Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Thursday, April 25, 2024

Uttar Pradesh Population Control Bill, 2021

Posted in: Political
Fri, Aug 13, 21, 13:09, 3 Years ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 4228
The purpose of this proposed law is to tackle the growing population in the State and so ensuring judicious and equal availability of all the resources in the State through a two-child policy.

The State Law Commission of Uttar Pradesh has drafted the Uttar Pradesh Population (Control, Stabilization, and Welfare) Bill, 2021. This Bill is a step towards the population policy set for 2021-2030. The purpose of this proposed law is to tackle the growing population in the State and so ensuring judicious and equal availability of all the resources in the State through a two-child policy.

The State Law Commission of UP on 9 July 2021, requested the public at large to vet the draft bill and respond with suggestions and comments by 19 July and along with newer ideas to improve the draft bill. The State Law Commission has received in excess of 8000 such responses including both those appreciating and critical of the draft bill as well as responses suggesting improvements to the draft bill.

To ensure couples will want to follow the policy set forth in the bill, certain incentives have been proposed in the bill. There are specific incentives for the public servants for accepting the two-child policy. However, they would only get such benefits if the public servant or his/ her spouse undergo sterilization operation voluntarily. Increments in salary, rebates on charges on utilities, maternity or paternity leave of 12 months with full salary, free healthcare facilities for spouse, etc. are few of the incentives listed.

Additional incentives for all public servants who undergo voluntary sterilization after having a single child such as free education for the child up-to graduation level and scholarships for girl child have been included. Similarly, incentives have been proposed for the general public as well derived from what is proposed to be provided to the public servants.

The proposed bill also contains an unusual clause: disincentives for couples not abiding with the policy after the enforcement of the Act. If anyone is in contravention of the proposed norm it will lead to debarment of the said person from contesting local body elections, and such person shall not be contained under the ambit of the government sponsored welfare schemes, and will also be barred from applying for government jobs, etc.

The draft bill has incorporated into it, certain exceptions to the two-child norm policy which includes multiple births from second pregnancy, death of child, disability of child, adoption, and contraventions of two-child norm in case of polygamous and polyandrous marriage.

The draft bill has also specified the duties of the government to ensure better implementation of the Policy and compliance with the provisions of the bill. This would be achieved by including topics on population control in secondary school curriculum. Educating the people, carrying out drives, providing contraceptives, conducting regular vaccination drives are to name a few. As per surveys majority of UP’s population is young – and may be shut out from government jobs, subsidies, welfare schemes by the bill.

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
kpalegal
Member since Apr 29, 2020
Location: Gurugram
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Najma vs Govt of NCT of Delhi a promise or assurance given by the Chief Minister in a press conference amounts to an enforceable promise and that a CM is expected to exercise his authority to give effect to such a promise.
It goes without saying that the population of India is increasing very rapidly which is a cause of grave concern
Madhav Sathe v Maharashtra a plea filed by two politician-applicants seeking quashing of a conviction order on the ground that they had settled the dispute with the victim-complainant.
Talibanis are entering in one go from Pakistan to Afghanistan to occupy it and massacre whoever comes in their way with full help, active support both moral and material with latest weapons
Susmita Saha Dutta v/s UOI has outrightly rejected State Government's argument that police can't be held responsible for post-poll violence due to Election Commission of India's (ECI's) Model Code of Conduct.
Dumya Alias Lakhan Alias Inamdar, Etc vs Maharashtra the default sentences imposed on a convict cannot be directed to run concurrently.
Hindus are the most tolerant of all the religions in the world. I am a Muslim but I will never shy away from saying that Muslims must learn tolerance from Hindus
Nine of our soldiers died in J&K and India will be playing T20 match with Pakistan on October 24? Do the lives of our soldiers carry no value?
o one can dare do what Congress can dare do in India. The biggest, bluntest and the boldest truth to prove my inevitable point lies in the irrefutable fact that it was the Congress party under the dynamic
West Bengal vs Suvendu Adhikari refused to interfere with an order of a Single Bench wherein criminal proceedings initiated against BJP MLA Suvendu Adhikari who secured maximum limelight after he defeated Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee in Nandigram by a convincing margin had been stayed.
Hasratullah Shervani v/s UP From perusal of the injury report, it prima facie supports the contents of first information report, therefore, in above circumstances and that the injured has turned hostile is of no consequence.
Lawyers Voice vs Punjabthere is a blame game between the State and Central Government as to who is responsible for such lapses.
High Court Bench must be created in West UP at Meerut even though his most commendable recommendation was not implemented in UPA's regime
Ashish Shelar v/s Maharashtra Legislative Assembly that the suspension of 12 BJP MLAs from the Maharashtra Assembly for a full year is prima facie unconstitutional and worse than expulsion as the constituency is remaining unrepresented.
dogged the limelight for quite some time over the wearing of hijab in educational institutions in Karnataka was most unfortunate.
hat had happened so brazenly with Muskan Khan even though she is a Muslim and I am a Hindu as there was no justification to haul her up in the manner
Dr Rajeev Gupta M.D. v. U.P. that it is like a termite in every system and once it enters the system, it keeps on getting bigger and bigger.
March a woman was shown offering namaz in a class in Sagar University
Shahida vs UP that tolerance, respect for all communities is essential to keep country united.
Madrasa-e-Anware Rabbani Waqf Committee v/s Surat Municipal Corporation on the ground that the construction was without prior permission of the competent authority.
Brinda Karat v. State of NCT of Delhi that: Hate speeches especially delivered by elected representatives, political and religious leaders based on religion, caste, region or ethnicity militate against the concept of fraternity, bulldoze the constitutional ethos, and violates Articles 14, 15, 19, 21 read with Article 38 of the Constitution
she was squarely blamed single handedly for the terror acts that were perpetrated in Udaipur, Kanpur and other parts of the country.
had lashed out most severely at Nupur Sharma for being single handedly responsible for putting the entire nation on fire which drew scathing criticism
Kamini Arya Through Perokar vs NCT Of Delhi has taken suo motu cognizance to facilitate admission of an 8 year old child to school which could not be facilitated for the reason that her parents were in judicial custody in a murder case since July 2021.
Parvez Parwaz vs Uttar Pradesh dismissed a plea challenging denial of sanction to prosecute Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath in a case alleging making of hate speech in 2007
Vishwanath Pratap Singh vs Election Commission of Indiathat the right to contest an election is not a fundamental right but only a right conferred by a statute.
Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Satyender Jain, dismissed the plea made by Delhi Health Minister challenging the trial court order transferring his money laundering case to another Judge.
Umar Khalid that the attack on police personnel during the 2020 North East Delhi riots by women protestors prima facie be covered by the definition of ‘terrorist act’ under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act.
United we stand and divided we fall! They also gloss over what Deanswift had once very famously
why Lord Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru is not the official father of the nation?
Ramaprasad Sarkar v. Union of India dismissed a PIL praying for a direction to the Central government to remove Jagdeep Dhankhar as the Governor of West Bengal, claiming that he was acting as the ‘mouthpiece of the Bharatiya Janata Party’.
Kapil Sibal himself says on record about Rahul Gandhi’s conviction that both the process and the outcome of the 2019 case are bizarre.
Mamata Banerjee is an Indian politician and the current Chief Minister of West Bengal. She was born on January 5, 1955, in Kolkata, West Bengal. Mamata Banerjee completed her education from Jogamaya Devi College and the University of Calcutta.
Shri Potsangbam Jaminikanta Singh v/s Manipur directed the State government to decongest the traffic on national highway in front of the Old Manipur Secretariat by making arrangements for proper parking of vehicles on both sides.
Shamim vs UP that it is a clear case of false implication due to political rivalry and property dispute. The Court also held that there is no material evidence to substantiate the prosecution case.
In my life, I definitely cannot ever even dare dream of a more bigger insult of legendary Prabhu Shri Ram
Top