Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Wednesday, May 8, 2024

Once Marriage Stands Validly Dissolved By Foreign Court, Proceedings Under Domestic Violence Act Cannot Be Initiated

Posted in: Woman laws
Tue, Oct 25, 22, 12:41, 2 Years ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 4006
S Rawail Singh Vs Gurinder Jeet Kour that once a marriage stands validly dissolved by a competent foreign court, the domestic relationship between the parties as husband and wife which is necessary to invoke the provisions of the Domestic Violence Act, also ceases.

In a very significant development which will definitely go a long way in clearing the air on whether marriage validly dissolved by foreign court will have legal implications in India, the Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court in an extremely laudable, learned, landmark and latest judgment titled S Rawail Singh Vs Gurinder Jeet Kour in CRMC No. 43/2018 (IA 1/2018) CrlM 1281/2019) and connected petitions and cited in 2022 LiveLaw (JKL) 190 that was pronounced finally on September 1, 2022 has ruled most decisively that once a marriage stands validly dissolved by a competent foreign court, the domestic relationship between the parties as husband and wife which is necessary to invoke the provisions of the Domestic Violence Act, also ceases.

The observations were made by the Single Judge Bench comprising of Hon’ble Mr Justice Vinod Chaterji Koul in a verdict on the petition seeking quashing of a complaint filed under Section 12(1) of the J&K Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act in December 2017. It must be mentioned that the couple got married in 2007 in Jammu and post marriage they became permanent residents of Germany. It is stated before stating anything else in this remarkable judgment that:
As the issue involved in all the afore-captioned petitions is identical in nature, therefore, all have been clubbed, heard together and are being decided by a common order.

CRMC No. 43/2018

At the very outset, this brief, brilliant, bold and balanced judgment authored by the Single Judge Bench comprising of Hon’ble Mr Justice Vinod Chaterji Koul of the Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court sets the ball rolling by first and foremost putting forth in para 1 that:
Petitioners in the instant petition seek quashment of the complaint titled Gurinder Jeet Kaur Versus S. Baldev Singh and Ors. filed under Section 12(1) of the J&K Protection of Women from Domestic Violence, Act (for brevity ‘impugned complaint’) which is pending before the Court of Learned JMIC, Sub-Judge, Jammu (for brevity ‘trial Court’), wherein process has been issued by the trial Court against the petitioners herein.

Needless to say, the Bench then states aptly in para 2 that:
The aforesaid complaint has been filed by the respondent-complainant- Gurinder Jeet Kaur on 20.12.2017, wherein she complained about being subjected to domestic violence by the accused-petitioners herein.

To put things in perspective, the Bench then envisages in para 3 that:
In brief, the acts of domestic violence are that she and the petitioner No. 4-Baldev Singh were married on 19.01.2007 as per the Sikh rites (Anand Karaj) and rituals at Gurudwara Shri Guru Singh Sabha, Greater Kailash Kunjwani, Jammu and out of the said wedlock one child, namely, Gurshish Singh has born. She alleges in the complaint that at the time of solemnizing of the marriage sufficient dowry in the shape of articles, i.e., Refrigerator, washing Machine, Air-conditioner, TV and Gold ornaments were given to the petitioners and in addition to the said articles, cash amount of Rupees one lac was also given to them.

She alleges that after solemnizing of marriage she was residing in H.No.98 Sector No. 9, Nanak Nagar, Jammu with the petitioners and their attitude from the very beginning was cruel and unbecoming towards her. They used to taunt her for bringing fewer dowries and were pressurizing her to fulfill other demands of dowry. The petitioners started torturing and harassing her on one pretax or another and also not being provided proper food and cloths and other basic amenities. Even after the birth of the child, their attitude did not change, but turned bad to worst.

Her husband-Baldev Singh who is working in Germany, used to come to Jammu after 4-6 months and when she asked him to accompany her, he used to abuse and beat her, she was thus, maltreated by the accused-Baldev Singh. In the complaint it was further alleged that complainant was thrown out of her house on 02.09.2010 and was threatened not to come back unless she brings Rs. 02 lacs for them. She on hearing that her husband Baldev Singh was leaving for Germany on 10.10.2010 she also booked her tickets and went to Germany along with her son. On reaching Germany, she was not treated properly by her husband-Baldev Singh and was not allowed to reside with him. She was compelled to live in a separate accommodation.

It was alleged that all the articles of Stridhan have been retained by the petitioners herein. She completed her studies in Jammu in the month of November, 2017 and now she is residing at Jammu and her minor son is studying in Class-IIIrd in Germany and his expenses are incurred by her and her daily needs and that of minor child are approximately one lac per month which are being borne by her. She claims in the complaint that petitioner-Baldev Singh is doing his business in Germany and earning Rs. 02 lac per month and has no liability except to maintain her and child.

As it turned out, the Bench then mentions in para 4 that:
The petitioners have challenged the complaint as well as the process issued by the trial Court precisely, on the ground that there is no relationship of husband and wife between the petitioner No. 4-Baldev Singh and respondent-Gurinder Jeet Kaur. The petitioners submit that the allegations contained in the complaint filed by her under the Domestic Violence, Act are false and frivolous.

It is submitted that after the marriage both the complainant-respondent herein and petitioner No. 4-Baldev Singh shifted to Germany where Baldev Singh was settled and working since 2002 on account of his employment. Both of them became the permanent residents of Germany, in support of their contention they have placed on record copy of the divorce issued by the District Court Wisman, Germany.

It is stated that after shifting to Germany the relationship between the complainant and petitioner No. 4-Baldev Singh became hostile. Petitioner No. 4-Baldev Singh in the month of February 2014 came to India for 10 days and when he returned back to Germany, he found that the respondent-complainant had left her matrimonial house along with all gold ornaments and other goods as well as money and had went to some place and to know her whereabouts, he made efforts, but she remained untraceable.

The respondent-complainant thereafter filed a false and frivolous case in Germany against the petitioner No. 4-Baldev Singh and started residing separately. The Court at Germany made several attempts for reconciliation between them, but all such efforts failed and she flatly refused to stay with him and ultimately he approached the District Court Wisman, Germany and filed a petition for divorce.

The respondent-complainant thereafter caused her appearance, he filed her objections, the Court after hearing both the parties and the perusing the evidence led by them allowed the divorce petition under Section 98 Sub-Clause 261 No. 2, Family Law and under Sections 122, 113 of Family Law, 261 Sub-Clause 261 Sub-Clauses 3 No.2 Zivil Process Act, and passed a Decree of Divorce vide Judgment and Decree dated 20.07.2017.The said decree of divorce passed by the said Court has been placed on the record of the instant petition.

To be sure, the Bench then states in para 25 that:
In the present case, the husband-Baldev Singh filed a divorce petition before a competent Court of law in Germany and the judgment has been passed on merits, after due service of summon upon the wife- Gurinder Jeet Kaur as well as after hearing both the parties.

As we see, the Bench then rightly points out in para 26 that:
The decree of divorce dated 20.07.2017, unless and until challenged, is binding upon both the parties. The child born out of the said wedlock as stated by the complainant-respondent herein is still residing in Germany, where he is undergoing studies.

Quite significantly, the Bench then mandates in para 27 that:
Therefore, for the reasons stated hereinabove, it is held that the judgment/decree of divorce dated 20.07.2017 passed by the District Court Wisman, Germany whereby the marriage has been dissolved is conclusive and binding upon the parties. The said judgment/decree has not been challenged by the complainant-respondent herein, therefore, it is held that the relationship of husband and wife between petitioner No. 4-Baldev Singh and respondent - Gurinder Jeet Kaur has come to an end.

Be it noted, the Bench then observes in para 34 that:
While having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the case in hand falls under rarest of the rare cases in which the discretion is required to be exercised, because there is no domestic relationship between the parties and in the absence of such domestic relationship provisions of Domestic Violence, Act cannot be invoked.

Most significantly, the Bench then holds in para 35 that:
Therefore, the allegations made in the complaint would not constitute commission of any offence under the provisions of Domestic Violence, Act which requires existence of domestic relationship. The allegations in the complaint thus, are absurd and inherently improbable and on the basis of such allegations there is no sufficient ground for proceeding against the petitioner-accused in the complaint. These criminal proceedings are thus, manifestly attended with mala fide and ulterior motive for wreaking vengeance on the petitioners. Thus, the grounds taken in the petition made out a case in favour of the petitioners for quashing of the proceedings. Accordingly, the complaint as well as the proceedings initiated thereon are quashed.

In conclusion, we thus see that the Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has made it indubitably clear that once marriage stands validly dissolved by the foreign court, the proceedings under Domestic Violence Act cannot be initiated. So there can be no gainsaying that this must be adhered to by the lower courts as directed in this leading case. There can be just no denying it!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col (Retd) BPS Sirohi,  82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Gender equality, also known as sexual equality, is the state of equal ease of access to resources and opportunities regardless of gender, including economic participation and decision-making; and the state of valuing different behaviors, aspirations and needs equally, regardless of gender.
Child sex ratio and right to life: The child sex ratio had deteriorated across the country over the last decade. In the Indian context there is a strong preference for son.
Facet relating to offences against women. The offences are of various types. They find mention in many enactments. These under- mentioned provisions are enumerated in Indian Penal Code, 1860:
The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 was brought into force by the Indian government from October 26, 2006.
For couples who cannot have children, a surrogate mother is a viable and increasingly popular option. A surrogate mother is a woman who has agreed to become pregnant in order to deliver a child specifically for a couple
Article 15(3) of Indian Constitution permits State to make any special provision in law for women as well as children.
Let me begin at the very beginning by first and foremost pointing out that in a latest landmark judgment by the Bombay High Court titled Mr Ali Abbas Daruwala v/s Mrs Shehnaz Daruwala
Uttarakhand High Court in State of Uttarakhand v/s Karandeep Sharma, Razia, Raju in its landmark judgment delivered on January 5, 2018 recommended strongly the state government to enact in three months a suitable legislation for awarding death sentence to those found guilty of raping girls of 15 years or below.
Brutal Gang Rape and murder of a 12 years old girl in Uttarkashi v State of Uttarakhand The Court took cognizance of two reports published in newspaper
It is most gratifying and satisfying to learn that from now onwards victims of online sexual abuse can report the same anonymously from their homes without bothering to run from pillar to post and pleading with police to lodge their report! The first-of-its-kind national sex offenders registry was launched on September 20.
Legal Implications of the #Metoo Movement and remedies under Indian law for the victims
Laws pertaining to online harassment abuse faced by women, and the the stringent measures taken by the Government to prevent online harassment/abuse of women with an insight to cyber-crime cell catering to women
The UDHR is a milestone document consisting of international human rights law based on the ideas of freedom, equality and dignity, a living text which is universal in scope and relevant to all individuals.
There are various property rights of women in India. This is a short study about them.
Delhi High Court in Anita Suresh vs. Union of India imposed Rs. 50,000 cost on a woman for false sexual harassment plea.
An over all view of Surrogacy Bill 2016
Punjab and Sind Bank and Others v/s Mrs Durgesh Kuwar have minced no words to make it abundantly clear that sexual harassment at the workplace is an affront to the fundamental rights of a woman.
The Secretary, Ministry of Defence vs Babita Puniya vs Lt Cdr Annie Nagaraja that serving women Short Service Commission Officers in Indian Navy were entitled to Permanent Commission at par with their male counterparts.
Scenario of Marital Rape in India - By Malvika Verma
This article relates to the Female Genital Mutilation that is being carried out in India.
The Author of this Article is Yashpriya Sahran. He is currently pursuing B.A. LL.B from Lloyd Law College, Greater Noida.
Reference v. Union of India asked Indian Railways to consider re-prioritising the lower berth allotment by giving the highest priority to pregnant women, then to senior citizens and thereafter to the VVIPs.
Nasiruddin Ali vs The State of Assam rape is a violation of victim's fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution. Mrs Justice Rumi Kumari Phukan of Gauhati High Court who authored this noteworthy judgment
Muhammad Abbas Vs The State in Jail Supreme Court of Pakistan observed that extremism and violence has permeated through Pakistani society and it has been brutalized. Not enough is done to ensure that crimes against women do not take place.
X vs State of Kerala Guidelines for maintaining rape victim's anonymity in the matters instituted before it. Justice PB Suresh Kumar who authored this recent, remarkable and righteous judgment while considering a petition arising out of a bail order passed by POCSO
Maheshwar Tigga vs Jharkhand have acquitted a man accused of raping a woman on the pretext of marriage. It observed that misconception of fact arising out of promise to marry has to be in proximity of time to the occurrence and cannot be spread over a long period of time coupled
Smt. Neeraj v. Rajasthan A female government servant is entitled to grant of maternity leave, irrespective of the fact that she had given birth to the child prior to her joining government service.
J & K v/s Md. Imran Khan while reminding the mandate of Section 228A of the J&K Ranbir Penal Code directed the Trial Courts of the Union Territories of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh to avoid disclosing identity of rape survivors in their proceedings and judgments.
marital rape an offence. A rape is a rape. A husband who is supposed to protect his wife and take care of her in all possible respects if himself starts raping his wife must be awarded the strictest punishment
Satish vs Maharashtra groping a child's breasts without skin-to-skin contact would amount to molestation under the Indian Penal Code but not the graver offence of sexual assault under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.
Sangita v/s Maharashtra has issued additional guidelines to restrain print/electronic media as well general public, using social media, from publishing information related to rape victim that could directly or indirectly disclose her identity.
Dr Sandeep Mourya vs State in Bail Appn granted anticipatory bail to a doctor based in Delhi accused of raping a woman on the pretext of false promise of marriage after observing that there was no forceful sexual assault done in the case.
The idea of marital rape has always been under a limelight when it came to the situations of India. The laws in India have extensively worked on rape, sexual assault and sexual abuse but have turned a dead eye to the concept of marital rape
A rape is a rape. Just because a man has married a woman that by itself does not confer the legitimate right to man to have sex with woman against her wish by forcing her in anyway.
huge surge in complaints by women of sexual harassment at workplace. As things stand, if strongest possible action is not taken against the culprits who dare to sexually harass a woman
fast-tracking rape trials, the Supreme Court has said that a rape victim should be taken directly to a Magistrate for recording her statements within 24 hours of the crime.
This article puts light on how a woman's life could have a positive impact if the marital age is revised.
Mohasina Mukhtar PhD Scholar Law, RIMT University,Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab
Monika vs HP there should be no restraint to a woman throughout the period of her pregnancy as restraints and confined spaces might cause mental stress to a pregnant woman.
Mahesha vs Malebennur Police Davanagerewhile displaying zero tolerance for crimes against humanity laid down in no uncertain terms
Aarti Sharma vs Ganga Saran provisions of Domestic Violence Act, being a social welfare legislation, cannot be used by a son as a ploy to either claim a right in his father's property or to retain possession of the same on the strength of his wife's right of residence
Rajkishore Shrivastava vs. MP that getting the consent of the prosecutrix to involve in a sexual act by making false promise of re-employment, can't be called 'free consent' and it would amount to consent obtained under a misconception of fact (as per Section 90 of IPC).
Guruvinder Singh v UP even if sexually explicit images and videos are captured with the consent of a woman, the misuse of the same can't be justified once the relationship between the victim and the accused gets strained.
Irappa Siddappa Murgannavar vs Karnataka the low age of the rape victim is not considered as the only or sufficient factor for imposing a death sentence.
Mamta Devi Vs UP Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow the rescue of a married woman who had moved the High Court with her protection plea claiming that she is facing threats from her family members
Kumari D v/s Karnataka has held most commendably that the right of a woman to exercise her reproductive choice is a dimension of personal liberty as understood under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and she has a sacrosanct right to have her bodily integrity protected.
Kashinath Narayan Gharat v/s Maharashtra that mere refusal to marry a woman after a long relationship would not constitute cheating under Section 417 of the IPC if there is no evidence of fraudulent misrepresentation of promise of marriage for sex.
Neha vs Vibhor Garg Recording of telephonic conversations of the wife without her knowledge amounts to infringement of her privacy and the transcripts of such conversations cannot be accepted as evidence by Family Courts.
Mirza Iqbal @ Golu v/s Uttar Pradesh quashed the criminal proceedings lodged for a dowry death and dowry demand against a man and a woman observing that the husband's family members are frequently named as accused in matrimonial disputes by making passing reference of them in the FIR.
Siddhivinayak Umesh Vindhe v/s Maharashtra asked the Maharashtra State Government to consider making offence punishable under Section 498A of IPC a compoundable offence. The Court also pointed out that Andhra Pradesh is already taking this approach.
Top