Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.
Legal Services India

» Home
Thursday, October 30, 2025

CJI Is Chief Justice Of India & Not Chief Justice Of Maharashtra

Posted in: Judiciary
Mon, Aug 4, 25, 16:52, 3 Months ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 21646
Demand grows for a High Court Bench in West UP amid glaring judicial disparity as Maharashtra gets its fifth bench for just 6 districts.

Never be afraid to raise your voice for honesty and truth and compassion against injustice and lying and greed. If people all over the world would do this, it would change the earth.”- William Faulkner

It is absolutely heart wrenching to see that for just 6 districts of Western Maharashtra with a population of just 1.64 lakh people, it has been announced on August 1, 2025 that the fifth High Court Bench at Kolhapur will start functioning from 18-8-2025. In protest, the lawyers of 22 districts of West UP have unitedly decided to boycott work on 4.8.2025 and stage demonstrations and submit memorandum reiterating the age old demand for High Court Bench in West UP so that people get easy and affordable justice just like Maharashtra – “justice at doorsteps”! Of course, this most third rated discrimination in allotment of High Court and High Court Benches in different States and different regions is completely unacceptable and CJI and Supreme Court must take suo motu cognizance of it and not be a silent and hapless spectator of what all is going on!

It has been reported just recently in the most prestigious “India Today” website that:
Maharashtra will get its fifth Bombay High Court Bench in Kolhapur from August 18, 2025 easing access to justice for six Western districts. The decision follows decades of demand and official notification by the state government. Bench will serve six districts including Kolhapur, Satara, Sangli, Solapur, Ratnagiri and Sindhudurg. Circuit bench aims to reduce travel burden on litigants from Western Maharashtra. Kolhapur Bench joins existing Benches in Nagpur, Aurangabad, Panaji and Mumbai. Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis made the announcement and said that:
I am extremely delighted to inform that the Bombay High Court has made arrangements for the administration of justice (Circuit Bench) at Kolhapur. The gazette regarding this has also been published, and it will come into effect from August 18, 2025. This arrangement will be for the six districts of Kolhapur, Satara, Sangli, Solapur, Ratnagiri and Sindhudurg.”

The incumbent CJI – Hon’ble Mr Justice BR Gavai on June 26, 2025 while speaking at his felicitation that was organized by the Advocates Association of the Aurangabad Bench of Bombay High Court has said most strongly that he supported the demand to set up a Bench of the Bombay High Court at Kolhapur in Western Maharashtra for 6 districts stating that justice should be available to every citizen “in every corner”. He said that:
Every time there is a demand for Kolhapur Bench of the Bombay High Court in Western Maharashtra, I have supported it and given the example of the Aurangabad Bench. More cases are filed in the Aurangabad Bench now than those in the Bombay Bench of the High Court.” To be sure, the incumbent CJI – Hon’ble Mr Justice BR Gavai whose home State is Maharashtra further hastened to add that:
It is not financially possible for everyone to come to Bombay (Mumbai) for each and every hearing. Every citizen in every corner should get justice without having to spend much time and money.” Absolutely right! No disputing it!

Honestly speaking, from the same angle, CJI must also introspect seriously that why 30 districts of West UP with more than 10 crores people not just 1.64 lakh people like in Kolhapur in Maharashtra have been most cruelly, consistently, cunningly and callously denied for so long even a single High Court Bench for whom the architect of Constitution – Dr BR Ambedkar had most vociferously recommended also separate Statehood itself? This is because CJI is Chief Justice of India and not just Chief Justice of Maharashtra only and so he must ensure equality in distribution of High Court Benches among all the States which most unfortunately we don’t see happening right now! Most disgusting indeed!

Hon’ble CJI Mr Gavai very sagaciously pointed out precisely that:
To get justice to the man standing at the last mile was important and thus, there has to be decentralization of the judicial system.” This applies to West UP also! How long will Centre keep fudging, keep fuming needlessly and keep forwarding lame excuses and keep dilly-dallying on such a most pressing issue for an inordinately long spell of time? What is also important to note is that even as Parliament session is going on, Centre has not shown any serious interest in demonstrating that it is most serious to address this most compelling demand for High Court Bench in West UP!

What has left me completely shocked, stunned, shaken and shattered to the hilt just like other lawyers of West UP and litigants is that even after nearly 80 years, Centre is least bothered to do anything serious on such a most burning issue directly affecting more than 10 crore people living in West UP especially litigants! It is well settled and well known all over that this core, compelling and critical issue of setting up a High Court Bench in West UP has been on the table since independence yet most unfortunately keeps getting pushed back to the oblivion! How long will Centre keep on neglecting intentionally such a most serious issue? About 78 years have already flown under the bridge of time!

To put it bluntly: The bogey that West UP needs no Bench needs to be most strongly debunked! Rather I will ask: What was the dire need for a High Court Bench in Lucknow so near to Allahabad where High Court itself is located yet it has High Court Bench since July 1, 1948? The point to reflect on is: How long will West UP be deprived from having even a single Bench? The most critical question is: How much more time will Centre senselessly keep purchasing to settle this long pending High Court Bench issue in West UP knowing it fully well that West UP owes for majority of pending cases of UP and contributes 80 percent to State's economy yet litigants from this region are made to suffer the most as both High Court and a single Bench are in Eastern UP only and nowhere else and most intriguingly West UP attached with not even Lucknow but most farthest with Allahabad which means litigants of 30 districts of West UP have to travel 600-800 km on average so far away and yet no one bothers not even CJI himself as I have never heard him saying anything like he said for Kolhapur which is just about 382 km from Mumbai where High Court is located?

Most ironically and most shamefully, we see that Justice Jaswant Singh Commission headed by former Supreme Court Judge was constituted by Centre itself for creating a High Court Bench in West UP among other places and it recommended maximum three High Court Benches in undivided UP – two circuit Benches in hilly areas at Dehradun and Nainital and a permanent High Court Bench in West UP at Agra yet not one Bench created till date which ultimately resulted in huge agitations in hilly areas of undivided UP and UP got partitioned in 2000 mainly because of hilly areas being denied even a single High Court Circuit Bench and then got separate High Court itself for just 88 lakh people and separate State named Uttarakhand but for West UP with more than 10 crores population for which permanent Bench recommended by Justice Jaswant Singh Commission which owes for majority of pending cases of UP, we see that not a single Bench created till date with August 2025 now running even though a permanent High Court Bench was recommended for it about 50 years ago most unfortunately and so also most astoundingly we also witnessed how where it recommended High Court Bench in Aurangabad in Maharashtra started functioning so early as in 1980s itself which already had multiple High Court Benches at Nagpur, Bombay and Panaji and yet created one more most promptly many decades ago in 1980s itself and now one more at Kolhapur and so also a High Court Bench at Japlaiguri was created in West Bengal which already had High Court Bench in Port Blair for just 2 lakh people and so also at Madurai in Tamil Nadu which were all created! This is the real tragedy and real worst discrimination in distribution of High Court Benches in different States! How can any CJI ever decide to remain wholly silent on this shocking, shameless and senseless discrimination? Denial of even a single Bench to West UP is wholly untenable and needs to be given a Bench at the earliest without any more dilly-dallying now!

I must add here that it is certainly high time now and the worst discrimination that has been perpetrated in judiciary itself since last 75 years of completion of Constitution must be addressed at the earliest now! Frustration stems in minds of litigants of West UP due to no Bench in this region inspite of such a huge population of more than 10 crores more than majority of the States in India and majority of the countries in the world! High Court Benches are tools to be used to strengthen speedy justice and “justice at doorsteps” as recommended most strongly and most sagaciously by the 230th Report of Law Commission of India prepared under Chairmanship of former Supreme Court Judge Late Dr AR Lakshmanan and other legal experts for all States and High Court Benches are not some gold ornaments to be just locked up in few elite States alone as per ruling elite own whims and fancies as we see most unfortunately and most disgracefully since last nearly eight decades!

One is totally clueless as to why Centre and concerned States are not taking any meaningful and decisive steps to create more High Court Benches not even in big States like UP and Rajasthan as both have only one Bench and lawless Bihar most shockingly has none even though the 230th Report of Law Commission of India in 2009 headed by former Supreme Court Judge and a very eminent jurist also even though the 230th Report of Law Commission of India in 2009 headed by former Supreme Court Judge even though the 230th Report of Law Commission of India in 2009 headed by former Supreme Court Judge and a very eminent jurist also - Late Hon'ble Dr AR Lakshmanan who most strongly advocated for creation of more High Court Benches in different States without any discrimination and yet even after 16 years on ground we see that only few elite States like Karnataka, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, West Bengal and Assam alone have exclusive privilege of having multiple High Court Benches? To cut a long story short, the question is whether Centre will ever try to dismantle the totally unjustified monopoly of few elite States in having multiple High Court Benches? To say the very least, at least Supreme Court and CJI must step in because CJI is Chief Justice of India and not Chief Justice of Maharashtra only!

No wonder, in the India Justice Report 2025 that was released on April 14, 2025, we see that States like Karnataka with population of just 6 crore which got VVIP treatment by being given multiple High Court Benches at Dharwad and Gulbarga for just 4 and 8 districts only created in 2008 which already had High Court Bench in Hubli rank among the best States right on top of all States and West UP with 30 districts and more than 10 crore people yet not even a single Bench and UP with more than 26 crore population which is more than Pakistan at 25 crore has just one Bench only and it is a no-brainer that it has been listed in worst category just like lawless Bihar not having even one Bench and Rajasthan just one among others also figuring in the worst category of States! Five south states rank among top performers as for just 3.5 crore people of Telangana, separate High Court created on June 2, 2014 and so also for Andhra Pradesh with just 4 crore people and we know that apart from High Court at Amaravati, the Andhra Pradesh Assembly just some recently approved a High Court Bench in Kurnool but for Punjab ad Haryana still there is no separate High Court for both the States and so no wonder it figures in middle performer category States!

Still why Parliament never ensures that big States like UP, lawless Bihar and Rajasthan have multiple High Court Benches even after more than 78 years of independence? Parliament cannot be absolved ever from its most notorious stupidity in doing nothing to set the record straight on this count and bringing them at least on parity with few elite States who have multiple High Court Benches like Karnataka even though its population at 6 crores is more than 4 crores less than West UP alone at 10 crores and more than 20 crores less than UP at 26 crores! No wonder, it is right at the top in the India Justice Report 2025!

But it really speaks volumes of how much ruthless discrimination our Centre and so also our Parliament that is both legislature and executive has ensured is perpetrated on big North Indian States like UP, Rajasthan and Bihar in judiciary itself in High Court Benches distribution which makes me hang my head in shame! It would be foolhardy to ignore the ground reality which speaks for itself. Yet Supreme Court also never takes suo motu cognizance of it and as we saw in November 2018 when an Apex Court Bench led by the then CJI Mr Ranjan Gogoi conceded the dire need of a High Court Bench in West UP while listening to a PIL by a woman lawyer KM Chitra dismissed the PIL saying that it was for Centre to decide! Is Supreme Court waiting for another 100 or 200 years for Centre to take action on this?

Will creation of more High Court Benches ensure or hinder the rule of law? No prizes for guessing the clear writing on the wall! Why the most legitimate voice of the litigants of West UP for a High Court Bench has been throttled for so long despite West UP owing for majority of pending cases of UP and contributing to more than 80% of State’s economy? The crux of the problem is: Centre is least interested in taking any pains to seriously resolve this long pending issue which definitely has to be roundly and most strongly condemned! A High Court Bench in West UP will better ensure that police and civil administration in West UP comply as directed as it will be much closer! It certainly brooks no more delay any longer now!

By any reckoning, there cannot be ever a bigger tragedy than this that for 78 years of independence we see that West UP has been denied even a single High Court Bench even though it is West UP which owes for majority of the pending cases of UP which is highest not just in UP but is also highest in any other region of India yet mercilessly deprived from having even a single High Court Bench which is undoubtedly most disastrous! What is even most worst and most disgusting is that the litigants of 30 districts of West UP have been most atrociously and most mercilessly attached with not even Lucknow where a High Court Bench exists since July 1948 in Eastern UP but attached most stupidly with Allahabad which is more than 230 km away from even Lucknow which means the poorest litigants of 30 districts of West UP have to spend more and travel whole night and nearly a day about 700 to 800 km in average by train to attend court hearings which is plainly unconstitutional just like litigants of hilly areas of undivided UP had to travel thousands of kilometers all the way again till Allahabad in true dictatorial style making the worst mockery of our Constitution and so also of poorest litigants till Uttar Pradesh was partitioned and this was the major reason which political parties never like to concede and judiciary also has been reticent in taking any action in this regard even though it took suo motu cognizance recently in cheating in Mayor elections as we saw in Chandigarh some time back! CJI must speak on this also like he spoke for High Court Bench in Western Maharashtra for just five districts!

It merits just no reiteration that the trials and tribulations that litigants of West UP have to face due to no Bench in this region even though majority of pending cases are from West UP are simply unending yet most atrociously we see that Centre has done absolutely just nothing to resolve it and media too has utterly failed to highlight it effectively! The step-motherly treatment that has been humiliatingly accorded to West UP which owes for majority of pending cases of UP and contributes more than 80 percent to State’s economy is most disgraceful and most saddening indeed! No denying it!

What intrigues me most is why so unjustly West UP has been deprived from having even a single Bench? Centre has repeatedly assured creation of Bench in West UP but in stark contrast when it comes to action, nothing done in last nearly 80 years! Most disgraceful, most disheartening, most derisive, most discriminatory double standards and so also most disbelieving to see how unabashedly Centre has turned a blind eye to such a most serious and compelling issue directly affecting the poorest litigants!

How long will a solution to this Bench issue in West UP just keep lurking in the shadows? To put it plainly, Centre’s absolute inaction on this front has to be most strongly and roundly condemned! On a serious note, the people’s cry for a High Court Bench in West UP cannot be ever silenced!

With a very heavy heart, I want to say that Centre has been most biased in denying West UP even a single Bench! You don’t need a telescope to see that which State should have maximum High Court Benches as it is the most populated State of India with maximum number of pending cases! How long will Supreme Court be in hibernation mode on this count? It has to be acknowledged with grace that denial of even a single High Court Bench to West UP which owes for majority of pending cases of UP which is also highest for any region in India is not only most dangerous and most deleterious but also most disastrous, most despicable and most discriminatory indeed!

Let us still fervently hope that some Judge in Supreme Court will definitely one day take suo motu cognizance of this worst discrimination of distribution of High Court and High Court Benches in different States and different regions right under the nose of Supreme Court most shamelessly, most senselessly, most surreptitiously and most sinisterly by not allowing even a single Bench in UP in last 78 years even though UP has maximum pending cases among all the States and majority of pending cases from West UP yet not even a single Bench even though Justice Jaswant Singh Commission appointed by Centre itself recommended permanent seat of High Court Bench in West UP about 50 years ago and address it in the best possible convincing manner! It brooks no more delay any longer now!

My point is very clear: This definitely cannot under any circumstances continue endlessly! I am of the considered view that Centre is taking far too long for deciding in an “open and shut” case of High Court Bench in West UP! What I find really most troubling and so also most demoralizing is that this key issue directly pertains to judiciary and it is a grave violation of what is envisaged in Article 14 about equality in Constitution yet Apex Court also has most astoundingly and inexplicably desisted in last nearly 80 years of independence in taking a proactive stand on it and in ensuring that West UP has a High Court Bench so that the litigants don’t keep on suffering endlessly!

But I still nurture a glimmer of hope that someday sooner or later it will definitely muster the requisite courage and conviction to honestly speak up most candidly on this also just like it spoke recently on more than half of Judges seat in Allahabad High Court lying vacant and ensure that a High Court Bench is created in West UP at the earliest as was directed also so very commendably by Justice Jaswant Singh Commission appointed by Centre itself about 50 years ago and yet not created till date! I just don’t buy any rubbish arguments forwarded by Centre for denying West UP even a single High Court Bench even though majority of pending cases are from West UP!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col (Retd) BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut - 250001, Uttar Pradesh.

Legal Services India

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Rahendra Baglari v. Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate (M) writ petitioner for adjoining a Judicial Magistrate and the High Court and its Registry as Respondents to his plea against the order passed by the said Magistrate.
Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal vs.Uttarakhand long standing or established status quo brought about by judgments interpreting local or state laws, should not be lightly departed from.
Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur apart from High Court at Mumbai but on the contrary UP which has maximum pending cases in India
It is most shocking to see that a peaceful, one of the most developed and most prosperous state like Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur
I am neither a member nor supporter of BJP or any other political party nor a member of any of BJP's affiliated organizations like the RSS or VHP or any other organization.
Kirti vs Oriental Insurance Company Limited advocates cannot throw away legal rights or enter into arrangements contrary to law. It was also made clear that any concession in law made in this regard by either counsel would not bind the parties.
Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) on December 28, 2020 had expressed shock and deep concern on the arbitrary, illegal and brazen exercise of brute power by the police against lawyers, including the search conducted at the premises of an advocate representing some of the accused in the North-East Delhi riots cases.
media trial during criminal investigation interferes with administration of justice and hence amounts to contempt of court as defined under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Jamal v. Maharashtra dismissed a plea filed by the National President of BJP Minority Morcha – Jamal Anwar Siddiqui seeking 'X' category security.
Duroply Industries Limited and anr. Vs Ma Mansa Enterprises Private Limited in exercise of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction has recalled its own order of an injunction passed in a trademark dispute as the Judge presiding over the case had appeared for one party in respect of the same trademark in the past.
At the outset, it must be stated rather disconcertingly that it is India's misfortune that UP which has the maximum population more than 23 crore as Yogi Adityanath
At the outset, it has to be stated without mincing any words that it merits no reiteration that Judges age for retirement must be now increased to 75
Rajeev Bhardwaj v. H.P while dismissing a plea seeking a declaration of a sitting Judge's dissenting view as Coram non-judice and non est in the eyes of law.
Adv KG Suresh vs UOI has declared as unconstitutional the bar on lawyers representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals constituted under the Maintenance Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (Maintenance Act).
Bar Council of India ensured that there is an entrance exam now for all those lawyers who want to practice which has to be cleared before lawyers can start practicing.
It is a matter of grave concern that while our Constitution enshrines the right to equality as postulated in Article 14 but in practice what we witness is just the reverse.
seeking interim bail/parole for the under-privileged and under-trial prisoners/convicts keeping in view the terrible havoc unleashed by the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic.
When an intellectual giant like Fali Sam Nariman whom I personally rate as the world's top jurist and it is not just me but his extremely impeccable credentials are acknowledged in legal field, it is not just India but the whole world which listens to him in silence
Treasa Josfine vs Kerala that a woman who is fully qualified cannot be denied of her right to be considered for employment on the ground that she is a woman and because the nature of the employment would require her to work during night hours.
Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs constituted a Committee to suggest reforms in our criminal justice system which has been facing repeated criticism for its various drawbacks
Congress government's rule in Centre, Kapil Sibal who was Union Law Minister had written very categorically to UP Government for creating a high court bench for West UP at Meerut
completely about the truthfulness of the retracted confession and should corroborate his/her confession as it is unsafe to convict an accused person solely on the basis of the retracted confession
Thabir Sagar vs Odisha the practice of Advocate's clerks filing affidavits on behalf of parties is unacceptable. Such a practice is in gross violation of Rule 26 of the Orissa High Court Rules. It has therefore rightly directed its Registry to ensure that steps are taken forthwith to stop the practice of accepting such affidavits
COVID situation in UP, the Allahabad High Court has issued revised fresh guidelines for the functioning of all the Courts and Tribunals subordinate to it.
amended its rules to make criticism and attack of Bar Council decisions by members a misconduct and ground for disqualification or suspension or removal of membership of a member from the Bar Council.
CJI NV Ramana who was appointed as the 48th CJI on 6th April, 2021 and took oath as CJI on 24th April 2021 has very rightly expressed his concern on the social media noise and how it adversely impacts the institutions also like judiciary to a great extent which actually should not be the case.
At the crucial meeting of the Central Action Committee. of more than 20 districts of Bar Association of West UP held at Aligarh
Why UP which is among the largest States, has maximum population more than 24 crore which is more than even Pakistan
When finances are needed for the purpose of improving the judicial system at the lower levels, there is reluctance to make such finances available.
rarely ever booked and made to face the consequences which only serves to further encourage men in uniform to take it for granted to indulge in worst custodial torture
Tarun Saxena vs Union of India as ultra vires Section 17 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 which bars lawyers from representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals
Dhanbad district of Jharkhand was mowed down by an autorickshaw has sent shivers down the spine. The ghastly incident happened on morning of July 28 near the Magistrate colony of Dhanbad that was close to the Judge's residence.
Suman Chadha & Anr. vs. Central Bank of India in that the wilful breach of the undertaking given to the Court can amount to Contempt under Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act.
Rajasthan High Court Rules for Video Conferencing for Courts 2020 which shall be applicable to the proceeding of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan and all the Subordinate Courts of the Rajasthan with immediate effect.
Arun Singh Chauhan v/s MP deprecate the conduct of a practicing advocate who chose not to answer the repeated queries of the Court pertaining to the maintainability of his petition seeking issuance of a writ of quo warranto and regarding the non-impleadment of a necessary party
Dr.Mukut Nath Verma vs UoI Allahabad High Court imposed Rs 5 lakh costs on an advocate Dr Mukut Nath Verma after concluding that he unauthorisedly filed a writ petition on behalf of suspended and absconding IPS officer Mani Lal Patidar and also levelled serious allegations against state authorities and thereby misleading the Court.
Anil JS vs Kerala that instances of allegations about the police disrespecting the citizens were arriving at its doors with alarming regularity and therefore issued certain general directions in its judgment.
If there is one Judge on whom I have blind faith for his exemplary conduct throughout his brilliant career and who can never favour wrongly even his own son
Indianisation of our legal system is the need of the hour and it is crucial to make the justice delivery system more accessible and effective.
the gang war of different gangs have now reached right up to the court premises itself which are supposed to be the holiest shrines for getting justice.
It is not just for enjoying life or going for some holiday trip that lawyers of West UP repeatedly keep going on strike since last many decades.
CM Yogi Adityanath UP has progressed by leaps and bounds which one certainly cannot deny but why is it that it has just one High Court Bench only and that too just approximately 200 km away at the city famously called Nawab City
Just changing name of Allahabad to Prayagraj won't change the ground reality. It is a proven fact that High Court is still called Allahabad High Court and not Prayagraj High Court.
It is most shocking that all the Chief Justices of India from 1947 till 2000 were never shocked nor were any world famous jurist like Nani Ardeshir Palkhiwala, Ram Jethmalani, Shanti Bhushan, Prashant Bhushan among many others
Raggu Baniya @ Raghwendra vs UP has directed the Uttar Pradesh Government to instruct the District Magistrates of all the districts to re-evaluate the cases for remission after 14 years of incarceration even if appeals in such cases are pending in the High Court.
Union Minister of State for Law and Justice – SP Singh Baghel who is also an MP from Agra again in Western UP and who just recently took over has made it clear that his ministry was open to the setting up of a Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Western UP.
Anil Kumar and Anr. Vs Amit that the practice of advocates acting as power of attorney holders of their clients and also as advocates in the matter, is contrary to the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961.
Shashank Singh vs/ Honourable High Court of Judicature at Allahabad that under Article 233 of the Constitution of India, a Judicial Officer regardless of his or her previous experience, as an Advocate, cannot apply and compete for appointment to any vacancy in the post of District Judge.
It must be stated at the very outset that it is quite bewildering and baffling to see that the state of UP which Ban ki moon who is the former UN Secretary General had slammed as the rape and crime capital of India
most powerfully raised vocally the legitimate demand for a High Court Bench in West UP which is the crying need of the hour also.
Top