Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.
Legal Services India

» Home
Tuesday, February 3, 2026

Why Supreme Court For 78 Years Has Permitted Most Atrocious Discrimination In Judiciary Itself?

Posted in: Supreme Court
Sat, Aug 9, 25, 03:38, 6 Months ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 33007
Supreme Court Split Verdict in ACIT v Shelf Drilling: Impact on Foreign Firms & Tax Timelines

“Throughout history, it has been the inaction of those who could have acted; the indifference of those who should have known better; the silence of the voice of justice when it mattered most; that has made it possible for evil to triumph.”- Haile Selassie

It is absolutely in the fitness of things that the Supreme Court has come down recently very heavily on Allahabad High Court Judge – Hon’ble Mr Justice Prashant Kumar of the Allahabad High Court who didn’t quash criminal case by saying that the civil suit remedy to recover the money was not effective even though I personally feel that the reprimand should have been made in a more soft yet firm manner but surely we can’t question the unfettered powers of the Supreme Court that has been vested in it by the Constitution itself. This same Hon’ble Mr Justice Prashant Kumar of Allahabad High Court who is under line of fire has not even completed three years in office. Who does not make terrible mistake at some point of time or the other yet how many of them are ever held seriously accountable as we have seen even in the Supreme Court itself? Yet he has been barred very rightly from handling criminal cases by withdrawing all criminal cases from the concerned Judge and assigned him to a Division Bench with a senior Judge but this definitely should have been for a limited period and not till he demits office as has been ordered so very unjustly by the Supreme Court with which I most strongly yet most politely differ!

Even Supreme Court Judges and Chief Justice of India have most grievously blundered so many times in the past! Everyone including Supreme Court makes not only just mere mistakes but even most historical, most Himalayan and most horrendous blunders and some of which seldom goes noticed even after many decades by none other than Supreme Court itself! The prime question here is: Who will hold Supreme Court itself accountable for its most not only atrocious lapse but also most atrocious, arbitrary and absolutely unjustified decisions by not deciding nor ever daring to take suo motu cognizance of even this “open dacoity” in some leading cases by which it disgraces itself most horribly without being held accountable in any manner by anyone not even by Supreme Court itself later on? To paraphrase what Pastor Martin Niemoller had once famously said that:
If we stay silent today, there will be no one to protest when they come for us tomorrow.”

I will dwell in this column only with the most historical, horrendous, humiliating and Himalayan blunder of denying UP multiple High Court Benches and West UP even one since last more than 78 years! It will definitely not be an exaggeration by any reckoning if I say that Supreme Court in last about 80 years has relentlessly and most grievously erred by not allowing even a single High Court in any nook and corner of Uttar Pradesh other than at Lucknow which is so close to Allahabad where High Court itself is located and most atrociously attached litigants of 30 districts of West UP and hilly areas of undivided UP with not even Lucknow which is more than 230 km closer but right uptill Allahabad most astoundingly to seek justice which in itself is the biggest betrayal of Constitution, deepest burial of justice and worst mockery of poorest litigants of hilly areas of undivided UP who had to travel thousands of kilometers all the way till not even Lucknow but right uptill Allahabad which under no circumstances can ever be justified! Does this not amount to a worst travesty of justice right under the nose of the Supreme Court for such a long spell of time from which not just one party but crores of people especially litigants from hilly areas of undivided UP and West UP suffered the most?

It is none other than Supreme Court which has behaved most worst in most despotic manner in this world by not ever till date for 78 long years ever taking suo motu cognizance of not just ‘open cheating’ but more appropriate would it be to say that “open dacoity” and “open plunder” in the distribution of High Court Benches in different States and different regions and so also in creation of new States where worst form of discrimination is ruling the roost! It is absolutely heart wrenching to see that for just 6 districts of Western Maharashtra with a population of just 1.64 lakh people, it has been announced on August 1, 2025 that the fifth High Court Bench at Kolhapur will start functioning from 18-8-2025. In protest, the lawyers of 22 districts of West UP have unitedly decided to boycott work on 4.8.2025 and stage demonstrations and submit memorandum reiterating the age old demand for High Court Bench in West UP so that people get easy and affordable justice just like Maharashtra – “justice at doorsteps”! Of course, this most third rated discrimination in allotment of High Court and High Court Benches in different States and different regions is completely unacceptable and CJI and Supreme Court must take suo motu cognizance of it and not be a silent and hapless spectator of what all is going on!

It has been reported just recently in the most prestigious “India Today” website that:
Maharashtra will get its fifth Bombay High Court Bench in Kolhapur from August 18, 2025 easing access to justice for six Western districts. The decision follows decades of demand and official notification by the state government. Bench will serve six districts including Kolhapur, Satara, Sangli, Solapur, Ratnagiri and Sindhudurg. Circuit bench aims to reduce travel burden on litigants from Western Maharashtra. Kolhapur Bench joins existing Benches in Nagpur, Aurangabad, Panaji and Mumbai. Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis made the announcement and said that:
I am extremely delighted to inform that the Bombay High Court has made arrangements for the administration of justice (Circuit Bench) at Kolhapur. The gazette regarding this has also been published, and it will come into effect from August 18, 2025. This arrangement will be for the six districts of Kolhapur, Satara, Sangli, Solapur, Ratnagiri and Sindhudurg.”

The incumbent CJI – Hon’ble Mr Justice BR Gavai on June 26, 2025 while speaking at his felicitation that was organized by the Advocates Association of the Aurangabad Bench of Bombay High Court has said most strongly that he supported the demand to set up a Bench of the Bombay High Court at Kolhapur in Western Maharashtra for 6 districts stating that justice should be available to every citizen “in every corner”. He said that:
Every time there is a demand for Kolhapur Bench of the Bombay High Court in Western Maharashtra, I have supported it and given the example of the Aurangabad Bench. More cases are filed in the Aurangabad Bench now than those in the Bombay Bench of the High Court.” To be sure, the incumbent CJI – Hon’ble Mr Justice BR Gavai whose home State is Maharashtra further hastened to add that:
It is not financially possible for everyone to come to Bombay (Mumbai) for each and every hearing. Every citizen in every corner should get justice without having to spend much time and money.” Absolutely right! No disputing it!

Honestly speaking, from the same angle, CJI Mr Justice BR Gavai must also introspect seriously that why 30 districts of West UP with more than 10 crores people not just 1.64 lakh people like we see in Kolhapur in Maharashtra where fifth High Court Bench approved and still have been most cruelly, consistently, cunningly and callously denied for so long even a single High Court Bench for whom the architect of Constitution – Dr BR Ambedkar had most vociferously recommended also separate Statehood itself? This is because CJI is Chief Justice of India and not just Chief Justice of Maharashtra only and so he must ensure equality in distribution of High Court Benches among all the States which most unfortunately we don’t see happening right now! Most disgusting indeed! How long will few elite States always be coddled, even at the cost of truth that it is UP which tops the States list in having maximum number of pending cases and still only one Bench in Eastern UP so close to Allahabad but West UP which owes for majority of pending cases of Allahabad High Court has no High Court Bench, not even a single High Court Circuit Bench! Yet Supreme Court has never bothered to do anything on this!

Hon’ble CJI Mr Gavai very sagaciously pointed out precisely observing that:
To get justice to the man standing at the last mile was important and thus, there has to be decentralization of the judicial system.” This definitely hundred percent applies to West UP and lawless Bihar also! How long will Centre keep fudging, keep fuming needlessly and keep forwarding lame excuses and keep dilly-dallying on such a most pressing issue for an inordinately long spell of time? What is also important to note is that even as Parliament session is going on, Centre has not shown any serious interest in demonstrating that it is most serious to address this most compelling demand for High Court Bench in West UP!

Why only a handful of elite States like Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, West Bengal, Karnataka and Assam have multiple High Court Benches? Why Supreme Court never lashes out ever at this most brazen, blind, brutal, blatant and baseless discrimination perpetrated in distribution of High Court Benches in not only different States but also different regions like in UP it is only Eastern UP alone which has both High Court and High Court Bench leaving other regions completely unrepresented including hilly areas as long as it formed part of UP, West UP, Purvanchal and Bundelkhand? Why the hell Supreme Court has tolerated for so long and is still tolerating such most worst form of dastardly, divisive and double standard absurd discrimination perpetrated against different regions of same State like in UP or between different States and so also in allocating Statehood to different States?

What has left me completely shocked, stunned, shaken and shattered to the hilt just like other lawyers of West UP and litigants is that even after nearly 80 years, Centre is least bothered to do anything serious on such a most burning issue directly affecting more than 10 crore people living in West UP especially litigants! It is well settled and well known all over that this core, compelling and critical issue of setting up a High Court Bench in West UP has been on the table since independence yet most unfortunately keeps getting pushed back to the oblivion! How long will Centre keep on neglecting intentionally such a most serious issue? About 78 years have already flown under the bridge of time!

To put it bluntly: The bogey that West UP needs no Bench needs to be most strongly debunked! Rather I will ask: What was the dire need for a High Court Bench in Lucknow so near to Allahabad where High Court itself is located yet it has High Court Bench since July 1, 1948? The point to reflect on is: How long will West UP be mercilessly deprived from having even a single Bench? The most critical question is: How much more time will Centre senselessly keep purchasing to settle this long pending High Court Bench issue in West UP knowing it fully well that West UP owes for majority of pending cases of UP and contributes 80 percent to State's economy yet litigants from this region are made to suffer the most as both High Court and a single Bench are in Eastern UP only and nowhere else and most intriguingly West UP attached with not even Lucknow but most farthest with Allahabad which means litigants of 30 districts of West UP have to travel 600-800 km on average so far away and yet no one bothers not even CJI himself as I have never heard him saying anything like he said for Kolhapur which is just about 382 km from Mumbai where High Court is located?

Most ironically and most shamefully, we see that Justice Jaswant Singh Commission headed by former Supreme Court Judge was constituted by Centre itself for creating a High Court Bench in West UP among other places and it recommended maximum three High Court Benches in undivided UP – two circuit Benches in hilly areas at Dehradun and Nainital and a permanent High Court Bench in West UP at Agra yet not one Bench created till date which ultimately resulted in huge agitations in hilly areas of undivided UP and UP got partitioned in 2000 mainly because of hilly areas being denied even a single High Court Circuit Bench and then got separate High Court itself for just 88 lakh people and separate State named Uttarakhand but for West UP with more than 10 crores population for which permanent Bench recommended by Justice Jaswant Singh Commission which owes for majority of pending cases of UP, we see that not a single Bench created till date with August 2025 now running even though a permanent High Court Bench was recommended for it about 50 years ago most unfortunately and so also most astoundingly we also witnessed how where it recommended High Court Bench in Aurangabad in Maharashtra started functioning so early as in 1980s itself which already had multiple High Court Benches at Nagpur, Bombay and Panaji and yet created one more fifth itself at Kolhapur from 18.8.2025 and so also Justice Jaswant Singh Commission had recommended High Court Bench at Japlaiguri for just 5 districts was created in West Bengal which already had High Court Bench in Port Blair for just 2 lakh people and so also at Madurai in Tamil Nadu with just 7 crore people which were all created promptly! This is the real tragedy and real worst discrimination in distribution of High Court Benches in different States! How can any CJI ever decide to remain wholly silent on this shocking, shameless and senseless discrimination? Denial of even a single Bench to West UP is wholly untenable and needs to be given a Bench at the earliest without any more dilly-dallying now!

I must add here that it is certainly high time now and the worst discrimination that has been perpetrated in judiciary itself since last 75 years of completion of Constitution must be definitely addressed at the earliest! Frustration stems in minds of litigants of West UP due to no Bench in this region inspite of such a huge population of more than 10 crores more than majority of the States in India and majority of the countries in the world! High Court Benches are tools to be used to strengthen speedy justice and “justice at doorsteps” as recommended most strongly and most sagaciously by the 230th Report of Law Commission of India prepared under Chairmanship of former Supreme Court Judge Late Dr AR Lakshmanan and other legal experts for all States and High Court Benches are not some gold ornaments to be just locked up in few elite States alone as per ruling elite own whims and fancies as we see most unfortunately and most disgracefully since last nearly eight decades!

There was no e-filing facility for hilly areas of undivided UP from 1947 to November 9, 2000 till Uttarakhand was created as a separate State due to which litigants relentlessly bore extreme hardships and wasted huge money in just travelling alone leave alone other expenses! Yet not one Judge either in Allahabad High Court or even Supreme Court which is the last bastion as ray of hope for the poorest litigants could summon the moral courage to speak up by taking suo motu cognizance

One is totally clueless as to why Centre and concerned States are not taking any meaningful and decisive steps to create more High Court Benches not even in big States like UP and Rajasthan as both have only one Bench and lawless Bihar most shockingly has none even though the 230th Report of Law Commission of India in 2009 headed by former Supreme Court Judge and a very eminent jurist also even though the 230th Report of Law Commission of India in 2009 headed by former Supreme Court Judge even though the 230th Report of Law Commission of India in 2009 headed by former Supreme Court Judge and a very eminent jurist also - Late Hon'ble Dr AR Lakshmanan who most strongly advocated for creation of more High Court Benches in different States without any discrimination and yet even after 16 years on ground we see that only few elite States like Karnataka, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, West Bengal and Assam alone have exclusive privilege of having multiple High Court Benches? To cut a long story short, the question is whether Centre will ever try to dismantle the totally unjustified monopoly of few elite States in having multiple High Court Benches? To say the very least, at least Supreme Court and CJI must step in because CJI is Chief Justice of India and not Chief Justice of Maharashtra only!

No wonder, in the India Justice Report 2025 that was released on April 14, 2025, we see that States like Karnataka with population of just 6 crore which got VVIP treatment by being given multiple High Court Benches at Dharwad and Gulbarga for just 4 and 8 districts only created in 2008 which already had High Court Bench in Hubli rank among the best States right on top of all States and West UP with 30 districts and more than 10 crore people yet not even a single Bench and UP with more than 26 crore population which is more than Pakistan at 25 crore has just one Bench only and it is a no-brainer that it has been listed in worst category just like lawless Bihar not having even one Bench and Rajasthan just one among others also figuring in the worst category of States! Five south states rank among top performers as for just 3.5 crore people of Telangana, separate High Court created on June 2, 2014 and so also for Andhra Pradesh with just 4 crore people and we know that apart from High Court at Amaravati, the Andhra Pradesh Assembly just some recently approved a High Court Bench in Kurnool and State Government it is being reported is now contemplating one more at Visakhapatnam but for Punjab and Haryana still there is no separate High Court for both the States and so no wonder it figures in middle performer category States!

Still why Parliament never ensures that big States like UP, lawless Bihar and Rajasthan have multiple High Court Benches even after more than 78 years of independence? Parliament cannot be absolved ever from its most notorious stupidity in doing nothing to set the record straight on this count and bringing them at least on parity with few elite States who have multiple High Court Benches like Karnataka even though its population at 6 crores is more than 4 crores less than West UP alone at 10 crores and more than 20 crores less than UP at 26 crores! No wonder, it is right at the top in the India Justice Report 2025!

But it really speaks volumes of how much ruthless discrimination our Centre and so also our Parliament that is both legislature and executive has ensured is perpetrated on big North Indian States like UP, Rajasthan and Bihar in judiciary itself in High Court Benches distribution which makes me hang my head in shame! It would be foolhardy to ignore the ground reality which speaks for itself. Yet Supreme Court also never takes suo motu cognizance of it and as we saw in November 2018 when an Apex Court Bench led by the then CJI Mr Ranjan Gogoi conceded the dire need of a High Court Bench in West UP while listening to a PIL by a woman lawyer KM Chitra dismissed the PIL saying that it was for Centre to decide! Is Supreme Court waiting for another 100 or 200 years for Centre to take action on this?

Will creation of more High Court Benches ensure or hinder the rule of law? No prizes for guessing the clear writing on the wall! Why the most legitimate voice of the litigants of West UP for a High Court Bench has been throttled for so long despite West UP owing for majority of pending cases of UP and contributing to more than 80% of State’s economy? The crux of the problem is: Centre is least interested in taking any pains to seriously resolve this long pending issue which definitely has to be roundly and most strongly condemned! A High Court Bench in West UP will better ensure that police and civil administration in West UP comply as directed as it will be much closer! It certainly brooks no more delay any longer now!

By any reckoning, there cannot be ever a bigger tragedy than this that for 78 years of independence we see that West UP has been denied even a single High Court Bench even though it is West UP which owes for majority of the pending cases of UP which is highest not just in UP but is also highest in any other region of India yet mercilessly deprived from having even a single High Court Bench which is undoubtedly most disastrous! What is even most worst and most disgusting is that the litigants of 30 districts of West UP have been most atrociously and most mercilessly attached with not even Lucknow where a High Court Bench exists since July 1948 in Eastern UP but attached most stupidly with Allahabad which is more than 230 km away from even Lucknow which means the poorest litigants of 30 districts of West UP have to spend more and travel whole night and nearly a day about 700 to 800 km in average by train to attend court hearings which is plainly unconstitutional just like litigants of hilly areas of undivided UP had to travel thousands of kilometers all the way again till Allahabad in true dictatorial style making the worst mockery of our Constitution and so also of poorest litigants till Uttar Pradesh was partitioned and this was the major reason which political parties never like to concede and judiciary also has been reticent in taking any action in this regard even though it took suo motu cognizance recently in cheating in Mayor elections as we saw in Chandigarh some time back! CJI must speak on this also like he spoke for High Court Bench in Western Maharashtra for just five districts!

It merits just no reiteration that the trials and tribulations that litigants of West UP have to face due to no Bench in this region even though majority of pending cases are from West UP are simply unending yet most atrociously we see that Centre has done absolutely just nothing to resolve it and media too has utterly failed to highlight it effectively! The step-motherly treatment that has been humiliatingly accorded to West UP which owes for majority of pending cases of UP and contributes more than 80 percent to State’s economy is most disgraceful and most saddening indeed! No denying it!

What intrigues me most is why so unjustly West UP has been deprived from having even a single Bench? Centre has repeatedly assured creation of Bench in West UP but in stark contrast when it comes to action, nothing done in last nearly 80 years! Most disgraceful, most disheartening, most derisive, most discriminatory double standards and so also most disbelieving to see how unabashedly Centre has turned a blind eye to such a most serious and compelling issue directly affecting the poorest litigants!

How long will a solution to this Bench issue in West UP just keep lurking in the shadows? To put it plainly, Centre’s absolute inaction on this front has to be most strongly and roundly condemned! On a serious note, the people’s cry for a High Court Bench in West UP cannot be ever silenced!

With a very heavy heart, I want to say that Centre has been most biased in denying West UP even a single Bench! You don’t need a telescope to see that which State should have maximum High Court Benches as it is the most populated State of India with maximum number of pending cases! How long will Supreme Court be in hibernation mode on this count with 78 years already flown under the bridge of time? It has to be acknowledged with grace that denial of even a single High Court Bench to West UP which owes for majority of pending cases of UP which is also highest for any region in India is not only most dangerous and most deleterious but also most disastrous, most despicable and most discriminatory indeed!

Let us still fervently hope that some Judge in Supreme Court will definitely one day take suo motu cognizance of this worst discrimination of distribution of High Court and High Court Benches in different States and different regions right under the nose of Supreme Court most shamelessly, most senselessly, most surreptitiously and most sinisterly by not allowing even a single Bench in UP in last 78 years even though UP has maximum pending cases among all the States and majority of pending cases from West UP yet not even a single Bench even though Justice Jaswant Singh Commission appointed by Centre itself recommended permanent seat of High Court Bench in West UP about 50 years ago and address it in the best possible convincing manner! It brooks no more delay any longer now!

My point is very clear: This definitely cannot under any circumstances continue endlessly! I am of the considered view that Centre is taking far too long for deciding in an “open and shut” case of High Court Bench in West UP! What I find really most troubling and so also most demoralizing is that this key issue directly pertains to judiciary and it is a grave violation of what is envisaged in Article 14 about equality in Constitution yet Apex Court also has most astoundingly and inexplicably desisted in last nearly 80 years of independence in taking a proactive stand on it and in ensuring that West UP has a High Court Bench so that the litigants don’t keep on suffering endlessly!

But I still nurture a glimmer of hope that someday sooner or later Supreme Court will definitely muster the requisite courage and conviction to honestly speak up most candidly on this also just like it spoke recently on more than half of Judges seat in Allahabad High Court lying vacant and ensure that a High Court Bench is created in West UP at the earliest as was directed also so very commendably by Justice Jaswant Singh Commission appointed by Centre itself about 50 years ago and yet not created till date! I just don’t buy any rubbish arguments that is forwarded by Centre as lame excuse on one pretext or other for denying West UP even a single High Court Bench even though majority of pending cases are from West UP yet what is worst is that even Supreme Court has done absolutely just nothing at all in this regard for last about 80 years without any bona fide justification for not taking any action in such a serious matter affecting so many litigants who are made to undergo untold hardships due to no Bench in this region! It would not be completely off the mark to say that it is West UP where High Court should now be shifted as majority of pending cases are from West UP as was conceded by Justice Jaswant Singh Commission also! But what I find most deeply unsettling and most perplexing to note is that West UP has not even a High Court Bench nor even just a High Court Circuit Bench and still Supreme Court says nothing! When will it speak up? It must speak up now fearlessly in the interest of justice so that the poorest litigants of West UP stands to gain the most and don’t keep on suffering endlessly with no end in sight!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col (Retd) BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut - 250001, Uttar Pradesh

Legal Services India

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 19, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
In the light of the latest judgment provided by the SC for commuting the death penalty of former pm Rajiv Gandhi’s assassins to life imprisonment on the ground of excessive wait on govt and President’s part to decide their whim pleas
Shanti Bhushan v Supreme Court of India through its Registrar and another in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 789 of 2018 (Arising out of Diary No. 12405 of 2018) refused pointblank to declare that the function of allocating cases and assigning benches should be exercised by the collegium of five senior Judges instead of the Chief Justice of India.
Coming straight to the nub of the matter, let me begin at the very beginning by first and foremost expressing my full and firm support to the growing perfectly justified demand that seeks chemical castration for child rapists
Justice KS Puttaswamy (Retd) and another v Union of India has upheld the validity of Aadhaar for availing government subsidies and benefits and for filing income tax returns! The lone dissenting Judge in this landmark case is Justice Dr DY Chandrachud. He differed entirely from the majority and struck down Section 139AA.
It is most reassuring, refreshing and re consoling to note that for the first time in at least my memory have I ever noticed a Chief Justice of India who even before assuming office outlined his priorities very clearly and courageously
Manohar Lal Sharma vs Narendra Damodardas Modi dismissed a string of petitions seeking an independent probe into the 2015 Rafale deal, for registration of FIR and Court-monitored investigation by CBI into corruption allegations in Rafale deal.
Judgement by the Supreme Court about energy conservation and infrastructure laws in the state of Himachal Pradesh.
In a major and significant development, the Supreme Court which is the highest court in India has for the second time designated 37 lawyers as Senior Advocates.
On 17th October 2018, the Cannabis Act came into force and Canada became the largest country in the world with a legal marijuana marketplace.
Why Only Lawyers Are Held Liable For Accepting Foreign Funding And Not Politicians? Why is it that under our Indian law only lawyers are held liable for accepting foreign funding and not politicians? Why politicians are mostly never held accountable for accepting foreign funding?
Finally Hindus Get The Right To Worship At Entire Disputed Land And Muslims Get 5 Acre In Ayodhya
I am a student at New Law College, Bharati Vidyapeeth University studying LLB. I am currently majoring in 3 yrs LLB Course from New Law College, and have started with my last year from July 2019.
230th report of Law Commission of India, it will certainly produce more diamonds like the Chief Justice of India designate Sharad Arvind Bobde who is most invaluable and even Kohinoor diamond stands just nowhere near him
Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court Of India vs Subhash Chandra Aggarwal the office of Chief Justice of India is a public authority under the Right to Information Act
Sections 126 to l29 deal with the privilege that is attached to Professional Communications between the legal advisors and their clients. Section 126 and 128 mention the circumstances under which the legal advisor can give evidence of such professional communication.
National Federation Of Societies For Fast Justice & Anr. Vs. UOI Notifications for establishing the Gram Nyayalayas to issue the same within four weeks.. It was considering a PIL filed by National Federation Of Societies For Fast Justice.
Madhuri Jajoo vs. Manoj Jajoo has allowed the first petition for divorce by mutual consent, through the virtual hearing system.
Reepak Kansal vs. Secretary-General, Supreme Court Of India has taken a stern view of the increasing tendency to blame the Registry for listing some cases more swiftly as compared to others.
upheld the Shebait rights of the erstwhile royals of Travancore in the administration, maintenance and management of Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple in Thiruvananthapuram.
Justice R Banumathi had assumed the role of a Supreme Court Judge on 13 August 2014. She is the sixth women to be a Judge of the Supreme Court of India
Judges cannot speak out even if they are humiliated. How long can the Supreme Court and the Judges suffer the humiliation heaped regularly?
Neelam Manmohan Attavar vs Manmohan Attavar that a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution would not be maintainable in order to challenge an order which has been passed by the High Court in the exercise of its judicial powers.
Jugut Ram vs. Chhattisgarh the fact that a lathi is also capable of being used as a weapon of assault, does not make it a weapon of assault simpliciter.
Sagufa Ahmed vs. Upper Assam Plywood Products Pvt. Ltd the said order extended only the period of limitation and not the period upto which delay can be condoned in exercise of discretion conferred by the statute
the legendary Kesavananda Bharati whose plea to the Apex Court is considered the real reason behind the much acclaimed Basic Structure doctrine propounded in 1973
Amar Singh vs NCT Of Delhi conviction can be based on the testimony of a single eye witness so long he is found to be wholly reliable.
Madhya Pradesh vs. Bherulalthe governments taking for granted the period of limitation prescribed. In other words, it is high time and all the governments in our country both in the Centre and the States must now
Madhya Pradesh vs. Bherulal the governments taking for granted the period of limitation prescribed.
the manner in which Bombay High Court handled the Arnab Goswami case. A vacation Bench comprising of Justices Dr DY Chandrachud and Indira Banerjee of the Supreme Court is currently hearing the petition filed by Republic TV anchor Arnab Goswami
Indian Olympics Association vs. Kerala Olympic Association civil original jurisdiction dismissed Indian Olympics Association's (IOA) plea seeking transfer of a writ petition before Kerala High Court to Delhi High Court.
In Arnab's case, Justice Dr DY Chandrachud had minced no words to say that: There has to be a message to High Courts – Please exercise your jurisdiction to uphold personal liberty
It is most shocking, most disgusting and most disheartening to read that criminals are ruling the roost and making the headlines in UP time and again
Parveen vs. State of Haryana while setting aside an order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissing the plea of a man in view of absence of his counsel has observed in clear, categorical
Madras Bar Association vs Union of India that exclusion of advocates in 10 out of 19 tribunals, for consideration as judicial members is contrary to the Supreme Court judgments in Union of India v. Madras Bar Association
Inderjeet Singh Sodhi vs Chairman, Punjab State Electricity Board the dismissal of special leave petition is of no consequence on the question of law. We all must bear it in mind from now on
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Zaixhu Xie the practice of pronouncing the final orders without reasoned judgments.
It cannot be denied by anyone that government is the biggest litigator in courts and is responsible to a large extent for the huge pending cases in different states all across the country. The top court is definitely not happy with the state of affairs and the lethargic and complacent motto of Sab Chalta Hain attitude of the governments in India.
Centre has finally decided to get its act together and constitute the All India Judicial Service (AIJS) about which we have been hearing since age
Prashant Dagajirao Patil vs. Vaibhav@Sonu Arun Pawar a High Court, while exercising bail jurisdiction cannot issue directions which will have a direct bearing upon the trial.
Commercial Taxes Officer, Circle-B, Bharatpur vs M/s Bhagat Singh in exercise of itsextraordinary appellate jurisdiction that a statute must be interpreted in a just, reasonable and sensible manner
Pravat Chandra Mohanty vs Odisha refused the plea seeking compounding of offences of two police officers accused in a custodial violence case.
Sessions Judge, Bhadrak in S.T. Case No.182/392 of 2014, acquitting the Respondents from charges under Sections 302/201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code IPC
Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. vs. M/S Navigant Technologies Pvt. Ltd. the period of limitation for filing the Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act would commence from the date on which the signed copy of the award was made available to the parties.
Niranjan Hemchandra Sashittal and another v. Maharashtra in page 386 of the citation that: The quantum of bribe is immaterial for judging gravity of the offence under PC Act. Proceedings under PC Act cannot be quashed on the ground of delay in conclusion particularly where the accused adopted dilatory tactics.
The Ministry of Information and Broadcasting has proposed to introduce the Cinematograph (Amendment) Bill, 2021.The new proposal would amend the Cinematograph Act of 1952 to grant the Centre "revisionary powers" and allow it to "re-examine" films that have already been certified by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC).
I have not come across a single person in my life who has not complained of milk being not up to the mark and even in my own life I don't remember how many times my mother
Akhila Bharata Kshatriya Mahasabha v/s Karnataka barring installation of statues or construction of any structure in public roads, pavements, sideways and other public utility places.
Manohar Lal Sharma vs Union of India has made it clear that State won't get a free pass by mere mention of national security.
State of MP vs Ghisilal the civil courts has no jurisdiction to try suit relating to land which is subject-matter of ceiling proceedings, Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976.
Deserving cases in Supreme Court also don't get listed in time and keep pending for a long time and not so deserving cases get listed most promptly when backed by eminent law firms and senior lawyers
Top