Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.
Legal Services India

» Home
Monday, June 2, 2025

Prayagraj Is Under Grip Of Medical Mafias: Allahabad HC

Posted in: Health Care Law
Thu, May 29, 25, 16:53, 4 Days ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 17665
Allahabad HC slams SRN Hospital, Prayagraj, calling it a ‘mortuary’ amid mafia control, apathy, and crumbling public healthcare.

While noting with utmost concern the most pathetic and deplorable condition of the State run Swaroop Rani Nehru Hospital in Prayagraj and taking potshots at it, the Allahabad High Court in a most learned, laudable, landmark, logical and latest judgment titled Dr Arvind Gupta vs President And Member State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Uttar Pradesh in Writ – C No. – 28694 of 2024 that was pronounced as recently as on 23.05.2025 has in a scathing indictment of the healthcare system that is in helm of affairs in Prayagraj minced absolutely just no words whatsoever to state most indubitably that the city is in the grip of medical mafias, and went ahead so far as to describe the Swaroop Rani Nehru (SRN) Hospital as a mortuary.

It must be noted that while highlighting the lack of political will, the Single Judge Bench of Allahabad High Court comprising of Hon’ble Mr Justice Rohit Ranjan Agarwal who authored this notable judgment criticized severely the elected representatives from Prayagraj which includes ministers in the UP State Cabinet for their indifference towards the crumbling public healthcare in their own constituency. The Court also pointed out clearly that poor and helpless patients are being misled and dragged by touts who allegedly operate under the patronage of private medical mafias to private hospitals who charge exorbitantly and are being denied proper treatment in government-run facilities. Very rightly so!

At the very outset, this brief, brilliant, bold and balanced judgment sets the ball in motion by first and foremost putting forth in para 1 that:
Prayagraj is under the grip of medical mafias. Swaroop Rani Nehru Hospital attached to Motilal Nehru Medical College is in a pathetic condition. The poor and helpless patients are being dragged by the touts posted by the medical mafias in the hospital to private medical set up, and are not being treated in the hospitals attached to the medical college.

Most significantly, most forthrightly and so also most remarkably, the Bench encapsulates in para 29 what constitutes the cornerstone and lifeline of this notable judgment postulating that:
Time has come when the Court has to take action, as the authorities have failed in discharging their duties and are engaged with private medical set ups. The Court cannot shut its eyes and see government sectors being ruined by handful of private persons. Thus, this Court issues following directions:

  1. The Municipal Commissioner, Prayagraj shall ensure that sewage line of the Swaroop Rani Hospital is cleared immediately and all the resources available with him are deployed in the hospital. The entire premises shall be cleaned up, within 48 hours and the Superintendent Incharge along with the Deputy SIC shall render all possible help to the Municipal Commissioner and its employees. The Municipal Commissioner is also hereby directed to release the second installment to U.P. Jal Nigam so that the road is immediately restored. The said action shall be taken by concerned officer, within a week.
  2. The Superintendent In-charge shall provide the complete list of doctors and their OPD time for the entire week to the office of District Magistrate by evening, and District Magistrate shall get the schedule of the doctors attending OPD to be published in daily newspapers circulated in the city having large circulation. He is also directed to get the CCTV cameras restored immediately which are not in working condition as indicated in the interim report submitted by amicus curiae, within a week.
  3. The District Magistrate is directed to constitute a team of officials who shall monitor and keep check on Professor, Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, Reader and Lecturers of the Medical College indulging in private practice at the accommodation provided by Government or in any private set up. He shall also ensure that the doctors are attending the OPD regularly from 8 am to 2 pm. The residents of the Prayagraj shall also be apprised about the doctors who would be holding the OPD during the week.
  4. The District Magistrate shall also take help of the officials of U.P. Jal Nigam and Public Works Department in getting necessary internal roads repaired so that the movement of patients from one department to another department is made easy and smooth.
  5. The District Magistrate shall also ensure that drinking water is made available to the patients and their attendants in the hospital as the officials of the hospitals who are managing the affairs have totally failed.
  6. The Chief Medical Officer, Prayagraj shall also ensure that proper sanitation drive is carried out in the area around the mortuary which is lying in shambles as the amicus curiae was not allowed to take photograph and make videography despite the orders of this Court. Prima facie, this Court finds that the officer is in contempt of the Court. However, this Court leaves the officer with a warning that he shall put his best efforts in restoring the things in proper shape.
  7. The Commissioner of Police, Prayagraj is also directed to provide enough security guards within campus of Swaroop Rani Hospital so as to prevent the medical touts entering into the hospital.
  8. The entry of medical representatives (MR) shall be strictly prohibited during OPD.
  9. The campus/lawn of Motilal Nehru Medical College shall not be given to any person for holding marriage ceremony or private parties. The authorities shall let out only for the functions so connected with the medical college such as seminars, convocations, re-union of old students etc.
  10. The unauthorised medical shops situated outside the campus shall not be allowed to function and district authorities to take action against those persons who are illegally running the medical shops.
  11. The Principal Secretary, Medical Health, Government of U.P. is hereby directed to submit his reply to the interim report filed by amicus curiae. A copy of which has been supplied to learned Additional Advocate General and learned Chief Standing Counsel who shall convey the same to him. He is also directed to take action against all those defaulting persons and make sure that proper infrastructure is put in place in the Swaroop Rani Nehru Hospital.
  12. The Principal Secretary shall also apprise about this order to State Government and place the same before Chief Secretary and if needed before Chief Minister for his due consideration.
  13. m. Superintendent In-charge shall also file his reply to the said interim report by next date fixed.


To put things in perspective, the Bench envisages in para 2 observing that:
The Government medical set up is under great threat by the private medical mafias of the city. The present case is a classic example which has come before this Court arising out of the order passed by State Consumer Court, wherein a Professor of Motilal Nehru Medical College has treated a patient in private medical set up in the city, who had dragged the doctor concerned to the District Consumer Forum where certain orders were passed against the concerned doctor. Thereafter, the matter travelled to State Forum which upheld the order passed by district forum.

As it turned out, the Bench enunciates in para 3 that:
Assailing the order passed by District forum as well as the State forum, the matter has come up before this Court and when the Court questioned as to how the doctor was treating the patient in a private set up, when he was under the working of Government, he could not answer and special appeal was filed against the order passed by this Court. The matter has now been posted before this Court by Division Bench treating the case to be a Public Interest Litigation.

As we see, the Bench then lays bare in para 4 disclosing that:
This Court while taking up this Public Interest Litigation had required the Principal Secretary, Medical Health, Government of U.P. to inform the Court as to action taken by State Government against those Government doctors who were posted either in the medical colleges of the State or in the Government Hospitals who were in active private practice. Pursuant to order of this Court, a personal affidavit of Principal Secretary was filed informing that number of doctors were put under suspension and proceedings have been initiated against them. The Court, thereafter, required the State to supply the list of medical colleges to the Court. Through an affidavit, list of 42 different State medical colleges have been placed before this Court. Motilal Nehru Medical College is one of those State medical colleges having a strength of 1750 beds in the three hospitals attached to it.

It would be instructive to note that the Bench notes in para 5 that:
This Court had taken up the matter of Medical College, Prayagraj and Kanpur on the priority basis and required the Principals of both medical colleges to file their personal affidavits. This Court scanned the affidavit filed by Principal of Motilal Nehru Medical College, Prayagraj wherein the details of beds in the different departments of the Swaroop Rani Nehru Hospital was given. The Court, thereafter, required the Principal to provide the details of infrastructure and the list of faculty in the said medical college as well as the hospitals attached to it. An affidavit was filed enclosing the coloured photographs of the various departments of the Swaroop Rani Nehru Hospital, prima facie, painting a rosy picture.

Do note, the Bench notes in para 6 that:
The Court was poised with the question as to why a Professor of Medical College having infrastructure in the hospital was treating patient in a private set up. The Court, thereafter, appointed two young lawyers of this Court as amicus curiae and required them to inspect the hospital concerned and submit a report.

Do further note, the Bench then notes in para 7 that:
In the interim report submitted by amicus curiae, the pathetic condition of the Swaroop Rani Nehru Hospital was brought on record. The Court was shocked to read the report and peruse the photographs appended along with the interim report as also the videography conducted by both respective counsels.

It cannot be left unnoticed that the Bench reveals in para 10 mentioning that, When the Court interacted with Sri R.B. Kamal, Superintendent Incharge of Swaroop Rani Nehru Hospital, at first he avoided the queries put by the Court. However, when confronted with the report, he revealed the entire story and condition prevailing in the Swaroop Rani Nehru Hospital. According to officer incharge, OPD starts at 8 am in the morning and continues till 2 pm in the afternoon. But most of the doctors arrive late i.e. after 9 am and after taking round they sit in their OPD. Thus, the report submitted by amicus curiae is fortified by the statement made by Sri Kamal, that when the inspection was done, there were no doctors in the OPD.

Be it noted, the Bench notes in para 11 that:
Then, coming to the infrastructure of the hospital in question, he fairly submitted that the copper pipes of VRF of air conditioners have been stolen and the ACs are not in a working condition in ICU, private wards as well as the general wards. He has candidly accepted that no fans and ACs are in a working condition in ICU. He also apprised the Court that steel tap of RO was stolen which has been replaced by a plastic tap.

As anticipated, the Bench points out in para 12 that:
When the Court confronted as to the availability of the medicines in the hospital, he submitted that 80% of the medicines are supplied by Medical Corporation and rest of 20% required medicines are purchased by hospital itself. According to him, there is a proper supply of medicines and are being given to the patients as per the prescription of the doctors in the OPD.

It cannot be lost on us that the Bench lays bare in para 13 stating that:
On the said statement, Sri Ishan Deo Giri, learned amicus curiae submitted that he has specifically mentioned in the report that on inquiry from patients it has been revealed that the basic medicines such as paracetamol are being purchased by patients from the medicine shops situated outside the campus of the hospitals. He further informed that Jan Aushadhi Kendra from where the generic medicines are dispensed with, was closed when the inspection was made at around 11 am.

What also cannot be lost sight of is that the Bench states in para 15 that, Now, coming to the radiology facility in the hospital in question, Sri Kamal informed that there is one MRI Machine installed in the hospital which is functional. He further submits that out of five x-ray machines installed in the hospital, three are not in a working condition.

As things stands, the Bench mentions in para 17 that:
The officer, thereafter, informed that out of the five ultrasound machines, two are in working condition and apart from that two portable ultrasound machines are also working which when needed in different departments are transported therein within the hospital.

Lamentably, the Bench points out in para 18 that:
On pointed query as to the working of radio therapy machine which was sent by Central Government in the year 2016, Mr. Kamal submitted that required infrastructure has not come up for the working of the radio therapy machine in the oncology department. He also submitted that sewage system was choked, and only yesterday the initiative has been taken for getting the sewage line cleared. He also informed that internal road connecting different departments of the hospital needs repair as work undertaken by U.P. Jal Nigam for laying sewerage line has completely damaged thereby causing hardship to patients.

Quite forthrightly, the Bench specifies in para 19 stating that:
It has been informed that radiology department of hospital is in chaotic state. Most of the diagnostic machines are not in a working condition. The report of Principal only reveals their number but not their working status. The interim report of amicus curiae has revealed their working status. He has also stated in his report that touts of the private diagnostic centres are roaming in the hospitals and are taking the patients for their diagnosis to different private diagnostic centres.

While continuing in the same vein, the Bench firmly holds in para 20 observing that:
This menace has to be stopped immediately and Superintendent Incharge has to immediately take firm action against the touts and if needed may take help of the police.

While catching the bull by the horns, the Bench in a scathing indictment comes down heavily holding strongly in para 21 that:
After interacting with the Superintendent Incharge as well as Deputy SIC of the hospital in question, this Court is shocked to note that Swaroop Rani Hospital cannot be at present called as hospital but rather a mortuary. There are no fans or ACs working in ICU, private wards and general wards. The copper pipes of the VRFs have been stolen and no effort has been undertaken by people incharge of the hospital to get the ACs functional before the summer season began.

Frankly speaking, the Bench observes in para 22 that:
Prayagraj has just witnesses Mahakumbh in the month of January-February, 2025. Swaroop Rani Hospital is just 1 km away from the mela area. According to State estimate, around 66.30 crores pilgrims took holy dip in Sangam. The medical infrastructure of the city is in shambles. It was by the grace of God that no untoward incident happened otherwise there was no medical facility available for treatment of the patients.

Most rationally, the Bench lays bare in para 23 propounding that:
Prima facie, this Court finds that nexus between private medical mafias and medical officers and staffs of the Swaroop Rani Nehru Hospital has practically crippled the infrastructure and working condition.

To be sure, the Bench points out in para 24 that:
The Incharge who is present in the Court has fairly admitted that Hospital lacks infrastructure and facilities. Residents of Prayagraj are facing great hardship and are unnecessarily put to financial hardship by approaching the private medical set ups for treatment.

Most miserably, the Bench laments in para 25 pointing out that:
The State and district administration are totally failing in providing the basic medical facilities to the residents of Prayagraj who have just witnessed the successful Mahakumbh, 2025 in the city. The earlier affidavit filed by Principal Secretary, Medical Health demonstrates that cities like Lucknow, Kanpur and Gorakhpur have hospitals with a capacity of more than 2000 beds but Prayagraj has only medical capacity of 1750 beds despite the fact that biggest religious fair on the earth was held in Prayagraj in the month of January-February, 2025.

No less miserable is the unpalatable truth that the Bench points out in para 26 holding that:
The representatives of people in the Parliament and State Legislature from Prayagraj are also not taking any keen interest in the welfare and well-being of the citizens. There are Ministers in the U.P. Cabinet from Prayagraj but they have not paid any attention to the deteriorating condition of the hospital attached to the Medical College.

More to the point, the Bench expounds in para 27 stating that:
The duty cast upon the officials holding high posts has not been discharged by them in providing adequate medical facilities to the residents of Prayagraj. People have been left in the clutches of private medical setup who are charging exorbitantly for the services provided by them.

Going ahead, the Bench forthrightly and candidly concedes in para 28 holding that:
The failure on the part of officials of the State and District administration and people holding high posts has caused lots of suffering and misery to the poor people.

What’s more, the Bench then further directs in para 30 holding that:
Put up as fresh on Thursday next i.e. 29.05.2025 at 2:00 pm.

Finally, the Bench then draws the curtains of this robust judgment by directing and mandating in para 31 stating clearly that:
On the next date, presence of District Magistrate, Prayagraj as well as Municipal Commissioner, Prayagraj are not required. However, Superintendent Incharge, Deputy SIC, Swaroop Rani Hospital as well as Chief Medical Officer, Prayagraj shall remain present.

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col (Retd) BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut - 250001, Uttar Pradesh

Legal Services India

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Man is the only animal who believes in keeping order in his world. This was one of the reasons that he invented the concept of law
Dilemma with Euthanasia: Of all the rights, the right to one's life is the most valuable. Article 21 of the Constitution, therefore, makes it a fundamental right. Explaining the scope of the words life and liberty.
Writing a surrogacy contract is a complicated piece of Contract, and only experienced Advocate should attempt such a task.
Chandra Shekhar Joshi v State of Uttarakhand recently issued a slew of commendable directions for improving the functioning of Government Medical College, Haldwani and its associate hospitals.
Ahmad Nabi v State of Uttarakhand Uttarakhand High Court has passed several directions to the state government and hospitals/clinical establishments in the state to strictly adhere to the Clinical Establishment (Registration and Regulation) Act, 2010.
The Government of India has enacted the Clinical Establishments (Registration and Regulation) Act, 2010 and notified Clinical Establishments (Central Government) Rules, 2012.
Common Cause Vs Union of India & Others, has “laid down the principles relating to the procedure for execution of Advance Directive and provided the guidelines to give effect to passive euthanasia in both circumstances
The surrogacy bill ensures regulation of surrogacy in India, prohibiting commercial surrogacy.
Baljinder Singh v Punjab and Ms. Khushi Khan v Punjab It is a no-brainer that these directions were certainly the crying need of the hour also and it is most heartening to note that we finally see them also being issued by a two Judge Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court which will help greatly in curbing drug abuse in the state.
This Summit is part ot the annual activities ot our Parliament in which we listen to our children and young people on what theirviews are about our works as public representatives. They choose their Presiding Otticers and run the Parliament on this day by themselves.
Anyone who suffers injuries in a road accident has the right to claim compensation for suffering and damages undergone.
In most cases, insurance companies are responsible for settling personal injury compensation claims, which involves a legal process best handled by personal injury lawyers.
Malik Ubaidullah vs Government of Punjab directed the Government of Pakistan and its agencies to desist forthwith from using the words like disabled, physically handicapped and mentally retarded for persons with different abilities.
When bitten by a dog, a small puppy or a big breed will injure you, leaving physical as well as mental scars. More so, if you see a child attacked by a dog and bitten, the experience is troubling and scary.
When we talk about domestic violence, one thing comes into the minds of most people. They picture a situation where an abusive man or wife hurts the other partner physically.
Women are most prone to sexual assault and rape globally, and it is one of the heinous crimes committed against women.
Swami Achyutanand Tirth vs UOI alarming level of milk adulteration in the country favoured stringent punishment for this offence and asked the Centre to consider amending the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Food Safety and Standards Act (FSSAI)
This article is about the medical negligence happening in our country during COVID 19
In digital healthcare programs information technology is used to provide the healthcare solutions to people who are undergoing treatment.
With an unprecedented load on medical infrastructure, many cases of medical negligence sprung up which have necessitated action to be taken by the Legislature or Judiciary.
Basic Rights of Food Security and its Outline in the Legal Field
Bhavneet Singh vs IRCON International Limited through Chairman and Managing Director that the Persons with Disabilities are not subjected to harassment by being transferred or posted at places where they cannot get an environment being conducive for their working.
S. Sahana Priyankaa v/s Tamil Nadu while taking a very grim view of the specialist doctors refusing to work in government hospitals has been most forthright in holding that the doctors after undergoing medical specialty courses
Sunayana Sibal v/s Government of NCT of Delhi issued a slew of landmark directions for maintaining proper hygiene in dairies in the national capital which is so imperative to ensure medical care of cattle kept therein and for use of spurious oxytocin.
Indian Medical Association v/s UOI that the fundamental right to health encompassed the right of a consumer to be made aware of the quality of products being offered for sale by manufacturers, service providers, advertisers and advertising agencies.
Ku. Shital Dinkar Bhagat vs Maharashtra that she took the extreme step under stress and thus her act is exempted from action owing to provisions of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017.
Top