Legal Services India

Supreme Court Judgments 2007

Complete text judgments available for free of the month of March 2007
Copyright Registration in India
Copyright Procedure in India
Legal Services India.com

Supreme Court Judgments - March 2007


  • Divorce Lawyer in Delhi

    Contact Details

    Ph no: +9650499965 / tapsash@gmail.com

    Chairman, Uttar Pradesh Jal Nigam and Another v Radhey Shyam Gautam & Another

    Appeal filed to challenge the correctness of the Order passed by a Division Bench in an interim order passed by a learned Single Judge - Permitting the respondent No.1 to continue in service of the appellant No.1 till attaining the age of 60 years. - Date of Judgment: 30/03/2007

    Manjuri Bera v Oriental Insurance Company Limited And Another

    Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Appeal against the judgment of High Court allowing claim petition of married daughter under Section 166 of the M V Act,- Judged in that background where a legal representative - not dependant files an application for compensation - the quantum cannot be less than the liability referable to Section 140 of the Act. - even if there is no loss of dependency the claimant if he or she is a legal representative will be entitled to compensation. - Date of Judgment: 30/03/2007

    Ashoka Kumar Thakur Vs. Union of India and Ors

    Writ petitions the policy of 27% reservation for the Other Backward Classes (in short the OBCs contained in the Central Educational Institutions Reservation in Admission) Act, 2006 in short the Act is the subject matter of challenge - Date of Judgment: 29/03/2007

    M.Srinivasa Prasad and Others v Comptroller and Auditor General of India and Others

    Indian Audit and Accounts Department Section Officer (Commercial Audit) Recruitment Rules, 1988 - Service - Promotion - Statutory rules are silent about the determination of inter se seniority - Appeals are devoid of merits and are accordingly dismissed - Date of Judgment: 29/03/2007

    Samar Ghosh Vs.Jaya Ghosh (Landmark Judgment)

    Family law - Respondent refused cohabitation - Her unilateral decision not to have any child caused mental cruelty on the appellant - The impugned judgment of the High Court is set aside and the judgment of the learned Additional District Judge granting the decree of divorce is restored. - Date of Judgment: 26/03/2007

    Kusheshwar Prasad Singh v State of Bihar and Others

    Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Act, 1961 - return filed under by the landholder as to excess land - "a wrong doer ought not to be permitted to make a profit out of his own wrong" - though the question was raised before the statutory authorities under the Act, the High Court (learned Single Judge as also the Division Bench) had decided the case only on the basis of Section 32B of the Act which could not have been done - the matter is remitted to the High Court to decide it afresh in accordance with law. - Date of Judgment: 19/03/2007

    Alchemist Limited and Another v State Bank of Sikkim and Others

    Constitution Of India, 1950, art. 226 - whether a part of the cause of action had arisen within the territorial jurisdiction of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana so as to entertain a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution filed by the appellant-Company against the respondents - Leave granted. - Date of Judgment: 16/03/2007

    Central Bureau of Investigation & Another & Others v Ashok Kumar Aggarwal & Others

    Criminal Procedure Code, s. 482 - While exercising jurisdiction whether the High Court would embark upon an enquiry whether the evidence in question is reliable or not - the High Court to peruse these notings and the observations made by the Hon'ble Finance Minister and thereafter issue appropriate directions to the parties to the action - Date of Judgment: 15/03/2007

    Tamil Nadu Housing Board v Keeravani Ammal & Others

    Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - s. 48B - Land acquired but not made use of - for 21 years - if not being used, it should be re-conveyed - High Court approached for the issue of mandamus directing the State of Tamil Nadu, its officers and Tamil Housing Board to re-convey the land - Date of Judgment: 15/03/2007

    Ashok Kumar Kapur & Others v Ashok Khanna & Others

    Indian Trusts Act, 1882 - s. 34 - it is not a case where jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution of India should be invoked particularly in view of the fact that the appellant is not remediless.- Leave granted. - Date of Judgment: 13/03/2007

    Mohan & Another v State of Maharashtra & Others

    Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - s. 11A - petition has prayed for quashing of the award published by special Land Acquisition officer in respect of Renapur Medium Project - whether the award was illegal in view of Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act. - Leave granted. - Date of Judgment: 13/03/2007

    Vijay Singh Gond & Others v Union of India & Others

    Scheduled Castes and scheduled Tribes Order (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Petition filed to pass an ad-interim ex-parte order staying the effect and operation of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders. - Date of Judgment: 13/03/2007

    Subhakar & Others v Harideesh Kumar & Others

    Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - s. 2 sub-s. 18 - appellant claim to be Chalgeni tenants and claim grant of occupancy rights - respondent claimed to be the owner of the land on the basis of gift deed from his grand father - Appeal against the judgment of Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court dismissing.- Date of Judgment: 13/03/2007

    BOC India Limited v Bhagwati Oxygen Limited

    Arbitration Act, 1940, ss. 30 r/w 33 - An appeal from a judgment of a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court dismissing an appeal which was filed against the judgment of a learned Judge refusing to accept the objection filed by the appellant - Leave granted. - Date of Judgment: 12/03/2007

    Bandu v State of Maharashtra

    Indian Penal Code, 1860 - s. 302 - Appellant Bandu - found guilty under Section 498-A of the India Penal Code - sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 2 years and a fine of Rs. 500/- by the trial court. - On appeal the High Court while setting aside the conviction of the appellant under Section 498A, held him guilty under Section 302 IPC and convicted him to life imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 500/-. - Date of Judgment: 09/03/2007

    All Bengal Excise Licensees Association v Raghabendra Singh and Others

    Contempt of court in excise case -- advertisement published for selection of exercise shops -- High Court made it clear that the respondent-authorities will not hold any lottery for the purpose of final selection of the excise shops in question without obtaining further orders from the High Court - Leave granted. - Date of Judgment: 09/03/2007

    Uttar Pradesh State Road Trasnport Corporation v UP Rajya Sadak Parivahan Karamchari Union

    U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - s.11-C r\w s. 13A of Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 - Industrial Disputes Act, 1947- Praying for a declaration that the 15 persons appointed on contract basis as 'drivers' and 'conductors' be declared as regular and substantive workmen - that the concerned workmen be given all the benefits and facilities of regular employees - Leave granted. - Date of Judgment: 09/03/2007

    N D P Namboodripad (Dead) by Lrs v Union of India & Ors

    High Court Judges (Conditions of service) Act, 1954 - The appellant entered the Kerala Higher Judicial Service as a directly recruited District & Sessions Judge and was later elevated as a Judge of the Kerala High Court - He retired with 23 years of pension able service which included 8 years of service as a Judge of the High Court. - the pension due be recalculated and settled accordingly. - Date of Judgment: 8/03/2007

    State of Punjab and Others v Swaran Kaur and Others

    Punjab State Class IV Service Rules, 1963 - whether the authorities were justified in holding that they did not possess the requisite qualification for appointment under the Punjab State Class IV Service Rules, 1963 - The State of Punjab had taken over Chanan Devi Memorial girl High School, Saleem Tabri, Ludhiana under certain conditions so far as the employment of the members of staff concerned - Leave granted. - Date of Judgment: 07/03/2007

    Regional Provident Fund Commissioner v M/s Raj's Continental Exports Private Limited

    Employees' Provident Funds & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, s. 7A - Respondent claimed in-fancy protection under the provisions of the Act - The appeal is sans merit, deserves dismissal - Date of Judgment: 07/03/2007

    National Insurance Company Limited v Laxmi Narain Dhut

    Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, s. 149 - Claims involving insurance company, owner of the vehicle and third party -- In each of the impugned judgments the concerned High Court held that the principles laid down by this Court in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Swaran Singh (2004 (3) SCC 297) is applicable even to claims other than third party claims. Some of these appeals also relate to orders passed by the NCDRC - Leave granted. - Date of Judgment: 02/03/2007

    State of Goa v Sanjay Thakran and Anr

    Indian Penal Code, 1860 sections 120-B, 364, 302 and 392 - acquittal order by High Court as well as by trail cost - in the circumstances of the case, the accused persons not giving any explanation in their examination under Section 313, Cr. P.C. could not be taken to be a circumstances pointing towards irresistible conclusion that they are involved in the commission of the crime - Date of Judgment: 02/03/2007

    Check here for Latest Judgment:
    Supreme Court and High Courts

    File Your Mutual Divorce - Right Now!Copyright Registration

    Call us at: 965049965 / or email at: tapsash@gmail.com



    Click here to file for mutual Consent Divorce


    Matrimonial laws in India:

    Procedure followed in Matrimonial Petitions
    Section 21 of Hindu Marriage Act provides that all proceedings under this Act shall be regulated as far as may be, by Code of Civil Procedure.

    Restitution of Conjugal Rights
    A husband has the right to require his wife to live with him wherever he may choose to reside. On the other hand, it is corresponding duty of the wife to live with her husband

    What should an Aggrieved Person do in case of Domestic Violence
    If you, being the aggrieved person, have reason to believe that an act of domestic violence has been committed or is being committed or is likely to be committed, you may give information about it to the concerned Protection Officer.

    Maintenance and Residence of Female Child
    Under the Hindu Marriage Act, there is provision for permanent alimony or allowance. Under section 4 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, in case of annulment of a child marriage

    Hindu Marriage Act
    Hindu Marriage Act of 1955, came into force on 18th of May, 1955. It has amended and codified the law relating to marriage solemnized between two Hindus.

    How Can A Hindu Marry from other Religion
    Marriage between two persons, who are not Hindus, it would be a case of special marriage. In this regard, reference may be made to provisions of Special Marriage Act (43 of 1954)

    Judicial Separation
    Section 10 of Hindu Marriage Act provides for judicial separation. It provides that either party to a marriage can file a petition before the Court for such a relief.

    Maintenance for wife, children and parents - Section 125 CrPC
    When any person neglects or refuses to maintain, his wife, children or parents, than they can claim maintenance by filing an application before the Magistrate under Section 125 CrPC

    Maintenance Pendente Lite and Expenses of Proceedings
    Under Hindu Marriage Act where in any proceeding under this Act it appears to the Court that either the wife or the husband has no independent income sufficient for her or his support, Court may order for payment of monthly maintenance to the petitioner by the respondent.

    Divorce India100% MONEY-BACK GUARANTEE!!
    We GUARANTEE that your Mutual Divorce application will be Properly
    Filed as par law and you will obtain a valid Divorce Decree.