Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.
Legal Services India

» Home
Monday, June 15, 2026

Jharkhand High Court Issues Landmark Guidelines for Protection, Rehabilitation and Dignity of Rape Survivors (2026)

Posted in: Criminal Law
Fri, Jun 12, 26, 05:01, 4 Days ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 26659
Jharkhand HC's landmark 2026 ruling strengthens rape survivor rights through compensation, rehabilitation, Zero FIR and legal aid.

Jharkhand High Court Issues Landmark Directions for Protection, Rehabilitation and Dignified Treatment of Rape Survivors

It is definitely most refreshing to note that while taking the right step in the right direction, the Jharkhand High Court, in a most learned, laudable, landmark, logical and latest judgement titled 'Court on its Own Motion v State of Jharkhand & Ors' in W.P. (PIL) No. 2253 of 2024 and cited in Neutral Citation No.: 2026:JHHC:16350-DB that was reserved on 04.05.2026 and then finally pronounced on 08.06.2026, has issued a slew of comprehensive directions to the state government to improve the response of police and civil authorities in cases of sexual violence for the protection and rehabilitation of rape survivors.

It must be noted that these most commendable directions have been issued for the protection, rehabilitation, and dignified treatment of rape survivors across the state, enveloping issues that ranged from police conduct and shelter homes to free education for children born as a result of rape and scholarships for meritorious students admitted to premier government institutions like IITs, NITs, AIIMS, and IIMs.

Most significantly and most remarkably, this notable judgement was authored by Hon’ble Justice Mr Rajesh Shankar for a Division Bench of Jharkhand High Court comprising the Hon’ble The Chief Justice Mr MS Sonak and he encapsulate in para 89 what constitutes the “real cornerstone” of this brilliant judgement, postulating precisely that, “In view of the discussions and observations made hereinabove, the directions of this court on the issues raised in the present PIL are summarized as follows:-

Summary of Key Directions Issued by Jharkhand High Court

Direction No. Subject Matter
(i) Zero FIR compliance and police accountability
(ii) Improvement of One-Stop Centres
(iii) Use of Nari Niketan as shelter home
(iv) Public awareness regarding shelter homes
(v) Free education and scholarships for children born out of rape
(vi) Interim and final compensation for victims
(vii) Time-bound payment of compensation
(viii) Expeditious trial of sexual offence cases
(ix) Constitution of Special Task Force
(x) Protection of victim identity
(xi) Training of officials handling sexual violence cases
(xii) Time-bound rape investigations
(xiii) Immediate legal aid and victim support
(xiv) Recording statements through female police officers
(xv) Sensitization of police personnel
(xvi) Ban on Two-Finger Test
(xvii) Legal awareness and self-defence programmes
(xviii) Rehabilitation and relocation mechanism
(xix) Designation of 181 as primary women-centric helpline

Direction (i): Zero FIR Compliance and Police Accountability

(i) The Director General of Police, Jharkhand, is directed to ensure strict compliancewithf the provisions of Section 173 of the BNSS,2023,3 and for that purpose, to issue necessary directions to all the police stations as well as to make periodical monitoring to see the compliance thereof. In the event of any police officer failing to comply with the directions, appropriate steps shall be taken for the initiation of penal as well as departmental action against such erring officer in accordance with law. The state government is further directed to arrange periodic sensitisation programmes for police personnel to ensure effective implementation of the legal mandate relating to zero FIRs.

Direction (ii): Strengthening One-Stop Centres

(ii) The Secretary, Department of Women, Child Development and Social Security, Government of Jharkhand, is directed to cure all the shortcomings and lapses existing in the ‘One-Stop Centres’ as pointed out by the learned Amicus Curiae without further delay. A women-headed committee shall be constituted by the said department to receive the complaints regarding the functioning of ‘One-Stop Centres’ and to supervise operations of the said centres by assessing adequacy and quality of services so as to ensure victim-centric delivery. The committee shall submit annual compliance and performance reports to the secretary of the said department. In the event of any failure in providing adequate and quality service in the ‘One-Stop Centres’, the persons responsible shall be liable for departmental/penal action.

Direction (iii): Nari Niketan as Shelter Home

(iii) The Department of Women, Child Development and Social Security, Government of Jharkhand, is directed to use “Nari Niketan” (Shakti Sadan) at Ranchi also as a shelter home for the female victims of sexual violence without fixing any maximum time limit for stay at that place; rather, the victims shall be allowed to stay there considering the facts and circumstances of a particular case.

Direction (iv): Public Awareness of Shelter Homes and Rehabilitation Centres

(iv) The Department of Women, Child Development and Social Security, Government of Jharkhand, is directed to widely and regularly publicise the purpose, location and contact details of the shelter homes/rehabilitation centres for women victims through all means of communication, viz., print media, electronic media, hoardings/LED display boards at all public places.

Direction (v): Free Education and Scholarships for Children Born Out of Rape

(v) The Department of School Education and Literacy, Government of Jharkhand, is directed to appoint nodal officers in every district to ensure that free and compulsory education up to Class XII is given to the children born out of rape incidents. In addition, the said department shall provide scholarships to the meritorious children who are selected in top/premier government institutions like IITs, NITs, AIIMs, IIMs, etc. The nodal officer shall monitor the compliance with the direction of this court, and if any problem is faced by such children, he shall communicate with the secretary of the said department, who shall promptly resolve the same.

Direction (vi): Interim and Final Compensation for Victims

(vi) The courts dealing with the sexual offences are directed to enquire about the need for interim relief to be given to the victims of sexual offences immediately upon the receipt of information and to pass appropriate orders accordingly. The trial courts are further directed to pass the order of final compensation to the victims at the time of passing the final judgement irrespective of it ending in acquittal or conviction of the accused or even in case the accused is not traced or has absconded. The quantum of compensation awarded to the concerned victims shall be just and reasonable, taking into consideration the loss and injury suffered by them.

Direction (vii): Time-Bound Payment of Compensation

(vii) The Department of Home, Jail & Disaster Management, Government of Jharkhand, and Jharkhand Legal Services Authority are directed to pay the compensation, whether interim or final, as awarded by the trial court to the victim within a period of 30 days from the date of communication of the order.

Direction (viii): Expeditious Trial of Sexual Offence Cases

(viii) The courts dealing with the sexual offences are directed to try the cases by strictly adhering to the timeline provided under section 346 of the BNSS, 2023, and no unnecessary adjournment shall be granted to the accused after commencement of the trial.

Direction (ix): Constitution of Special Task Force

(ix) The Director General of Police, Jharkhand, is directed to constitute a special task force which shall quarterly monitor the cases of sexual offences and ensure adherence to the prescribed timelines by the prosecuting agencies so as to ensure that no unnecessary adjournment is taken by them during the trial.

Direction (x): Protection of Victim Identity

(x) All mediapersonnel,, police officials, officers and staff of the trial courts are directed to mandatorily follow the direction of the Hon’ble Supreme Court rendered in the case of Nipun Saxena(supra.). . The erring persons will be subjected to departmental proceeding as well as penal action by the competent authority of the concerned department.

Direction (xi): Training and Capacity Building

(xi) The Secretary, Department of Home, Jail & Disaster Management, Government of Jharkhand, is directed to arrange a training programme for the persons who are dealing with the cases of sexual violence. The Principal District and Sessions Judge of the concerned district shall also ensure strict compliance with the provisions of BNSS, 2023, within the courts.

Direction (xii): Time-Bound Investigation of Rape Cases

(xii) The police officers are directed to complete the preliminary investigation of rape cases within fifteen days and the final investigation within two months from the date on which the information is recorded by the officer-in-charge of the concerned police station.

Direction (xiii): Immediate Legal Aid and Victim Assistance

(xiii) The superintendents of police of all the districts are directed to arrange immediate legal aid for the victims by trained lawyers who will deal with the victims with all sensitivity and not as mere clients. They should provide guidance to the victims as to how they would get help of various nature from different specialized agencies, such as emotional counselling, medical assistance, etc. Immediate care and protection shall also be extended to the victims under the POCSO Act within 24 hours of the incident, which shall include admitting the child into a shelter home and her medical examination.

Direction (xiv): Recording Statements Through Female Police Officers

(xiv) The Director General of Police, Jharkhand, is directed to ensure that the statement of victims of sexual offences is recorded by female police officers.

Direction (xv): Police Sensitization Programmes

(xv) The Secretary, Department of Home, Jail & Disaster Management, Government of Jharkhand, is directed to periodically arrange a sensitisation programme for imparting proper training to the police officers to ensure that a friendly environment is given to the rape victims while recording their statements so that true facts are reflected in their statements. No force or compulsion is to be imposed on them while recording their statements.

Direction (xvi): Ban on the Two-Finger Test

(xvi) The Department of Home, Jail & Disaster Management, Government of Jharkhand, is directed to issue a circular prohibiting the “two-finger test” (if not yet issued) in all government and private hospitals/medical institutions, with a further direction that violation of the said circular by any person, including doctors and paramedical staff, will be treated as professional misconduct and the erring person will be subjected to departmental proceedings.

Direction (xvii): Legal Awareness and Self-Defence Programmes

(xvii) The state government is directed to institutionalise periodic legal awareness programmes in a manner which is easily understandable to the girls residing in remote areas for which street plays or audio-visual tools may be used. The state government is also directed to arrange physical area self-defence programmes at the level of schools, colleges and villages without charging any fee from them.

Direction (xviii): Rehabilitation and Relocation of Victims

(xviii) If, due to any social reason, the rape victims and their family wish to shift their place of residence to some other place, the State shall have a mechanism to rehabilitate them at a place they wish to reside.

Direction (xix): Designating 181 as the Primary Women-Centric Helpline

(xix) The state government shall consider designating the number ‘181’ (i.e., women-centric helpline for sexual violence, domestic abuse and gender-based emergencies) as the primary helpline number with automatic back-end linkage to the helpline number ‘112’, i.e., the emergency response support system for immediate police, medical and rescue response.”

Conclusion

The directions issued by the Jharkhand High Court in Court on its Own Motion v State of Jharkhand & Ors constitute a comprehensive framework aimed at ensuring protection, rehabilitation, compensation, dignity, education, legal aid, shelter, medical care and speedy justice for rape survivors. The judgement also emphasises the accountability of police officials, judicial officers, medical professionals and government departments while reinforcing victim-centric justice and rehabilitation measures throughout the State of Jharkhand.

Division Bench Observations on Public Interest Litigation

It is worth noting that the Division Bench notes in para. 2 that, “On perusal of the record, it appears that on previous dates, Ms Padma Baraik was insisting to espouse her personal cause, which could not have been entertained in a public interest litigation. Nonetheless, looking to the importance of the aspects involved in the present PIL, suo motu cognisance of the issue was taken by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 24.09.2025, and Ms Padma Baraik was permitted to assist the court as an intervenor. Ms Padma Baraik was, however, given liberty to pursue her individual cause in accordance with law.”

Notes of Suggestion Filed by Intervenor

It would be instructive to note that the Division Bench hastens to add in para 3, noting that, “The intervenor, Ms Padma Baraik, has also filed her notes of suggestion in this court in Hindi, which is taken on record. The notes also contain general grievances which are summarized as under:-

Summary of General Grievances

  • (i) In spite of the specific provision in Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, the police officers are not registering a zero FIR with respect to the offences of sexual violence; rather, they misbehave with the victims.
  • (ii) Neither a free copy of the FIR is being provided to the victims nor are their statements recorded by the female police officers as mandated under BNSS.
  • (iii) Appropriate compensation is not provided to the rape victims as per the guidelines laid down in the judgement of the Hon’ble Supreme Court rendered in the case of Nipun Saxena & Anr. vs. Union of India & Ors., reported in (2019) 2 SCC 705, and the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) Compensation Scheme for Women Victims/Survivors of Sexual Assault/Other Crimes.
  • (iv) ‘Sakti Sadan’, Arsande, Kanke, Ranchi and One-Stop Centres (OSCs) located in every district lack proper facilities, and the same are required to be improved.”

Key Grievances at a Glance

Issue Concern Raised
Zero FIR Registration Police officers are allegedly not registering Zero FIRs in cases of sexual violence and are misbehaving with victims.
Victims' Rights Under BNSS Victims are not receiving free copies of FIRs, and statements are not always recorded by female police officers.
Compensation to Victims Compensation is allegedly not being provided in accordance with Supreme Court guidelines and NALSA schemes.
Shelter and Support Facilities Sakti Sadan and one-stop centres are stated to lack adequate facilities and require improvement.

Clarification on Scope of Directions

For the sake of clarity, the Division Bench clarifies in para 90, holding that, “It is further clarified that the above directions are not exhaustive and are in addition to the observations made in different preceding paragraphs. These shall, however, in no manner preclude the respondent authorities from taking additional measures to deal with the issues raised in the present PIL.”

Directions for Immediate Compliance

In its concluding part, the Division Bench directs and holds in para 92 that "Let copies of this judgement be forthwith forwarded to all the concerned State authorities, the Principal District and Sessions Judges of all districts in the State of Jharkhand, including the Judicial Commissioner, Ranchi; the Member Secretary, JHALSA; the Director, Judicial Academy Jharkhand; and the District Magistrates and the Superintendents of Police of all districts for immediate and necessary compliance." The institutional district heads are further directed to share this judgement with all magistrates, whether judicial or executive, for their information and necessary action.”

Authorities Directed to Receive the Judgment

Authority/Institution Purpose
State Authorities Immediate and necessary compliance
Principal District and Sessions Judges Implementation and dissemination
Judicial Commissioner, Ranchi Information and compliance
Member Secretary, JHALSA Necessary action
Director, Judicial Academy Jharkhand Awareness and implementation
District Magistrates Administrative compliance
Superintendents of Police Law enforcement compliance
All Judicial and Executive Magistrates Information and necessary action

Significance of the Judgment for Rape Survivors

In essence, this most progressive, pragmatic, persuasive and pertinent judgement by the Jharkhand High Court issuing a slew of most commendable, courageous and comprehensive directions for the protection and rehabilitation of rape survivors must be most strictly implemented in totality. The amicus curiae in this leading case had also very rightly urged the Jharkhand High Court to issue a direction to prohibit the “two-finger test", and while accepting the brilliant suggestion, the order directed the Jharkhand State government to issue a circular prohibiting the “two-finger test” in all government and private hospitals/medical institutions, with a further direction that any violation of the said circular will be treated as professional misconduct and the erring person will be liable to be strictly dealt with in accordance with law. Very rightly so!

Major Takeaways from the Judgment

  • Recognition of systemic issues faced by survivors of sexual violence.
  • Emphasis on proper registration of Zero FIRs.
  • Reinforcement of victims' rights under BNSS, 2023.
  • Focus on compensation and rehabilitation mechanisms.
  • Directions to improve facilities at Sakti Sadan and One-Stop Centres.
  • Prohibition of the “two-finger test” in government and private medical institutions.
  • Strict action against violations, treating them as professional misconduct.
  • Statewide dissemination and implementation of the judgement.

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col (Retd) BPS Sirohi, A - 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh.

Legal Services India

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 19, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
The general principle, is that a FIR cannot be depended upon a substantive piece of evidence.The article discusses the general priciple, along with exceptions to it.
Victim plays an important role in the criminal justice system but his/her welfare is not given due regard by the state instrumentality. Thus, the role of High Courts or the Supreme Court in our country in affirming and establishing their rights is dwelt in this article.
Can anybody really know what is going inside the heads of criminal lawyers? I mean, yes, we can pick bits of their intelligence during courtroom trials and through the legal documents that they draft.
Terrorism and organized crimes are interrelated in myriad forms. Infact in many illustration terrorism and organized crimes have converged and mutated.
Right to a copy of police report and other documents As per section 207 of CrPC, accused has the right to be furnished with the following in case the proceeding has been initiated on a police report:
In terms of Section 2 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 hereafter referred to as 'the Act'), "human rights" means the rights relating to life, liberty, equality and dignity of the individual guaranteed under the Constitution
The Oxford dictionary defines police as an official organization whose job is to make people obey the law and to prevent and solve crime
the Supreme Court let off three gang rapists after they claimed a ‘compromise formula’ with the victim and agreed to pay her a fine of Rs 50,000 each for their offence.
benefit those prisoners who are kept in solitary confinement, the Uttarakhand High Court delivered a landmark judgment in the case of State of Uttarakhand v 1. Mehtab s/o Tahir Hassan 2. Sushil @Bhura s/o Gulab Singh Criminal Reference No. 1 of 2014 on April 27, 2018
this article helps you knowing how to become a criminal lawyer
helps you to know adultery and its types
In the landmark case of Manoj Singh Pawar v State of Uttarakhand & others Writ Petition (PIL) No. 156 of 2016 which was delivered on June 18, 2018, the Uttarakhand High Court issued a slew of landmark directions
Scope and ambit of Section 6 of Indian Evidence Act,1872
Victims of Crime Can Seek Cancellation of Bail: MP HC in Mahesh Pahade vs State of MP
State of Orissa v Mahimananda Mishra said clearly and convincingly that the court must not go deep into merits of the matter while considering an application for bail and all that needs to be established from the record is the existence of a prima facie case against the accused.
Yashwant v Maharashtra while the conviction of some police officers involved in a custodial torture which led to the death of a man was upheld, the Apex Court underscored on the need to develop and recognize the concept of democratic policing wherein crime control is not the only end, but the means to achieve this order is also equally important.
20 more people guilty of killing a 60-year-old Dalit man and his physically-challenged daughter. Upheld acquittals of 21 other accused, holding that there was insufficient evidence to establish their guilt. So it was but natural that they had to be acquitted
No person accused of an offence punishable for offences involving commercial quantity shall be released on bail or on his own bond unless
Accident under section 80 under the Indian Penal Code falls under the chapter of general exceptions. This article was made with the objective of keeping in mind the students of law who are nowadays in dire need of material which simplify the law than complicating it.
Nishan Singh v State of Punjab. Has ordered one Nishan Singh Brar, convicted of abduction and rape of a minor victim girl, and his mother Navjot Kaur to pay Rs 90 lakh towards compensation.
Rajesh Sharma v State of UP to regulate the purported gross misuse of Section 498A IPC have been modified just recently in a latest judgment titled Social Action Forum Manav for Manav Adhikar and another v Union of India Ministry of Law and Justice and others.
Kodungallur Film Society vs. Union of India has issued comprehensive guidelines to control vandalism by protesting mobs. Vandalism is vandalism and it cannot be justified under any circumstances. Those who indulge in it and those who instigate it must all be held clearly accountable and made to pay for what they have done most shamefully.
Ram Lal vs. State of Himachal Pradesh If the court is satisfied that if the confession is voluntary, the conviction can be based upon the same. Rule of prudence does not require that each and every circumstance mentioned in the confession must be separately and independently corroborated. Absolutely right There can be no denying it
Joseph Shine case struck down the law of adultery under Section 497. It declared that adultery can be a ground for civil issues including dissolution of marriages but it cannot be a criminal offence. It invalidated the Section 497 of IPC as a violation of Articles 14 and 15 and under Article 21 of the Constitution
Mallikarjun Kodagali (Dead) represented through Legal Representatives v/s Karnataka, Had no hesitation to concede right from the start while underscoring the rights of victims of crime that, The rights of victims of crime is a subject that has, unfortunately, only drawn sporadic attention of Parliament, the judiciary and civil society.
State of Kerala v Rasheed observed that while deciding an application to defer cross examination under Section 231(2) of the Cr.P.C. a balance must be struck between the rights of the accused, and the prerogative of the prosecution to lead evidence. The Apex Court in this landmark judgment also listed out practical guidelines.
Reena Hazarika v State of Assam that a solemn duty is cast on the court in the dispensation of justice to adequately consider the defence of the accused taken under Section 313 CrPC and to either accept or reject the same for reasons specified in writing.
Zulfikar Nasir & Ors v UP has set aside the trial court judgment that had acquitted 16 Provincial Armed Constabulary (PAC) officials in the 1987 Hashimpur mass murder case. The Delhi High Court has convicted all the accused and sentenced them to life imprisonment.
In Babasaheb Maruti Kamble v Maharashtra it was held that the Special Leave Petitions filed in those cases where death sentence is awarded by the courts below, should not be dismissed without giving reasons, at least qua death sentence.
Shambhir & Ors v State upholding the conviction and punishment of over 80 rioters has brought some solace to all those affected people who lost their near and dear ones in the ghastly 1984 anti-Sikh riots which brought disrepute to our country and alienated many Sikhs from the national mainstream
Naman Singh alias Naman Pratap Singh and another vs. UP, Supreme Court held a reading of the FIR reveals that the police has registered the F.I.R on directions of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate which was clearly impermissible in the law.
It has been a long and gruelling wait of 34 long years for the survivors of 1984 anti-Sikh riots to finally see one big leader Sajjan Kumar being sentenced to life term by Delhi High Court
Rajendra Pralhadrao Wasnik v State of Maharashtra held that criminals are also entitled to life of dignity and probability of reformation/rehabilitation to be seriously and earnestly considered before awarding death sentence. It will help us better understand and appreciate the intricacies of law.
Sukhlal v The State of Madhya Pradesh 'life imprisonment is the rule and death penalty is the exception' has laid down clearly that even when a crime is heinous or brutal, it may not still fall under the rarest of rare category.
Deepak v State of Madhya Pradesh in which has served to clarify the entire legal position under Section 319 CrPC, upheld a trial court order under Section 319 of the CrPc summoning accused who were in the past discharged by it ignoring the supplementary charge sheet against them.
It has to be said right at the outset that in a major reprieve for all the political leaders accused of being involved in the Sohrabuddin fake encounter case, in CBI, Mumbai vs Dahyaji Goharji Vanzara
Devi Lal v State of Rajasthan the Supreme Court has dispelled all misconceived notions about suspicion and reiterated that,
Madhya Pradesh v Kalyan Singh has finally set all doubts to rest on the nagging question of whether offences under Section 307 of IPC can be quashed on the basis of settlement between parties.
Dr Dhruvaram Murlidhar Sonar v Maharashtra made it amply clear that if a person had not made the promise to marry with the sole intention to seduce a woman to indulge in sexual acts, such an act would not amount to rape.
Rajesh v State of Haryana conviction under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code (Abetment of Suicide) is not sustainable on the allegation of harassment without there being any positive action proximate to the time of occurrence on the part of the accused, which led or compelled the person to commit suicide.
Nand Kishore v Madhya Pradesh has commuted to life imprisonment the death sentence which was earlier confirmed by the Madhya Pradesh High Court of a convicted for the rape and murder of an eight-year-old girl.
Raju Jagdish Paswan v. Maharashtra has commuted the death penalty of a man accused of rape and murder of a nine year old girl and sentenced him to 30 years imprisonment without remission.
Swapan Kumar Chatterjee v CBI permitting the application filed by the prosecution for summoning a hand writing expert in a corruption case of which the trial had started in 1985. On expected lines, the Bench accordingly delivered its significant judgment thus laying down the correct proposition of law to be followed always in such cases
Sukhpal Singh v Punjab that the inability of the prosecution to establish motive in a case of circumstantial evidence is not always fatal to the prosecution case. Importance of motive in determining the culpability of the accused but refused to acknowledge it as the sole criteria for not convicting the accused in the absence of motive.
Gagan Kumar v Punjab it is a mandatory legal requirement for Magistrate to specify whether sentences awarded to an accused convicted for two or more offences, would run concurrently or consecutively.
Dnyaneshwar Suresh Borkar v Maharashtra Even poem can help save a death convict from gallows. The Apex Court has in this latest, landmark and laudable judgment commuted the death penalty of a kidnap cum murder convict who was just 22 years of age at the time of occurrence
Himachal Pradesh v Vijay Kumar Supreme court held about acid attack crime that a crime of this nature does not deserve any kind of clemency.
Death Sentence Can Be Imposed Only When Life Imprisonment Appears To Be An Altogether Inappropriate Punishment: SC
S. Sreesanth v. The Board of Control For Cricket In India the Supreme Court set aside a life ban imposed on former Indian cricketer S Sreesanth in connection with the 2013 IPL spot-fixing scandal and asked the BCCI Disciplinary Committee to take a fresh call on the quantum of his punishment under the Anti-Corruption Code.
Adding Additional Accused To Invoke Section 319 CrPC Stronger Evidence Than Mere Probability of Complicity of A Person Required: SC stated in Sugreev Kumar v. State of Punjab
Top