|
 Supreme
Court Judgments - March 2008 |
Orchid Employees Union & others v Orchid Chemicals
& Pharmaceuticals Ltd.25/3/2008.
Trade Union Act, 1926 - section 22 -
contravention of - the formation of the appellant No.1-Union was
challenged and cancellation proceedings were pending before Deputy
Commissioner of Labour, Chennai. The High Court felt that it would be in
the interest of the parties to pursue their remedy before the Deputy
Commissioner of Labour, Chennai |
Golla Yelugu Govindu v State of Andhra
Pradesh 26/3/2008.
Indian Penal Code, 1860 - section 302 -
conviction - appeal dismissed - challenged - where the offender takes
undue advantage or has acted in a cruel or unusual manner, the benefit
of Exception 4 cannot be given to him. If the weapon used or the manner
of attack by the assailant is out of all proportion, that circumstance
must be taken into consideration to decide whether undue advantage has
been taken |
Punjab Urban Planning & Dev. Authority v Gurmail
Singh & others 27/3/2008.
Site - attachment - the letter of allotment
required PUPDA to deliver the possession of the site to the allottee
within three months - the Estate Officer of PUPDA made an order dated
21.7.1997 resuming the site on the ground that the respondents had
failed to pay the instalments. The respondents challenged the order of
resumption before the Appellate Authority contending that they could not
pay the instalments, as PUPDA had not delivered possession of the site |
|
|
 |
Lawyers
Directory:
Delhi
-
Delhi-2 -
Kolkata -
Mumbai -
Mumbai-2 -
Chennai -
Bangalore -
Hyderabad -
Allahabad -
Pune -
Ahmedabad -
Nagpur -
Cochin -
Gurgaon -
Jaipur -
Ludhiana -
Thane -
Noida -
Indore -
Lucknow -
Ghaziabad
Chandigarh -
Jodhpur
-
Pondicherry -
New York -
Milan -
Switzerland -
Barbados -
London -
Cameroon -
Dubai -
Paris -
Johannesburg -
Lawyers In America
-
Lawyers Home |
