Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.
Legal Services India

» Home
Thursday, October 30, 2025

Not Only Just Constitution But Now Even PM Also Turns 75

Posted in: Constitutional Law
Thu, Sep 18, 25, 16:27, 1 Month ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 27914
High Court Bench demand in West UP highlights injustice, population imbalance, and urgent need for judicial reforms in India.

High Court Bench Issue in West Uttar Pradesh

It was at the start of the year, on January 26, 2025, that our Constitution officially turned 75 years old. Just recently, on September 17, 2025, our Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi also turned 75 years old. Now, 100 years is not very far away!

What is most unsettling to note, however, is that the endless woes faced by the litigants of West UP — comprising 30 districts with more than 10 crore population — are still not coming to an end. Poor litigants who cannot afford plane travel still have to journey whole nights and nearly a day, not even to Lucknow, but all the way to Allahabad for justice. This continues despite the fact that a High Court Bench was created in Lucknow as far back as July 1948, even before the Constitution came into force.

The Struggle of Litigants

The litigants of 30 districts of West UP and the hilly areas of undivided UP had to travel all the way to Allahabad. This was the biggest betrayal of the Constitution and the deepest burial of justice. People of hilly areas fought on the streets, many sacrificed their lives, and ultimately secured statehood on November 9, 2000, along with a High Court at Nainital for just 88 lakh people. But nearly 25 years later, the woes of people in West UP remain unchanged.

Failure of the Centre

The Centre must be singled out for not taking any interest in resolving this issue, which explains why it has lingered for nearly 80 years of independence. The question is simple: Why so much delay in setting up a High Court Bench in West UP, whose population is larger than most Indian States, when Maharashtra with less than half the population has five High Court Benches?

  • Kolhapur High Court Bench created on 18.08.2025 for just 6 districts with 1.64 lakh people.
  • No new Bench in UP since 1948 despite maximum pending cases.
  • West UP accounts for the majority of pending cases but has no Bench or Circuit Bench.

Justice Jaswant Singh Commission

The Justice Jaswant Singh Commission, headed by a former Supreme Court Judge, recommended:

  • Two circuit Benches in hilly areas — Dehradun and Nainital.
  • A permanent High Court Bench in West UP at Agra.

Yet, not a single Bench was created in West UP. Ironically, where it recommended Benches in Aurangabad (Maharashtra), Jalpaiguri (West Bengal), and Madurai (Tamil Nadu), they were promptly created. Maharashtra, with multiple Benches already, even got a fifth one in Kolhapur. Meanwhile, West UP, with more than 10 crore people, still has none. This is blatant discrimination in distribution of High Court Benches.

Discrimination and Neglect

The Centre’s approach has been irrational, undemocratic, and discriminatory. Even Lahore (Pakistan) is geographically closer to West UP than Allahabad, yet litigants are forced to travel there. This injustice culminated in the partition of UP in 2000, when Uttarakhand was carved out.

Denying West UP and Bihar even a single High Court Bench is not just illogical, but deeply insensitive and discriminatory. Why does the Centre, led by the Prime Minister, and the Supreme Court, led by the Chief Justice, remain silent on this issue?

Ignored Recommendations

Key recommendations ignored include:

  • Dr. B.R. Ambedkar’s suggestion for separate Statehood for West UP.
  • Justice Jaswant Singh Commission’s recommendation for a permanent Bench at Agra.
  • 230th Report of the Law Commission recommending multiple Benches across States.

Smaller States like Madhya Pradesh (7 crore), Karnataka (6 crore), and Assam (4 crore) have multiple High Court Benches, while UP with over 20 crore people still struggles.

The Call for Justice

The Supreme Court itself has said: “Justice must not only be done but must also be seen to be done.” Yet, this glaring discrimination persists. Judiciary must ensure equal justice for all regions, not just for a few elite States.

The Billion-Dollar Question

How long will a solution to the High Court Bench issue in West UP keep lurking in the shadows? The people’s demand is legitimate, pressing, and cannot be silenced any longer.

A Hope for Change

As PM Narendra Modi turns 75 in 2025, just like the Constitution, it is hoped he will change his approach and address this discrimination. Approving a High Court Bench in West UP will be the boldest and best tribute to the Constitution and to his own tall stature.

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col (Retd) BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut - 250001, Uttar Pradesh

Legal Services India

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
This article critically analyses the concept of Parliamentary privileges enshrined under Article 105 of the Constitution of India along with various judicial pronouncement.
Here we have two legal systems, one tracing its roots to Roman law and another originating in England or we can say one codified and the other not codified or one following adversarial type of system other inquisitorial or one is continental whereas the other one Anglo-American
The principle of gender equality is enshrined in the Indian Constitution in its Preamble, Fundamental Rights, Fundamental Duties and Directive Principles.
The constitutional interpretations metamorphose a non-federal constitution into a federal one which results into a shift from reality to a myth
What justice is? and why one wants access to it? are important question which need to be addressed in introductory part of the literature. Justice is a concept of rightness, fairness based on ethics, moral, religion and rationality.
It is not the whole Act which would be held invalid by being inconsistent with Part III of the Constitution but only such provisions of it which are violative of the fundamental rights
Thomas Mann had in 1924 said; a man’s dying is more the survivor’s affair than his own’. Today his words are considered to be true as there is a wide range of debate on legalizing euthanasia.
India became one of 135 countries to make education a fundamental right of every child, when the Parliament passed the 86th Constitutional amendment in 2002.
Following are the salient features of the amended Lokpal bill passed by Parliament:
Good governance is associated with efficient and effective administration in a democratic framework. It is considered as citizen-friendly, citizen caring and responsive administration. Good governance emerged as a powerful idea when multilateral and bilateral agencies like the World Bank, UNDP, OECD, ADB, etc.
A democratic society survives by accepting new ideas, experimenting with them, and rejecting them if found unimportant. Therefore it is necessary that whatever ideas the government or its other members hold must be freely put before the public.
This article describes relationship between Indian Legislative provisions and freedom of press.
This article gives an overview of the Definition of State as per Article 12 Of the Constitution of India with emphasis on Relevant case law
Coming straight to the nub of the matter, The Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in Bir Singh v Delhi Jal Board held that Pan India Reservation Rule in force in National Capital Territory of Delhi is in accord with the constitutional scheme relating to services under the Union and the States/Union Territories
Jasvinder Singh Chauhan case that denial of passport or its non-renewal without assigning reasons as listed under the Passports Act, 1967 infringes the fundamental rights. who was praying for the renewal of his passport and issuance of a fresh passport to him.
In Indian Young Lawyers Association v/s Kerala has very laudably permitted entry of women of all age groups to the Sabarimala temple, holding that 'devotion cannot be subjected to gender discrimination'. It is one of the most progressive and path breaking judgment that we have witnessed in last many decades just like in the Shayara Bano case
Sadhna Chaudhary v U.P. has upheld the dismissal of a judicial officer on grounds of misconduct, on the basis of two orders passed by her in land acquisition cases. This has certainly sent shockwaves across Uttar Pradesh especially in judicial circles.
The term judiciary refers to the higher officials of the government i.e Judges of all the hierarchy of the courts. The constitution of India gives greater importance to the independence of the Indian judiciary. Every democratic country set up it’s own independent judiciary for the welfare of it’s citizens.
various allowances, perquisites, salaries granted to mp and mla
This article presents a glimpse of human life through the constitutional approach.
Er. K. Arumugam v. V. Balakrishnan In the contempt jurisdiction, the court has to confine itself to the four corners of the order alleged to have been disobeyed
As Parliamentarians, we remain the guardians and protectors of fundamental rights, and always need to ensure we are fulfilling our many responsibilities, as legislators, representatives and role models. to uphold the rights set out in the Declaration, particularly as regards safeguarding political and civil society space.
Kashmiri Sikh Community and others v. J&K has very rightly upheld PM's Employment Package 2009 for Kashmiri Pandits living in the Valley.
The Supreme Court on 12th September stuck down the penal provision of adultery enshrined under Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code.
President A. Akeem Raja case it has been made amply clear that, Freedom of religion can't trump demands of public order. Public order has to be maintained at all cost. There can be no compromise on it.
Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghosh who is a former Supreme Court Judge and former Chief Justice of Andhra Pradesh High Court who retired in May 2017 and a current member of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) was appointed as India's first Lokpal
colonial era Official Secrets Act (OSA) as many feel that it has far outlived its utility. Before drawing any definite conclusion on such an important issue, we need to certainly analyse this issue dispassionately from a close angle.
Sri Aniruddha Das Vs The State Of Assam held that bandhs / road/rail blockades are illegal and unconstitutional and organizers must be prosecuted.
ABout changes in Changes in Constitutional (Forty-Second) Amendment Act
Definition of State as per Article 12 f the Constitution of India with emphasis on Relevant case law
Justice KS Puttaswamy (Retd) and Anr vs UOI held that right to privacy is a fundamental right.
You want India to defend Kashmir, feed its people, give Kashmiris equal rights all over India. But you want to deny India and Indians all rights in Kashmir. I am a Law Minister of India, I cannot be a party to such a betrayal of national interests.
Faheema Shirin RK Vs State of Kerala and others that right to access internet is a fundamental right forming part of right to privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
the Supreme Court of UK has gone all guns blazing by categorically and courageously pronouncing in Gilham v Ministry of Justice the whistle-blowing protection envisaged under Employment
The Constitution directs the government that High Court shall have power, throughout in relation to it jurisdiction, to issue to any person or authority, including in appropriate cases, any Government, directions, orders or writs, for the enforcement of any of the rights conferred by Part III and for any other purpose also.
What is child labour ? Why bonded in india?
Shiv Sena And Ors. Vs UOI whether the newly sworn in Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis enjoys majority in the State Assembly or not! This latest order was necessitated after Shiv Sena knocked the doors of the Apex Court along with Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) and Congress.
Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and the National Register of Citizens (NRC), saying they are two different things. We all saw in different news channels that many people who were protesting did not had even the elementary knowledge of CAA but were protesting vehemently just on the provocation of leaders from different political parties
Sanmay Banerjee v/s. West Bengal in exercise of Constitutional writ jurisdiction on the appellate side has that people have every right to criticize dispensation running the country, being legislature, executive or judiciary
On May 16, 1946 Cabinet Mission Plan arbitrarily announced to group British Indian states in A, B & C categories. Assam was kept in Group C with Bengal, creating a predominantly Muslim zone in Eastern India like the one proposed to be setup in western India.
Top political leaders and Members of Parliament from Left Parties have very often raised the questions of atrocities and accommodation of these minorities even in the Parliament. Unfortunately when this dream of opening the doors of India for her cultural children was about to be realized
Why is it that even after more than 81 days the blocking of road at Shaheen Bagh in Delhi is continuing uninterrupted since 15 December 2019? Why is it that Centre allowed this to happen? Why were they not promptly evicted?
The Basic Structure Of Indian Constitution Or Doctrine Applies During The Time Of Amendments In Constitution Of India. These Basic Structure State That The Government Of India Cann’t Touch Or Destroy
Arjun Aggarwal Vs Union Of India And Anr (stay) dismissed a PIL filed by a petitioner who is a law student. The PIL had challenged the June 30 order of the Ministry of Home Affairs wherein considerable relaxations from lockdown were operationalised under Unlock 1.0
This blog deals explains the Right to Access Internet as a Fundamental Right under Constitution of India and the reasonable restrcitions which it is subject to and whether it can be considered to be a fundamental right or not.
This article talks about what exactly is meant by the doctrine of colourable legislation, how various case laws have come up time and again to reiterate its meaning and how the supreme court views this doctrine. To address legislative transparency for some improvements in the legislative system, colorable legislation is necessary to be studied
Shri Naini Gopal Vs The Union of India and Ors. in Case No. – LD-VC-CW-665 of 2020 has minced no words to hold that: We need to remind the Bank that the pension payable to the employees upon superannuation is a property under Article 300-A of the Constitution of India
Article 25 of the Constitution of India, thus ruled that the immediate family members of Covid-19 victims be permitted to perform the funeral rites of the deceased subject to them following certain precautionary guidelines
Top