Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.
Legal Services India

» Home
Thursday, November 20, 2025

Justice L Nageswara Rao’s Retirement Huge Loss For The Bench: CJI

Posted in: Judiciary
Sun, May 22, 22, 01:21, 4 Years ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 5535
Justice L Nageswara Rao’s retirement is a huge loss for the Bench and his keen analytical skills and passion for the cause of justice will be thoroughly missed by all.

Without mincing any words whatsoever, Chief Justice of India NV Ramana said most forthrightly in the farewell ceremony on May 20, 2022 organised by Supreme Court Bar Association that Justice L Nageswara Rao’s retirement is a huge loss for the Bench and his keen analytical skills and passion for the cause of justice will be thoroughly missed by all. It certainly merits no reiteration that there are very few Judges who have been directly elevated to the Supreme Court as Judge and Justice L Nageswara Rao happens to be one among them! Justice Rao is the seventh Judge in the history of the Apex Court in last 75 years since independence who was elevated directly from the Bar and will retire as an Apex Court Judge on June 7. As the summer vacations were to start soon and so it was decided to organize his farewell ceremony much earlier! Very rightly so!

It will definitely not tantamount to an exaggeration to say that Justice L Nageswara Rao is an entirely self-made man from whom we all who are still quite young must take the right inspiration from his chequered life. He was a first generation lawyer and there was no father or grandfather to guide him on how to march ahead. He chalked out his own strategy and is a living and brightest inspiration for all to follow who went on to become the Judge of the Apex Court only and only due to his own sheer merit and competence. This alone explains why none other than the CJI NV Ramana said that Rao’s journey from an agricultural family in Andhra Pradesh to the top court in the country without any godfather in the profession will inspire many young lawyers and judges. Of course, what CJI NV Ramana has said is nothing but the gospel truth which definitely cannot be denied even by his sharp critics!

While continuing in the same vein, the CJI NV Ramana also recalled that when he started his practice in Delhi, he had no support system to back him up. Through his exceptional skills, he achieved recognition at the national level. He was appointed as the Additional Solicitor General of India for two terms. During those years, he left a mark as one of the most hardworking and dedicated ASGs in the country. As additional Solicitor, he argued in several important cases. The CJI NV Ramana also disclosed that:
He appeared in the leading case of Hyder Consulting, wherein the Supreme Court interpreted S. 31(7) of the Arbitration Act. He also argued in the famous case of Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India relating to the constitutionality of criminal defamation. He appeared in numerous other high profile cases and he was one of the most sought after advocates in the country. Absolutely right!

It must be disclosed here that Justice L Nageswara Rao hails from Chirala in Prakasam district of Andhra Pradesh and did his law at Nagarjuna University at Guntur and was enrolled as an advocate in 1982 at the Bar Council of Andhra Pradesh. After practicing law at Guntur district court for two years, Justice Rao then shifted to Andhra Pradesh High Court and remained there in active practice as a lawyer till December 1994. It must also be revealed here that from January 1995 to May 2016, he practiced as a lawyer in the Supreme Court with elegance and then first became a senior advocate and then twice Additional Solicitor General. He was then finally appointed as a Judge of the Supreme Court on May 13, 2016.

It cannot be glossed over that none other than the CJI NV Ramana himself also said that as a Judge, Justice Rao played a vital role in expounding the law and interpreting the Constitution in several noteworthy opinions and has authored several landmark decisions. Speaking for myself, I too have read many of his brief, brilliant and bold judgments and have really relished reading it not stopping till I read his entire judgment and for me such a self made Judge and so also lawyer with no backing can never retire and will always remain at least in my heart and so also in the heart of all those who have seriously read his learned judgments. He has never shown any biased approach ever in his tenure as Judge and will always be remembered for delivering judgments with full sincerity, zeal and dedication!

Moving on, CJI NV Ramana also shed light on Justice L Nageswara Rao multi-talent by pointing out emphatically that:
He is one of the founders of the International Arbitration and Mediation Centre, Hyderabad. Under his excellent leadership, I am sure, the Centre will emerge as one of the leading hubs for arbitration and mediation in this part of the world. His proficiency is not limited to the legal field, but also extends to the cricket pitch. He played for his university and also went on to play in the Ranji trophy tournament in 1982. This is really terrific! A Judge like Justice L Nageswara Rao can never retire from the heart of all those who have seen his talent in so many diverse fields!

While shedding more light on Justice L Nageswara Rao’s multi-talented personality, CJI NV Ramana then also disclosed stating that:
His passion for the sport is one of the reasons why he is so spirited and sharp. He has been the captain of both the lawyer’s cricket team as well as the Judge’s team. Recently, under his captaincy, the Chief Justice of India’s team won for the first time against the lawyers. Brother Nageswara Rao is a fine golf player. He is also an avid biker since his youth. He is very passionate about acting, arts, and music. I am sure he will find time for new adventures, after this break from his hectic schedule as a Judge.

It must be mentioned here that senior and eminent advocate Pradeep Rai who is also the Vice President of Supreme Court Bar Association stumped many lawyers themselves and so all the Judges and his audiences when he disclosed that not many people know that Justice Rao has acted in many films as a police inspector. Pradeep also disclosed that:
He has acted in a movie called Kanoon Apna Apna with Kader Khan and Sanjay Dutt. His role won many hearts. Honestly speaking, even I myself was till now not aware about this little known fact what Pradeep Rai so very commendably brought out before the audience which even stumped me when I read about this in my mobile phone because this happened a long time back in 1989 when even I myself was a teenager! Pradeep Rai definitely like the CJI NV Ramana deserves all the praise on earth for making us know about the multi talent of Justice Rao who now can never retire from hearts of many like me!

It must also be mentioned that Pradeep Rai also was extremely candid in saying that:
Justice Rao has been a judge for 2200 days almost. We have seen you in the corridors and as a judge also. We never felt that you were not among one of us. Your son-in-law is also a practicing lawyer. We have to find out something so that you are more with us.

While speaking about his short foray into Bollywood, Justice L Nageswara Rao was very forthright in candidly acknowledging that:
I was in the theatre when I was in college. My cousin was a Director and thereby had a short role in a movie. That’s it. CJI very rightly said that:
He is extremely soft spoken, both as a lawyer as well as a Judge. Yet it cannot be denied that he never fights shy to speak the truth always with politeness. As for instance, Justice Rao who is the fifth senior-most Judge very rightly said that the superannuation age of 65 years for top court judges was too young and the Judges who came here should have a minimum of seven to eight years as a judgeship tenure. I am sure that Centre and so also our law makers would seriously ponder over what he has so rightly and robustly suggested!

It was most touching to learn from none other than CJI NV Ramana himself revealing that:
We both started at same time, he from Guntur Bar Association and I from Vijayawada Bar Association. It was remarkable that he gave up such a luring practice with VIP clients and took up Judgeship. He has no godfather or support and is first generation lawyer. Coming from the rural background and reaching the top level in Supreme Court as among the lawyers and then judge is remarkable. There can definitely be no denying what the CJI NV Ramana has said so very sagaciously!

Senior advocate Aman Lekhi too very rightly said in honour of Justice Rao that, You had all the attributes of a perfect Judge. Justice Rao himself was very humble in saying that:
I hope if I have lived upto the expectations, I hope I have been fair and apologies if I have been harsh. Sometimes pressure of work get on us since we are not monks. I have at times raised my voice to drown the voice of the lawyer. But one side has to win. Such a kind gesture and humbleness on the part of Justice Rao definitely deserves to be emulated by all of us!

While talking about Justice Rao’s nature, CJI Ramana said he is extremely soft-spoken, both as a lawyer as well as a Judge. CJI Ramana was also gracious enough to candidly acknowledge that:
He certainly is the jewel of the Bar and remained as one of the favourite seniors. Generations of young lawyers should attempt to live up to his example. He strongly believe in giving back to society and leads by example. He left a roaring practice to adorn the Bench to render justice. Not everyone can think of making such a sacrifice. Adding more to it, CJI NV Ramana also revealed that:
His father, Late Lavu Venkateswarlu Garu was an agro-entrepreneur with social consciousness and a commitment to society. It is his ideals that inspired my brother Justice Nageswara Rao to adopt his village and bring in an era of growth and progress.

It cannot be glossed over that none other than the Attorney General KK Venugopal himself also praised Justice Rao for accepting the offer of judgeship and said he was one of the few who was ready to let go of all the wealth he’d have made. Venugopal also disclosed that:
He has delivered 163 judgments and been part of 552 benches. There seems to be nothing that Justice Rao cannot succeed at. Taking judgeship wouldn’t have been an easy decision considering his successful practice. This is a test of the strength of one’s character.

What’s more, even former Attorney General of India Mukul Rohatgi also said for Justice L Nageswara Rao that:
I wish you a prosperous inning in the future. I know you will not come to bar but in arbitration you will be in the middle.

Interestingly enough, even Supreme Court Bar Association President and senior advocate Vikas Singh said that Justice Rao has a diverse personality and is an eminent jurist and true custodian of the Constitution. Vikas also very rightly pointed out that:
65 is no age for a Judge to retire and this should increase as the kind of productive years a Judge has at 65 is completely wasted asking him to retire at that age.

All said, it cannot be denied that Justice L Nageswara Rao will always remain etched in the memories of all those who believe in justice and law. His track record is so immaculate that cannot be described in words. His talent even in other fields like sports and films has just been highlighted now only when he is on verge of retirement. I am sure that even after retirement, he will continue rendering his selfless service to Indian society in some form or the other! Wish him always the very best and pray for his long life so that our nation and humanity stands to gain the most from his invaluable experiences!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi (retd), A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh

Legal Services India

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 19, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Rahendra Baglari v. Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate (M) writ petitioner for adjoining a Judicial Magistrate and the High Court and its Registry as Respondents to his plea against the order passed by the said Magistrate.
Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal vs.Uttarakhand long standing or established status quo brought about by judgments interpreting local or state laws, should not be lightly departed from.
Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur apart from High Court at Mumbai but on the contrary UP which has maximum pending cases in India
It is most shocking to see that a peaceful, one of the most developed and most prosperous state like Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur
I am neither a member nor supporter of BJP or any other political party nor a member of any of BJP's affiliated organizations like the RSS or VHP or any other organization.
Kirti vs Oriental Insurance Company Limited advocates cannot throw away legal rights or enter into arrangements contrary to law. It was also made clear that any concession in law made in this regard by either counsel would not bind the parties.
Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) on December 28, 2020 had expressed shock and deep concern on the arbitrary, illegal and brazen exercise of brute power by the police against lawyers, including the search conducted at the premises of an advocate representing some of the accused in the North-East Delhi riots cases.
media trial during criminal investigation interferes with administration of justice and hence amounts to contempt of court as defined under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Jamal v. Maharashtra dismissed a plea filed by the National President of BJP Minority Morcha – Jamal Anwar Siddiqui seeking 'X' category security.
Duroply Industries Limited and anr. Vs Ma Mansa Enterprises Private Limited in exercise of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction has recalled its own order of an injunction passed in a trademark dispute as the Judge presiding over the case had appeared for one party in respect of the same trademark in the past.
At the outset, it must be stated rather disconcertingly that it is India's misfortune that UP which has the maximum population more than 23 crore as Yogi Adityanath
At the outset, it has to be stated without mincing any words that it merits no reiteration that Judges age for retirement must be now increased to 75
Rajeev Bhardwaj v. H.P while dismissing a plea seeking a declaration of a sitting Judge's dissenting view as Coram non-judice and non est in the eyes of law.
Adv KG Suresh vs UOI has declared as unconstitutional the bar on lawyers representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals constituted under the Maintenance Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (Maintenance Act).
Bar Council of India ensured that there is an entrance exam now for all those lawyers who want to practice which has to be cleared before lawyers can start practicing.
It is a matter of grave concern that while our Constitution enshrines the right to equality as postulated in Article 14 but in practice what we witness is just the reverse.
seeking interim bail/parole for the under-privileged and under-trial prisoners/convicts keeping in view the terrible havoc unleashed by the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic.
When an intellectual giant like Fali Sam Nariman whom I personally rate as the world's top jurist and it is not just me but his extremely impeccable credentials are acknowledged in legal field, it is not just India but the whole world which listens to him in silence
Treasa Josfine vs Kerala that a woman who is fully qualified cannot be denied of her right to be considered for employment on the ground that she is a woman and because the nature of the employment would require her to work during night hours.
Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs constituted a Committee to suggest reforms in our criminal justice system which has been facing repeated criticism for its various drawbacks
Congress government's rule in Centre, Kapil Sibal who was Union Law Minister had written very categorically to UP Government for creating a high court bench for West UP at Meerut
completely about the truthfulness of the retracted confession and should corroborate his/her confession as it is unsafe to convict an accused person solely on the basis of the retracted confession
Thabir Sagar vs Odisha the practice of Advocate's clerks filing affidavits on behalf of parties is unacceptable. Such a practice is in gross violation of Rule 26 of the Orissa High Court Rules. It has therefore rightly directed its Registry to ensure that steps are taken forthwith to stop the practice of accepting such affidavits
COVID situation in UP, the Allahabad High Court has issued revised fresh guidelines for the functioning of all the Courts and Tribunals subordinate to it.
amended its rules to make criticism and attack of Bar Council decisions by members a misconduct and ground for disqualification or suspension or removal of membership of a member from the Bar Council.
CJI NV Ramana who was appointed as the 48th CJI on 6th April, 2021 and took oath as CJI on 24th April 2021 has very rightly expressed his concern on the social media noise and how it adversely impacts the institutions also like judiciary to a great extent which actually should not be the case.
At the crucial meeting of the Central Action Committee. of more than 20 districts of Bar Association of West UP held at Aligarh
Why UP which is among the largest States, has maximum population more than 24 crore which is more than even Pakistan
When finances are needed for the purpose of improving the judicial system at the lower levels, there is reluctance to make such finances available.
rarely ever booked and made to face the consequences which only serves to further encourage men in uniform to take it for granted to indulge in worst custodial torture
Tarun Saxena vs Union of India as ultra vires Section 17 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 which bars lawyers from representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals
Dhanbad district of Jharkhand was mowed down by an autorickshaw has sent shivers down the spine. The ghastly incident happened on morning of July 28 near the Magistrate colony of Dhanbad that was close to the Judge's residence.
Suman Chadha & Anr. vs. Central Bank of India in that the wilful breach of the undertaking given to the Court can amount to Contempt under Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act.
Rajasthan High Court Rules for Video Conferencing for Courts 2020 which shall be applicable to the proceeding of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan and all the Subordinate Courts of the Rajasthan with immediate effect.
Arun Singh Chauhan v/s MP deprecate the conduct of a practicing advocate who chose not to answer the repeated queries of the Court pertaining to the maintainability of his petition seeking issuance of a writ of quo warranto and regarding the non-impleadment of a necessary party
Dr.Mukut Nath Verma vs UoI Allahabad High Court imposed Rs 5 lakh costs on an advocate Dr Mukut Nath Verma after concluding that he unauthorisedly filed a writ petition on behalf of suspended and absconding IPS officer Mani Lal Patidar and also levelled serious allegations against state authorities and thereby misleading the Court.
Anil JS vs Kerala that instances of allegations about the police disrespecting the citizens were arriving at its doors with alarming regularity and therefore issued certain general directions in its judgment.
If there is one Judge on whom I have blind faith for his exemplary conduct throughout his brilliant career and who can never favour wrongly even his own son
Indianisation of our legal system is the need of the hour and it is crucial to make the justice delivery system more accessible and effective.
the gang war of different gangs have now reached right up to the court premises itself which are supposed to be the holiest shrines for getting justice.
It is not just for enjoying life or going for some holiday trip that lawyers of West UP repeatedly keep going on strike since last many decades.
CM Yogi Adityanath UP has progressed by leaps and bounds which one certainly cannot deny but why is it that it has just one High Court Bench only and that too just approximately 200 km away at the city famously called Nawab City
Just changing name of Allahabad to Prayagraj won't change the ground reality. It is a proven fact that High Court is still called Allahabad High Court and not Prayagraj High Court.
It is most shocking that all the Chief Justices of India from 1947 till 2000 were never shocked nor were any world famous jurist like Nani Ardeshir Palkhiwala, Ram Jethmalani, Shanti Bhushan, Prashant Bhushan among many others
Raggu Baniya @ Raghwendra vs UP has directed the Uttar Pradesh Government to instruct the District Magistrates of all the districts to re-evaluate the cases for remission after 14 years of incarceration even if appeals in such cases are pending in the High Court.
Union Minister of State for Law and Justice – SP Singh Baghel who is also an MP from Agra again in Western UP and who just recently took over has made it clear that his ministry was open to the setting up of a Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Western UP.
Anil Kumar and Anr. Vs Amit that the practice of advocates acting as power of attorney holders of their clients and also as advocates in the matter, is contrary to the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961.
Shashank Singh vs/ Honourable High Court of Judicature at Allahabad that under Article 233 of the Constitution of India, a Judicial Officer regardless of his or her previous experience, as an Advocate, cannot apply and compete for appointment to any vacancy in the post of District Judge.
It must be stated at the very outset that it is quite bewildering and baffling to see that the state of UP which Ban ki moon who is the former UN Secretary General had slammed as the rape and crime capital of India
most powerfully raised vocally the legitimate demand for a High Court Bench in West UP which is the crying need of the hour also.
Top