Home       Top Rated       Submit Article     Advanced Search     FAQ       Contact Us       Lawyers in India       Law Forum     RSS Feeds     

Register your Copyright Online

We offer copyright registration right from your desktop click here for details.

Latest Articles | Articles 2014 | Articles 2013 | Articles 2012 | Articles 2011 | Articles 2010 | Articles 2009 | Articles 2008 | Articles 2007 | Articles 2006 | Articles 2000-05

Search On:Laws in IndiaLawyers Search

Mutual Consent Divorce in Delhi
We provide fast, cost effective and Hassle free solution.
Contact us at Ph no: 9650499965 (Divorce Law Firm Delhi)
File Caveat in Supreme Court
Contact Ph no: +9650499965

Main Categories
 Accident Law
 Animal Laws
 Aviation Law
 Bangladesh Law
 Banking and Finance laws
 Case Laws
 Civil Laws
 Company Law
 Constitutional Law
 Consumer laws
 Contracts laws
 Criminal law
 Drug laws
 Dubai laws
 Educational laws
 Employment / Labour laws
 Environmental Law
 family law
 Gay laws and Third Gender
 Human Rights laws
 Immigration laws
 Insurance / Accident Claim
 Intellectual Property
 International Law
 Juvenile Laws
 Law - lawyers & legal Profession
 Legal Aid and Lok Adalat
 Legal outsourcing
 Media laws
 Medico legal
 Real estate laws
 Right To Information
 Tax Laws
 Torts Law
 Woman Issues
 Workplace Equality & Non-Discrimination
 Yet Another Category

More Options
 Most read articles
 Most rated articles

Subscribe now and receive free articles and updates instantly.


Published : November 08, 2011 | Author : christopher.vijayrao
Category : Contracts laws | Total Views : 17030 | Rating :

Christopher Vijay Rao,22 Law Student at Christ University, Bangalore.

A Critique on Section 65 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 with special reference to Discharge of a Contract by Frustration

The following critique is based on the implications of Section 65 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 and its inadequacies with respect to eradicating ‘unjust enrichment’ in frustrated contracts.
This paper seeks to analyze the effects of frustration with special reference to the restitution of advantages or benefits received by a party, not entitled to such advantage or benefit. On account of an agreement being deemed void, subsequent to certain obligations being fulfilled by either party, there would continue to subsist, rights to make good the loss caused. Section 65 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, states,
“When an agreement is discovered to be void, or when a contract becomes void, any person who has received any advantage under such agreement or contract is bound to restore, it, or to make compensation for it, to the person from whom he received it.”

The above section is based on the principle elucidated in the English case, Fibrosa Spolka v. Fairbairn Lawson. This case may be explained as follows:
The respondent contracted with the appellant, a Polish company, to manufacture certain machinery and deliver it to Gdynia. Part of the price was to be paid in advance, and the appellant accordingly paid £1000. The contract was frustrated by the occupation of Gdynia by hostile German forces in September 1939. The appellant thereupon requested the return of the £1000. This amount was not returned only because considerable work had already been put into construction of the machinery.

The amount recovered in the above case is to be construed, not as an action on the contract but an action in restitution to recover the money paid on a consideration which had failed. Further, the term consideration as used in the above sentence is to be construed, not in the sense of consideration as may be necessary to the formation of the contract, but rather in the sense of the performance of an obligation already incurred. Therefore the essence of Section 65 may be captured in that a party who has paid money but has received no part of the bargained –for performance, is entitled to recover it, for the consideration has completely failed.

Instances exemplifying the above mentioned concept are as follows:
(a) A pays B 1,000 rupees, in consideration of B’s promising to marry C, A’s daughter. C is dead at the time of the promise. The agreement is void, but B must repay A the 1,000 rupees.

(b) A contracts with B to deliver to him 250 bags of rice before the first of May. A delivers 130 bags only before that day, and none after. B retains the 130 bags after the first of May. He is bound to pay A for them.

(c) A contracts to sing for B at a concert for 1,000 rupees, which are paid in advance. A is too ill to sing. A is not bound to make compensation to B for the loss of the profits which B would have made if A had been able to sing, but must refund to B the 1,000 rupees paid in advance.

Inadequacies of Section 65
Section 65 and the subsequent explanation are considered settled law in India. However, there exist certain fallacies in such law in comparison with English law principles. On a very preliminary evaluation of Section 65 as against established English law Principles, a subtle difference may be observed with regard to the apportionment of losses on frustration in that such a concept is not provided for by the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

The concept of apportionment of losses considers any act performed by a party which may not be realized in the form of money but has been done in furtherance of one’s obligations under the contract, also to be compensated for.

If one of the above examples was used to elucidate this concept it would read as follows:
‘A’ contracts to sing for ‘B’ at a concert for 1,000 rupees, which are paid in advance. ‘A’ is too ill to sing. ‘A’ is not bound to make compensation to ‘B’ for the loss of the profits which ‘B’ would have made if ‘A’ had been able to sing, but must refund to ‘B’ the 1,000 rupees paid in advance. However, due consideration must be given to the efforts made by ‘A’, in preparation for the concert while repaying the advance amount of 1000rupees.

Therefore, the compensation of only such material that may be realized in terms of money as part of an obligation under a frustrated contract without giving due consideration to any act performed by the other party in furtherance of the same contract may seem to be rather unfair to the latter.

However, exposing the term ‘consideration’ to such a broad interpretation may also lead to certain complications. These complications entail converting acts or efforts made by parties into monetary value.

The concept of apportionment of losses must be reasonably brought under the purview of Section 65 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 such that ‘unjust enrichment’ is completely mitigated.
# [1943] A. C. 32, as cited in Anson’s Law Of Contracts, 28th Edition, 557
# Indian Contract Act, 1872, S. 65.
# Anson’s Law Of Contracts, 28th Edition, 557
# B.P. Exploration Co. Ltd. v. Hunt [1979] 1 W.L.R. 783

Authors contact info - articles The  author can be reached at: christopher.vijayrao@legalserviceindia.com

1 2 3 4 5
Rate this article!     Poor

Most viewed articles in Contracts laws category
Void & Voidable Agreements
Privity of contract & third party beneficiary in a contract
Specific performance of Contracts
Regulation of Contract Labour
Wagering Agreements
Fundamental Breach of Contract
Standard form of Contract
Nemo Dat Quod Non Habet
Time is the essance of the Contract
Perspectives on Contract Labour Act
Indemnity in a contract
Contract Ratification
Pre-incorporation contracts
Contract- II: Bailment
Importance of Consideration in Contract
Position Finder of Goods under Indian Contract Act
Most recent articles in Contracts laws category
Emails and contracts - communication and validity
Government Contracts
Offer in a Contract
Standard Form of Contracts: Effect Of Unequal Bargaining Power
John Lockes Social Contract Theory
Rescission of contract
Nemo Dat Quod Non Habet
Comparative Analysis of a Treaty Governed By Vienna Convention And A Contract Regulated by Indian Contract Act
Fundamental Principles of Contract Drafting
Importance of Consideration in Contract
Anti Competitive Agreements and whether Consumers can be a Party to such Agreements?
Position Finder of Goods under Indian Contract Act
Deemed Sale
A Legal Perspective on Public Private Partnerships in India
Study of Contractual Documents Involved In Yamuna Expressway Project
Perspectives on Contract Labour Act

Article Comments

Posted by inderpalsingh on August 25, 2013
Please indicate case laws relating to Breach of Contract

Please login or register a new free account.

Random Pick
Terrorism is a voluntary action to terrorize innocent people. It is a according to dictionary meaning a use of violence and threat of violence, especially for political purpose.

» Total Articles
» Total Authors
» Total Views
» Total categories

Law Forum

Legal Articles

Lawyers in India- Click on a link below for legal Services

lawyers in Chennai
lawyers in Bangalore
lawyers in Hyderabad
lawyers in Cochin
lawyers in Pondicherry
lawyers in Guwahati
lawyers in Nashik

lawyers in Jaipur
lawyers in New Delhi
lawyers in Dimapur
lawyers in Agra
Noida lawyers
lawyers in Siliguri

For Mutual consent Divorce in Delhi

Ph no: 9650499965
For online Copyright Registration

Ph no: 9891244487
Law Articles

lawyers in Delhi
lawyers in Chandigarh
lawyers in Allahabad
lawyers in Lucknow
lawyers in Jodhpur
Faridabad lawyers

lawyers in Mumbai
lawyers in Pune
lawyers in Nagpur
lawyers in Ahmedabad
lawyers in Surat
Ghaziabad lawyers

lawyers in Kolkata
lawyers in Janjgir
lawyers in Rajkot
lawyers in Indore
lawyers in Ludhiana
Gurgaon lawyers


India's Most Trusted Online law library
Legal Services India is Copyrighted under the Registrar of Copyright Act ( Govt of India) 2000-2017
 ISBN No: 978-81-928510-1-3