Right To Free Legal Aid
Legal Aid which means giving free legal services to the poor and needy who are unable to afford the services of an advocate for the conduct of a case or a legal proceeding in any court, tribunal or before an Judicial authority.
The preamble of the Indian constitution basically aims to secure to the people of India justice – socio economic and political. His Lordship Justice P.N. Bhagwati aptly stated that legal aid means providing an arrangement in the society which makes the machinery of administration of Justice easily accessible and in reach of those who have to resort to it for enforcement of rights given to them by law. Article 38(1) avows that the State shall promote the welfare of the people by securing and protecting the social order including justice. Article 21 clearly says that every person has an equal right to life and liberty except according to the procedure established by the law.
The State shall secure that the operation of the legal system promotes justice, on a basis of equal opportunity, and shall, in particular, provide free legal aid, by suitable legislation or schemes or in any other way, to ensure that opportunities for securing justice are not denied to any citizen by reason of economic or other disabilities.
In the case of Hussainara khatoon vs. State of Bihar, it was held that if any accused is not able to afford legal services then he has a right to free legal aid at the cost of the state.
It is the duty of the State to see that the legal system promotes justice on the basis of equal opportunity for all its citizens. It must therefore arrange to provide free legal aid to those who cannot access justice due to economic and other disabilities.
—(Art.39 A of the Constitution of India)
If the accused does not have sufficient means to engage a lawyer, the court must provide one for the defense of the accused at the expense of the state.
—(Sec. 304 of Code of Criminal Procedure,1973)
The Constitutional duty to provide legal aid arises from the time the accused is produced before the Magistrate for the first time and continues whenever he is produced for remand.
—(Khatri II Vs. State of Bihar, (1981) 1SCC; 1981 SCC (Cri) 228; 1981 Cri. LJ 470)
A person entitled to appeal against his/her sentence has the right to ask for a counsel, to prepare and argue the appeal.
—(Madav Hayavadanrao Hoskot Vs. State of Maharastra (1978)3 SCC 544) (Art. 142 of the Constitution r/w Articles 21 and 39A of Indian Constitution )
Services offered by the Legal Services Authority:
1.Payment of court and other process fee;
2. Charges for preparing, drafting and filing of any legal proceedings;
3.Charges of a legal practitioner or legal advisor;
4. Costs of obtaining decrees, judgments, orders or any other documents in a legal proceeding;
5.Costs of paper work, including printing, translation etc.
Duties of the Police and the Courts:
The police must inform the nearest Legal Aid Committee about the arrest of a person immediately after such arrest.
—(Sheela Barse V. State of Maharashtra)
The Magistrates and sessions judges must inform every accused who appears before them and who is not represented by a lawyer on account of his poverty or indigence that he is entitled to free legal services at the cost of the State.
Failure to provide legal aid to an indigent accused, unless it was refused, would vitiate the trial. It might even result in setting aside a conviction and sentence. —(Suk Das Vs. Union Territory of Arunachal Pradesh (1986) 2 SCC 401; 1986 SCC (Cri) 166)
When can Legal services be rejected?
If the applicant
- has adequate means to access justice;
- does not fulfill the eligibility criteria;
- has no merits in his application requiring legal action.
Cases for which legal aid is not available:
1. Cases in respect of defamation, malicious prosecution, contempt of court, perjury etc.
2. Proceedings relating to election;
3.Cases where the fine imposed is not more than Rs.50/-;
4.Economic offences and offences against social laws;
5.Cases where the person seeking legal aid is not directly concerned with the proceedings and whose interests will not be affected.
When can the legal services be withdrawn?
The legal services committee can with draw the services if,
1. the aid is obtained through misrepresentation or fraud;
2. any material change occurs in the circumstances of the aided person;
3. there is misconduct, misbehavior or negligence on the part of the aided person;
4. the aided person does not cooperate with the allotted advocate;
5. the aided persons appoints another legal practitioner;
6. the aided person dies, except in civil cases;
7. the proceedings amount to misusing the process of law or of legal service.
Who is entitled to free legal aid?
Any person, who is:
1. a member of the scheduled castes or tribes;
2. any person belonging to the Schedule caste/tribe, persons suffering from natural calamity, industrial worker, children, insane person, handicap, persons in custody and those having annual income less than Rs 1 lakh were entitled to avail free legal aid
3. a victim of trafficking in human beings or beggar;
4.disabled, including mentally disabled;
5. a woman or child;
6. a victim of mass disaster, ethnic violence, caste atrocity, flood, drought, earth quake, industrial
disaster and other cases of undeserved want;
7. an industrial workman;
8. in custody, including protective custody;
9. facing a charge which might result in imprisonment; —(Khatri II Vs. State of Bihar, (1981) 1SCC); and
10.unable to engage a lawyer and secure legal services on account of reasons such as pover ty, indigence, and incommunicado situation;
11. in cases of great public importance;
12. special cases considered
deserving of legal services.
The Concept of Lok Adalat:
Lok Adalat is judicial body set up for the purpose of facilitating peaceful resolution of disputes between the litigating parties. It has the powers of an ordinary civil court, like summoning, examining evidence etc. Its orders are like any court orders, yet the parties cannot appeal against such orders. Lok Adalat can resolve all matters, except criminal cases that which are non-compoundable. Either of the parties to litigation can make an application to the court for transferring the case to a lok adalat. Where no compromise or settlement is made by the lok adalat, such a case is transferred to the court and that court deals with the litigation from the stage the lok adalat had reached.
Is FDI really going to be beneficial for India?
Affirmative Position : Yes, FDI Will
be Beneficial for India, I am for it because....
Negative Position :
No, FDI Will NOT be Beneficial for India I am against FDI because...
Post your argument
Dr.Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University
Was established by an Act of Govt.of Uttar Pradesh in 2005, U.P.Act No.28
of 2005 and came into being on 4th of January 2006 to meet up the new
challenges in legal field and to strengthen the vision that was given by
the establishment of first National Law School of the country....
here to see a list of Top law colleges in the world
| Posted by binod kumar goswami on October 28, 2012
Respected Sir/ Madam, Jai Hind. Presently I am serving in BSF(MHA). I select as constable fit in 1997 but deptt. dono\'t issue order to joining. Then I lodge petition in H\'nble High Court. Then deppt. issue order to join me in 2000 (Order by Court). But deppt. pay facility from 2000 which should be pay from 1997 because in this case totally fault of deptt. If deptt. call me in timely I able to join. I Want to getting facility (All) since 1997, it\'s possible? If yes, tell me How?. Kindly hlp me. Also send me estimate of this case if you deal, by return mail. With regards, B K Goswami, 75 Bn BSF 8972801612
The article attempts to analyze the legally recognized methods of calculating/computing damages under EPC Contracts...
| » Total Articles
| » Total Authors
| » Total Views
| » Total categories