Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Saturday, April 27, 2024

Why Should MPs Be Paid For Disrupting Parliament?

Posted in: Legislation
Fri, Jan 15, 21, 12:49, 3 Years ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 1 - hits: 4661
Member of Parliaments (MPs) are disrupting Parliament time and again and not allowing Parliament to function smoothly. This under no circumstances can ever be justified.

Let me say first and foremost: I am hugely dismayed, dejected and disappointed to see how Member of Parliaments (MPs) are disrupting Parliament time and again and not allowing Parliament to function smoothly. This under no circumstances can ever be justified. These MPs don't bother that how much money of taxpayer is getting wasted when they repeatedly adjourn Parliament and even while in session don't allow it to function smoothly by disrupting Parliament on one pretext or the other. Why then should their pay also not be deducted? Why should they have the unfettered discretion to behave as they like?

While craving for the exclusive indulgence of my esteemed readers, let me inform them that I am not alone in feeling so. This is the overwhelming opinion of majority of citizens of India. To top it all, even the former first person of India – the former President Pranab Mukherjee had too openly and very strongly expressed his huge seething anger over the logjam in Parliament and said that the House is not a place for dharna and disruptions which amounts to gagging of majority by the minority.

For my esteemed readers exclusive indulgence, let me also inform them that Dr Pranab Mukherjee had also minced no words in making it absolutely clear that, Three Ds are essential in a democracy and these are debate, dissension and decision. But there was no fourth D. At least my teacher did not tell me that there is a fourth D which is disruption. His observations assumes huge significance as both the Houses of Parliament saw proceedings being washed out yet again on December 9, 2016 with the Opposition demanding the Government mourn the deaths caused due to hardships after demonetisation. Things have not improved even after five years now!

Nothing on earth can be more unfortunate than this that time and again Parliament is witnessing disruption and yet MPs time and again themselves approve 100% or 200% or 300% hike in their pay as they have the unfettered licence to hike their salaries whenever they want. No one else decides for them as to how much pay they should receive. It is they themselves who decide for themselves as to how much pay they should receive.

Be it noted, the Opposition leaders also observed one month of the demonetisation decision by wearing black bands and staging protests in Parliament complex. Speaking on 'Electoral reforms for a stronger democracy' on the occasion of Defence Estates lecture, the former President Dr Pranab Mukherjee said unequivocally that, Disruption is totally unacceptable in Parliamentary system. People send representatives to speak and not to sit on dharna and not to create any trouble on the floor. Very rightly said and there can be no denying this! Why do our elected representatives fail to adhere to what Dr Pranab Mukherjee said so explicitly?

Let me be direct in asking:
Why MPs have the freedom to disrupt Parliament? Why are they not permanently barred from entering Parliament if they disrupt Parliament? Why MPs have the colonial power to retain houses at taxpayer's expense even after they complete their tenure? Why MPs salary is not deducted if they disrupt Parliament? Why are MPs not fined if they disrupt Parliament?

Truth be told, why for acquiring any government job there is a proper police verification and even if one case is found registered in any police station the concerned candidate is debarred from joining any government service but for becoming an MP or MLA you can be a Phoolan Devi and murder many and still enter Parliament and term cases as politically motivated? Why MPs are not made to disclose all their assets and why their unaccounted assets not seized immediately? Why MPs are not made to disclose all donations they receive publicly and same is the case with political parties? Why they are exempted from RTI Act?

To put things in perspective, himself a veteran Parliamentarian before becoming the President, Dr Pranab Mukherjee palpably anguished by the manner in which the winter session of Parliament has been stalled due to disruptions made no bones in saying from his inner heart that, Disruption means you are hurt, you are gagging majority. Majority never participates in this disruption. Only minority comes to the well, shouts slogans, stop the proceedings and creates a situation in which the Chair has no option but to adjourn the House. This is totally unacceptable. Those minority who are in Opposition and who repeatedly disrupt Parliament must seriously introspect on what the former President had said while he was in office! But they care a damn and that alone explains why they repeatedly disrupt Parliament!

As it turned out, the former President Dr Pranab Mukherjee noted that Parliament is in session for only a few weeks in a year. Rest is all washed out in disruption. Now you can imagine how many crores and crores of rupees are wasted for no purpose by MPs and they have no regret in doing so and will also give hundred reasons to justify it. You just cannot convince them under any circumstances because they think that what they do is right and rest all others are wrong including the President!

For all practical purposes, it is in national interest for Parliament to function normally so that all important Bills are passed and meaningful discussion takes place in Parliament. But what we hear in Parliament is nothing but shouting and slanging matches except on few occasions when few members speak on serious issues and they too are frequently disrupted. When will this end?

While maintaining that he was not targeting any single party or individuals, the former President Dr Pranab Mukherjee was quite forthright in saying that the responsibility of allowing Parliament to function is of everyone. He said that, Fact remains that this (disruption) has become a practice which should not be acceptable at all. Whatever be the differences, we have the opportunity to speak our mind, to speak freely and no court can interfere in what I say on the floor of the House. Why can't MPs pay heed to what the former President Dr Pranab Mukherjee had said with a heavy heart while he was in office?

To say the least, the former President Dr Pranab Mukherjee had pointed out that even if a member is leveling an allegation against someone, no court can prosecute him because he has said so on the floor of the House. The former President Dr Pranab Mukherjee minced no words in making it clear to all MPs that, This type of freedom should not be misused by causing disruption. It is high time and now this freedom must be ended once and for all so that MPs are also held liable just like any other ordinary individual!

Recalling the past days, President pointed out that:
When India's budget was paltry and when outlay of Five Year Plan was very meager, two-thirds of time of Parliament was devoted to discussing money and finance. This was because elected representatives in Lok Sabha have singular right under which no tax can be imposed without their approval and neither can any money be withdrawn from the consolidated fund without their approval. No amount can be spent from the consolidated fund of India without the approval of Parliament. But if these issues are not debated, when you are spending Rs 16 lakh to Rs 18 lakh crore per year, if these things are not properly scrutinized on the floor of the House, not debated, not discussed, I do not see that our parliamentary system can be very effective and can proceed successfully. But what a crowning irony that our elected representatives just do lip service in paying regard to what Dr Pranab Mukherjee stood for but when it comes to the implementation part, they pay scant attention to it due to which our democratic system suffers as a whole and time is wasted in just shouting and mud slinging exercise directed against each other which is most atrocious!

What an unbeatable irony that our former President Dr Pranab Mukherjee was saying with a very heavy heart that:
Don't disrupt Parliament. For God's sake, do your job. But Opposition is just not prepared to abide by what he is appealing them to and keep disrupting Parliament time and again. Not just this, even the Government is no less and they too want that MPs should have unfettered licence to do what they want to do and as they like to do and under no circumstances should they be punished in any manner. Nor should they be thrown out of Parliament nor should their salary be deducted nor should they punished in any other manner. For how long?

We must ask ourselves: How long will politicians be allowed to have a free run in all spheres of life? How long will politicians be allowed to scream and shout at each other in Parliament and State Assemblies without any fear of facing prosecution as they stand protected by Constitution? How long will they be simply just not held accountable just like others? How long will they be allowed endlessly to decide their own pay package and have a complete free run?

Needless to say, if any other person does anything even slightly wrong especially those in government services they are immediately thrown out but why MPs are above all such rules and regulations? MPs must be made to pay for the disruption they cause and no salary should be given to them under any circumstances for the time they disrupt Parliament. No MP should be allowed to disrupt Parliament and they must be thrown out if they insist on disrupting Parliament and should be permanently barred from entering Parliament which is the highest institution of democracy if they don't pay heed to rules and regulations! Their pay should also be deducted significantly if they disrupt the smooth functioning of either House of Parliament! This will be the best tribute that we can pay to Parliament and our democratic system of functioning in which there should be no place at all under any circumstances for disruption! Nothing else can be better than this!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh.

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
It must be said with utmost regret that due to guns being easily available in various countries we see that the most ghastly, dastardly and cowardly attack on innocent people as we saw just recently in the New Zealand city of Christchurch on a mosque in which at least 50 people were killed and 50 injured in a mass shooting on March 15, 2019.
Somnath Chatterjee, the Speaker of the 14th Lok Sabha (2004-2009), the House of the People, India, who was born on 25 July 1929, passed away on 9 May 2018 at the age of 89.
The Prevention of Corruption Act. the ratification by India of the UN Convention Against Corruption. the international practice on treatment of the offence of bribery and corruption and judicial pronouncements had necessitated a review of the existing provisions to the Act
I have introduced the Bill to further amend the Jammu and Kashmir Reservation Act, 2004 and the Jammu and Kashmir Reservation (Second Amendment) Bill, 2019. I have come up with the proposal of the Government of India
Jammu and Kashmir has been abrogated, Article 35A and Article 370 would become a thing of the past and Jammu and Kashmir would be made a Union Territory.
The J&K gamble by the Central government has received popular national support and seems to be consistent with the national mood although history and future alone can attest to its wisdom. He also clarified that he can't work by diktat.
PM Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah decided to take the bull by the horns and carry out the most daring step since independence to protect our supreme national interests
R Miller v/s The Prime Minister v/s Advocate General for Scotland United Kingdom Supreme Court has unanimously declared the prorogation of UK Parliament by Boris Johnson to be unlawful and void.
no Indian would be allowed to settle in Jammu and Kashmir nor be allowed to buy any property there or apply for any job there under the garb of protecting people from Jammu and Kashmir.
PM Modi On The Role Of Rajya Sabha In Indian Polity And Need For Reforms on the occasion of 250th Session of Rajya Sabha
Sanjay Kumar Sharda v/s Jharkhand the Chief Minister Public Hearing Cell does not have jurisdiction to direct the police to register an FIR. While deprecating the usurpation of power, the Jharkhand High Court
Opposition blocked roads, opposition blocked rails, opposition members screamed to the hilt in Parliament as never seen before, opposition MPs like learned Derek O' Brien attempted to himself tear the Rule Book in Rajya Sabha,
Arun and Shailendra vs Maharashtra State Government of Maharashtra to pay Rs. 50,000/- each towards compensation to two men who were illegally detained in Beed District of Aurangabad Division for six days in 2013.
Article puts some light on the glaring defects in the three farming laws recently passed by the Indian Parliament. Although, the whole debate has been focused around MSP but rather the acts have serious shortcomings which can prove disastrous for already struggling farmers.
How long will politicians be given long rope and allowed to contest elections from jail itself? How long will MP and MLAs be allowed to misbehave in Parliament and State Assemblies
Anavir A Aravind vs Ministry of Home Affairs has restrained the Government of India and National Informatics Centre (NIC) from sharing the response data of users of Aarogya Setu app
Haryana has also now joined the distinguished club of states who have their own exclusive law for recovering damages from protesters.
Law Commission Recommends Disqualification Of Politicians On Framing Of Charges It merits immense significance that the Law Commission
intolerant and violent while dealing with the common man. As if this is not enough, they have just stopped caring whether the person
Vasaya Yunusali Alarakhabhai v/s Gujarat that the State government take initiatives to implement the guidelines issued by the Apex Court in the landmark case of DK Basu v. State of West Bengal and to install CCTV cameras
Siddharth Rao vs The Govt of NCT of Delhi that: After having analyzed the constitutional provisions, it is concluded that appointments to the position of Secretary, DLA fall outside the purview of the office of Speaker, DLA
It is definitely most disappointing to see that even after more than 77 years of independence we still see that no party ruling in Centre has ever cared for the endless woes of the litigants of West UP
Speaker to reconvene a sitting of Vidhan Sabha which pertains to the Punjab Government’s plea challenging the Governor’s inaction on four Bills
We must definitely also acknowledge now most candidly in all fairness that as compared to the other fields
Top