Home       Top Rated       Submit Article     Advanced Search     FAQ       Contact Us       Lawyers in India       Law Forum     RSS Feeds     

Register your Copyright Online

We offer copyright registration right from your desktop click here for details.

Latest Articles | Articles 2014 | Articles 2013 | Articles 2012 | Articles 2011 | Articles 2010 | Articles 2009 | Articles 2008 | Articles 2007 | Articles 2006 | Articles 2000-05

Search On:Laws in IndiaLawyers Search

Mutual Consent Divorce in Delhi
We provide fast, cost effective and Hassle free solution.
Contact us at Ph no: 9650499965 (Divorce Law Firm Delhi)
File Caveat in Supreme Court
Contact Ph no: +9650499965

Main Categories
 Accident Law
 Animal Laws
 Aviation Law
 Bangladesh Law
 Banking and Finance laws
 Case Laws
 Civil Laws
 Company Law
 Constitutional Law
 Consumer laws
 Contracts laws
 Criminal law
 Drug laws
 Dubai laws
 Educational laws
 Employment / Labour laws
 Environmental Law
 family law
 Gay laws and Third Gender
 Human Rights laws
 Immigration laws
 Insurance / Accident Claim
 Intellectual Property
 International Law
 Juvenile Laws
 Law - lawyers & legal Profession
 Legal Aid and Lok Adalat
 Legal outsourcing
 Media laws
 Medico legal
 Real estate laws
 Right To Information
 Tax Laws
 Torts Law
 Woman Issues
 Workplace Equality & Non-Discrimination
 Yet Another Category

More Options
 Most read articles
 Most rated articles

Subscribe now and receive free articles and updates instantly.


Published : November 26, 2015 | Author : Sugandha.ch
Category : family law | Total Views : 5382 | Rating :



The 71st Law Commission Report titles “Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage as a ground for Divorce”, para 6.5 read as follows:

“The essence of marriage is a sharing of common life, a sharing of all the happiness that life had to offer and all the misery that has to be faces in life. Living together is a symbol of such sharing. Living apart is a symbol indicating the negation of such sharing.”

In India, the conjugal rights, i.e. the right of the husband or the wife to the society of the other spouse is not merely creature of the statute. Such a right is inherent in the very institution of marriage itself.

The importance of the concept of conjugal rights was very clearly portrayed in the above Law Commission Report. It serves as a social purpose as an aid to the prevention of breakdown of marriage.

a. Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: Sec 9 of the Act deals with restitution of conjugal rights. By 1976 Amendment, ‘Explanation’ was added and Sec 9(2) was deleted.

b. Code of Civil Procedure: Order 21 of Rule 32 and Rule 33 deal with decree for specific performance of conjugal rights or for an injunction. There can be only financial sanction behind every restitution decree.

The remedy had its origin in ecclesiastical law of England. It was applied for the first time in India in 1866 by the Privy Council in Moonshee Bazloor v. Shamsoonaissa Begum.

According to Oxford English Dictionary, ‘conjugal’ is defined as ‘of pertaining to marriage or to husband and wife in their relations to each other.’

Dictionary of English Law defines ‘conjugal rights’ as ‘the right which husband and wife have to each other’s society and martial intercourse. Its suit is a marital suit cognizable in the Divorce Court.’

T. Sareetha v. Venkata Subbaiah (1983)

The case was decided by the Andhra Pradesh High Court which observed that Section 9 of the said Act was a savage and barbarous remedy violating the right to privacy and human dignity and equality guaranteed by Article 14 & 21 of the Constitution.

Hence, Sec 9 was declared to be constitutionally void for abridging rights guaranteed under Part III of the Constitution. According to the learned Judge, a decree for restitution of conjugal rights deprived of her choice as and when and by whom the various parts of her body should be allowed to be sensed. The court relied on the Scarman Commission’s Report in England that recommended its abolition.

Harvinder Kaur v. Harmander Singh 1983

It was held that sec 9 was not violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution, since the leading idea behind Sec 9 was to preserve the marriage. The remedy of restitution was aimed at cohabitation and consortium and not merely at sexual intercourse.

Saroj Rani v. Sudarshan Kumar

The above contradictions about the constitutional validity of Sec 9 were set at rest by the Apex Court in this case. The case primarily raised 3 issues:
1. Determination of husband entitlement to divorce when petition of restitution of conjugal rights was filed by wife. – since a spouse is not barred by Sec 23(a) from claiming relief under Sec 13(1A), the decree was passed.
2. Constitutionality of remedy of restitution of conjugal rights provided under Sec 9 of the Act. – it was held that Sec 9 is not violative of Article 14 and 21 of Constitution.
3. Determination of maintenance – Separate maintenance was ordered for the wife and the daughter.

Vuyyuru Pothuraju v. Radha 1965

In the instant case, there was a pre- nuptial agreement between the husband and wife that after marriage, the husband would live with wife at her foster- father’s house. Subsequently he was ill-treated there and returned to his village and requested his wife to come over to him. On her refusal, he initiated a suit of restitution of conjugal rights. The Court held that pre- nuptial agreement was unenforceable and subsequently allowed the petition.

As a general principle, any agreement, be it under Hindu law or Muslim law, between husband wife to live separately, is considered to be void for being contrary to public policy.

Mirchumal v. Devi Bai

This case primarily deals with the effect of husband and wife serving in different places. In this case, the husband was in service near Ajmer and the wife worked in Adipur. On the wife’s refusal to quit her job, the husband moved the petition for restitution of conjugal rights.

The court held that if there is no refusal on the part of the wife to allow access to her husband and no reluctance on her part in going to her husband, then the mere refusal on her part to resign her job is sufficient ground for the husband to seek relief for restitution of conjugal rights.

Hence the petition was dismissed.

Burden of Proof
Restitution of conjugal rights can be claimed when the other party to the marriage has withdrawn from conjugal society without and reasonable care.

It is for the party who has withdrawn from conjugal society to show valid excuse. This excuse should be reasonable and convincing.

The facts that the aged parents of the husband are residing with him or that the wife has to look after her deceased father’s lands are not reasonable excuses. However a wife would be justified in leaving her husband is she is forced to non-vegetarian food or drinking alcohol against her wishes.



1 2 3 4 5
Rate this article!     Poor

Most viewed articles in family law category
Salient features of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
Succession to the property of a Hindu Male
Sources of Hindu Law
Child Custody & Guardianship
Karta of a Family / Hindu Law
Domestic Violence Against Women Causes And Cure
Married womans right over spousal property
Mediation In Divorce
Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage
The Road to Becoming Parents
Restitution of Conjugal Right
Right to marry
Cruelty - as a ground for Divorce
Status of Children born in Live in Relationships
Live-in- Relationship and Indian Judiciary
Most recent articles in family law category
Steps to Get CENOMAR from India in the US for Marriage
How to Apply for Non -Availability of Birth Certificate (NABC)
Talaq-Divorce in Islam
DNA Test: Adultery as a Ground for Divorce.
Right of Hindu Wife To Maintenance Under Hindu Adoption And Maintenance Act
Uniform Civil Code in Goa
Dowry laws: Loopholes and Possibilities of misuse
Surrogonomics: A Minting Methodology
Hindu Marriage A Journey From Sanskar to Philosophy
Understanding 498a cruelty
Restitution of Conjugal Rights
Right To Maintenance Section 125 crpc
Cruelty - as a ground for Divorce
Role of a Mediator in the Process of Mediation
Abuse of Domestic Violence Act

Article Comments

there are no comments...

Please login or register a new free account.

Random Pick
Getting married abroad is not as easy as it sounds. It requires attestation and entry form to get valid proof of legal entry to the US or any other country. Unmarried certificate is the essential proof that is required for submission at the USCIS before solemnizing marriage with the US spouse & to change the status.

» Total Articles
» Total Authors
» Total Views
» Total categories

Law Forum

Legal Articles

Lawyers in India- Click on a link below for legal Services

lawyers in Chennai
lawyers in Bangalore
lawyers in Hyderabad
lawyers in Cochin
lawyers in Pondicherry
lawyers in Guwahati
lawyers in Nashik

lawyers in Jaipur
lawyers in New Delhi
lawyers in Dimapur
lawyers in Agra
Noida lawyers
lawyers in Siliguri

For Mutual consent Divorce in Delhi

Ph no: 9650499965
For online Copyright Registration

Ph no: 9891244487
Law Articles

lawyers in Delhi
lawyers in Chandigarh
lawyers in Allahabad
lawyers in Lucknow
lawyers in Jodhpur
Faridabad lawyers

lawyers in Mumbai
lawyers in Pune
lawyers in Nagpur
lawyers in Ahmedabad
lawyers in Surat
Ghaziabad lawyers

lawyers in Kolkata
lawyers in Janjgir
lawyers in Rajkot
lawyers in Indore
lawyers in Ludhiana
Gurgaon lawyers


India's Most Trusted Online law library
Legal Services India is Copyrighted under the Registrar of Copyright Act ( Govt of India) 2000-2017
 ISBN No: 978-81-928510-1-3