend which has numerous erstwhile contemporaries. A fiduciary relationship has developed due to efflux of time whereby the will of the one party is dominated by the will of the other dominant party. As per the Jurisprudence, every right has a jurally corresponding duty. If this is so, then why the litigant had been considered a proletariat whereby he has a right to get justice but does not create its respective Jural Corelative when evidenced to reality.

According to Marxist theory; the revolution can only take place through rebellion. Many erudite cognitive faculties would render the aforesaid as being highly preposterous as it would be incongruous of any goal being achieved through rebellion in a nation where the legendry figures like mahatma and Buddha once walked. In fact, on the contrary, I, certainly does not endorse the Gandhian / Buddhist View due to obvious reasons circumventing the procedural, substantive, social, physical, psychological, economical improprieties. There is another school of thought which does not believe either in the Marxism or Gandhian / Buddhism school of thought as both of them eliminated the Burgeoise. The school is of the view that the instantaneous position is different as we are not committed to get rid of the legal fraternity but our aim is to make legal fraternity bereft of the individualistic character of the legal cum judicial fraternity whereby the right shall be accorded its corresponding jural correlative; whereby justice is not delayed neither denied; whereby the legal cum judicial fraternity does not mint pecuniary benefit to its advantage while sitting on the graveyard of justice.

I took a minute off from this hanky-panky Court’s matrix & was recollected of an ancient (due to efflux of time) incident where the judge was about to dismiss my Petition on the ground that such was barred by time. I further recalled that the actual time was overridden by 7 days only and it was only after filing an application for condonation of delay and 5 hearings on that application, the Petition was finally admitted with a levy of exorbitant costs which was eventually paid by my father, a litigant then. I queried my attorney as to the limitation period for the delivery of justice? He laughed as if I made a jest; probably the answer was in the negative. Looking at my attorney, I inculcated a twin-fold indicative presumption; one being of suspicion and other being of apprehension. The former implying an unholy virtual nexus between the legal and the Judicial fraternity to Procrastinate and the latter implying non-delivery of Justice.

The judicial cum politico-legal big wheels are self proclaimed public spirited persons/organizations as they boast of creating numerous substantive, procedural and hierarchical mechanisms, be it horizontal or vertical. At the very outset, a litigant like me would come to know as to who is benefiting from such mechanism. Is it going to benefit the litigant or it manifests yet another evolution of bourgeoisie. Does a fast track court is competent enough or it is an attempt to recruit people after they have been superannuated. This questionnaire itself questions the very legislative intentional edifice of such judicial structures being uplifted to allegedly succoring the legal cum judicial fraternity instead of the litigants.

In all these gasping years, I might not have learned the nitty-gritties of the substance of practicing Law but certainly I mastered the practice of bowing down before the so-called Temple of Justice and how can I ever forget those infamous lines ”AND FOR THIS ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL EVER PRAY AS DUTY BOUND.

The treacherous path between ‘Justice delayed’ and ‘Justice delivered’ has become so tumultuous that whosoever intends to tread on this pathway will probably succumb to ‘Litigant Insomnia’-a state where I am busy in devolving a mechanism by which I can relieve myself of the plights bestowed upon me by virtue of ramifications of the proletarianism which has been inherited by me and of which my father was an unwilling Testator.

Last but not the least; a democratic patronage shall ever prevail over partisanship and there shall be no Burgeoisie as the same is mutually exclusive to the Principles of Jural Correlatives.

Lets’ Jural Correlatives prevail

1 2 3 4 5
Rate this article!     Poor

Most viewed articles in Law - lawyers & legal Profession category
Professional Misconduct by lawyers in India
Professional misconduct of lawyers in india
Judicial Process in India
Restriction on Advocates
Power of Attorney
Basic Principles & Rules of Law of Evidence
The Legal system in ancient India
Judicial Accountability in India
Development of Adalat System during the time of Warren Hastings
Natural Law
Review of National Education Policy from Student
Interpretation of Statutes
Judiciary system in India
Judges of Supreme Court and High Court can be Impeach - A Controversy
Mesne Profit
Theory of Relationship between Law and Morality
Most recent articles in Law - lawyers & legal Profession category
How to Identify Best Criminal Lawyers
Qualities to Look for Divorce Lawyers
Empowering Aspiring Advocates is necessary
How to get Real Time Experience of solving Legal Issues
Representation of Women in the Legal Profession In India
Freedom of Business, Trade and Profession
Legal Profession in India
Law Firm Document Management Software
Theory of Relationship between Law and Morality
Role of Lawyers in Social Transformation
National Judicial Appointment Commission Act
Tribunalization of Justice
Role of Judiciary In Strengthening PIL
Theory of Justice by John Rawls: its criticism by Martha C. Nussbaum and Amartya Sen
Lets Be Defiant
Litigation: An Inherited Proletarianism

Article Comments

there are no comments...

Please login or register a new free account.

Random Pick
Many people often feel offended when they are charged with a Criminal case, such as for financial crimes, physical violence, cyber crimes and so on. Some individuals think that they will receive compensation if they file a criminal case against the accused. However, that is not the case. In criminal cases the accused, if the guilt is proven, receives punishment accordingly. Even if the criminal court decides to fine the accused, the fine is payable to the court, not the victim. The victim will still have to file a separate case for claiming compensation from the accused. As people often get confused at this stage, I decided to write this article to shed some light on the matter.

» Total Articles
» Total Authors
» Total Views
» Total categories

Law Forum

Legal Articles

Lawyers in India- Click on a link below for legal Services

lawyers in Chennai
lawyers in Bangalore
lawyers in Hyderabad
lawyers in Cochin
lawyers in Pondicherry
lawyers in Guwahati
lawyers in Nashik

lawyers in Jaipur
lawyers in New Delhi
lawyers in Dimapur
lawyers in Agra
Noida lawyers
lawyers in Siliguri

For Mutual consent Divorce in Delhi

Ph no: 9650499965
For online Copyright Registration

Ph no: 9891244487
Law Articles

lawyers in Delhi
lawyers in Chandigarh
lawyers in Allahabad
lawyers in Lucknow
lawyers in Jodhpur
Faridabad lawyers

lawyers in Mumbai
lawyers in Pune
lawyers in Nagpur
lawyers in Ahmedabad
lawyers in Surat
Ghaziabad lawyers

lawyers in Kolkata
lawyers in Janjgir
lawyers in Rajkot
lawyers in Indore
lawyers in Ludhiana
Gurgaon lawyers


India's Most Trusted Online law library
Legal Services India is Copyrighted under the Registrar of Copyright Act ( Govt of India) 2000-2017
 ISBN No: 978-81-928510-1-3