Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Sunday, May 19, 2024

SC Orders Expansion Of E-Filing And Hybrid Hearings All Across Uttar Pradesh District Courts

Posted in: Judiciary
Tue, May 7, 24, 11:31, 2 Weeks ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 9969
Md Anas Chaudhary Vs Registrar General High Court of Judicature at Allahabad with respect to e-filing through e-Sewa Kendras of District Courts of Uttar Pradesh, the Registrar General of Allahabad High Court has been directed to communicate the following directions

It is definitely a matter of paramount satisfaction to note that for the optimum utilization of the e-Sewa Kendras established in the District Courts of Uttar Pradesh and so also consequent to the directions contained in the order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India dated 15.04.2024 passed in Writ Petition(s) Civil No(s). 1429/2023, Md Anas Chaudhary Vs Registrar General High Court of Judicature at Allahabad which additionally directs compliance of Rule 3-A of Chapter XXIV of the High Court Rules 1952 with respect to e-filing through e-Sewa Kendras of District Courts of Uttar Pradesh, the Registrar General of Allahabad High Court has been directed to communicate the following directions of this Hon’ble Court to all the District Judges of Uttar Pradesh :-

e-filing for litigants ‘in-person’ be enabled through e-Sewa Kendras of the District Courts of Uttar Pradesh. The option of photo identity verification be removed from the process of e-filing at the e-Sewa Kendras of District Judiciary. The litigant must appear ‘in person’ at the e-sewa kendras for e-filing. Scanned Notary affidavits bearing a photograph of the deponent be used with e-filed cases.

To recapitulate, it must be always borne in mind that we had witnessed that how for ensuring that e-filing facility is started in all the district courts of Uttar Pradesh, a senior lawyer and so also the incumbent General Secretary of Meerut Bar – Mr Amit Dixit and so also another eminent lawyer Mr Siddharth Jain had filed a writ in the Apex Court. The stellar role played so well by the General Secretary of Meerut Bar – Mr Amit Dixit in ensuring that Supreme Court approved e-filing of cases by relentlessly pursuing the case in Apex Court will always be written in golden letters in the golden pages of history and all the litigants all across UP must be deeply indebted to him and aided ably by his top legal team for ensuring that such a great arduous job considered a pipe dream still some time back is translated into reality. The Apex Court also found clear merit in their arguments for starting e-filing facility in the district courts of Uttar Pradesh.

Consequently, we saw how while ruling in favour of e-filing of cases in the district courts in Uttar Pradesh on April 15, the Apex Court Bench comprising of Hon’ble CJI Dr Dhananjaya Yashwant Chandrachud, Hon’ble Mr Justice JB Pardiwala and Hon’ble Mr Justice Manoj Jain had directed this e-filing facility to be started in all the district courts of Uttar Pradesh. Additionally, the Court specified that within two weeks, hybrid hearings before the High Court, facilitated by virtual setups in the District Courts of Western UP, should be conducted in accordance with the Allahabad High Court Rules (Rules of 1952). We ought to note that the most commendable directive stems from a writ petition that had been filed under Article 32, contesting a prior communication dated 28.10.23 from the Registrar General as I have just pointed out. This communication had also instructed the District Judges statewide in Uttar Pradesh to suspend the compliance with the directives issued by the High Court on 18.10.23. On October 18, 2023, the High Court, in its administrative communication, issued the following directives aimed at maximizing the utilization of E-Seva Kendras and enhancing the provision of citizen-centric services to litigants and advocates through e-filing:

...e-filing facility must be enabled at the e-Sewa Kendras of the District Courts of Uttar Pradesh alongwith the facility of e-affidavit. The option of photo identity verification shall be removed from the process of e-filing at the e-Sewa Kendras of District Judiciary. The litigant/lawyer must appear ‘in person’ at the e-sewa kendra for e-filing.

Following that, we then also saw how on October 28, 2023, the Allahabad High Court Registrar General had clearly communicated to the district judges, placing the aforementioned directives in abeyance which came as a bolt from the blue. If it was not directed to be kept in abeyance, the e-filing of cases would have started about 6 months ago on November 1, 2023 which really disappointed the lawyers of district courts of Uttar Pradesh and so also the litigants who were hoping that from November 1, 2023 they would not be required to travel whole night and half day all the way till Allahabad to seek justice which in itself is the biggest injustice. At the risk of repetition, it must be said that in a most historic step we saw how in a communication addressed to all the District Judges in the State of Uttar Pradesh, the Registrar General of the Allahabad High Court on Tuesday enabled e-filing for litigants ‘in-person’ through the e-Sewa Kendras of the District Courts of Uttar Pradesh to maximize the utilization of the e-Sewa Kendras. Importantly, we need to note that this move comes 8 days after the Supreme Court’s judgment dated April 15, 2024.

Furthermore, the petitioner had also sought a mandamus to establish a dedicated filing counter and virtual hearing facilities in the District and Sessions Courts of Western Uttar Pradesh for conducting the hybrid hearings in the Allahabad High Court, pending a decision on establishing a High Court bench in Western UP. It must be also mentioned here that Mr. Pulkit Aggarwal and so also the Advocate-On-Record (AOR) Ansar Ahmad Chaudhary while forcefully representing the petitioner had vehemently contended that the communication dated 28.10.2023 from the Registrar General constitutes a denial of access to justice for residents of Western Uttar Pradesh.

In their written submissions, the petitioner emphasized that the lack of a permanent bench of the Allahabad High Court in the Western zone of the state since 1950 has posed significant obstacles for litigants and lawyers in accessing justice. It is not hidden from anyone that even Justice Jaswant Singh Commission headed by former Supreme Court Judge appointed by Centre itself had recommended a Main Permanent High Court Bench for West UP at Agra and two circuit bench in hilly areas of undivided UP yet not a single Bench was created all over UP while in Maharashtra which already had multiple High Court Benches at Nagpur and Panaji was given one more at Aurangabad as recommended and so also in States like West Bengal and Tamil Nadu. Consequently, the petitioner had previously filed a writ petition in the Apex Court seeking the establishment of a dedicated filing counter and a virtual hearing setup in District Courts to facilitate hybrid mode hearings in the High Court.

A bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Dr DY Chandrachud with Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra issued notice and listed the matter for hearing after four weeks. The public interest litigation (PIL) petition filed by advocate Ansar Ahmad Chaudhary raised grievance against a letter by the Registrar of the High Court dated November 28, 2023 effectively putting in abeyance the setting up of such kendras in district courts in UP.The plea said that the absence of the technology assistance kiosks has made it difficult for lawyers of Western UP to electronically file and appear in their cases. The petitioner also stated that the Registrar's move came at the behest of the High Court Bar Association. The plea besides challenging the decision on e-seva kendras also prayed that cases before the Allahabad High Court from Western UP be taken up via hybrid mode.

In hindsight, we saw how the Supreme Court on August 28, 2022 had earlier declined to entertain the writ petition, granting liberty to the petitioners to approach the Registrar General of the Allahabad High Court regarding the matter. Subsequently, the communications of October 18 and October 28, 2023, occurred. Therefore, Mr. Parmeshwar submitted the following points:

(1) Regarding e-filing by litigants, the provisions outlined in the circular dated October 18, 2023, should be reinstated.

(2) Concerning filing through an advocate, Rule 3A(i) specifies that an advocate not on the rolls of advocates in the Allahabad and Lucknow High Courts cannot appear or plead in the High Court solely by filing an appointment, unless accompanied by an advocate enrolled in Allahabad and Lucknow, respectively. Thus, his contention was that Rule 3A must be considered for advocates to participate in filing for hybrid hearings of cases in the High Court.

The Bench also took note of Rule 3A(iii), which stipulates that the roll of advocates must include the name and other pertinent details, including residence and office, which must be within the confines of the city of Allahabad and Lucknow, respectively, as applicable. It must be noted that while so very rightly taking into account the aforementioned provisions concerning the High Court Roll of Advocates and the procedure for advocates not on the High Court rolls to appear, the bench observed that the High Court has the discretion to enforce compliance with the discussed provisions to ensure the efficient operation of the E-Seva Kendras. The Bench also clearly asked the Registrar General of Allahabad High Court to definitely comply with the directions within a period of 2 weeks.

While addressing the core issue of the lack of infrastructure in district judiciary and the colonial perception of subordination, the Chief Justice of India Hon’ble Dr DY Chandrachud had so commendably mentioned while speaking at the felicitation ceremony organized by the Supreme Court Bar Association on 14 November, 2022 that:
If we have to change, we have to change the face of the district judiciary, first and foremost. We have fostered a culture of subordination. We call our district judiciary, as subordinate judiciary. I make the conscious effort not to call our district judges as subordinate judges because they are not subordinate, they belong to the district judiciary…we have to change our mindsets about how we perceive the district judiciary.

All told, it is definitely most refreshing and most fulfilling to see that now all the 75 districts of Uttar Pradesh which is the most populated State of India with maximum number of pending cases have been all so very commendably linked directly with the Allahabad High Court by e-filing of cases being implemented in each and every district in whole of Uttar Pradesh from May 1, 2024. There can be just no gainsaying that it is the most historic and so also the most revolutionary step that has ever been taken since independence for which the Apex Court Bench who delivered this most landmark judgment will always be remembered in the days to come! It certainly also merits no reiteration of any kind that all those who have contributed their part in any manner in making this utopian task actually possible including Mr Laxmikant Vajpayee who is the former State President of BJP in UP and so also is a Rajya Sabha MP from Meerut who has so generously donated money from his MPs fund exclusively for this sacred purpose of ensuring that the e-filing of cases is made actually possible by opening e-filing kendras and who has most vociferously advocated for allowing e-filing of cases deserves the utmost admiration along with others as I have already mentioned above led valiantly by the General Secretary of Meerut Bar – Mr Amit Dixit for taking the legal battle right to the top court and most significantly also further ensuring through personal painstaking and relentless efforts that it is also won stupendously. There can be, of course, just no denying or disputing it!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col (Retd) BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut - 250001, Uttar Pradesh

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Rahendra Baglari v. Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate (M) writ petitioner for adjoining a Judicial Magistrate and the High Court and its Registry as Respondents to his plea against the order passed by the said Magistrate.
Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal vs.Uttarakhand long standing or established status quo brought about by judgments interpreting local or state laws, should not be lightly departed from.
Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur apart from High Court at Mumbai but on the contrary UP which has maximum pending cases in India
It is most shocking to see that a peaceful, one of the most developed and most prosperous state like Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur
I am neither a member nor supporter of BJP or any other political party nor a member of any of BJP's affiliated organizations like the RSS or VHP or any other organization.
Kirti vs Oriental Insurance Company Limited advocates cannot throw away legal rights or enter into arrangements contrary to law. It was also made clear that any concession in law made in this regard by either counsel would not bind the parties.
Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) on December 28, 2020 had expressed shock and deep concern on the arbitrary, illegal and brazen exercise of brute power by the police against lawyers, including the search conducted at the premises of an advocate representing some of the accused in the North-East Delhi riots cases.
media trial during criminal investigation interferes with administration of justice and hence amounts to contempt of court as defined under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Jamal v. Maharashtra dismissed a plea filed by the National President of BJP Minority Morcha – Jamal Anwar Siddiqui seeking 'X' category security.
Duroply Industries Limited and anr. Vs Ma Mansa Enterprises Private Limited in exercise of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction has recalled its own order of an injunction passed in a trademark dispute as the Judge presiding over the case had appeared for one party in respect of the same trademark in the past.
At the outset, it must be stated rather disconcertingly that it is India's misfortune that UP which has the maximum population more than 23 crore as Yogi Adityanath
At the outset, it has to be stated without mincing any words that it merits no reiteration that Judges age for retirement must be now increased to 75
Rajeev Bhardwaj v. H.P while dismissing a plea seeking a declaration of a sitting Judge's dissenting view as Coram non-judice and non est in the eyes of law.
Adv KG Suresh vs UOI has declared as unconstitutional the bar on lawyers representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals constituted under the Maintenance Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (Maintenance Act).
Bar Council of India ensured that there is an entrance exam now for all those lawyers who want to practice which has to be cleared before lawyers can start practicing.
It is a matter of grave concern that while our Constitution enshrines the right to equality as postulated in Article 14 but in practice what we witness is just the reverse.
seeking interim bail/parole for the under-privileged and under-trial prisoners/convicts keeping in view the terrible havoc unleashed by the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic.
When an intellectual giant like Fali Sam Nariman whom I personally rate as the world's top jurist and it is not just me but his extremely impeccable credentials are acknowledged in legal field, it is not just India but the whole world which listens to him in silence
Treasa Josfine vs Kerala that a woman who is fully qualified cannot be denied of her right to be considered for employment on the ground that she is a woman and because the nature of the employment would require her to work during night hours.
Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs constituted a Committee to suggest reforms in our criminal justice system which has been facing repeated criticism for its various drawbacks
Congress government's rule in Centre, Kapil Sibal who was Union Law Minister had written very categorically to UP Government for creating a high court bench for West UP at Meerut
completely about the truthfulness of the retracted confession and should corroborate his/her confession as it is unsafe to convict an accused person solely on the basis of the retracted confession
Thabir Sagar vs Odisha the practice of Advocate's clerks filing affidavits on behalf of parties is unacceptable. Such a practice is in gross violation of Rule 26 of the Orissa High Court Rules. It has therefore rightly directed its Registry to ensure that steps are taken forthwith to stop the practice of accepting such affidavits
COVID situation in UP, the Allahabad High Court has issued revised fresh guidelines for the functioning of all the Courts and Tribunals subordinate to it.
amended its rules to make criticism and attack of Bar Council decisions by members a misconduct and ground for disqualification or suspension or removal of membership of a member from the Bar Council.
CJI NV Ramana who was appointed as the 48th CJI on 6th April, 2021 and took oath as CJI on 24th April 2021 has very rightly expressed his concern on the social media noise and how it adversely impacts the institutions also like judiciary to a great extent which actually should not be the case.
At the crucial meeting of the Central Action Committee. of more than 20 districts of Bar Association of West UP held at Aligarh
Why UP which is among the largest States, has maximum population more than 24 crore which is more than even Pakistan
When finances are needed for the purpose of improving the judicial system at the lower levels, there is reluctance to make such finances available.
rarely ever booked and made to face the consequences which only serves to further encourage men in uniform to take it for granted to indulge in worst custodial torture
Tarun Saxena vs Union of India as ultra vires Section 17 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 which bars lawyers from representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals
Dhanbad district of Jharkhand was mowed down by an autorickshaw has sent shivers down the spine. The ghastly incident happened on morning of July 28 near the Magistrate colony of Dhanbad that was close to the Judge's residence.
Suman Chadha & Anr. vs. Central Bank of India in that the wilful breach of the undertaking given to the Court can amount to Contempt under Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act.
Rajasthan High Court Rules for Video Conferencing for Courts 2020 which shall be applicable to the proceeding of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan and all the Subordinate Courts of the Rajasthan with immediate effect.
Arun Singh Chauhan v/s MP deprecate the conduct of a practicing advocate who chose not to answer the repeated queries of the Court pertaining to the maintainability of his petition seeking issuance of a writ of quo warranto and regarding the non-impleadment of a necessary party
Dr.Mukut Nath Verma vs UoI Allahabad High Court imposed Rs 5 lakh costs on an advocate Dr Mukut Nath Verma after concluding that he unauthorisedly filed a writ petition on behalf of suspended and absconding IPS officer Mani Lal Patidar and also levelled serious allegations against state authorities and thereby misleading the Court.
Anil JS vs Kerala that instances of allegations about the police disrespecting the citizens were arriving at its doors with alarming regularity and therefore issued certain general directions in its judgment.
If there is one Judge on whom I have blind faith for his exemplary conduct throughout his brilliant career and who can never favour wrongly even his own son
Indianisation of our legal system is the need of the hour and it is crucial to make the justice delivery system more accessible and effective.
the gang war of different gangs have now reached right up to the court premises itself which are supposed to be the holiest shrines for getting justice.
It is not just for enjoying life or going for some holiday trip that lawyers of West UP repeatedly keep going on strike since last many decades.
CM Yogi Adityanath UP has progressed by leaps and bounds which one certainly cannot deny but why is it that it has just one High Court Bench only and that too just approximately 200 km away at the city famously called Nawab City
Just changing name of Allahabad to Prayagraj won't change the ground reality. It is a proven fact that High Court is still called Allahabad High Court and not Prayagraj High Court.
It is most shocking that all the Chief Justices of India from 1947 till 2000 were never shocked nor were any world famous jurist like Nani Ardeshir Palkhiwala, Ram Jethmalani, Shanti Bhushan, Prashant Bhushan among many others
Raggu Baniya @ Raghwendra vs UP has directed the Uttar Pradesh Government to instruct the District Magistrates of all the districts to re-evaluate the cases for remission after 14 years of incarceration even if appeals in such cases are pending in the High Court.
Union Minister of State for Law and Justice – SP Singh Baghel who is also an MP from Agra again in Western UP and who just recently took over has made it clear that his ministry was open to the setting up of a Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Western UP.
Anil Kumar and Anr. Vs Amit that the practice of advocates acting as power of attorney holders of their clients and also as advocates in the matter, is contrary to the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961.
Shashank Singh vs/ Honourable High Court of Judicature at Allahabad that under Article 233 of the Constitution of India, a Judicial Officer regardless of his or her previous experience, as an Advocate, cannot apply and compete for appointment to any vacancy in the post of District Judge.
It must be stated at the very outset that it is quite bewildering and baffling to see that the state of UP which Ban ki moon who is the former UN Secretary General had slammed as the rape and crime capital of India
most powerfully raised vocally the legitimate demand for a High Court Bench in West UP which is the crying need of the hour also.
Top