Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Tuesday, April 30, 2024

Surrogacy Bill 2016

Posted in: Woman laws
Mon, Jul 22, 19, 11:28, 5 Years ago
star star star star star
5 out of 5 with 1 ratings
comments: 3 - hits: 40737
An over all view of Surrogacy Bill 2016

Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill 2016 -

On 21st November 2016 the 228th report of law commission had recommended prohibition of commercial surrogacy in India.

Surrogacy (regulation)bill 2016 has been a major decision taken by the bench towards regulation of surrogacy practices in India. The bill focuses on prevention of commercial surrogacy, exploitation of surrogate mothers and children born through surrogacy.
Surrogacy means, a woman who becomes pregnant usually by artificial insemination or surgical implantation of a fertilized egg for the purpose of carrying the foetus to term for another woman. Thus surrogacy is part of third-party reproduction which can include oocytes (eggs bought in the baby bazaar), sperm, and embryos.
 

Surrogacy in India

India is considered to be the global hub for surrogacy. Infertile parents from different countries come to India to opt for baby’s birth through surrogacy. Western Gujrat, Hyderabad and Mumbai are the main surrogacy centres in India.

As per 2009 law commission report the surrogacy industry in India of worth Rs.25000 crores. It is currently estimated a business of 2 dollars billion industry.

Before the ban foreigners accounted for 80% of surrogacy births in our country. In the year 2002 India became the first country to legalise commercial surrogacy and in the year 2012 India was named as the surrogacy capital.

Despite this growing prominence of the Indian surrogacy industry in recent years, it is strange but true that the surrogacy practices in India remain largely unregulated.

The Trigger
The debate began in 2008, a Japanese couple commissioned a baby in a small town of Gujarat. The surrogate mother gave birth to a healthy baby girl. By then the couple got divorced and the baby was parentless and stateless caught between the legal system of both the countries.

In 2012, an Australian couple who had twins by surrogacy, rejected one and took home the other.

A single mother of two from Chennai decided to become a surrogate mother in the hope that she will start a shop near her house. Unfortunately, she was paid only 75,000 rupees by the autorickshaw driver and taking a 50% cut, who served as the middle man in the surrogacy business.

On January 2014, a 26-year-old Yuma Sherpa died in the aftermath of a surgical procedure to harvest eggs from her body, as a part of the egg donation programme of a private clinic in New Delhi.

The Bill
August 2017, Parliamentary Standing Committee submitted its 102nd report on the Surrogacy(regulation) bill 2016 and it was tabled in Rajya Sabha and in Lok Sabha on 10th August 2017. The report gives the analysis of the nature of the bill.
Surrogacy bill 2016 shall be applicable to whole of the India except Jammu and Kashmir.

The bill regulates the commercial surrogacy and highlights on altruistic surrogacy in which no expenses are to be paid other than medical expenditure, and also it protects the surrogate mother as well as the baby born through surrogacy. The bill has put a strict prohibition on clinics stating neither getting involved into commercial surrogacy nor shall offer, conduct, promote and undertake or associate with commercial surrogacy. All Assisted Reproductive Technology clinics will need to be registered.

It also bans foreigners and homosexual, single parent, live-in and NRI’s from opting surrogacy.

The bill allows surrogacy for Indian married couples after 5 years of marriage with an official certificate of a doctor declaring the couple to be medically unfit to give birth to a child.

Women within the age group of 23 to 50 years and men aged between 26 to 55 years will be eligible for going through surrogacy.
 

Altruistic surrogacy

Altruistic surrogacy refers to an arrangement where the surrogate does not receive money for her service but for the medical expenses. Many of the arrangements are made within family members or close friends.

The expenses to be paid are-
# Medical expenses, including the embryo transfer or artificial insemination, fertility injections, and labour and delivery costs
# Donation fees ifan egg donor or sperm donor if required.
# Attorney fees
# Counselling expenses
# Additional fees, including maternity clothing and travel costs to transport her to and from appointments
# Agency fees
 

Eligibility for surrogacy

# Indian married couple who are medically declared unfit for producing a baby.
# The couple must not have any child, neither adopted nor natural.
# Women of age 23-50 years and Men of age 26-55 years of age.
# Only close relative can be approached for ‘altruistic’ surrogacy.

Penalty
Any intending couple or person or any clinic getting involved into commercial surrogacy will be charged a heavy fine of 5 lakhs and imprisonment of 5 years and repeated offenders will have to face a fine of 10 lakhs and imprisonment of 10 years.
Whoever contravenes the act will have to face imprisonment for not less than 3 years, 5 lakhs fine and repeated offenders might be charged with additional 10,000 rupees fine per day.


Analysis
In India, infertility is generally known to be a sin. The trauma of infertility is best described and felt by the married infertile couples.
Hence surrogacy is considered as the ultimate option by many of the couples resulting in win-win situation for both, the couple as well as the surrogate mother.
The Assisted Reproductive Technology has helped millions of infertile couples who have got medical complications.
But the banning of surrogacy has shattered millions of couple’s dream of becoming parents.
The bill, rather than safeguarding surrogacy through strict and transparent mechanism, the government has banned the commercial surrogacy.
The bill does not even define the term ‘close relative’ properly, which might to exploitation of law by wrongfully using the ‘close relative’ clause.
The value of the so-called surrogacy industry of India is 2 billion dollars, which has now come down to null.
Besides, if surrogacy is banned, a black market will surely emerge where middle-men would take away the financial benefits and women would lose both income and adequate parental care.

Conclusion
However, the Surrogacy Bill will curb unethical practices and protect the exploitation of surrogates by middlemen and will also keep a check on illegal acts like flesh trade and many more.

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Prarthana Markod
Member since Jul 15, 2019
Location: n/a
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Gender equality, also known as sexual equality, is the state of equal ease of access to resources and opportunities regardless of gender, including economic participation and decision-making; and the state of valuing different behaviors, aspirations and needs equally, regardless of gender.
Child sex ratio and right to life: The child sex ratio had deteriorated across the country over the last decade. In the Indian context there is a strong preference for son.
Facet relating to offences against women. The offences are of various types. They find mention in many enactments. These under- mentioned provisions are enumerated in Indian Penal Code, 1860:
The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 was brought into force by the Indian government from October 26, 2006.
For couples who cannot have children, a surrogate mother is a viable and increasingly popular option. A surrogate mother is a woman who has agreed to become pregnant in order to deliver a child specifically for a couple
Article 15(3) of Indian Constitution permits State to make any special provision in law for women as well as children.
Let me begin at the very beginning by first and foremost pointing out that in a latest landmark judgment by the Bombay High Court titled Mr Ali Abbas Daruwala v/s Mrs Shehnaz Daruwala
Uttarakhand High Court in State of Uttarakhand v/s Karandeep Sharma, Razia, Raju in its landmark judgment delivered on January 5, 2018 recommended strongly the state government to enact in three months a suitable legislation for awarding death sentence to those found guilty of raping girls of 15 years or below.
Brutal Gang Rape and murder of a 12 years old girl in Uttarkashi v State of Uttarakhand The Court took cognizance of two reports published in newspaper
It is most gratifying and satisfying to learn that from now onwards victims of online sexual abuse can report the same anonymously from their homes without bothering to run from pillar to post and pleading with police to lodge their report! The first-of-its-kind national sex offenders registry was launched on September 20.
Legal Implications of the #Metoo Movement and remedies under Indian law for the victims
Laws pertaining to online harassment abuse faced by women, and the the stringent measures taken by the Government to prevent online harassment/abuse of women with an insight to cyber-crime cell catering to women
The UDHR is a milestone document consisting of international human rights law based on the ideas of freedom, equality and dignity, a living text which is universal in scope and relevant to all individuals.
There are various property rights of women in India. This is a short study about them.
Delhi High Court in Anita Suresh vs. Union of India imposed Rs. 50,000 cost on a woman for false sexual harassment plea.
Punjab and Sind Bank and Others v/s Mrs Durgesh Kuwar have minced no words to make it abundantly clear that sexual harassment at the workplace is an affront to the fundamental rights of a woman.
The Secretary, Ministry of Defence vs Babita Puniya vs Lt Cdr Annie Nagaraja that serving women Short Service Commission Officers in Indian Navy were entitled to Permanent Commission at par with their male counterparts.
Scenario of Marital Rape in India - By Malvika Verma
This article relates to the Female Genital Mutilation that is being carried out in India.
The Author of this Article is Yashpriya Sahran. He is currently pursuing B.A. LL.B from Lloyd Law College, Greater Noida.
Reference v. Union of India asked Indian Railways to consider re-prioritising the lower berth allotment by giving the highest priority to pregnant women, then to senior citizens and thereafter to the VVIPs.
Nasiruddin Ali vs The State of Assam rape is a violation of victim's fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution. Mrs Justice Rumi Kumari Phukan of Gauhati High Court who authored this noteworthy judgment
Muhammad Abbas Vs The State in Jail Supreme Court of Pakistan observed that extremism and violence has permeated through Pakistani society and it has been brutalized. Not enough is done to ensure that crimes against women do not take place.
X vs State of Kerala Guidelines for maintaining rape victim's anonymity in the matters instituted before it. Justice PB Suresh Kumar who authored this recent, remarkable and righteous judgment while considering a petition arising out of a bail order passed by POCSO
Maheshwar Tigga vs Jharkhand have acquitted a man accused of raping a woman on the pretext of marriage. It observed that misconception of fact arising out of promise to marry has to be in proximity of time to the occurrence and cannot be spread over a long period of time coupled
Smt. Neeraj v. Rajasthan A female government servant is entitled to grant of maternity leave, irrespective of the fact that she had given birth to the child prior to her joining government service.
J & K v/s Md. Imran Khan while reminding the mandate of Section 228A of the J&K Ranbir Penal Code directed the Trial Courts of the Union Territories of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh to avoid disclosing identity of rape survivors in their proceedings and judgments.
marital rape an offence. A rape is a rape. A husband who is supposed to protect his wife and take care of her in all possible respects if himself starts raping his wife must be awarded the strictest punishment
Satish vs Maharashtra groping a child's breasts without skin-to-skin contact would amount to molestation under the Indian Penal Code but not the graver offence of sexual assault under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.
Sangita v/s Maharashtra has issued additional guidelines to restrain print/electronic media as well general public, using social media, from publishing information related to rape victim that could directly or indirectly disclose her identity.
Dr Sandeep Mourya vs State in Bail Appn granted anticipatory bail to a doctor based in Delhi accused of raping a woman on the pretext of false promise of marriage after observing that there was no forceful sexual assault done in the case.
The idea of marital rape has always been under a limelight when it came to the situations of India. The laws in India have extensively worked on rape, sexual assault and sexual abuse but have turned a dead eye to the concept of marital rape
A rape is a rape. Just because a man has married a woman that by itself does not confer the legitimate right to man to have sex with woman against her wish by forcing her in anyway.
huge surge in complaints by women of sexual harassment at workplace. As things stand, if strongest possible action is not taken against the culprits who dare to sexually harass a woman
fast-tracking rape trials, the Supreme Court has said that a rape victim should be taken directly to a Magistrate for recording her statements within 24 hours of the crime.
This article puts light on how a woman's life could have a positive impact if the marital age is revised.
Mohasina Mukhtar PhD Scholar Law, RIMT University,Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab
Monika vs HP there should be no restraint to a woman throughout the period of her pregnancy as restraints and confined spaces might cause mental stress to a pregnant woman.
Mahesha vs Malebennur Police Davanagerewhile displaying zero tolerance for crimes against humanity laid down in no uncertain terms
Aarti Sharma vs Ganga Saran provisions of Domestic Violence Act, being a social welfare legislation, cannot be used by a son as a ploy to either claim a right in his father's property or to retain possession of the same on the strength of his wife's right of residence
Rajkishore Shrivastava vs. MP that getting the consent of the prosecutrix to involve in a sexual act by making false promise of re-employment, can't be called 'free consent' and it would amount to consent obtained under a misconception of fact (as per Section 90 of IPC).
Guruvinder Singh v UP even if sexually explicit images and videos are captured with the consent of a woman, the misuse of the same can't be justified once the relationship between the victim and the accused gets strained.
Irappa Siddappa Murgannavar vs Karnataka the low age of the rape victim is not considered as the only or sufficient factor for imposing a death sentence.
Mamta Devi Vs UP Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow the rescue of a married woman who had moved the High Court with her protection plea claiming that she is facing threats from her family members
Kumari D v/s Karnataka has held most commendably that the right of a woman to exercise her reproductive choice is a dimension of personal liberty as understood under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and she has a sacrosanct right to have her bodily integrity protected.
Kashinath Narayan Gharat v/s Maharashtra that mere refusal to marry a woman after a long relationship would not constitute cheating under Section 417 of the IPC if there is no evidence of fraudulent misrepresentation of promise of marriage for sex.
Neha vs Vibhor Garg Recording of telephonic conversations of the wife without her knowledge amounts to infringement of her privacy and the transcripts of such conversations cannot be accepted as evidence by Family Courts.
Mirza Iqbal @ Golu v/s Uttar Pradesh quashed the criminal proceedings lodged for a dowry death and dowry demand against a man and a woman observing that the husband's family members are frequently named as accused in matrimonial disputes by making passing reference of them in the FIR.
Siddhivinayak Umesh Vindhe v/s Maharashtra asked the Maharashtra State Government to consider making offence punishable under Section 498A of IPC a compoundable offence. The Court also pointed out that Andhra Pradesh is already taking this approach.
Top