Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.
Legal Services India

» Home
Wednesday, December 17, 2025

How Can SC Tolerate Worst Discrimination In Judiciary Itself?

Posted in: Judiciary
Wed, Dec 17, 25, 04:01, 3 Hours ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 33275
West UP faces grave judicial discrimination as no High Court Bench exists despite massive pendency, population, and constitutional equality demands.

“Discrimination no matter how small is wrong. Support of discrimination no matter who does it is wrong.”– Germany Kent

Uttar Pradesh: Scale, Statistics, And Stark Contradictions

It is most shocking that UP which is among the largest States, has maximum population – more than 26 crore as CM Yogi Adityanath and so also PM Narendra Modi always so very proudly claims which means more than even Pakistan at 25 crores, maximum districts - 76, maximum constituencies - 80, maximum MPs – 80, maximum MLAs - 404, maximum PM including Narendra Modi who represents Varanasi as an MP.

Judicial Pendency And Court Burden

UP has maximum pending cases – more than 11 lakh in Allahabad High Court and here too West UP accounts for more than half of pending cases as noted by Justice Jaswant Commission about 57% and now after so many decades the percentage of pending cases in West UP has gone substantially much higher with Dr Laxmi Kant Vajpayee who is Rajya Sabha MP while demanding two High Court Benches in Parliament for West UP at Meerut and Agra pointing out that West UP owes for 63 percent of pending cases of UP and two High Court Benches at Gorakhpur and Varanasi.

There are maximum cases in lower courts about to touch 1 crore, maximum Judges both in High Court – 160 and also in lower courts, maximum vacancies of Judges both in High Court and also in lower courts.

Legal Profession And Bar Council

UP has maximum members in UP Bar Council more than 3 lakh and which is also the largest Bar Council in the world as claimed in the website itself of UP Bar Council yet the former Chairman of UP Bar Council – Darvesh Yadav who was the first woman to get appointed to this post was murdered cold blooded right in court premises in Agra which is again in West UP on June 12, 2019 by pumping bullets on her head and stomach.

Demography And Rural Structure

  • Maximum poverty
  • Maximum villages more than one lakh, the exact number being 107040
  • Maximum gram panchayats at 74626

Crime, Human Rights, And Law And Order

  • Maximum fake encounters killings
  • Maximum official encounters more than 15,000 from 2017 till date
  • Maximum custody killings
  • Maximum dowry cases
  • Maximum bride burning cases
  • Maximum cases of human rights violations
  • Maximum robberies, dacoities, crime, loot, arson and riots

Here too West UP tops with Saharanpur riots, Meerut riots, Muzaffarnagar riots tarnishing our international reputation to the extent that former UN Secretary General Ban ki Moon termed UP as “crime and rape capital” of India and just recently we see after Bahraich even Fatehpur and now most recently even Bareilly in West UP coming in news for shameless communal disturbances most recently.

Undertrials And Access To Justice

UP has maximum undertrials in all age groups and what not yet Centre till now in December 2025 from July 1948 when a Bench was created in Lucknow which is so close to Allahabad and where it was just not needed at all is not prepared to create even a single bench for not just West UP but for the entire UP nor even ready to attach 30 districts of West UP with more than 10 crore population which is more than majority of States with Lucknow!

Infrastructure Vs Judicial Neglect

Not only just this, Uttar Pradesh has maximum number of airports – 21 and maximum international airports – 5 at Lucknow, Kushinagar, Ayodhya, Varanasi and Noida in West UP still only one High Court Bench at Lucknow so close to Allahabad High Court and litigants of West UP attached with not even Lucknow but right uptill Allahabad most stupidly!

For foreigners maximum facility of maximum airports in Uttar Pradesh but for litigants of West UP, Purvanchal and Bundelkhand not even a single High Court Bench by which Indians will gain most and not foreigners! How can Centre ever deny, distort or dispute such most irrefutable facts?

What exacerbates matters is Centre stonewalling any attempt to create a Bench in West UP or any other part of UP except Eastern UP! One can say without a shred of doubt that Centre has been most partial in distribution of High Courts and High Court Benches in different regions and different States without any prima facie reason to justify it! How long will Centre remain pregnant on possibility of the creation of a High Court Bench in West UP like we keep hearing Union Law Minister Mr Arjun Ram Meghwal saying time and again that Meerut in West UP is among top ten places where Centre is contemplating to set up a High Court Bench but till date do nothing to ensure that pregnancy is not aborted as has been the past track record till now? How quickly fifth High Court Bench in Kolhapur set up on August 18, 2025 for just 6 districts is known all too well on which Union Law Minister said nothing earlier!

From a legal standpoint, it is UP which tops the State list in having maximum number of pending cases and so also has maximum population and here too it is West UP which owes for majority of pending cases of UP and still leave alone High Court or Bench not even a Circuit Bench Centre is ready to concede most disgracefully and most mercilessly the litigants of 30 districts of West UP with more than 10 crore people attached with not even Lucknow which falls much earlier but right uptill Allahabad most astoundingly which is already overburdened with huge pending cases! I often find myself battling with a moot question: Why is Centre so hell bent in denying West UP even a single Bench and thwarting all chances of creating even a Circuit Bench most spinelessly without any remorse or regret? Perhaps the saddest part is even Apex Court has not stepped forward to ensure that West UP gets a High Court Bench which it so richly deserves also!

This Bench issue in West UP will undoubtedly refuse to just die down unless and until it is addressed permanently by creating a High Court Bench in any of the districts of West UP. Centre has no “jadu ki chadi” or “magic wand” to reduce huge backlog of pending cases in Allahabad High Court but creation of High Court Bench in West UP and other needy regions can go a long way in playing an instrumental role in reducing it to a large extent! If this worst discrimination is not addressed now, the concept of equality as enshrined in Article 14 of Constitution as fundamental right will remain only on paper! One is left wondering aloud that:
Why Supreme Court is tolerating most merciless discrimination in judiciary in distribution of High Court Benches in different regions and different States?” Indian democracy is sinking into worst morass because of all this and most of national media, national newspapers and so also national news channels don’t ever bring out this worst discrimination perpetrated in judiciary itself!

It is good to see that the Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court just like Chief Justice of India very quickly takes action against financial corruption but what about High Court Bench corruption in different States and different regions since last about 80 years which has so far gone largely unnoticed! It is a matter of supreme irony that the most populated State of India that is Uttar Pradesh which tops the State list with maximum number of pending cases has just one High Court Bench at Lucknow so close to Allahabad in Eastern UP created 78 years ago in July 1948 and West UP which owes for majority of pending cases of Allahabad High Court has been attached with not even Lucknow which falls much earlier but right uptill Allahabad to seek justice which in itself is the biggest betrayal of Constitution, deepest burial of justice and worst mockery of poorest litigants of 30 districts of West UP who have to travel whole night and nearly a day by train about 700 to 800 km on average most shockingly! Even Lahore High Court in Pakistan is just 430 km away from West UP and so also High Court or Bench of 8 different States like Punjab, Haryana, Rajasthan, Himachal Pradesh among others are closer to West UP than Allahabad High Court which is more than 700 to 800 km from most of the districts which is why Justice Jaswant Singh Commission headed by former Supreme Court Judge appointed by Centre itself recommended permanent seat of High Court Bench in West UP about 50 years ago yet not even a Circuit Bench created till date most astoundingly! It was also acknowledged that majority of pending cases are from West UP and still both High Court at Allahabad and Bench in Lucknow are in Eastern UP only which is most baffling indeed!

On 17 December, 2025 there will be complete shutdown of West UP and lawyers of West UP will also boycott court proceedings from December 15 to December 17 in protest against West UP not being given even a single High Court Bench since last about 80 years even though West UP contributes maximum to State’s economy and yet litigants are made to suffer not only just financially but also mentally and physically by being made to travel most foolishly till not even Lucknow but right uptill Allahabad most astoundingly yet neither the Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court nor the Chief Justice of India nor any Judge of Allahabad High Court or Supreme Court ever bother to take suo motu cognizance of this open dacoity and worst discrimination perpetrated in judiciary itself right under the nose of Apex Court and Allahabad High Court!

This despite the most irrefutable fact that Dr BR Ambedkar recommended separate Statehood itself for West UP and separate High Court and Justice Jaswant Singh Commission headed by former Supreme Court Judge appointed by Centre itself recommended permanent seat of High Court Bench in West UP about 50 years ago yet not even a single High Court Circuit Bench created till date even though more than 63 percent of pending cases are from West UP and so many Chief Minister like Dr Sampoornanand in 1954 and so also ND Tiwari, Mayawati among others have recommended creation of a separate High Court Bench in West UP from time to time and even Hansraj Bhardwaj as Union Law Minister of India in 1986 had recommended creation of High Court Bench in West UP but nothing done absolutely which is crippling the litigants of West UP from all aspects yet neither Allahabad High Court nor Apex Court ever bother to take suo motu cognizance of it! This is most disgraceful and most disgusting indeed!

UP would never have been partitioned if Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court or Chief Justice of India had taken suo motu cognizance of open dacoity in implementation of Justice Jaswant Singh Commission Report headed by former Supreme Court Judge appointed by Centre itself who recommended maximum three High Court Benches for undivided UP and yet not one created and Maharashtra which already had multiple High Court Benches in Nagpur and Panaji was given straightaway one more at Aurangabad for just 7 districts then as recommended even though Maharashtra already had multiple High Court Benches at Nagpur and Panaji just like for Jalpaiguri in West Bengal for 5 districts which already had High Court Bench in Port Blair and so also at Madurai in Tamil Nadu even though population of Tamil Nadu is far less than even West UP! Two High Court Circuit Benches recommended by Justice Jaswant Singh Commission for hilly areas of undivided UP yet not one created which culminated in resentment brewing further and in partition of undivided UP 25 years ago and one permanent seat of High Court Bench was also recommended for West UP in Agra yet not created even after nearly 50 years!

It is definitely most deeply anguishing to see that the lawyers of 22 districts of West UP out of total 30 districts with more than 10 crore people have been so unitedly agitating for a High Court Bench with full discipline since last about 80 years of independence and I myself have been personal witness to this most sacred agitation since last about 25 years in Meerut yet most disappointingly to no avail! As recently as on 20 September, 2025, the lawyers of West UP of 22 districts protested and held dharna and protested against the step-motherly treatment accorded to West UP and on December 17, 2025 there will be “complete shutdown” in West UP in protest of denial of High Court Bench to West UP because once again Maharashtra which already had multiple High Court Benches at Mumbai, Aurangabad, Nagpur and Panaji was given one more fifth at Kolhapur for just 6 districts which started functioning from Aug 18, 2025 and population also very less but West UP with 30 districts and more than 10 crores people has not even a single High Court Circuit Bench! This is definitely most disgusting indeed and presents a most disturbing picture of the sorry state of affairs and “open slaughtering of justice and equality” yet Centre is not doing anything on this and worst of all even Allahabad High Court and Apex Court are maintaining a deafening silence on it!

No sense of shame left in Allahabad High Court and Apex Court on this count and this is worst than even financial corruption because this is continuing uninterrupted since last about 80 years with no solution in sight and so many people of hilly areas of undivided UP sacrificed their lives because they had to travel thousands of kilometers all the way most atrociously till not even Lucknow but right uptill Allahabad which culminated in partition of Uttar Pradesh ultimately 25 years ago! Fifth High Court Bench created in Maharashtra which started functioning at Kolhapur for just 6 districts from August 18, 2025 without any recommendation from any Commission headed by former Supreme Court Judge or even former High Court Judge! This is most worst than even financial corruption because even Apex Court and Allahabad High Court have utterly failed to take suo motu cognizance of it even though this is directly concerning with judiciary itself! If no action is taken even now to create a High Court Bench in West UP, it will only lead to another partition of Uttar Pradesh for which both Allahabad High Court and Apex Court will be fully culpable!

By the way, Maharashtra is not most populated State of India nor has maximum number of pending cases and still has so many High Court Benches – five maximum among all States while big States like UP and Rajasthan having only one each and lawless Bihar with more population than Maharashtra not even one just like Orissa and UP which has more than double the population of Maharashtra has just one and that too so close to Allahabad at Lucknow and litigants of 30 districts of West UP attached with not even Lucknow but right uptill Allahabad which means whole night and nearly a day wasted in just travelling alone about 700 to 750 km on average by train while Kolhapur and adjoining districts averages 350 to 380 km and still one more High Court Bench in Kolhapur for just 6 districts started functioning from Aug 18, 2025!

Why is Supreme Court not taking suo motu cognizance of non-implementation of Justice Jaswant Singh Commission report in West UP even after horrible partition of UP 25 years ago due to this reason only and with what face has it allowed fifth High Court Bench in Kolhapur for just 6 districts whose population is more than 10 times less than that of West UP for whom Justice Jaswant Singh Commission recommended permanent seat of High Court Bench about 50 years ago is most startling indeed? All I am saying and submitting is: For how long will West UP be deprived from having not just a permanent seat of High Court Bench but even a Circuit Bench so spinelessly and so sinisterly by Centre with Apex Court leaving litigants of West UP at whims and fancies of Centre as we have seen since last about 80 years?

Much water has flown down the bridge since India became independent in 1947 but the most stark truth is that even nearly 80 years later in December 2025, we see that West UP is without a High Court Bench which is definitely most deplorable, most dangerous, most self destructive and most discriminatory that even Supreme Court has dared not to ever intervene even when UP was undivided! Why Supreme Court has so quietly tolerated such dastardly discrimination in distribution of High Court Benches in different States and in different regions? If this is not the biggest tight slap on Constitution and Dr BR Ambedkar, then what else is?

Dr BR Ambedkar had recommended separate Statehood itself for West UP! I just don’t buy any rubbish argument forwarded by Centre to deny West UP even a single High Court Bench even when UP was undivided and Centre knows fully well that the High Courts and Benches of eight States like Punjab, Haryana, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh among others are much closer to West UP than Allahabad High Court with even Lahore High Court in Pakistan being much closer to West UP than Allahabad!

Why this High Court Bench issue in West UP has most mysteriously remained in limbo for so long? Why can’t Centre bury the hatchet and move forward to balance the regional imbalance of Eastern UP having both High Court at Allahabad and a single Bench at Lucknow so close to each other and West UP inspite of owing for majority of pending cases of UP for whom Justice Jaswant Singh Commission recommended permanent seat of High Court Bench yet even after nearly 50 years not even a Bench created nor even a Circuit Bench created! What I find most deeply unsettling is that even now we see that neither the Supreme Court nor Centre is ready to open its eyes and take most concrete action to dismember the most historical, Himalayan blunder committed about 80 years ago!

Denying West UP and Bihar even a single High Court Bench is not just illogical but also deeply insensitive, deeply flawed and most deeply discriminatory also that has gone unnoticed, unchecked and unaddressed for so long! Apex Court has definitely not crowned itself with glory by doing absolutely just nothing tangible on this front since last nearly 80 years of independence!

What is Supreme Court meant for when right to equality as enshrined in Article 14 of Constitution is trampled upon most horrendously and most mercilessly by Centre by shamelessly perpetrating most third rated worst discrimination perpetrated in distribution of High Courts, High Court Benches and High Court Circuit Benches in different States and different regions without any rhyme or reason? The sole hegemony of few elite regions like Eastern UP having both High Court at Allahabad and a single High Court Bench at Lucknow so close to each other is continuing uninterrupted for nearly 80 years and so also few elite States like Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, West Bengal, Karnataka and Assam in having multiple High Court Benches is continuing uninterrupted for so long and yet Supreme Court by never taking suo motu cognizance of it has disgraced itself most horribly leaving its reputation in tatters on this front! This must definitely end now!

To survive and thrive, India must go beyond empowering just five elite States – Karnataka, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Assam and West Bengal with multiple High Court Benches leaving all other 24 States in the cold without any prima facie reason for the same not sparing even big States like UP, Rajasthan and lawless Bihar among others! Centre must act now or risk falling irreversibly behind! Centre’s approach is definitely not in consonance with what is enshrined in Article 14 of Constitution! Being the world’s largest democracy, it is high time that the merciless discrimination in distribution of High Court Benches in different States and different regions is abolished most promptly altogether as it brooks no more delay any longer now!

Most disconcertingly, we see that Centre’s step-motherly treatment for big States like UP, lawless Bihar and Rajasthan and Orissa is starkly evident! The most telling part is: Even Apex Court has never spared time to catch the bull by the horns by taking suo motu cognizance of such a most pressing issue directly concerning judiciary itself! The soul of Indian Constitution that is Article 14 envisaging right to equality as fundamental right is being trampled upon most ruthlessly by Centre in depriving West UP from having even a single Bench just like lawless Bihar, Orissa among others yet Apex Court is not willing to take suo motu cognizance of it till date!

When Supreme Court can address gender inequality by ordering 30 percent reservation for women lawyers in State Bar Councils then why regional and State inequality cannot be addressed by ordering High Court Bench in West UP? It definitely merits course correction at earliest to salvage its lost reputation on this count and must do some honest and serious self introspection on it! It brooks no more delay any longer now!

The most critical question is: Why Supreme Court never dares to lash out ever at this most brazen, blind, brutal, blatant and baseless discrimination perpetrated in distribution of High Court Benches in not only different States but also different regions like in UP it is only Eastern UP alone which has both High Court and High Court Bench leaving other regions completely unrepresented including hilly areas as long as it formed part of UP which was prime reason for partition of undivided UP 25 years ago, West UP, Purvanchal and Bundelkhand?

Why the hell Supreme Court has tolerated most absurdly for so long and is still tolerating such most worst form of dastardly, divisive and double standard absurd discrimination perpetrated against different regions of same State like in UP or between different States and so also in allocating Statehood to different States? Over and above all, how can Centre and top court most mercilessly and most groundlessly keep favouring baseless, blatant and brutal discrimination between different States and different regions and keep rubbishing the most legitimate demand for a High Court Bench in West UP without any bona fide reason as per its own whims and fancies as we see also right now?

Unquestionably, UP would never have been partitioned if Supreme Court had displayed moral spine to order two High Court Circuit Benches in Dehradun and Nainital as was recommended also by Justice Jaswant Singh Commission appointed by Centre itself and so many innocent persons would not have lost their lives in the demand for Bench escalating into separate Statehood itself!

The lawyers of hilly areas and lawyers of West UP unitedly struggled for the implementation of Justice Jaswant Singh Commission in UP where it recommended maximum three High Court Benches – two for hilly areas and permanent Bench for West UP about 50 years ago yet not even one created most horrendously leading to partition of UP 25 years ago! What if situation in West UP turns out similarly in future with demand for separate Statehood gaining chorus? Who will be held responsible for it? There is a deep-seated unease and huge resentment brewing over such an inordinate unjustified delay in setting up a High Court Bench in West UP! It is Supreme Court and Centre who would be blamed for doing absolutely just nothing on it!

To put it gently, it would not be completely off the mark to say that it is West UP where High Court should now be shifted as the pendency of cases in Allahabad High Court continues to be staggeringly high putting an unprecedented strain on the judicial system and majority of pending cases are from West UP as was conceded by Justice Jaswant Singh Commission also! But what I find most deeply unsettling and so also most perplexing to note is that West UP has not even a High Court Bench nor even just a High Court Circuit Bench and still Supreme Court says nothing! When will it speak up? It must speak up now fearlessly in the interest of justice so that the poorest litigants of West UP stands to gain the most and don’t just keep on suffering endlessly with no end in sight for no fault of theirs!

Will creation of more High Court Benches ensure or hinder the rule of law? No prizes for guessing the clear writing on the wall! Why the most legitimate voice of the litigants of West UP for a High Court Bench has been throttled for so long despite West UP owing for majority of pending cases of UP and so also contributing to more than 80% of the State’s economy? The crux of the problem is: Centre is least interested in taking any pains to seriously resolve this long pending issue which definitely has to be roundly and most strongly condemned!

None other than the incumbent CJI – Hon’ble Mr Justice Surya Kant had himself candidly acknowledged while on a trip to Meerut Bar early this year that a High Court Bench in West UP is a dire necessity and must be created at the earliest as was disclosed by the President of Meerut Bar Association – Mr Sanjay Sharma. One fervently hopes that he ensures that the needful is done in this direction at the earliest and so also in all those regions and States where it is necessary as was recommended also by the 230th Report of the Law Commission of India 16 years ago which is still gathering only dust!

By all accounts, there can be just no gainsaying that failure to act will not only just erode but also completely destroy public trust in the judiciary and the systemic bias against West UP that has already been exposed as we see openly that how despite owing for majority of the pending cases of Allahabad High Court and contributing again in majority to the State’s economy only to receive such a shabby step-motherly treatment by being denied most unfairly the right to “speedy and affordable justice at doorsteps” for so long without any bona fide reason which culminates in justice being delayed and justice delayed is justice denied! It is high time and Supreme Court must definitely now take suo motu cognizance of it most promptly and stop keeping a deafening silence that affects billions of litigants so hugely with poorest litigants bearing the worst brunt! Centre for so long has been consistently maintaining that it is considering setting up of High Court Bench in West UP yet after nearly 80 years not even a Circuit Bench set up but in Eastern UP which already had High Court at Allahabad since centuries, Centre did not take even an year after independence to set up most promptly permanent High Court Bench in Lucknow in July 1948! How can Apex Court so quietly tolerate most merciless discrimination in judiciary itself in distribution of High Court Benches in different States and different regions for nearly 80 years of independence?

The most fundamental question to ask here is: How long will Centre keep inventing lame excuses to deny West UP even a single Bench? The moot question that begs an answer is: Why a permanent solution in such an “open and shut” case is remaining elusive and stalemate persisting for nearly 80 years of independence defies logic and is truly incomprehensible? Centre’s complete lackadaisical approach in not addressing this burning issue for so long has thrown up more questions than answers!

By any reckoning, every person with even a minimal of knowledge on Constitution knows fully well that Supreme Court is duty bound to act and speak up for litigants of 30 districts of West UP with more than 10 crores people and so also of lawless Bihar which has not even a single High Court Circuit Bench and in stark contrast, smaller States like Karnataka have multiple High Court Benches without any prima facie reason at Dharwad and Gulbarga for just few districts yet never seen any suo motu cognizance being taken by Supreme Court even though it directly pertains to judiciary itself which definitely makes for most depressing reading! It is a no-brainer that the merciless, unjustified and absurd discrimination perpetrated in distribution of High Courts and High Court Benches and High Court Circuit Benches in different states and different regions cannot be ever justified under any circumstances! It is an unfortunate remnant of deeply entrenched bias not set right even after nearly 80 years of independence that urgently needs to be consigned to the past! The importance and urgency of West UP having a Bench cannot be overstated!

Leave alone creating two High Court Benches in Uttar Pradesh as in Karnataka in 2008 first as High Court Circuit Benches and then in 2013 as permanent High Court Benches for just four and eight districts only at Gulbarga and Dharwad respectively, Centre for 30 districts has most appallingly kicked out the most strongest recommendation that had been made by Justice Jaswant Singh Commission headed by a former Supreme Court Judge appointed by Centre itself for creation of High Court Bench in West UP at Agra in mid 1980s while having just no compunction to create High Court Bench in Aurangabad in Maharashtra for just 9 districts which already had multiple High Court Benches in Nagpur for just 10 districts and at Panaji for just 2 districts! As if this was not enough, we see most recently fifth High Court Bench in Maharashtra at Kolhapur in Western Maharashtra has started functioning from 18.08.2025 for just 6 districts with shockingly only just 1.64 crore people! What is happening in our country? If this is not biggest cheating by Centre in Indian history then what else is?

In 2014, we saw how Telangana with just 3.5 crore people given separate Statehood itself on June 2, 2014 and so also separate High Court at Hyderabad and separate capital and Andhra Pradesh with population of just 4 crores also given separate High Court at Amaravati after partition in 2014 and a High Court Bench also approved by State Assembly at Kurnool and another at Visakhapatnam is under active consideration! The most serious question that has bubbled up to the fore is: Why has Centre so unscrupulously denied West UP with more than 10 crore people even a single High Court Circuit Bench which deserves separate High Court as recommended by Dr BR Ambedkar who is key architect of Constitution and so also Mayawati when she was UP CM by creating West UP as a separate State? Why Centre is caring a damn for West UP, Purvanchal, Bundelkhand all in UP and so also not even a single in lawless Bihar?

In any case, it has now definitely warmed the innermost cockles of my heart and mind to read that none other than one of the most eminent former Supreme Court Judge Hon’ble Mr Justice Markandey Katju who has himself practiced in Allahabad High Court from 1970 to 1991 with specialization in Taxation, Labour Laws and Writ Petition and is one of the most distinguished jurists that India has ever produced known all across the globe and was also appointed Acting Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court in August 2004 and so also was Chief Justice of Madras High Court in November 2004 and also of Delhi High Court in October 2005 has in a eye-opener blog titled:

“The Demand For A Western Bench Of Allahabad HC Is Justified” published on September 24, 2025 in website named “Medium” written that:
While I do not approve of blocking roads, I believe that the demand for a bench of the Allahabad High Court in western Uttar Pradesh is fully justified. The reason is simple: litigants of western UP face a huge financial and logistical burden when they are compelled to travel all the way to Allahabad, which is in eastern UP. The Justice Jaswant Singh Committee, after studying the matter in great detail, came to the same conclusion.

There are several benches of the Madhya Pradesh High Court and the Bombay High Court. Similarly, the Madurai bench of the Madras High Court, which was created in July 2004 when I was Chief Justice of that court, was established for the very same reason: litigants in southern Tamil Nadu found it prohibitively expensive and inconvenient to travel to Chennai in the north. On exactly the same logic, there is no reason why western UP should be denied a bench of the Allahabad High Court.”

In conclusion, Centre must definitely pay heed to what Mr Laxmi Kant Vajpayee who is also former BJP President of UP State unit with many decades of rich experience as MP and in other capacities as well has pointed out in Parliament just recently while demanding two High Court Benches in West UP at Meerut and Agra and overall four in UP with two others at Gorakhpur and Varanasi. Why Centre finds itself in a conundrum in an “open and shut” case?

Depriving West UP from having not just multiple High Court Benches as Vajpayee had demanded even earlier but even a single High Court Bench is bereft of any logic and is nothing but absurdity of the highest order which must be discarded at the earliest! It merits just no reiteration that the age old demand for a High Court Bench in West UP is fully justified and is long overdue which definitely must be created at the earliest as it brooks no more delay any longer now! No denying or disputing it!

Much water has flown down the bridge since India became independent in 1947 but the most stark truth is that even nearly 80 years later in December 2025, we see that West UP is without a High Court Bench which is definitely most deplorable, most dangerous, most self destructive and most discriminatory that even Supreme Court has dared not to ever intervene even when UP was undivided! Why Supreme Court has so quietly tolerated such dastardly discrimination in distribution of High Court Benches in different States and in different regions? If this is not the biggest tight slap on Constitution and Dr BR Ambedkar, then what else is?

Dr BR Ambedkar had recommended separate Statehood itself for West UP! I just don’t buy any rubbish argument forwarded by Centre to deny West UP even a single High Court Bench even when UP was undivided and Centre knows fully well that the High Courts and Benches of eight States like Punjab, Haryana, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh among others are much closer to West UP than Allahabad High Court with even Lahore High Court in Pakistan being much closer to West UP than Allahabad!

Why this High Court Bench issue in West UP has most mysteriously remained in limbo for so long? Why can’t Centre bury the hatchet and move forward to balance the regional imbalance of Eastern UP having both High Court at Allahabad and a single Bench at Lucknow so close to each other and West UP inspite of owing for majority of pending cases of UP for whom Justice Jaswant Singh Commission recommended permanent seat of High Court Bench yet even after nearly 50 years not even a Bench created nor even a Circuit Bench created! What I find most deeply unsettling is that even now we see that neither the Supreme Court nor Centre is ready to open its eyes and take most concrete action to dismember the most historical, Himalayan blunder committed about 80 years ago!

Denying West UP and Bihar even a single High Court Bench is not just illogical but also deeply insensitive, deeply flawed and most deeply discriminatory also that has gone unnoticed, unchecked and unaddressed for so long! Apex Court has definitely not crowned itself with glory by doing absolutely just nothing tangible on this front since last nearly 80 years of independence!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col (Retd) BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh

Legal Services India

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 19, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Rahendra Baglari v. Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate (M) writ petitioner for adjoining a Judicial Magistrate and the High Court and its Registry as Respondents to his plea against the order passed by the said Magistrate.
Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal vs.Uttarakhand long standing or established status quo brought about by judgments interpreting local or state laws, should not be lightly departed from.
Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur apart from High Court at Mumbai but on the contrary UP which has maximum pending cases in India
It is most shocking to see that a peaceful, one of the most developed and most prosperous state like Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur
I am neither a member nor supporter of BJP or any other political party nor a member of any of BJP's affiliated organizations like the RSS or VHP or any other organization.
Kirti vs Oriental Insurance Company Limited advocates cannot throw away legal rights or enter into arrangements contrary to law. It was also made clear that any concession in law made in this regard by either counsel would not bind the parties.
Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) on December 28, 2020 had expressed shock and deep concern on the arbitrary, illegal and brazen exercise of brute power by the police against lawyers, including the search conducted at the premises of an advocate representing some of the accused in the North-East Delhi riots cases.
media trial during criminal investigation interferes with administration of justice and hence amounts to contempt of court as defined under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Jamal v. Maharashtra dismissed a plea filed by the National President of BJP Minority Morcha – Jamal Anwar Siddiqui seeking 'X' category security.
Duroply Industries Limited and anr. Vs Ma Mansa Enterprises Private Limited in exercise of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction has recalled its own order of an injunction passed in a trademark dispute as the Judge presiding over the case had appeared for one party in respect of the same trademark in the past.
At the outset, it must be stated rather disconcertingly that it is India's misfortune that UP which has the maximum population more than 23 crore as Yogi Adityanath
At the outset, it has to be stated without mincing any words that it merits no reiteration that Judges age for retirement must be now increased to 75
Rajeev Bhardwaj v. H.P while dismissing a plea seeking a declaration of a sitting Judge's dissenting view as Coram non-judice and non est in the eyes of law.
Adv KG Suresh vs UOI has declared as unconstitutional the bar on lawyers representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals constituted under the Maintenance Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (Maintenance Act).
Bar Council of India ensured that there is an entrance exam now for all those lawyers who want to practice which has to be cleared before lawyers can start practicing.
It is a matter of grave concern that while our Constitution enshrines the right to equality as postulated in Article 14 but in practice what we witness is just the reverse.
seeking interim bail/parole for the under-privileged and under-trial prisoners/convicts keeping in view the terrible havoc unleashed by the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic.
When an intellectual giant like Fali Sam Nariman whom I personally rate as the world's top jurist and it is not just me but his extremely impeccable credentials are acknowledged in legal field, it is not just India but the whole world which listens to him in silence
Treasa Josfine vs Kerala that a woman who is fully qualified cannot be denied of her right to be considered for employment on the ground that she is a woman and because the nature of the employment would require her to work during night hours.
Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs constituted a Committee to suggest reforms in our criminal justice system which has been facing repeated criticism for its various drawbacks
Congress government's rule in Centre, Kapil Sibal who was Union Law Minister had written very categorically to UP Government for creating a high court bench for West UP at Meerut
completely about the truthfulness of the retracted confession and should corroborate his/her confession as it is unsafe to convict an accused person solely on the basis of the retracted confession
Thabir Sagar vs Odisha the practice of Advocate's clerks filing affidavits on behalf of parties is unacceptable. Such a practice is in gross violation of Rule 26 of the Orissa High Court Rules. It has therefore rightly directed its Registry to ensure that steps are taken forthwith to stop the practice of accepting such affidavits
COVID situation in UP, the Allahabad High Court has issued revised fresh guidelines for the functioning of all the Courts and Tribunals subordinate to it.
amended its rules to make criticism and attack of Bar Council decisions by members a misconduct and ground for disqualification or suspension or removal of membership of a member from the Bar Council.
CJI NV Ramana who was appointed as the 48th CJI on 6th April, 2021 and took oath as CJI on 24th April 2021 has very rightly expressed his concern on the social media noise and how it adversely impacts the institutions also like judiciary to a great extent which actually should not be the case.
At the crucial meeting of the Central Action Committee. of more than 20 districts of Bar Association of West UP held at Aligarh
Why UP which is among the largest States, has maximum population more than 24 crore which is more than even Pakistan
When finances are needed for the purpose of improving the judicial system at the lower levels, there is reluctance to make such finances available.
rarely ever booked and made to face the consequences which only serves to further encourage men in uniform to take it for granted to indulge in worst custodial torture
Tarun Saxena vs Union of India as ultra vires Section 17 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 which bars lawyers from representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals
Dhanbad district of Jharkhand was mowed down by an autorickshaw has sent shivers down the spine. The ghastly incident happened on morning of July 28 near the Magistrate colony of Dhanbad that was close to the Judge's residence.
Suman Chadha & Anr. vs. Central Bank of India in that the wilful breach of the undertaking given to the Court can amount to Contempt under Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act.
Rajasthan High Court Rules for Video Conferencing for Courts 2020 which shall be applicable to the proceeding of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan and all the Subordinate Courts of the Rajasthan with immediate effect.
Arun Singh Chauhan v/s MP deprecate the conduct of a practicing advocate who chose not to answer the repeated queries of the Court pertaining to the maintainability of his petition seeking issuance of a writ of quo warranto and regarding the non-impleadment of a necessary party
Dr.Mukut Nath Verma vs UoI Allahabad High Court imposed Rs 5 lakh costs on an advocate Dr Mukut Nath Verma after concluding that he unauthorisedly filed a writ petition on behalf of suspended and absconding IPS officer Mani Lal Patidar and also levelled serious allegations against state authorities and thereby misleading the Court.
Anil JS vs Kerala that instances of allegations about the police disrespecting the citizens were arriving at its doors with alarming regularity and therefore issued certain general directions in its judgment.
If there is one Judge on whom I have blind faith for his exemplary conduct throughout his brilliant career and who can never favour wrongly even his own son
Indianisation of our legal system is the need of the hour and it is crucial to make the justice delivery system more accessible and effective.
the gang war of different gangs have now reached right up to the court premises itself which are supposed to be the holiest shrines for getting justice.
It is not just for enjoying life or going for some holiday trip that lawyers of West UP repeatedly keep going on strike since last many decades.
CM Yogi Adityanath UP has progressed by leaps and bounds which one certainly cannot deny but why is it that it has just one High Court Bench only and that too just approximately 200 km away at the city famously called Nawab City
Just changing name of Allahabad to Prayagraj won't change the ground reality. It is a proven fact that High Court is still called Allahabad High Court and not Prayagraj High Court.
It is most shocking that all the Chief Justices of India from 1947 till 2000 were never shocked nor were any world famous jurist like Nani Ardeshir Palkhiwala, Ram Jethmalani, Shanti Bhushan, Prashant Bhushan among many others
Raggu Baniya @ Raghwendra vs UP has directed the Uttar Pradesh Government to instruct the District Magistrates of all the districts to re-evaluate the cases for remission after 14 years of incarceration even if appeals in such cases are pending in the High Court.
Union Minister of State for Law and Justice – SP Singh Baghel who is also an MP from Agra again in Western UP and who just recently took over has made it clear that his ministry was open to the setting up of a Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Western UP.
Anil Kumar and Anr. Vs Amit that the practice of advocates acting as power of attorney holders of their clients and also as advocates in the matter, is contrary to the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961.
Shashank Singh vs/ Honourable High Court of Judicature at Allahabad that under Article 233 of the Constitution of India, a Judicial Officer regardless of his or her previous experience, as an Advocate, cannot apply and compete for appointment to any vacancy in the post of District Judge.
It must be stated at the very outset that it is quite bewildering and baffling to see that the state of UP which Ban ki moon who is the former UN Secretary General had slammed as the rape and crime capital of India
most powerfully raised vocally the legitimate demand for a High Court Bench in West UP which is the crying need of the hour also.
Top