Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Friday, May 3, 2024

CJI Calls For Debate On Social Media Noise Impact On Institutions

Posted in: Judiciary
Tue, Jul 6, 21, 16:43, 3 Years ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 3975
CJI NV Ramana who was appointed as the 48th CJI on 6th April, 2021 and took oath as CJI on 24th April 2021 has very rightly expressed his concern on the social media noise and how it adversely impacts the institutions also like judiciary to a great extent which actually should not be the case.

It is really good to see that the new CJI NV Ramana who was appointed as the 48th CJI on 6th April, 2021 and took oath as CJI on 24th April 2021 has very rightly expressed his concern on the social media noise and how it adversely impacts the institutions also like judiciary to a great extent which actually should not be the case. The CJI NV Ramana whose reputation is of a very down-to-earth upright person who always speaks politely but powerfully has struck the right note on this. The CJI NV Ramana has very rightly suggested a debate on the impact of the social media noise on institutions such as the judiciary as such noise may not necessarily be reflective of what is right but may put the institution under a lot of stress and pressure.

It goes without saying that there are very few Judges like the incumbent CJI NV Ramana and Justice Dr DY Chandrachud among others who never come under pressure of such noise. All Judges must emulate them and should care the least about what the social media says on any particular case and should exercise their own brain muscles to come to the right, rational and robust conclusion. Only then can our nation progress, prosper and become powerful.

Truth be told, the CJI very rightly said that the judiciary must be completely freed of all pressures if it was to act as a check on governmental power. He also very rightly pointed out that the judiciary cannot be controlled directly or indirectly by the legislature or the executive or else the rule of law would become illusory. All those who are in the legislature or the executive must always pay heed to what the CJI NV Ramana has said and conduct themselves accordingly.

It cannot be denied that the CJI NV Ramana has very rightly said that Judges cannot be swayed by the emotional pitch of public opinion which gets amplified by social media platforms. He also very rightly said which must be adhered to also in totality that:
Judges have to be mindful of the fact that the noise thus amplified is not necessarily reflective of what is right or what the majority believes in. Judges must always go by the laid down law and the evidence that is produced before it and how valid it is for either acquitting or convicting the accused. Nothing else should matter at all for Judges!

Without mincing any words and showing the real mirror, the CJI NV Ramana then very rightly, remarkably and rationally pointed out that:
The new media tools that have enormous amplifying ability are incapable of distinguishing between right and wrong, good and bad, and the real and fake. Therefore, media trials cannot be a guiding factor in deciding cases.

If there is one recent case to the best of my memory which in my opinion is amply good to demonstrate that in India we see a complete mockery of personal liberty was made, it is that of none other than a serving Lt Colonel in the Indian Army – Prasad Shrikant Purohit who even before charge sheet was framed against him was labelled a hardline Hindu terrorist accused of masterminding Malegaon blast in Maharashtra in which 7 Muslims were killed and many others injured in a mosque where the blast occurred. Some news channels adding fuel to the fire while according prime coverage to his case dubbed him as a Hindu hardliner out to convert India into a Hindu nation from a secular nation as it is now! All sorts of absurd things were shown on media! Nothing on earth can be further from the truth!

It needs no rocket scientist to conclude that this played a key role in turning the tide of people's sentiments against him which clearly tantamount to worst media trial which cannot be ever justified under any circumstances! Even Army must hundred percent feel most terribly ashamed for not doing anything to save him from suffering the worst ignominy without committing any crime! How could Mumbai ATS ensure that a serving Army officer was illegally arrested, illegally detained, illegally tortured for a long time before formally effecting his arrest and then illegally kept in jail for nine years did not file even a charge sheet against him with Army watching everything like a mute and helpless spectator and media maintaining a pin drop silence on it? There is certainly more to it than meets the eye!

What makes his entire case most murky is that the illegal manner in which he was arrested by Mumbai ATS notorious for indulging in many fake encounters along with an Army Intelligence officer named Col RK Srivastav, illegally detained, illegally tortured and after many days was then officially arrested! As if this was not enough, Mumbai ATS did not file chargesheet against Lt Col Purohit for 9 long years and he kept rotting in jail all this while and it was only a super legal giant named Harish Salve who is not just a top lawyer in India and England but is also the highest paid lawyer of India and also a former Solicitor General that Supreme Court ultimately granted bail to Lt Col Purohit! Even in medical examination conducted, it was confirmed that Lt Col Purohit was brutally tortured still why no action was taken against all those who tortured him? No men in uniform has any legal right to torture anyone even if someone is accused of being involved in a heinous crime whether it is terror or any other offence and that too a serving senior Army Officer!

In a lighter vein, it must be asked: What was Mumbai ATS doing for one year after arresting Lt Col Purohit as it failed to file a chargesheet? Were offering havan in some temple and saying Swaha! What after two years? Swaha! What after three years? Swaha! What after four years? Swaha! What after five years? Swaha! What after six years after Mumbai ATS handed over the case to NIA? Swaha! What after seven years? Swaha! What after eight years? Swaha! What after nine years? Swaha and then some action finally happened as Supreme Court appeared quite convinced with senior and eminent lawyer Harish Salve's arguments for bail of his client Lt Col Purohit as even charge sheet was not filed against him of 9 years and the charges of MCOCA were just untenable! Why the same promptness was not showed in filing charge sheet as was shown in arresting him by Mumbai ATS? It is because what all was done was at the behest of the party in power and there was no concrete evidence that could be used against him and the media maintained a deafening silence on it instead of asking Mumbai ATS as to how could they arrest a serving Army Officer and then keep him in jail for nine years without even filing a charge sheet against him! NIA too had said that bombs were planted by Mumbai ATS in Col Purohit's house!

More than 76 serving Army Officers testified in his favour and even in Army Court of Inquiry, he got a clean chit and even Maj Gen GD Bakshi, Col RSN Singh, Major Gaurav Arya among others all spoke in his favour and he had an excellent service track record with invaluable experience of having served even in J&K for many years and got many citations apart from Chief of Army Staff commendation card but media did not highlight all this and just portrayed him in negative light! This ensured that he was locked up in jail for 9 years without even charge sheet not being field against him! It is this same media which glorified the Pakistani invader Gen Pervez Musharaf who masterminded Kargil war in which we officially lost more than 600 soldiers, termed terrorists as freedom fighters and in his tenure as Army Chief and President, India witnessed maximum terror attacks and yet media hailed him and some media houses even honoured him like a royal emperor for what I fail to comprehend even now many years later and this same media wastes no time to depict an Indian brave soldier and a Lieutenant Colonel in the Indian Army as a Hindu Terrorist and hails Mumbai ATS for keeping him in jail for 9 long years without filing even a charge sheet!

It is here that judiciary also came under pressure from social media and did just nothing to find out the truth and allowed the serving Army officer of rank of Lieutenant Colonel to rot in the jail for 9 years and face immense torture as was confirmed in the medical report also but this was never highlighted in the media! Media has a lot of explaining to do on this! So we all must always bear this in mind that media does not always show or speak the truth and very often gets biased in its reporting as we saw in case of Lt Colonel Purohit!

Coming back to CJI NV Ramana views on social media noises and its impact on institutions. He further also said that:
It is therefore extremely vital to function independently and withstand all external aids and pressures. While there is a lot of discussion about the pressure from the executive, it is also imperative to start a discourse as to how social media trends can affect the institutions.

Going ahead, CJI Ramana also said that:
This, however, does not mean that Judges should dissociate themselves completely from what is going on. CJI Ramana was speaking on Rule of Law at the 17th PD Memorial Lecture delivered on 30 June, 2021. The CJI Ramana cautioned that the pandemic may be a pre-cursor to a bigger crisis in the days to come and called for an honest evaluation of whether the rule of law had been used to ensure the welfare of all. He said that he didn't want to give such an evaluation as he was bound by his post and temperament.

In essence, social media must be bound not to create a hype on cases which have not been decided by a court of law. Whenever cases of importance are to be decided, social media must refrain from passing advanced judgments by holding kangaroo courts and kangaroo judges and kangaroo trial and kangaroo judgment as we saw most shamefully in case of Lt Col Prasad Shrikanth Purohit! Only then can law take its own course!

Of course, Judges too must not get biased and must decide cases at the earliest with an unbiased mindset as it is very difficult to totally gag media from reporting on sensitive cases! Judges should not get influenced by what media says and should always decide the case on merit!

Also, Judges must not allow cases to keep pending for decades and if police fails to file charge sheet within the stipulated time of 90 days in serious cases and 60 days in other cases then it must acquit the accused. Police cannot hold the life, liberty and reputation of an individual to ransom by not filing a charge sheet for 9 years as we saw most shamefully and most disgracefully in case of Lt Col Purohit and so is the case in many other cases also and judiciary must act tough on all the erring police officials! Judiciary should never buckle under pressure from social media under any circumstances! Only then can our legal system function smoothly, efficiently and as per law as it should always function which will definitely ensure that justice is done to the victim and the accused is not wrongly punished! This is the very purpose also of our courts! What the CJI has said is cent percent right and steps must be initiated in that direction as CJI wants also so that social media noise does not sway a Judge as they want by colouring his thoughts and beliefs which can have an impact on the judgment also as this will always be detrimental to the way in which cases are decided by Judges and this we all who believe in due process of law would never want to happen under any circumstances!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh.

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Rahendra Baglari v. Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate (M) writ petitioner for adjoining a Judicial Magistrate and the High Court and its Registry as Respondents to his plea against the order passed by the said Magistrate.
Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal vs.Uttarakhand long standing or established status quo brought about by judgments interpreting local or state laws, should not be lightly departed from.
Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur apart from High Court at Mumbai but on the contrary UP which has maximum pending cases in India
It is most shocking to see that a peaceful, one of the most developed and most prosperous state like Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur
I am neither a member nor supporter of BJP or any other political party nor a member of any of BJP's affiliated organizations like the RSS or VHP or any other organization.
Kirti vs Oriental Insurance Company Limited advocates cannot throw away legal rights or enter into arrangements contrary to law. It was also made clear that any concession in law made in this regard by either counsel would not bind the parties.
Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) on December 28, 2020 had expressed shock and deep concern on the arbitrary, illegal and brazen exercise of brute power by the police against lawyers, including the search conducted at the premises of an advocate representing some of the accused in the North-East Delhi riots cases.
media trial during criminal investigation interferes with administration of justice and hence amounts to contempt of court as defined under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Jamal v. Maharashtra dismissed a plea filed by the National President of BJP Minority Morcha – Jamal Anwar Siddiqui seeking 'X' category security.
Duroply Industries Limited and anr. Vs Ma Mansa Enterprises Private Limited in exercise of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction has recalled its own order of an injunction passed in a trademark dispute as the Judge presiding over the case had appeared for one party in respect of the same trademark in the past.
At the outset, it must be stated rather disconcertingly that it is India's misfortune that UP which has the maximum population more than 23 crore as Yogi Adityanath
At the outset, it has to be stated without mincing any words that it merits no reiteration that Judges age for retirement must be now increased to 75
Rajeev Bhardwaj v. H.P while dismissing a plea seeking a declaration of a sitting Judge's dissenting view as Coram non-judice and non est in the eyes of law.
Adv KG Suresh vs UOI has declared as unconstitutional the bar on lawyers representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals constituted under the Maintenance Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (Maintenance Act).
Bar Council of India ensured that there is an entrance exam now for all those lawyers who want to practice which has to be cleared before lawyers can start practicing.
It is a matter of grave concern that while our Constitution enshrines the right to equality as postulated in Article 14 but in practice what we witness is just the reverse.
seeking interim bail/parole for the under-privileged and under-trial prisoners/convicts keeping in view the terrible havoc unleashed by the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic.
When an intellectual giant like Fali Sam Nariman whom I personally rate as the world's top jurist and it is not just me but his extremely impeccable credentials are acknowledged in legal field, it is not just India but the whole world which listens to him in silence
Treasa Josfine vs Kerala that a woman who is fully qualified cannot be denied of her right to be considered for employment on the ground that she is a woman and because the nature of the employment would require her to work during night hours.
Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs constituted a Committee to suggest reforms in our criminal justice system which has been facing repeated criticism for its various drawbacks
Congress government's rule in Centre, Kapil Sibal who was Union Law Minister had written very categorically to UP Government for creating a high court bench for West UP at Meerut
completely about the truthfulness of the retracted confession and should corroborate his/her confession as it is unsafe to convict an accused person solely on the basis of the retracted confession
Thabir Sagar vs Odisha the practice of Advocate's clerks filing affidavits on behalf of parties is unacceptable. Such a practice is in gross violation of Rule 26 of the Orissa High Court Rules. It has therefore rightly directed its Registry to ensure that steps are taken forthwith to stop the practice of accepting such affidavits
COVID situation in UP, the Allahabad High Court has issued revised fresh guidelines for the functioning of all the Courts and Tribunals subordinate to it.
amended its rules to make criticism and attack of Bar Council decisions by members a misconduct and ground for disqualification or suspension or removal of membership of a member from the Bar Council.
At the crucial meeting of the Central Action Committee. of more than 20 districts of Bar Association of West UP held at Aligarh
Why UP which is among the largest States, has maximum population more than 24 crore which is more than even Pakistan
When finances are needed for the purpose of improving the judicial system at the lower levels, there is reluctance to make such finances available.
rarely ever booked and made to face the consequences which only serves to further encourage men in uniform to take it for granted to indulge in worst custodial torture
Tarun Saxena vs Union of India as ultra vires Section 17 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 which bars lawyers from representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals
Dhanbad district of Jharkhand was mowed down by an autorickshaw has sent shivers down the spine. The ghastly incident happened on morning of July 28 near the Magistrate colony of Dhanbad that was close to the Judge's residence.
Suman Chadha & Anr. vs. Central Bank of India in that the wilful breach of the undertaking given to the Court can amount to Contempt under Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act.
Rajasthan High Court Rules for Video Conferencing for Courts 2020 which shall be applicable to the proceeding of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan and all the Subordinate Courts of the Rajasthan with immediate effect.
Arun Singh Chauhan v/s MP deprecate the conduct of a practicing advocate who chose not to answer the repeated queries of the Court pertaining to the maintainability of his petition seeking issuance of a writ of quo warranto and regarding the non-impleadment of a necessary party
Dr.Mukut Nath Verma vs UoI Allahabad High Court imposed Rs 5 lakh costs on an advocate Dr Mukut Nath Verma after concluding that he unauthorisedly filed a writ petition on behalf of suspended and absconding IPS officer Mani Lal Patidar and also levelled serious allegations against state authorities and thereby misleading the Court.
Anil JS vs Kerala that instances of allegations about the police disrespecting the citizens were arriving at its doors with alarming regularity and therefore issued certain general directions in its judgment.
If there is one Judge on whom I have blind faith for his exemplary conduct throughout his brilliant career and who can never favour wrongly even his own son
Indianisation of our legal system is the need of the hour and it is crucial to make the justice delivery system more accessible and effective.
the gang war of different gangs have now reached right up to the court premises itself which are supposed to be the holiest shrines for getting justice.
It is not just for enjoying life or going for some holiday trip that lawyers of West UP repeatedly keep going on strike since last many decades.
CM Yogi Adityanath UP has progressed by leaps and bounds which one certainly cannot deny but why is it that it has just one High Court Bench only and that too just approximately 200 km away at the city famously called Nawab City
Just changing name of Allahabad to Prayagraj won't change the ground reality. It is a proven fact that High Court is still called Allahabad High Court and not Prayagraj High Court.
It is most shocking that all the Chief Justices of India from 1947 till 2000 were never shocked nor were any world famous jurist like Nani Ardeshir Palkhiwala, Ram Jethmalani, Shanti Bhushan, Prashant Bhushan among many others
Raggu Baniya @ Raghwendra vs UP has directed the Uttar Pradesh Government to instruct the District Magistrates of all the districts to re-evaluate the cases for remission after 14 years of incarceration even if appeals in such cases are pending in the High Court.
Union Minister of State for Law and Justice – SP Singh Baghel who is also an MP from Agra again in Western UP and who just recently took over has made it clear that his ministry was open to the setting up of a Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Western UP.
Anil Kumar and Anr. Vs Amit that the practice of advocates acting as power of attorney holders of their clients and also as advocates in the matter, is contrary to the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961.
Shashank Singh vs/ Honourable High Court of Judicature at Allahabad that under Article 233 of the Constitution of India, a Judicial Officer regardless of his or her previous experience, as an Advocate, cannot apply and compete for appointment to any vacancy in the post of District Judge.
It must be stated at the very outset that it is quite bewildering and baffling to see that the state of UP which Ban ki moon who is the former UN Secretary General had slammed as the rape and crime capital of India
most powerfully raised vocally the legitimate demand for a High Court Bench in West UP which is the crying need of the hour also.
Top