Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Saturday, April 27, 2024

Offer And Its Types Under Indian Contract Act, 1872

Posted in: Civil Laws
Mon, Jun 29, 20, 16:22, 4 Years ago
star star star star star
4 out of 5 with 15 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 66967
Indian Contract Act was commenced in the year 1872 and since then, several deductions and additions have happened to the same. The following piece of work discusses about the concept of offer under the Indian Contract Act, 1872

Offer
The first and foremost essential element of a valid contract is offer or proposal. Section 2 (a) of ICA defines Proposal as:
When one person signifies to another his willingness to do or to abstain from doing anything, with a view to obtain the assent of that other to such act or abstinence, he is said to make a proposal.

Elements Of A Proposal
i. Expression of willingness to do or not to do something;
ii. Made to another person;
iii. With a view to obtain the assent of that other person.

Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.,1 QB 256
• The Carbolic Smoke Ball Company, once advertised that their Carbolic Smoke Ball was a cure of several diseases including flu, bronchitis, cough, cold etc. 
• The company was so confident that it published in the advertisement that any person who would use the smoke ball thrice a day, for two weeks according to the printed directions and still catches Influenza would be eligible to claim 100 pounds from the company.
• Mrs. Carlill, the plaintiff used the smoke ball as per the printed directions but still caught influenza and claimed for the money from the company which the company denied.
• The defendant in its argument submitted that the advertisement was merely a sale puff and can’t be considered as an offer as offer can’t be made to the world.

It was held that, the advertisement was not a unilateral offer to the whole world, but an offer restricted to those who acted upon the terms contained in the advertisement. Thus, the plaintiff was purely entitled to the claim of 100 pounds.

Essentials Of A Valid Offer
i. It must be certain, definite and not vague.
ii. Must be communicated to the offeree by the offerer. 
iii. May be conditional (but not against public policies).
iv. Must be capable of creating legal relationship.
v. Should not contain any undue terms.

Types Of Offers
An offer can be of many types, and ranging from the vast pool of Contract, the following are the six basic kinds of offer:
• Express offer
• Implied offer
• General offer
• Specific offer
• Cross offer
• Counter offer

Express Offer
Section 9 of ICA says: In so far as the proposal or acceptance of any promise is made in words, the promise is said to be express.
Thus, any offer which is made by words (either spoken or written) is considered as an express offer.

Implied Offer
Section 9 of ICA also says that: In so far as such a proposal or acceptance is made otherwise than in words, the promise is said to be implied.
Therefore, any offer or set of offers made through any mode other than written or verbal words is considered as implied offer. It may include (i) offer through conduct of the parties, or (ii) offer through the circumstances.

General Offer
The offer which is made out to the world at large is called a general offer. The idea of general offer was given to the world post the Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. case, stating the theory that, performance of the condition is sufficient acceptance without ratification.

Section 8 of the ICA talks about performance of conditions for fulfilment of a contract: Performance of the conditions of a proposal, or the acceptance of any consideration for a reciprocal promise which may be offered with a proposal, is an acceptance of the proposal.

This means that in cases of general offers, there is no need of communicating the acceptance and the performance of the condition would clearly imply about the acceptance of the offer.

Specific Offer
The offer which is made to a particular or ascertained person or group of persons and the acceptance of the same can be given by that specific party(s) only is called a specific offer. 
Boulton v. Jones
(1857) 2 H and N 564
• The plaintiff had taken over the business of one, Brocklehurst with whom the defendant had old business relations.
• The defendant not knowing about the change in ownership, sent him a requirement of certain goods.
• The defendant later on after receiving an invoice by the plaintiff, at that point came to know about the change in ownership, and by then he had already consumed the goods.
• The defendant refused to pay as he already had a settlement with the previous owner for the same. The plaintiff sued him for non payment of the money.
It was held that the defendant was not liable to pay any penny. It clarified that if one wants to contract with 'A' then 'B' can’t substitute 'A' without the knowledge of the other party. It also held that whenever someone comes into contract with a specific party, no other person can come out and say that he is the party contracted with.

Cross Offer
When there are identical offers made by two parties to each other without the knowledge of each other’s offers, cross offer is said to be created and since there is no acceptance of any such offer, cross offers are not considered valid.
For example, 'A' makes an offer to 'B' to sell his car for 10 Lakhs and 'B' in absence of knowledge of the same, makes an offer to 'A' to buy his car for 10 Lakhs and thus, there is no acceptance of such an offer. This is called cross offer.
It must be noted that for constituting a valid contract, there should be am offer made and the same be accepted, but since in a cross offer there is no such acceptance but, only simultaneous offers, therefore, a cross offer will never lead to the formation of a valid contract.

Counter Offer
When a previous offer is accepted by the offeree but with some changes and valid modifications, then such an offer is said to be a counter offer. Thus, a counter offer is the rejection of an old offer and a new offer is placed instead.

For example, if 'A' offers 'B' to sell his car for 5 Lakhs and 'B' agrees to buy it for 3 Lakhs only, to which 'A' agrees. Here, the old offer is rejected and a new offer is placed. This offer will be called a counter offer.

Communication Of Offer
Communication of the offer is the most essential condition to be fulfilled for creation of a valid contract. An offer is valid if it is communicated to the offeree. As discussed, the communication may be either expressed or implied. 

Section 4 of ICA says that, the communication of a proposal is complete when it comes to the knowledge of the person to whom it is made.
Lalman Shukla v. Gauri Dutt (1913) 40 All 489

• The plaintiff was the servant of the defendant to whom his master had asked to find his missing nephew.
• Meanwhile, the defendant announced a reward of 501 Rupees for anyone finding his nephew of which, the servant wasn’t aware.
• Later on, when the servant brought his master’s missing nephew, he claimed for the said reward to which the master simply denied.
• The plaintiff sued his master arguing that, mere performance of the act was sufficient to entitle a person performing it to claim the reward advertised for.
• The defendant in his defence contended that since there was no communication of the offer to the plaintiff, thus, it doesn’t create any valid contract.
It was held by the Allahabad High Court that, although the performance of the condition was there on the part of the plaintiff still it won’t create any contract, since, the knowledge of the offer was missing to the plaintiff. Thus, the right of reward was dismissed as it could only be founded upon a contract.

Revocation Of Offer
Section 5 of the ICA says that, the offer may be revoked anytime before the communication of the acceptance is complete against the proposer/offerer.
Acceptance as against the proposer means that, when the acceptance is put in the course of transmission, so as to be out of the power of the acceptor to withdraw the same.
This means that once an offer is made and is accepted by the offeree, the offer can’t be revoked. Withdrawal of the offer can only happen before the acceptance of the same by the offeree.

Invitation To Offer
An invitation to offer which is also sometimes called as invitation to treat is an offer which is made to the seller and not made by the seller. An invitation to offer as understood from the term is calling parties to offer something. As per this, initially, there is no such pure intention of any party to enter into a contract. Thus, we can say that it is the offer which the buyer makes to the seller and to which, the seller has a complete right to whether accepting or letting it go. The seller without any dispute, will only accept that offer whichever he finds best for himself.

Illustration
If 'A' displays a certain kind of alcohol at his liquor shop, but intends to sell it only to people who he wants. Here, the displayed alcohol is an invitation to offer and only becomes an offer when the buyer accepts the invitation and makes an offer.

This type of contractual system can be observed mostly at the malls, shops and food outlets around us. 

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
A. Bhattacharya
Member since Jun 29, 2020
Location: n/a
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Present space law framework in the country. Space has heightened the curiosity of mankind for centuries. Due to the advancement in technology, there is fierce competition amongst nations for the next space war.
The scope of Section 151 CPC has been explained by the Supreme Court in the case K.K. Velusamy v. N. Palanisamy
Co-operative Societies are governed by the Central Co-operative Societies Act 1912, where there is no State Act. In West Bengal they were governed by the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act
Registration enables an NGO to be a transparent in its operations to the Government, Donors, to its members and to its urgent community.
The ingredients of Section 18 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 are
Drafting of legal Agreements and Deeds in India
ST Land rules in India,West Bengal
The paper will discuss about the provisions related to liquidated damages. How the law has evolved. Difference between the provisions of England and India.
A privilege may not be a right, but, under the constitution of the country, I do not gather that any broad distinction is drawn between the rights and the privileges that were enjoyed and that were taken away.
It is most hurting to see that in India, the soldiers who hail from Jammu and Kashmir and who join forces either in Army or in CRPF or in BSF or in police or in any other forces against the will of majority
Pukhraj v/s State of Uttarakhand warned high caste priests very strongly against refusing to perform religious ceremonies on behalf of lower caste pilgrims. It took a very stern view of the still existing practice of exclusion of the SC/ST community in Haridwar.
This article aims to define delay in civil suits. It finds the general as well as specific causes leading to pendency of civil suits and over-burdening of courts. This articles suggests some solutions which are pragmatic as well as effective to reduce the burden of the courts and speed up the civil judicial process.
This article deals with importance, needs, highlights and provisions of the Surrogacy Bill 2016, which is passed by the lok sabha on 19th December 2018 .
Cross Examination In Case of Injunction Suits, Injunctions are governed by Sections 37, 38, 39 to Section 42 of Specific Relief Act.
Satishchandra Ratanlal Shah v Gujarat inability of a person to return the loan amount cannot give rise to a criminal prosecution for cheating unless fraudulent or dishonest intention is shown right at the beginning of the transaction..
Dr.Ashok Khemka V/s Haryana upheld the integrity of eminent IAS officer because of his upright and impeccable credentials has emerged as an eyesore for politicians of all hues but also very rightly expunged Haryana Chief Minister ML Khattar adverse remarks in his Personal Appraisal Report
State of Rajasthan and others v. Mukesh Sharma has upheld the constitutional validity of Rule 8(2)(i) of the Rajasthan Prisons (Shortening of Sentences) Rules, 2006.
Gurmit Singh Bhatia Vs Kiran Kant Robinson the Supreme Court reiterated that, in a suit, the plaintiff is the dominus litis and cannot be forced to add parties against whom he does not want to fight unless there is a compulsion of the rule of law.
explicitly in a latest landmark ruling prohibited the use of loudspeakers in the territory without prior permission from the authorities.
The Commissioner of Police v/s Devender Anand held that filing of criminal complaint for settling a dispute of civil nature is abuse of process of law.
Rajasthan Vs Shiv Dayal High Court cannot dismiss a second appeal merely on the ground that there is a concurrent finding of two Courts (whether of dismissal or decreeing of the suit), and thus such finding becomes unassailable.
Complete Guide to Pleadings in India, get your Written statement and Plaint Drafted by highly qualified lawyers at reasonable rate.
Sushil Chandra Srivastava vs UP imposed absolute prohibition on use of DJs in the state and asked the state government to issue a toll-free number, dedicated to registering complaints against illegal use of loudspeakers. It will help control noise pollution to a very large extent if implemented in totality.
Rajasthan v/s Shri Ramesh Chandra Mundra that institutional independence, financial autonomy is integral to independence of judiciary. directing the Rajasthan Government to reconsider the two decade old proposal of the then Chief Justice of Rajasthan High Court to upgrade 16 posts of its Private Secretaries as Senior Private Secretaries
The Indian Contract act, 1872 necessities significant consideration in a few of its areas. One such area of the Indian Contract act of 1872 is where if any person finds a lost good belonging to others and takes them into his custody acts as the bailee to the owner of the good.
Government has notified 63 provisions of the Motor Vehicles Amendment Act 2019 including the ones dealing with enhanced penalties
Jose Paulo Coutinho vs. Maria Luiza Valentina Pereira no attempt has been made yet to frame a Uniform Civil Code applicable to all citizens of the country despite exhortations by it. Whether succession to the property of a Goan situated outside Goa in India will be governed by the Portuguese Civil Code, 1867
In a major legal setback to Pakistan, the High Court of England and Wales rejecting rightly Pakistan's frivolous claims and ruling explicitly that the VII Nizam of Hyderabad's descendants and India can collect 35 million pounds from Londons National Westminster Bank.
Power of Attorney and the Specific Relief Act, 1963
air pollution in Delhi and even adjoining regions like several districts of West UP are crossing all limits and this year even in districts adjoining Delhi like Meerut where air pollution was never felt so much as is now being felt.
Dr Syed Afzal (Dead) v/sRubina Syed Faizuddin that the Civil Courts while considering the application seeking interim mandatory injunction in long pending cases, should grant opportunity of hearing to the opposite side, interim mandatory injunctions can be granted after granting opportunity of hearing to the opposite side.
students of Banaras Hindu University's (BHU's) Sanskrit Vedvigyan Sankay (SVDVS) went on strike demanding the cancellation of the appointment of Assistant Professor Feroze Khan and transfer him to another faculty.
Odisha Development Corporation Ltd Vs. M/s Anupam Traders & Anr. the time tested maxim actus curiae neminem gravabit which in simple and straight language means that, No party should suffer due to the act of Court.
M/S Daffodills Pharmaceuticals Ltd v/s. State of U.P that no one can be inflicted with an adverse order, without being afforded a minimum opportunity of hearing. In other words, the Apex Court reiterated the supreme importance of the legal maxim and latin phrase titled Audi alteram partem
Ram Murti Yadav v/s State of Uttar Pradesh the standard or yardstick for judging the conduct of the judicial officer has necessarily to be strict, that the public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from anyone performing a judicial function.
Judicial Officers Being Made Scapegoats And Penalized By Inconvenient Transfers And Otherwise: SC
Desh Raj v/s Balkishan that the mandatory time-line for filing written statement is not applicable to non-commercial suits. In non-commercial suits, the time-line for written statement is directory and not mandatory, the courts have the discretion to condone delay in filing of written statement in non-commercial suits.
M/S Granules India Ltd. Vs UOI State, as a litigant, cannot behave as a private litigant, and it has solemn and constitutional duty to assist the court in dispensation of justice.
To exercise one's own fundamental right to protest peacefully does not give anyone the unfettered right to block road under any circumstances thereby causing maximum inconvenience to others.
Today, you have numerous traffic laws as well as cases of traffic violations. People know about safe driving yet they end up defying the safety guidelines. It could be anything like driving while talking on the phone, hit and run incidents, or driving under the influence of alcohol.
The legal processes are uncertain. Also, there are times when justice gets denied, and the legal outcomes get delayed. Hence, nobody wants to see themselves or their loved one end up in jail.
Arun Kumar Gupta v/s Jharkhand that judicial officer's integrity must be of a higher order and even a single aberration is not permitted. The law pertaining to the vital subject of compulsory retirement of judicial officers have thus been summed up in this noteworthy judgment.
Online Contracts or Digital Agreements are contracts created and signed over the internet. Also known as e-contracts or electronic contracts, these contracts are a more convenient and faster way of creating and signing contracts for individuals, institutions and corporate.
Re: Problems And Miseries Of Migrant Labourers has asked Maharashtra to be more vigilant and make concerted effort in identifying and sending stranded migrant workers to their native places.
Gerald Lynn Bostock v/s Clayton County, Georgia that employees cannot be fired from the jobs merely because of their transgender and homosexual identity.
This article compares two cases with similar facts, yet different outcomes and examines the reasons for the same. It revolves around consideration and validation of contracts.
Odisha Vikas Parishad vs Union Of India while modifying the absolute stay on conducting the Jagannath Rath Yatra at Puri has allowed it observing the strict restrictions and regulations of the Centre and the State Government.
Soni Beniwal v/s Uttarakhand even if there is a bar on certain matters to be taken as PIL, there is always discretion available with the Court to do so in exercise of its inherent powers.
Top