Home       Top Rated       Submit Article     Advanced Search     FAQ       Contact Us       Lawyers in India       Law Forum     RSS Feeds     

Register your Copyright Online

We offer copyright registration right from your desktop click here for details.

Latest Articles | Articles 2014 | Articles 2013 | Articles 2012 | Articles 2011 | Articles 2010 | Articles 2009 | Articles 2008 | Articles 2007 | Articles 2006 | Articles 2000-05

Search On:Laws in IndiaLawyers Search

Mutual Consent Divorce in Delhi
We provide fast, cost effective and Hassle free solution.
Contact us at Ph no: 9650499965 (Divorce Law Firm Delhi)

E-mail login                       Password

Free Email Sign Up

Main Categories
 Accident Law
 Aviation Law
 Banking and Finance laws
 Case Laws
 Civil Laws
 Company Law
 Constitutional Law
 Consumer laws
 Contracts laws
 Criminal law
 Drug laws
 Dubai laws
 Educational laws
 Employment / Labour laws
 Environmental Law
 family law
 Gay laws and Third Gender
 Human Rights laws
 Immigration laws
 Insurance / Accident Claim
 Intellectual Property
 International Law
 Juvenile Laws
 Law - lawyers & legal Profession
 Legal Aid and Lok Adalat
 Legal outsourcing
 Media laws
 Medico legal
 Real estate laws
 Right To Information
 Tax Laws
 Torts Law
 Woman Issues
 Workplace Equality & Non-Discrimination
 Yet Another Category

More Options
 Most read articles
 Most rated articles

Subscribe now and receive free articles and updates instantly.


Copyright Registration

To Copyright Your Books, Videos, Songs, Scripts etc
Call us at: 9891244487 / or email at: admin@legalserviceindia.com
Top Law Colleges

Law Updates:

# Income-Tax
# Family law
# Company Law
# Constitutional Law
# Partnership firms
# Immigration Law
# Cyber Law
# Lok Adalat, legal Aid & PIL
# Forms
# Trademarks
# Woman issues
# Medico Legal
# Consumer laws
# Criminal laws
# Supreme Court Judgments

Published : January 27, 2013 | Author : grover@legalserviceindia.com
Category : Intellectual Property | Total Views : 4602 | Rating :

Dhruv Grover . 4th Year student of Symbiosis Law School , Pune.

Reasons For The Adoption Of The Universal Copyright Convention

The developments in Latin America explain the need perceived in the mid 1940’s for another multilateral treaty on author’s rights in addition to the Berne Convention - a need perceived although the Berne Convention had just proved its dynamics by its then latest revision of 1948. Indeed , international relations in the field of copyright in the first half of the twentieth century were not truly universal but split between major parts of the world.

While the Berne Convention was centred around Europe , other multilateral treaties had developed in parallel in the America’s to govern relations among most North and South American countries. At the same time , most American countries were not members of the Berne Convention because they were not ready to comply with its comparatively high level of minimum standards.

The USA had the additional obstacle of its national copyright system , which partly remained at odds with the authors’ rights system embodied in Berne . In particular , the US law required the fulfilment of formalities for the enjoyment of copyright protection . Furthermore , the duration was twenty-eight years . Moreover , the moral rights were fundamentally alien to its system of protection.

This development towards a split into two separate international protection systems contradicted the fundamental aim of the Berne Convention to achieve international protection universally . The idea of a convention that should overcome this split was born .

Way Towards The Adoption Of The Universal Copyright Convention
In order to advance work on a more universal approach by reconciling the different multilateral conventions , the Rome Revision Conferencce 1928 of the Berne Convention adopted a view to take measures towards the preparation of a general agreement on the basis of the similar rules of the Berne and the Buenos Aires / Havana Conventions with the aim of the worldwide unification of the laws.

In addition , the General Assembly of the League of Nations in 1935 mandated two International Institutes with the relevant work . Many options were explored at that time , such as one universal convention replacing the existing ones , or a roof convention under which the existing Conventions of Berne and Buenos Aires / Havana would be maintained but linked . The Second World War interrupted this and other preparatory work . After the Second World War, these plans were no longer pursued in the framework of the Berne Convention but by the newly established UNESCO .

When UNESCO started work on these plans in initial meetings of it’s copyright expert committee in 1947 and in 1949 in Paris , it became clear to the experts that the existing convention should not be replaced , and that even a roof convention should not be adopted . Instead , all countries irrespective of their membership in the existing unions and treaties , were to be able to sign and ratify the envisaged new treaty , even if they were not members of UNESCO .

On this basis , the Universal Copyright Convention was adopted on 6 September 1952 and came into force on 16th September 1955 after ratification by twelve countries . Its historical background – its aim of avoiding a lasting split into the Berne and the American protection systems – was reflected in the attendance at the Conference- Most of the Berne Union countries and American countries signed it .

Main Contents Of The Universal Copyright Convention Of 1952
To approach the aim of universal membership and thus to include countries with a need for low protections , such as developing countries ( more than in the pre-existing conventions ) , the USA and the Soviet Union , the contents of the 1952 Universal Copyright Convention had to follow a relatively minimalist approach.

The Preamble , unlike that of the Berne Convention , did not introduce the aim of protecting the rights of the authors ‘in as effective and uniform a manner as possible ‘ , but only intended to ‘assure in all countries copyright protection’ . The principle of minimum rights was hardly realized in the 1952 text ; there was only very limited translation right in addition to the very general obligation to ‘provide for the adequate and effective protection of the rights …’

Instead of Berne’s principle of ‘no formalities ‘ , Article 3(1) of the UCC permitted formalities for foreign works , but only those specified in this provision . This compromise allowed countries such as the USA to continue their requirements for domestic works , while enabling works from other UCC countries to enjoy protection in the USA or other countries if they only fulfilled the limited requirements of the UCC .

Article 4 of the UCC provided for a general minimum duration of only twenty five years , and of ten years for photographic works and works of applied art. A transitional provision even allowed any Contracting State which , at the date of entry into force of the UCC in that state , provided for certain classes of works. The duration had to be computed after the first publication of the work . Reciprocity was introduced , given the diversity of national laws on the duration .

The principle of national treatment was drafted in a slightly different way from that under the Berne Convention. The UCC in the version of 1952 also contained a definition of ‘publication’ , a rule on application in time , final and administrative clauses and framework provisions - in particular the Berne safeguard clause.

This clause was to discourage Berne Union countries from leaving the Berne Convention .The countries that adhered only to the UCC, would not be protected under the Berne Convention. Moreover, if a Berne country which was country of origin of a work under the Berne Convention withdrew from the Berne Convention after 1 January 1951 , the respective work would not be protected by the Universal Copyright Convention in the Berne countries. In addition , this provision stipulated that among Berne Union countries which were also Contracting States of the Universal Copyright Convention , the latter was not applicable in respect of works whose country of origin was a Berne country .

1971 Paris Revision
At the 1971 Paris Revision Conference which took place in combination with the Paris Revision Conference of the Berne Convention , a number of major amendments were made to the UCC. The Paris Revision was adopted on 24th July 1971 and came into force on 10th July 1974 .

First , some basic economic minimum rights in addition to the existing translation rights were introduced for works in their original form and derived therefrom : the rights of reproduction , public performance and broadcasting . At the same time , Contracting States were allowed to introduce exceptions to these rights as long as a ‘ reasonable degree of effective protection ‘ was reached . These amendments accommodated the needs of developed countries with a high standard of protection because they were not ready to grant national treatment while not receiving any guaranteed comparable protection in other Contracting states .

Another provision that favoured developing countries was a loosening of the strict Berne safeguard of the 1951 version whereby they withdraw from the Berne Union without losing the protection of the Universal Copyright Convention , on condition of deposit of a specific notifications .

The relation between the 1952 and 1971 was regulated as follows ; both were separate conventions ; accession to the 1971 text would also constitute accession to the 1952 text ; after the entry into force of the 1971 text , no country could adhere only to the 1952 text ; where only one of the two UCC members adhered to the 1952 text that text applied exclusively between them .

Development Of The Universal Copyright Convention After 1971
For some forty years , the UCC fulfilled its purpose to establish international copyright protection beyond the membership of the Berne Convention . In particular , most of those countries which were not ready to accede to the Berne Convention joined the UCC , namely most Latin American countries and the USA. Another important country that had largely stayed outside international copyright relations was Russia ,which joined the UCC as part of the Soviet Union in 1973 . In 2007 , the UCC had 100 members.

The UCC has , however , lost importance to the extent that its Contracting States also adhered to the Berne Convention because the UCC does not apply to Berne works between the UCC countries which are also Berne members . Mainly since the end of the 1980’ s many UCC countries also adhered to the Berne Union ,as in particular the USA in 1989 , the Russian Federation in 1995, as well as many other former Soviet countries and some Central and Eastern European countries since the early 1990s.

Others that had not been a member of the UCC directly also adhered to the Berne convention such as China , 1992. Another wave of accessions to the Berne Conventions was indirectly due to the bilateral agreements initiated by the USA since the end of the 1980’s by which countries were mostly obliged or at least encouraged to accede to the Berne Convention if they were not members yet.

Also the TRIPS agreement , 1994 had a similar effect ; although it did not oblige its members to accede to the Berne Convention , it required compliance with the Berne substantive standards , so that countries which had to comply with them anyway usually decided also to become Berne members .

In 2007 , only Laos remains as a party to the UCC but not the Berne Convention for the TRIPS Agreement . This country , has begun measures to accede to the WTO / TRIPS Agreement and the Berne Convention , such that the UCC will no longer apply to the Laos in the foreseeable future .

In the future , other countries might bring life back to the UCC , namely those countries which are not yet parties to any multilateral instrument covering copyright protection . For the same reasons that the UCC originally attracted acceptance , these countries might adhere to the UCC as an initial step towards international copyright protection , then they will directly adhere to the Berne Convention ( as did China 1992 ) , the WTO / TRIPS Agreement , or both . Indeed , all of the above countries except Eritrea ,San Marino and Somalia who have applied for WTO membership.

Prospects For The Role Of UCC In The Future
Although the UCC may be more favourable to developing countries that have not yet a highly developed infrastructure or cultural industry – and it was indeed the UCC's purpose to enable in particular countries with a low level of development to become part of the international copyright community – it is rather unlikely that they would denounce the BC, the WTO/TRIPS Agreement or even the WCT, particularly because many countries have an interest in being part at least in the WTO be it for other reasons than intellectual property.

#Often, they have to provide for a higher level of protection under bilateral treaties anyway. In other words, even in the current situation where it seems that many countries would like to be under lower level obligations in the field of international copyright, it may not be expected that they would denounce the BC, the TRIPS Agreement and the WCT respectively and thereby allow the application of the UCC.
# The Inter American Conventions of Buenos Aires(1910), Havana(1928), and Washington (1946)which was adopted with the leadership of USA.
# On 1st January 1952, Brazil and Canada were the only Berne Union members from the Americas.
# The International Institute for Intellectual Cooperation and International Institute of Rome for the Unification of Private Law.
# UNESCO’s first programme in the field of Copyright which included a universal convention reflected its focus on education and science and the view that copyright would be an obstacle to free circulation of information-a view that was later revised.
# Since the UCC was adopted in Geneva, it is also often referred to as ‘the Geneva Convention.’
# Articles V to I of the Geneva Text, 1952
# Art VI of the UCC, 1952.
# No application of the UCC to works that are already in the public domain in the country where protection is claimed. (Art.VII of the UCC 1952)
# Articles VIII-XVI and XVII-XXI
# Article XVII

Authors contact info - articles The  author can be reached at: grover@legalserviceindia.com

We offer Copyright Registration Services
Right from your Desktop.....
Click here

1 2 3 4 5
Rate this article!     Poor

Most viewed articles in Intellectual Property category
Bajaj Auto Limited
Copyright Societies
Infringement of trademark and what constitutes honest practice in relation to trade and bussiness
Trade Mark Law in India & Its Violation
Trademark Infringement and Remedies
Section 25 of The Trade Marks Act, 1999
Passing off under trademark
Patenting of Micro-Organisms in India: An Overview
Originality Under Copyright Law-Is There Any Definite Standard?
Indian Copyright Software
Product Patent & Exclusive Marketing Rights
Competition Law vis-a-vis IPR rights
Author's moral Right
Registration & filing of Copyrights in India
Most recent articles in Intellectual Property category
Patent for technological companies
International Commercial Arbitration
Trademark infringement and passing off Indian pharmaceutical industry
Protecting Tradition And Culture In India Development of A Sui Generis System
De Jure Mobile Applications under the IP Law
Sports and IPR
Protecting Tradition and Culture in India: Development of A Sui Generis System
The Effectiveness of the Remedies for Copyright Infringement
National IPR Policy 2016
Trademark Law in Music and Film Industry
Trademark Infringement and Passing off in the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry
Design Your Sound Make Your Sound A Mark
Brand Protection Agency Racket in India?
WHY a Registered Trademark in INDIA
Draft Patent (Amendment) Rules, 2015 changes on the face of it. (Part I)
Steps in Conducting a Patent Search

Article Comments

Posted by Deempal on May 10, 2016
The countries that adhered only to the UCC, would not be protected under the Bern Convention.

Post Your Comments


Your comments

Note : Your email address is only visible to admin, other members / users cannot see it.

You can use following FXCodes

BOLD : [b]
Italic : [i]

[b] Legal Services India [/b] is a [i]nice website[/i].
[url= http://www.legalservicesindia.com/article/ ]click here to visit.[/url]

Legal Services India is a nice website.
Click here to visit


Note : Currently, user comments are moderated and will be posted only after approval.

Please login or register a new free account.

Random Pick
provisions mentioned in the Special Marriage Act, 1954 are hurdle in getting married and may be harassed to parties.

» Total Articles
» Total Authors
» Total Views
» Total categories

Law Forum

Legal Articles

Lawyers in India- Click on a link below for legal Services

lawyers in Chennai
lawyers in Bangalore
lawyers in Hyderabad
lawyers in Cochin
lawyers in Pondicherry
lawyers in Guwahati
lawyers in Nashik

lawyers in Jaipur
lawyers in New Delhi
lawyers in Dimapur
lawyers in Agra
Noida lawyers
lawyers in Siliguri

For Mutual consent Divorce in Delhi

Ph no: 9650499965
For online Copyright Registration

Ph no: 9891244487
Law Articles

lawyers in Delhi
lawyers in Chandigarh
lawyers in Allahabad
lawyers in Lucknow
lawyers in Jodhpur
Faridabad lawyers

lawyers in Mumbai
lawyers in Pune
lawyers in Nagpur
lawyers in Ahmedabad
lawyers in Surat
Ghaziabad lawyers

lawyers in Kolkata
lawyers in Janjgir
lawyers in Rajkot
lawyers in Indore
lawyers in Ludhiana
Gurgaon lawyers


India's Most Trusted Online law library
Legal Services India is Copyrighted under the Registrar of Copyright Act ( Govt of India) 2000-2016
 ISBN No: 978-81-928510-1-3