Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Saturday, April 27, 2024

Government Notifies Strict Provisions Of Motor Vehicle (Amendment) Act 2019

Posted in: Civil Laws
Mon, Sep 2, 19, 11:03, 5 Years ago
star star star star star
5 out of 5 with 1 ratings
comments: 14 - hits: 8218
Government has notified 63 provisions of the Motor Vehicles Amendment Act 2019 including the ones dealing with enhanced penalties

It is most heartening to learn that as per an official release, the Government has notified 63 provisions of the Motor Vehicles Amendment Act 2019 including the ones dealing with enhanced penalties for various traffic offences. The new clauses would come into effect from September 1, 2019.

The Ministry of Road Transport and Highways said in a statement that these are provisions which require no further amendments in the Central Motor Vehicles Rules 1989. The 63 clauses deal with various provisions like penalties, licences, registration and National Transport Policy among others.

Needless to say, we earlier saw how Parliament passed the Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Bill. This Bill was introduced in Lok Sabha on July 15, 2019 by the Minister for Road Transport and Highways – Nitin Gadkari. The Lok Sabha had passed the Bill on July 23, 2019. The Rajya Sabha had passed the Bill on July 31, 2019. Earlier we saw how the legislation on this which was previously introduced in 2017 could not be passed in Rajya Sabha and lapsed with the dissolution of the 16th Lok Sabha

As it turned out, the Bill was passed in Rajya Sabha with three key amendments and so it had to be sent back to the Lok Sabha for approval. The President gave his assent to the Bill on August 9, 2019. The Bill contains all such provisions that will ensure Indian roads are made more safer. Presently, we all know that India records maximum road accidents in the world and maximum people die in India from such accidents. Union Road Transport and Highways Minister Nitin Gadkari was candid enough to concede in Lok Sabha that more than 1.50 lakh people die and 5 lakh people injured annually in road accidents.

Let us now briefly discuss some of the salient provisions of this Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Bill which has now become an Act after being passed by both Houses of Parliament. It will help us in understanding better what exactly the new law postulates to check road accidents. Some of the important salient provisions of this new law are as follows:-

1. It makes Aadhaar mandatory for getting a driving licence and vehicle registration.

2. For deaths in hit-and-run cases, the government will provide an enhanced compensation under Section 161 of Rs 2 lakh or more to the victim's family out of the scheme fund and Rs 50,000 in case of bodily injury. Presently, we see that the amount is just Rs 25,000 in case of death and Rs 12,500 in case of bodily injury.

3. In traffic violations by juveniles, the guardians or owner of the vehicle would be held responsible unless they prove that the offence was committed without their knowledge or they tried to prevent it. A penalty of Rs 25,000 with 3 years imprisonment can be imposed under Section 199. The registration of the motor vehicle in question will be cancelled. The juvenile will be tried under the Juvenile Justice Act. The newly proposed Section 199A imposes liability on guardian or the owner of the vehicle responsible for an accident caused by the juvenile.

4. It incorporates provisions for protection of good Samaritans. Those who come forward to help accident victims will be protected from civil or criminal liability. It will be optional to them to disclose their identity to the police or medical personnel.

5. The minimum fine for drunk driving under Section 185 has been increased from Rs 2000 to Rs 10,000.

6. The fine for dangerous driving under Section 184 has been increased from Rs 1000 to Rs 5000.

7. Now driving without a licence under Section 181 will attract a minimum fine of Rs 5000 as against Rs 500 at present.

8. The fine for over-speeding under Section 183 will go up from Rs 400 at present to Rs1000 for LMV and Rs 2000 for Medium passenger vehicle.

9. Not wearing seatbelt would under Section 194B attract a fine of Rs 1000 as against Rs 100 at present.

10. Talking on mobile phone while driving would now attract a fine of Rs 5000 up from Rs 1000 at present.

11. A Motor Vehicle Accident Fund will provide compulsory insurance cover to all road users in India for certain types of accidents. This has been introduced under Section 164B which is to be augmented by a special tax or cess. The Fund is to be utilized for giving immediate relief to victims of motor accidents and also hit and run cases. The compensation paid out of this Fund shall be deductible from the compensation which the victim may get in future from the Tribunal.

12. It will be mandatory to alter vehicles to make them suitable for specially abled people.

13. Contractors, consultants and civic agencies will be accountable for faulty design, construction or poor maintenance of roads leading to accidents.

14. A time limit of six months has been specified for an application of compensation to the Claims Tribunal with regard to road accidents.

15. Now the cap on liability for third-party insurance has been removed. The 2016 Bill had capped the maximum liability at Rs 10 lakh in case of death and Rs 5 lakh in case of grievous injury.

16. The time limit for renewal of driving licence is increased from one month to one year before and after the expiry date.

17. The government can recall vehicles whose components or engine do not meet the required standards. Manufacturers can be fined up to Rs 500 crore in case of sub-standard components or engine.

18. The penalty for motor vehicles is proposed to be increased by 10 percent every year.

19. The new law now mandates the recall of defective motor vehicles if the defect may cause a threat to the environment, or the driver or other people on the road. In such a case, the recalled vehicle's manufacturer will have to :

(i) Reimburse the vehicle owner the full cost of the vehicle.

(ii) Replace the defective vehicle with another vehicle of similar make.

20. The new law now very rightly and commendably provides for the setting up of a National Road Safety Board by the Central Government as per Section 215D for advising on matters related to road safety. The National Road Safety Board will be now required to advise the Central and State Governments on all aspects of road safety and traffic management including registration and licensing of vehicles, standards of motor vehicles, standards for road safety and promotion of new vehicle technology.

21. Now the condition to undergo "driver refresher training course" for reviving license after suspension/revocation under Section 19, and also for compounding of traffic offences under Section 200 has been introduced.

22. A provision has been suggested to regulate the licensing of cab aggregators, by amending Section 93 of the Act, and also by introducing definition of "aggregator" under Section 2(1A).

23. Through amendment to Section 200, punishment in the form of 'Community Service' can be imposed for traffic violations. The newly proposed Section 2(4A) defines 'Community Service' as unpaid work which a person is required to perform as a punishment for an offence committed under this Act.

24. The newly proposed Section 198A imposes liability on contractor, concessionaire or designated authority when their failure to follow prescribed design and standards results in death or injury.

25. The amendment makes non-receipt of premium one of the specified conditions, which would enable the insurer to seek exoneration from the liability by virtue of new section proposed as Section 150 2(c).

26. The newly proposed Section 88A empowers the Central Government to frame schemes for inter-state permits and make schemes for national, multi-nodal and inter-state transportation of goods or passengers.

27. As per the present law we find that a claim for personal injury would abate on the death of the claimant, and would not survive to his estate, due to the operation of Section 306 of the Indian Succession Act. The claim would survive to the estate only if death had nexus with the injuries, and only in such cases the legal heirs would be entitled to come on record and continue with the prosecution of the claim. But the amendment cures that loophole by incorporation of a new sub-section, Section 166(5), with a non-obstante clause which stipulates that the right of a person to claim compensation for injury in an accident shall, upon the death of the person injured, survive to his legal representatives, irrespective of whether the cause of death is relatable to or had any nexus with the injury or not.

28. The newly introduced Section 66A empowers the Central Government to develop a "National Transportation Policy", for establishing a framework for grant of transport permits. The Section directs the Central Government to consult the State Governments before formulation of policy.

29. The penalty for violation under Section 177 was Rs 100 but now it has been raised to Rs 500.

30. The penalty for violation under new Section 177A pertaining to rules of road regulation has also been enhanced from Rs 100 to Rs 500.

31. The penalty for travelling without ticket under Section 178 has been raised from Rs 200 to Rs 500.

32. The penalty for disobedience of orders of authorities under Section 179 has been raised from Rs 500 to Rs 2000.

33. The penalty for unauthorized use of vehicles without licence under Section 180 has been raised from Rs 1000 to Rs 5000.

34. The penalty for driving despite disqualification under Section 182 has been increased from Rs 500 to Rs 10,000.

35. The penalty for oversize vehicles under Section 182B is Rs 5000.

36. Now for offences committed by enforcing authorities under Section 210B twice the penalty can be imposed under the relevant Section.

37. The power of officers to impound documents as stipulated in Section 206 provides for suspension of driving licenses under Sections 183, 184, 185, 189, 190, 194C, 194D and 194E.

38. Now the fine for driving without insurance under Section 196 has been increased from Rs 1000 to Rs 2000 for first offence and Rs 4000 for subsequent offence.

39. Now not providing way for emergency vehicles will be punished with fine of Rs 10,000 under Section 194E.

40. Now penalty for not wearing helmet has been increased from Rs 100 to Rs 1000 along with disqualification for 3 months for licence under Section 194D.

41. Now penalty for overloading of two wheelers has been raised from Rs 100 to Rs 2000 along with disqualification for 3 months for licence under Section 194C.

42. Now overloading which earlier under Section 194 was punishable with Rs 2000 and Rs 1000 per extra tonne will now be punishable with Rs 20,000 and Rs 2000 per extra tonne.

43. Now overloading of passengers under Section 194A will be punished with Rs 1000 per extra passenger.

44. The penalty for vehicles without permit which earlier was upto Rs 5000 under Section 192A has now been enhanced upto Rs 10,000.

45. The penalty for aggregators (violation of licencing conditions) under Section 193 will be ranging from Rs 25,000 to Rs 1,00,000.

46. For second offence of drunken driving, the punishment will be two years in jail or fine of Rs 15,000.

47. For the first offence of drunken driving, the punishment can be 6 months in jail or fine of Rs 10,000.

48. Now if driving is done with more than one pillion rider, the punishment which earlier was Rs 100 has been increased to Rs 1000.

49. Using horn in silent zones would be now punishable with Rs 1000 for first offence and 2000 for subsequent offence.

50. Driving uninsured vehicle would be punishable with Rs 2000 for first offence and Rs 4000 for subsequent offence.

51. The list of uncompoundable offences where the violator has to visit court to pay challan are jumping traffic, driving against the flow of traffic, drunk driving, juvenile driving etc which have provisions for high penalty and jail term.

52. Using vehicles without permit for commercial purposes would be Rs 10,000 for first offence and for subsequent offence not just Rs 10,000 would be imposed as fine but jail term will also be there for up to 1 year.

53. Now for racing and trial of speed, the punishment would be Rs 5000 for first offence and Rs 10,000 for subsequent offence.

54. The only provision against road owning agencies is a Rs 1 lakh fine if faulty designs lead to any fatal accidents.

To conclude, it is most heartening and most refreshing to learn that many new amendments have been made in the Motor Vehicles Act which was first enacted in 1988. They were necessary also as more than 31 years have flown under the bridge. We have discussed by and large all the important provisions under the new law. More stricter laws and more stricter penalties for violations of rules was the crying need of the hour. But enacting strict laws alone is just not enough.

What is most important is implementing them with equal vigour is the real solution to increasing road accidents and this alone can help in containing this deadly malaise which is responsible for the maximum deaths in the whole world in our country alone. The violators must be taken to task and should not be let off lightly so that a loud and clear message goes to one and all that, "Be you ever so high, the law is above you. If you dare to violate the law, the long arms of law will catch you and you will not be able to smirk it by wielding your money power or muscle power or political power under any circumstances".

It goes without saying that only then will the people start respecting law truly in the real sense. This alone explains why Nitin Gadkari who is Union Transport Minister very rightly said that, "Stiff fines for traffic offences will instill fear of law among violators. If people don't respect or fear the law, that is not a good place to be in. Around five lakh accidents occur in the country every year and 65% of the persons killed are in the age group of 18 to 35. Shouldn't people's lives be saved? There should be respect and fear for the law. I feel the high penalty will show good results in the next few months." It is good to see that now the strength of people applying for driving licence has increased very rapidly. Hope now that road accidents and so many deaths due to them will now decline substantially.

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh.

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Present space law framework in the country. Space has heightened the curiosity of mankind for centuries. Due to the advancement in technology, there is fierce competition amongst nations for the next space war.
The scope of Section 151 CPC has been explained by the Supreme Court in the case K.K. Velusamy v. N. Palanisamy
Co-operative Societies are governed by the Central Co-operative Societies Act 1912, where there is no State Act. In West Bengal they were governed by the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act
Registration enables an NGO to be a transparent in its operations to the Government, Donors, to its members and to its urgent community.
The ingredients of Section 18 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 are
Drafting of legal Agreements and Deeds in India
ST Land rules in India,West Bengal
The paper will discuss about the provisions related to liquidated damages. How the law has evolved. Difference between the provisions of England and India.
A privilege may not be a right, but, under the constitution of the country, I do not gather that any broad distinction is drawn between the rights and the privileges that were enjoyed and that were taken away.
It is most hurting to see that in India, the soldiers who hail from Jammu and Kashmir and who join forces either in Army or in CRPF or in BSF or in police or in any other forces against the will of majority
Pukhraj v/s State of Uttarakhand warned high caste priests very strongly against refusing to perform religious ceremonies on behalf of lower caste pilgrims. It took a very stern view of the still existing practice of exclusion of the SC/ST community in Haridwar.
This article aims to define delay in civil suits. It finds the general as well as specific causes leading to pendency of civil suits and over-burdening of courts. This articles suggests some solutions which are pragmatic as well as effective to reduce the burden of the courts and speed up the civil judicial process.
This article deals with importance, needs, highlights and provisions of the Surrogacy Bill 2016, which is passed by the lok sabha on 19th December 2018 .
Cross Examination In Case of Injunction Suits, Injunctions are governed by Sections 37, 38, 39 to Section 42 of Specific Relief Act.
Satishchandra Ratanlal Shah v Gujarat inability of a person to return the loan amount cannot give rise to a criminal prosecution for cheating unless fraudulent or dishonest intention is shown right at the beginning of the transaction..
Dr.Ashok Khemka V/s Haryana upheld the integrity of eminent IAS officer because of his upright and impeccable credentials has emerged as an eyesore for politicians of all hues but also very rightly expunged Haryana Chief Minister ML Khattar adverse remarks in his Personal Appraisal Report
State of Rajasthan and others v. Mukesh Sharma has upheld the constitutional validity of Rule 8(2)(i) of the Rajasthan Prisons (Shortening of Sentences) Rules, 2006.
Gurmit Singh Bhatia Vs Kiran Kant Robinson the Supreme Court reiterated that, in a suit, the plaintiff is the dominus litis and cannot be forced to add parties against whom he does not want to fight unless there is a compulsion of the rule of law.
explicitly in a latest landmark ruling prohibited the use of loudspeakers in the territory without prior permission from the authorities.
The Commissioner of Police v/s Devender Anand held that filing of criminal complaint for settling a dispute of civil nature is abuse of process of law.
Rajasthan Vs Shiv Dayal High Court cannot dismiss a second appeal merely on the ground that there is a concurrent finding of two Courts (whether of dismissal or decreeing of the suit), and thus such finding becomes unassailable.
Complete Guide to Pleadings in India, get your Written statement and Plaint Drafted by highly qualified lawyers at reasonable rate.
Sushil Chandra Srivastava vs UP imposed absolute prohibition on use of DJs in the state and asked the state government to issue a toll-free number, dedicated to registering complaints against illegal use of loudspeakers. It will help control noise pollution to a very large extent if implemented in totality.
Rajasthan v/s Shri Ramesh Chandra Mundra that institutional independence, financial autonomy is integral to independence of judiciary. directing the Rajasthan Government to reconsider the two decade old proposal of the then Chief Justice of Rajasthan High Court to upgrade 16 posts of its Private Secretaries as Senior Private Secretaries
The Indian Contract act, 1872 necessities significant consideration in a few of its areas. One such area of the Indian Contract act of 1872 is where if any person finds a lost good belonging to others and takes them into his custody acts as the bailee to the owner of the good.
Jose Paulo Coutinho vs. Maria Luiza Valentina Pereira no attempt has been made yet to frame a Uniform Civil Code applicable to all citizens of the country despite exhortations by it. Whether succession to the property of a Goan situated outside Goa in India will be governed by the Portuguese Civil Code, 1867
In a major legal setback to Pakistan, the High Court of England and Wales rejecting rightly Pakistan's frivolous claims and ruling explicitly that the VII Nizam of Hyderabad's descendants and India can collect 35 million pounds from Londons National Westminster Bank.
Power of Attorney and the Specific Relief Act, 1963
air pollution in Delhi and even adjoining regions like several districts of West UP are crossing all limits and this year even in districts adjoining Delhi like Meerut where air pollution was never felt so much as is now being felt.
Dr Syed Afzal (Dead) v/sRubina Syed Faizuddin that the Civil Courts while considering the application seeking interim mandatory injunction in long pending cases, should grant opportunity of hearing to the opposite side, interim mandatory injunctions can be granted after granting opportunity of hearing to the opposite side.
students of Banaras Hindu University's (BHU's) Sanskrit Vedvigyan Sankay (SVDVS) went on strike demanding the cancellation of the appointment of Assistant Professor Feroze Khan and transfer him to another faculty.
Odisha Development Corporation Ltd Vs. M/s Anupam Traders & Anr. the time tested maxim actus curiae neminem gravabit which in simple and straight language means that, No party should suffer due to the act of Court.
M/S Daffodills Pharmaceuticals Ltd v/s. State of U.P that no one can be inflicted with an adverse order, without being afforded a minimum opportunity of hearing. In other words, the Apex Court reiterated the supreme importance of the legal maxim and latin phrase titled Audi alteram partem
Ram Murti Yadav v/s State of Uttar Pradesh the standard or yardstick for judging the conduct of the judicial officer has necessarily to be strict, that the public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from anyone performing a judicial function.
Judicial Officers Being Made Scapegoats And Penalized By Inconvenient Transfers And Otherwise: SC
Desh Raj v/s Balkishan that the mandatory time-line for filing written statement is not applicable to non-commercial suits. In non-commercial suits, the time-line for written statement is directory and not mandatory, the courts have the discretion to condone delay in filing of written statement in non-commercial suits.
M/S Granules India Ltd. Vs UOI State, as a litigant, cannot behave as a private litigant, and it has solemn and constitutional duty to assist the court in dispensation of justice.
To exercise one's own fundamental right to protest peacefully does not give anyone the unfettered right to block road under any circumstances thereby causing maximum inconvenience to others.
Today, you have numerous traffic laws as well as cases of traffic violations. People know about safe driving yet they end up defying the safety guidelines. It could be anything like driving while talking on the phone, hit and run incidents, or driving under the influence of alcohol.
The legal processes are uncertain. Also, there are times when justice gets denied, and the legal outcomes get delayed. Hence, nobody wants to see themselves or their loved one end up in jail.
Arun Kumar Gupta v/s Jharkhand that judicial officer's integrity must be of a higher order and even a single aberration is not permitted. The law pertaining to the vital subject of compulsory retirement of judicial officers have thus been summed up in this noteworthy judgment.
Online Contracts or Digital Agreements are contracts created and signed over the internet. Also known as e-contracts or electronic contracts, these contracts are a more convenient and faster way of creating and signing contracts for individuals, institutions and corporate.
Re: Problems And Miseries Of Migrant Labourers has asked Maharashtra to be more vigilant and make concerted effort in identifying and sending stranded migrant workers to their native places.
Gerald Lynn Bostock v/s Clayton County, Georgia that employees cannot be fired from the jobs merely because of their transgender and homosexual identity.
This article compares two cases with similar facts, yet different outcomes and examines the reasons for the same. It revolves around consideration and validation of contracts.
Odisha Vikas Parishad vs Union Of India while modifying the absolute stay on conducting the Jagannath Rath Yatra at Puri has allowed it observing the strict restrictions and regulations of the Centre and the State Government.
Soni Beniwal v/s Uttarakhand even if there is a bar on certain matters to be taken as PIL, there is always discretion available with the Court to do so in exercise of its inherent powers.
Indian Contract Act was commenced in the year 1872 and since then, several deductions and additions have happened to the same. The following piece of work discusses about the concept of offer under the Indian Contract Act, 1872
Top