Home       Top Rated       Submit Article     Advanced Search     FAQ       Contact Us       Lawyers in India       Law Forum     RSS Feeds     

Register your Copyright Online

We offer copyright registration right from your desktop click here for details.

Latest Articles | Articles 2014 | Articles 2013 | Articles 2012 | Articles 2011 | Articles 2010 | Articles 2009 | Articles 2008 | Articles 2007 | Articles 2006 | Articles 2000-05

Search On:Laws in IndiaLawyers Search

Mutual Consent Divorce in Delhi
We provide fast, cost effective and Hassle free solution.
Contact us at Ph no: 9650499965 (Divorce Law Firm Delhi)
File Caveat in Supreme Court
Contact Ph no: +9650499965

Main Categories
 Accident Law
 Animal Laws
 Arbitration
 Aviation Law
 Bangladesh Law
 Banking and Finance laws
 Case Laws
 Civil Laws
 Company Law
 Constitutional Law
 Consumer laws
 Contracts laws
 Criminal law
 Drug laws
 Dubai laws
 Educational laws
 Employment / Labour laws
 Environmental Law
 family law
 Gay laws and Third Gender
 Human Rights laws
 Immigration laws
 Insurance / Accident Claim
 Intellectual Property
 International Law
 Juvenile Laws
 Law - lawyers & legal Profession
 Legal Aid and Lok Adalat
 Legal outsourcing
 Media laws
 Medico legal
 Miscellaneous
 Real estate laws
 Right To Information
 Tax Laws
 Torts Law
 Woman Issues
 Workplace Equality & Non-Discrimination
 Yet Another Category

More Options
 Most read articles
 Most rated articles

Subscription
Subscribe now and receive free articles and updates instantly.

Name
Email




Published : June 14, 2017 | Author : RUTH DIYA C
Category : Miscellaneous | Total Views : 3615 | Rating :

  
RUTH DIYA C
LAW STUDENT
 

Right to Privacy Violated- Aadhaar Card

A few days ago the Supreme Court delivered its first verdict in a series of legal challenges against the Aadhaar project. In the present matter, the court was examining whether a provision of the Finance Act, 2017 that makes Aadhaar mandatory for filing of income tax returns and applying for Permanent Account Number (PAN) cards was constitutionally valid. The court has upheld the validity of this provision, subject to a few qualifications.

The Supreme Court delivered its judgment in the constitutional challenge to Section 139AA of the Income Tax Act, which was brought in by way of an amendment in April this year, this provision made it mandatory for all taxpayers to quote their Aadhaar number when applying for a Permanent Account Number (PAN) and for filing returns of income. Failure to link one’s PAN with Aadhaar would automatically invalidate the former.

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) issued a clarification regarding the quoting of Aadhaar for filing IT Returns, on the basis of Supreme Court Judgment in the Binoy Viswam Case.

In a press release, the CBDT explained the effect of Supreme Court Judgment as follows:

(i)From July 1, 2017 onwards, every person eligible to obtain Aadhaar must quote their Aadhaar number or their Aadhaar Enrolment ID number for filing of Income Tax Returns as well as for applications for PAN;

(ii) Everyone who has been allotted permanent account number as on the 1st day of July, 2017, and who has Aadhaar number or is eligible to obtain Aadhaar number, shall intimate his Aadhaar number to income tax authorities for the purpose of linking PAN with Aadhaar;

(iii) However, for non-compliance of the above point No.(ii), only a partial relief by the Court has been given to those who do not have Aadhaar and who do not wish to obtain Aadhaar for the time being, that their PAN will not be cancelled so that other consequences under the Income Tax Act for failing to quote PAN may not arise

In Binoy Viswam Case, the division bench held that Section 139AA of the Act is not discriminatory nor does it offend equality clause enshrined in Article 14 of the Constitution. (Section 139AA is also not violative of Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution in so far as it mandates giving of Aadhaar enrolment number for applying PAN cards in the income tax returns or notified Aadhaar enrolment number to the designated authorities.

Even as Aadhaar is being rolled out, with about 111 crore of the 125 crore population already on the database, there are several important constitutional and legal questions around the unique identity project. While this judgement addresses one of these issues, other questions remain unresolved. A description of the key legal questions is provided below.

It has been argued that the collection of identity data without adequate safeguards interferes with the fundamental right to privacy protected under Article 21 of the Constitution. Article 21 guarantees right to life and personal liberty. In August 2015, a three judge bench of the Supreme Court passed an order stating that a larger bench must be formed to decide the questions of: (i) whether right to privacy is a fundamental right, and (ii) whether Aadhaar violates this right. However, the court has not set up a larger bench to hear these petitions till June 2017.

Another question before the court is whether Aadhaar can be made mandatory for those government benefits and services that citizens are entitled to under law. In 2015, the Supreme Court passed some interim orders stating that:
(i) Aadhaar cannot be made mandatory for providing citizens with benefits and entitlements, and
(ii) it can only be used for seven schemes including PDS distribution of food-grains and kerosene, LPG distribution scheme, MGNREGA wage payments, and Prime Minister’s Jan Dhan Yojana.

Subsequently, Parliament enacted the Aadhaar Act, 2016, and the government has been issuing notifications under it to make Aadhaar mandatory for various schemes. In light of this, more petitions have been filed challenging these notifications. Judgements on these petitions are awaited as well.

The Supreme Court has held that the new provision of the Income Tax Act that makes Aadhaar mandatory for income tax assesses is not in violation of the fundamental right to equality, or the fundamental right to practice one’s profession or trade. The petitioner had contended that Aadhaar could not address the problem of tax fraud through duplicate PANs because there was evidence to show that people had multiple Aadhaar numbers as well but it has been rejected with a statement that Aadhaar is perceived as the best method of eliminating duplicate PANs, and therefore there is reasonable rationale behind linking the PAN database with Aadhaar.

As a result, the court decided not to examine questions related to human dignity and privacy, on the ground that issues affecting Article 21 will be examined by a larger bench to be set up by the court. However, it granted relief to people, who have not enrolled for Aadhaar, by stating that their PAN cards cannot be invalidated till the time when the matter is finally decided by such a bench.

In the context of the Aadhaar-PAN petitions, the pending reference on the issue of privacy is important as it severely curtails the ground for challenge available to the petitioners. Forced to give up arguments on privacy, the submissions in this case were largely limited to the issue of bodily integrity and the right to equality. Arguments were also made on the grounds that the introduction of Section 139AA of the Income Tax Act violates Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India.

However, in the present judgement, the Court has construed privacy broadly. The Court excluded all arguments made on bodily integrity, dignity and the right to informational self-determination, on the basis that these concepts linked to privacy.

 




1 2 3 4 5
Rate this article!     Poor
Excellent    

Most viewed articles in Miscellaneous category
Indian Partnership Act,1932
Law on Parking Spaces
Shops & Establishment Act of Punjab & Haryana
Role Of Election Commission
Restrictive & Extensive Definitions
Judicial Review in India And USA
Doctrine of Permissible Limits Under Delegated Legislation
Tribal Laws & Customs in India
Conversion and Reservation: Christian Dalits and the obstacles to social mobility
Enabling Statute: Rules of Interpretation
Is Poverty A Cause of Corruption
Factory in The Factories act,1948
Whistleblowers and their Protection in India
Indian Legal Metrology System
Administrative law
Land Reforms & Duty Of State
Most recent articles in Miscellaneous category
Legalization of Prostitution in India: Need of the hour
Taj Mahal Palace: Now A Registered Trademark
Iritech Inc. v. Controller of Patents
Concept of Crime
Copyright License For Playing Music
Perjury Under Indian Law
Feminism and Equality: Make A Balance
Evolution of Right to privacy as Fundamental right
Law and Morality
Compulsory Licensing on Foreign Direct Investment
Loopholes in POCSO
Article 131 of the Indian Constitution
Human Elements in the Administration of Justice
legalizing abortion in India
Draconian law of section 377 IPC
Justice As Fairness

Article Comments

there are no comments...


Welcome!
Please login or register a new free account.

Random Pick
India is a democratic country. The head of the country is elected by the people of the country. The Government of the country possesses the authority to work...

Statistics
» Total Articles
1577
» Total Authors
4708
» Total Views
21242079
» Total categories
42

Law Forum


Legal Articles

Lawyers in India- Click on a link below for legal Services

lawyers in Chennai
lawyers in Bangalore
lawyers in Hyderabad
lawyers in Cochin
lawyers in Pondicherry
lawyers in Guwahati
lawyers in Nashik

lawyers in Jaipur
lawyers in New Delhi
lawyers in Dimapur
lawyers in Agra
Noida lawyers
lawyers in Siliguri

For Mutual consent Divorce in Delhi

Ph no: 9650499965
For online Copyright Registration

Ph no: 9891244487
Law Articles

lawyers in Delhi
lawyers in Chandigarh
lawyers in Allahabad
lawyers in Lucknow
lawyers in Jodhpur
Faridabad lawyers

lawyers in Mumbai
lawyers in Pune
lawyers in Nagpur
lawyers in Ahmedabad
lawyers in Surat
Ghaziabad lawyers

lawyers in Kolkata
lawyers in Janjgir
lawyers in Rajkot
lawyers in Indore
lawyers in Ludhiana
Gurgaon lawyers

TOP

India's Most Trusted Online law library
Legal Services India is Copyrighted under the Registrar of Copyright Act ( Govt of India) 2000-2017
 ISBN No: 978-81-928510-1-3