Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Monday, April 29, 2024

UNNAO RAPE CASE

Posted in: Supreme Court
Wed, Nov 13, 19, 15:08, 5 Years ago
star star star star star
5 out of 5 with 2 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 8944
I am a student at New Law College, Bharati Vidyapeeth University studying LLB. I am currently majoring in 3 yrs LLB Course from New Law College, and have started with my last year from July 2019.

UNNAO RAPE CASE

 

WHAT IS UNNAO RAPE CASE?

The case[1] came in light last Sunday when the victim and her family attempted to immolate her outside Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath home, alleging police inaction against the accused. The family asserted that the lady was assaulted by the MLA and his accomplices a year ago. The kin included that the family was thrashed after a complaint was recorded with the police about the incident.

The Unnao rape case alludes to the gang rape of a 17-year-old girl on 4 June 2017. Two separate chargesheet has been filed for the situation up until this point. The first charge sheet was documented by the Central Bureau of Investigation on 11 July 2018, naming Kuldeep Singh Sengar, a Bhartiya Janata Party Member of the Legislative Assembly from Uttar Pradesh, like a blamed in the alleged rape for a 17-year-old girl. The second charge sheet was recorded on 13 July 2018 and named Kuldeep Singh Sengar and his sibling, three police officers and five other individuals for allegedly framing the Unnao assault survivor's father.

The assault survivor attempted to kill herself in front of the residence of Yogi Adityanath, the Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh, on 8 April 2018. Her father died in judicial custody after that. These occurrences prompted the rape is generally announced in the national media in April 2018.

 

INCIDENT THAT TOOK PLACE IN 2017:

The rape victim expressed that she was baited by a lady named Shashi Singh, Shashi Singh's son Shubham Singh, and Nidhi Singh (Shashi Singh's little girl) to move to Kanpur, under the pretext of giving her work. On the night of 11 June 2017, she went with Shubham Singh and after that, she was allegedly raped on various occasions by him and his driver Awdhesh Tiwari. She was later raped by unknown individuals and purportedly offered to Brajesh Yadav for 60,000rs.

 A First Information Report (FIR) was filed under section 363 and 366 of Indian Penal Code (IPC) on 20 June 2017 against Shubham Singh and Awdhesh Tiwari. A day later, Uttar Pradesh Police followed her down and recuperated her from a town in Auraiya. She was sent for a medical examination around the same time. On 22 June 2017, she recorded her statement before a Judicial Magistrate under Section 164 of Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)[2] in which she portrayed her difficulty and named Shubham Singh, Awdhesh Tiwari, Brajesh Yadav and other unknown persons for abduction and gang rape. A subsequent FIR was enlisted later under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses Act (POCSO) and all the accused were sent to prison.

 

INCIDENTS THAT HAPPENED AFTER THE ALLEGED RAPE CASE IN 2017[3]:

June 4, 2017: Rape victim alleges that she was assaulted in the place of BJP MLA Kuldeep Sengar. The girl said she had gone to meet him with a neighbor to look for his assistance in getting employment.

June 11, 2017: The girl disappears. Her family complained to the police.

June 20, 2017: She is recuperated from a town in Auraiya and brought to Unnao the following day.

June 22, 2017: She is produced by the police before the court and her statement is recorded under Section 164 of CrPC. She affirms the police did not enable her to name the MLA in her announcement.

July 3, 2017: She is given over to her family after 10 days. She leaves for Delhi asserting police harassment. She begins sending complaints to the CM's office and senior police officers looking for registration of the complaint of the rape case against the MLA and his sibling Atul Singh.

 

February 24, 2018: The girl's mom moves the court of chief judicial magistrate (CJM), Unnao, looking for registration of FIR under Section 156 (3) of CrPC.

April 3, 2018: Court hears the mother's request. The girl's father comes down to Unnao with family for hearing of the case. A similar night, he is purportedly ambushed by Atul Singh and his helpers in Makhi. The man is given over to the police, which lodge a case under Section 25 (illegal possession of a gun).

April 5, 2018: The girl's father is sent to imprison after medical examination at the local medical clinic. The girl's father alleges he was framed and beaten up by the MLA’s brother. On his complaint no action was taken.

April 8, 2018: The young lady attempts killing herself at the CM's residence in Lucknow, requesting FIR against the MLA.

April 9, 2018: The girl’s father dies at the district hospital hours after he is moved from district jail. Six police officers are suspended, authoritative tests requested.

 

SUPREME COURT ON UNNAO RAPE CASE:

The Supreme Court took Suo Moto Cognizance[4] of the case on 31st July, 2019 through the letter written by the victim and her family written to the Chief Justice of India telling about the threats they were receiving.

The Supreme Court on Thursday appointed Dharmesh Sharma, District Judge, West, and Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi to hold the trial in four cases related to Unnao rape.

The CJI-led bench transferred the case to CBI Court Delhi to avoid tampering of the evidence in the suo moto proceedings based on the letter by family of Unnao rape survivor seeking protection from intimidation by accused.

The court has asked the CBI to complete probe in the road crash case within two weeks. The UP Government has been ordered to give Rs. 25 lakhs compensation to the survivor. The survivor, her family and her lawyer should be provided CRPF security.

 

CONCLUSION:

After 2 years and 35 complaints later finally the court took notice of the Unnao rape case. The CJI expressed anguish at the Unnao rape tragedy and has asked the registry to as to why the letter complaining of criminal intimidation at the instance of the accused and praying for protective measures came to him only post the accident on Sunday. Finally the victim got the compensation and security after the court took suo moto cognizance of the case and also asked the CBI to complete the investigation of the case in 7 days.

 

 

 

 

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
drpriyapandey98
Member since Nov 13, 2019
Location: n/a
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
In the light of the latest judgment provided by the SC for commuting the death penalty of former pm Rajiv Gandhi’s assassins to life imprisonment on the ground of excessive wait on govt and President’s part to decide their whim pleas
Shanti Bhushan v Supreme Court of India through its Registrar and another in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 789 of 2018 (Arising out of Diary No. 12405 of 2018) refused pointblank to declare that the function of allocating cases and assigning benches should be exercised by the collegium of five senior Judges instead of the Chief Justice of India.
Coming straight to the nub of the matter, let me begin at the very beginning by first and foremost expressing my full and firm support to the growing perfectly justified demand that seeks chemical castration for child rapists
Justice KS Puttaswamy (Retd) and another v Union of India has upheld the validity of Aadhaar for availing government subsidies and benefits and for filing income tax returns! The lone dissenting Judge in this landmark case is Justice Dr DY Chandrachud. He differed entirely from the majority and struck down Section 139AA.
It is most reassuring, refreshing and re consoling to note that for the first time in at least my memory have I ever noticed a Chief Justice of India who even before assuming office outlined his priorities very clearly and courageously
Manohar Lal Sharma vs Narendra Damodardas Modi dismissed a string of petitions seeking an independent probe into the 2015 Rafale deal, for registration of FIR and Court-monitored investigation by CBI into corruption allegations in Rafale deal.
Judgement by the Supreme Court about energy conservation and infrastructure laws in the state of Himachal Pradesh.
In a major and significant development, the Supreme Court which is the highest court in India has for the second time designated 37 lawyers as Senior Advocates.
On 17th October 2018, the Cannabis Act came into force and Canada became the largest country in the world with a legal marijuana marketplace.
Why Only Lawyers Are Held Liable For Accepting Foreign Funding And Not Politicians? Why is it that under our Indian law only lawyers are held liable for accepting foreign funding and not politicians? Why politicians are mostly never held accountable for accepting foreign funding?
Finally Hindus Get The Right To Worship At Entire Disputed Land And Muslims Get 5 Acre In Ayodhya
230th report of Law Commission of India, it will certainly produce more diamonds like the Chief Justice of India designate Sharad Arvind Bobde who is most invaluable and even Kohinoor diamond stands just nowhere near him
Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court Of India vs Subhash Chandra Aggarwal the office of Chief Justice of India is a public authority under the Right to Information Act
Sections 126 to l29 deal with the privilege that is attached to Professional Communications between the legal advisors and their clients. Section 126 and 128 mention the circumstances under which the legal advisor can give evidence of such professional communication.
National Federation Of Societies For Fast Justice & Anr. Vs. UOI Notifications for establishing the Gram Nyayalayas to issue the same within four weeks.. It was considering a PIL filed by National Federation Of Societies For Fast Justice.
Madhuri Jajoo vs. Manoj Jajoo has allowed the first petition for divorce by mutual consent, through the virtual hearing system.
Reepak Kansal vs. Secretary-General, Supreme Court Of India has taken a stern view of the increasing tendency to blame the Registry for listing some cases more swiftly as compared to others.
upheld the Shebait rights of the erstwhile royals of Travancore in the administration, maintenance and management of Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple in Thiruvananthapuram.
Justice R Banumathi had assumed the role of a Supreme Court Judge on 13 August 2014. She is the sixth women to be a Judge of the Supreme Court of India
Judges cannot speak out even if they are humiliated. How long can the Supreme Court and the Judges suffer the humiliation heaped regularly?
Neelam Manmohan Attavar vs Manmohan Attavar that a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution would not be maintainable in order to challenge an order which has been passed by the High Court in the exercise of its judicial powers.
Jugut Ram vs. Chhattisgarh the fact that a lathi is also capable of being used as a weapon of assault, does not make it a weapon of assault simpliciter.
Sagufa Ahmed vs. Upper Assam Plywood Products Pvt. Ltd the said order extended only the period of limitation and not the period upto which delay can be condoned in exercise of discretion conferred by the statute
the legendary Kesavananda Bharati whose plea to the Apex Court is considered the real reason behind the much acclaimed Basic Structure doctrine propounded in 1973
Amar Singh vs NCT Of Delhi conviction can be based on the testimony of a single eye witness so long he is found to be wholly reliable.
Madhya Pradesh vs. Bherulalthe governments taking for granted the period of limitation prescribed. In other words, it is high time and all the governments in our country both in the Centre and the States must now
Madhya Pradesh vs. Bherulal the governments taking for granted the period of limitation prescribed.
the manner in which Bombay High Court handled the Arnab Goswami case. A vacation Bench comprising of Justices Dr DY Chandrachud and Indira Banerjee of the Supreme Court is currently hearing the petition filed by Republic TV anchor Arnab Goswami
Indian Olympics Association vs. Kerala Olympic Association civil original jurisdiction dismissed Indian Olympics Association's (IOA) plea seeking transfer of a writ petition before Kerala High Court to Delhi High Court.
In Arnab's case, Justice Dr DY Chandrachud had minced no words to say that: There has to be a message to High Courts – Please exercise your jurisdiction to uphold personal liberty
It is most shocking, most disgusting and most disheartening to read that criminals are ruling the roost and making the headlines in UP time and again
Parveen vs. State of Haryana while setting aside an order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissing the plea of a man in view of absence of his counsel has observed in clear, categorical
Madras Bar Association vs Union of India that exclusion of advocates in 10 out of 19 tribunals, for consideration as judicial members is contrary to the Supreme Court judgments in Union of India v. Madras Bar Association
Inderjeet Singh Sodhi vs Chairman, Punjab State Electricity Board the dismissal of special leave petition is of no consequence on the question of law. We all must bear it in mind from now on
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Zaixhu Xie the practice of pronouncing the final orders without reasoned judgments.
It cannot be denied by anyone that government is the biggest litigator in courts and is responsible to a large extent for the huge pending cases in different states all across the country. The top court is definitely not happy with the state of affairs and the lethargic and complacent motto of Sab Chalta Hain attitude of the governments in India.
Centre has finally decided to get its act together and constitute the All India Judicial Service (AIJS) about which we have been hearing since age
Prashant Dagajirao Patil vs. Vaibhav@Sonu Arun Pawar a High Court, while exercising bail jurisdiction cannot issue directions which will have a direct bearing upon the trial.
Commercial Taxes Officer, Circle-B, Bharatpur vs M/s Bhagat Singh in exercise of itsextraordinary appellate jurisdiction that a statute must be interpreted in a just, reasonable and sensible manner
Pravat Chandra Mohanty vs Odisha refused the plea seeking compounding of offences of two police officers accused in a custodial violence case.
Sessions Judge, Bhadrak in S.T. Case No.182/392 of 2014, acquitting the Respondents from charges under Sections 302/201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code IPC
Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. vs. M/S Navigant Technologies Pvt. Ltd. the period of limitation for filing the Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act would commence from the date on which the signed copy of the award was made available to the parties.
Niranjan Hemchandra Sashittal and another v. Maharashtra in page 386 of the citation that: The quantum of bribe is immaterial for judging gravity of the offence under PC Act. Proceedings under PC Act cannot be quashed on the ground of delay in conclusion particularly where the accused adopted dilatory tactics.
The Ministry of Information and Broadcasting has proposed to introduce the Cinematograph (Amendment) Bill, 2021.The new proposal would amend the Cinematograph Act of 1952 to grant the Centre "revisionary powers" and allow it to "re-examine" films that have already been certified by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC).
I have not come across a single person in my life who has not complained of milk being not up to the mark and even in my own life I don't remember how many times my mother
Akhila Bharata Kshatriya Mahasabha v/s Karnataka barring installation of statues or construction of any structure in public roads, pavements, sideways and other public utility places.
Manohar Lal Sharma vs Union of India has made it clear that State won't get a free pass by mere mention of national security.
State of MP vs Ghisilal the civil courts has no jurisdiction to try suit relating to land which is subject-matter of ceiling proceedings, Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976.
Deserving cases in Supreme Court also don't get listed in time and keep pending for a long time and not so deserving cases get listed most promptly when backed by eminent law firms and senior lawyers
Top