Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.
Legal Services India

» Home
Tuesday, March 17, 2026

First Muslim To Be Ever Elected The General Secretary Of Meerut Bar Association

Posted in: Judiciary
Mon, Mar 2, 26, 04:22, 2 Weeks ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 30047
Historic election of Parvez Alam as first Muslim General Secretary of Meerut Bar Association highlights push for High Court Bench in West UP.

t cannot be now ever erased from history that Mr Parvez Alam has on February 26, 2026 taken oath as the new General Secretary of Meerut Bar Association and oath was administered by the Chief Guest and District Judge Hon’ble Mr Anupam Kumar thereby becoming the first Muslim ever in the history of Meerut Bar Association from 1883 till 2026 breaking all the huge barriers that he encountered by relentlessly trying hard not for his own benefit but for the welfare and advancement of the advocates fraternity as a whole to hold the post of General Secretary and I am most proud that I could witness this most historic solemn occasion but it is also an unpalatable truth that this should not have been the case that it took 143 long years for a Muslim to rise to occupy this prestigious post.

But it is definitely better to be late than never for which I really from the bottom of my heart thank all the advocates of Meerut Bar Association who voted for him in large numbers irrespective of religion, caste, creed or sex and ensured that he comfortably romp home victorious which he so richly deserved also as his track record is impeccable always which definitely even his worst critics candidly acknowledge!

Delegation Of Lawyers Meets CJI Surya Kant

It was also most heartening to note that on February 24, 2026, a delegation of senior and eminent lawyers of West UP comprising of Mr Jitendra Mohan Sharma who is former General Secretary of Meerut Bar Association and also a senior lawyer of Supreme Court, Mr Parvez Alam who is the newly elected General Secretary of the Meerut Bar Association and first Muslim in the history of Meerut Bar Association from 1883 till 2026 to hold the post of General Secretary and I am most proud that I could witness this, Mr Anuj Sharma who is the newly elected President of Meerut Bar Association, Mr Sanjay Sharma who is the incumbent President of Meerut Bar Association and Mr Rajender Singh Rana who is incumbent General Secretary of Meerut Bar Association and Mr Akshat Sharma met the CJI Hon’ble Mr Justice Surya Kant and apprised him of the long lingering most legitimate and compelling demand for a High Court Bench in West UP!

The discussion was positive and in most amiable atmosphere! The lawyers are most optimistic that this will definitely pave the way for the establishment of a High Court Bench in West UP.

The lawyers holding high offices in Meerut Bar Association including Mr Parvez Alam point out that this will definitely be a significant step and a huge stride towards ensuring access to justice for the people of West UP.

Hope From CJI Surya Kant For West UP High Court Bench

One fervently hopes that the incumbent CJI Mr Surya Kant will take the much requisite initiative in this regard as lawyers of West UP have met and apprised him of the dire need for the same. He has always stood up for truth, justice and equality as enshrined in Article 14 of the Constitution!

Of course, it is the bounden duty of Supreme Court to interfere and stop this most despicable, dastardly, dangerous and deplorable discrimination perpetrated in distribution of High Court and High Court Benches in different States and different regions which needs to be set right most promptly by setting up of a High Court Bench in West UP which owes for majority of pending cases of Allahabad High Court and still has not even a Circuit Bench most disgracefully!

Key Priorities Of The Newly Elected Meerut Bar Leadership

Mr Parvez Alam has listed the setting up of a High Court Bench in West UP among his key issues in priority list just like Mr Anuj Sharma who has been elected as the new President of Meerut Bar Association and from same panel of Mr Parvez Alam who too has always been most vocal in this regard of placing the creation of a High Court Bench in West UP in the highest priority list of issues to be solved along with other very elementary yet critical issues directly affecting the advocates.

Major Issues Raised By The Bar Leadership

  • Implementation of the Advocate Protection Act.
  • Allotment of chambers to lawyers who do not have chambers.
  • Providing e-library facility for advocates.
  • Providing SCC Online Journal Subscription of judgments of Supreme Courts and High Courts free to young lawyers.
  • Improving parking facilities in court premises.
  • Ensuring that lawyers are not arrested arbitrarily.
  • Mandatory requirement for police to inform the Bar before arresting any advocate.
  • Better toilet facilities especially for women lawyers.
  • Improved drinking water facilities within court premises.

Both being elected from the same panel will ensure better coordination and most effective output in the direction of achieving the goals set up by them for the betterment of lawyers fraternity.

Additional Reforms Proposed

  • Efforts to ensure that toll tax is not imposed on lawyers.
  • Strengthening coordination between Bar leadership.
  • Addressing long-standing professional issues of advocates.

I am most happy to see that before Mr Parvez Alam has even assumed the high office of General Secretary, he has started working most steadfastly and relentlessly in this direction just like President of Meerut Bar Association – Mr Anuj Sharma who too has accorded creation of High Court Bench in West UP as his top priority and even met CJI Hon’ble Mr Justice Surya Kant along with a delegation of senior lawyers as mentioned hereinabove to convince him of the dire need for a High Court Bench in West UP.

Political Support For High Court Bench In West UP

Just recently Dr Laxmi Kant Vajpayee who is Rajya Sabha MP in Parliament from Meerut pitched strongly for setting up of two High Court Benches in West UP at Meerut and Agra apart from Gorakhpur and Varanasi but even after nearly 80 years of independence, UP has not witnessed setting up of even a second High Court Bench anywhere other than in Lucknow so close to Allahabad High Court for just 8 districts then where it was set up in July 1948 and nowhere else as 2048 is fast approaching.

Legal Advocacy And Writings Of Parvez Alam

I have read many of enlightening legal articles by Mr Parvez Alam on the setting up of High Court Bench in West UP in The Daily Guardian Newspaper, The Daily Punjab Times E-Newspaper among others and so also prestigious websites like Law Insider in which he has underscored how imperative it is to set up a High Court Bench in West UP and I am hundred percent sure that he will definitely pursue this long lingering issue to its logical conclusion.

Even the newly elected President of Meerut Bar Association – Mr Anuj Sharma has been a member of the High Court Bench Mission that was set up by eminent and senior lawyer Mr Narendra Sharma many years ago which he has been pursuing relentlessly this most key issue and it definitely now deserves to be settled once and for all for which lawyers of West UP have been working hard relentlessly since last so many decades when I aged 50 years was not even born.

Questions On Distribution Of High Court Benches In India

One fervently hopes that Hon’ble Mr Justice JB Pardiwala who is touted by some as the “most fearless judge” of Apex Court till date since independence speak out fearlessly as to why Uttar Pradesh which has maximum pending cases and maximum population has only one High Court Bench created 78 years ago at Lucknow so close to Allahabad and nowhere else even though Justice Jaswant Singh Commission headed by former Supreme Court Judge appointed by Centre itself recommended permanent seat of High Court Bench in West UP at Agra about 50 years ago yet not even a Circuit Bench created till date.

Maharashtra which already had multiple High Court Benches at Bombay, Nagpur and Panaji was given one more at Aurangabad in 1980s as recommended by Justice Jaswant Singh Commission and now one more fifth High Court Bench created in Kolhapur for just 6 districts with 1.64 lakh people which started functioning from August 18, 2025 but for West UP with 30 districts and more than 10 crore people not even a single High Court Circuit Bench created till date.

Comparative Distance To High Courts

Location Distance From Meerut
Delhi High Court About 70 km
Gwalior Bench (MP High Court) 368 km
Punjab & Haryana High Court (Chandigarh) 239 km
Himachal Pradesh High Court (Shimla) 336 km
Uttarakhand High Court (Nainital) 249 km
Lahore High Court (Pakistan) 433 km
Allahabad High Court 705 km

From Saharanpur to Allahabad is more than 750 km which means whole night and a day by train wasted on just travelling alone.

Disparity In High Court Benches Across States

It is absolutely most baffling rather gut wrenching to say more appropriately that both Supreme Court and Centre in last about 80 years of independence most inexplicably feel that Allahabad High Court which is biggest High Court in not only just India, in not only just Asia but also in whole world should have only one High Court bench so close to Allahabad at Lucknow and nowhere else even though it is West UP which owes for majority of pending cases of Allahabad High Court which is the biggest national disgrace.

Lawless Bihar has not even a single High Court Bench nor Circuit Bench just like Orissa due to which poorest litigants suffer the most who have to travel whole night and nearly a day to attend at every hearing in High Court as West UP has not even a single High Court Bench not even a Circuit Bench to say the very least.

States With Multiple High Court Benches

  • Madhya Pradesh
  • Karnataka
  • Maharashtra
  • West Bengal
  • Assam

Why big States like UP, Rajasthan, Bihar and Orissa have been left to suffer most mysteriously in the cold with first two States having just one Bench and last two States not having even a single Bench just like majority of the States which is definitely a national disgrace that cannot be brushed beneath the carpet for a very long time?

Why West UP which ideally should have separate High Court and separate Statehood due to its huge population of more than 10 crores which is more than majority of the States in India and pending cases owing for majority of pending cases of UP which is highest for any region in India has not even a High Court Bench nor even a Circuit Bench to say the very least for so long? Why is Supreme Court not taking suo motu cognizance of it?

Law Commission Recommendation On High Court Benches

Of course, this key long simmering issue affects billions of litigants across so many States and regions which alone explains why 230th Report of Law Commission of India recommended creation of High Court Benches in different States yet after nearly 17 years gathering only dust.

Conclusion

I sincerely wish Mr Parvez Alam who is the newly elected General Secretary of Meerut Bar Association and Mr Anuj Sharma who is the newly elected President of the Meerut Bar Association and other office bearers always the very best and I am fully sure that apart from addressing many serious grievances of lawyers faced by them as mentioned hereinabove, the most sacred agitation for a High Court Bench in West UP will definitely also be carried forward to its logical conclusion before they demit office in 2027.

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col (Retd) BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh.

Legal Services India

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 19, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Rahendra Baglari v. Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate (M) writ petitioner for adjoining a Judicial Magistrate and the High Court and its Registry as Respondents to his plea against the order passed by the said Magistrate.
Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal vs.Uttarakhand long standing or established status quo brought about by judgments interpreting local or state laws, should not be lightly departed from.
Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur apart from High Court at Mumbai but on the contrary UP which has maximum pending cases in India
It is most shocking to see that a peaceful, one of the most developed and most prosperous state like Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur
I am neither a member nor supporter of BJP or any other political party nor a member of any of BJP's affiliated organizations like the RSS or VHP or any other organization.
Kirti vs Oriental Insurance Company Limited advocates cannot throw away legal rights or enter into arrangements contrary to law. It was also made clear that any concession in law made in this regard by either counsel would not bind the parties.
Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) on December 28, 2020 had expressed shock and deep concern on the arbitrary, illegal and brazen exercise of brute power by the police against lawyers, including the search conducted at the premises of an advocate representing some of the accused in the North-East Delhi riots cases.
media trial during criminal investigation interferes with administration of justice and hence amounts to contempt of court as defined under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Jamal v. Maharashtra dismissed a plea filed by the National President of BJP Minority Morcha – Jamal Anwar Siddiqui seeking 'X' category security.
Duroply Industries Limited and anr. Vs Ma Mansa Enterprises Private Limited in exercise of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction has recalled its own order of an injunction passed in a trademark dispute as the Judge presiding over the case had appeared for one party in respect of the same trademark in the past.
At the outset, it must be stated rather disconcertingly that it is India's misfortune that UP which has the maximum population more than 23 crore as Yogi Adityanath
At the outset, it has to be stated without mincing any words that it merits no reiteration that Judges age for retirement must be now increased to 75
Rajeev Bhardwaj v. H.P while dismissing a plea seeking a declaration of a sitting Judge's dissenting view as Coram non-judice and non est in the eyes of law.
Adv KG Suresh vs UOI has declared as unconstitutional the bar on lawyers representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals constituted under the Maintenance Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (Maintenance Act).
Bar Council of India ensured that there is an entrance exam now for all those lawyers who want to practice which has to be cleared before lawyers can start practicing.
It is a matter of grave concern that while our Constitution enshrines the right to equality as postulated in Article 14 but in practice what we witness is just the reverse.
seeking interim bail/parole for the under-privileged and under-trial prisoners/convicts keeping in view the terrible havoc unleashed by the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic.
When an intellectual giant like Fali Sam Nariman whom I personally rate as the world's top jurist and it is not just me but his extremely impeccable credentials are acknowledged in legal field, it is not just India but the whole world which listens to him in silence
Treasa Josfine vs Kerala that a woman who is fully qualified cannot be denied of her right to be considered for employment on the ground that she is a woman and because the nature of the employment would require her to work during night hours.
Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs constituted a Committee to suggest reforms in our criminal justice system which has been facing repeated criticism for its various drawbacks
Congress government's rule in Centre, Kapil Sibal who was Union Law Minister had written very categorically to UP Government for creating a high court bench for West UP at Meerut
completely about the truthfulness of the retracted confession and should corroborate his/her confession as it is unsafe to convict an accused person solely on the basis of the retracted confession
Thabir Sagar vs Odisha the practice of Advocate's clerks filing affidavits on behalf of parties is unacceptable. Such a practice is in gross violation of Rule 26 of the Orissa High Court Rules. It has therefore rightly directed its Registry to ensure that steps are taken forthwith to stop the practice of accepting such affidavits
COVID situation in UP, the Allahabad High Court has issued revised fresh guidelines for the functioning of all the Courts and Tribunals subordinate to it.
amended its rules to make criticism and attack of Bar Council decisions by members a misconduct and ground for disqualification or suspension or removal of membership of a member from the Bar Council.
CJI NV Ramana who was appointed as the 48th CJI on 6th April, 2021 and took oath as CJI on 24th April 2021 has very rightly expressed his concern on the social media noise and how it adversely impacts the institutions also like judiciary to a great extent which actually should not be the case.
At the crucial meeting of the Central Action Committee. of more than 20 districts of Bar Association of West UP held at Aligarh
Why UP which is among the largest States, has maximum population more than 24 crore which is more than even Pakistan
When finances are needed for the purpose of improving the judicial system at the lower levels, there is reluctance to make such finances available.
rarely ever booked and made to face the consequences which only serves to further encourage men in uniform to take it for granted to indulge in worst custodial torture
Tarun Saxena vs Union of India as ultra vires Section 17 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 which bars lawyers from representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals
Dhanbad district of Jharkhand was mowed down by an autorickshaw has sent shivers down the spine. The ghastly incident happened on morning of July 28 near the Magistrate colony of Dhanbad that was close to the Judge's residence.
Suman Chadha & Anr. vs. Central Bank of India in that the wilful breach of the undertaking given to the Court can amount to Contempt under Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act.
Rajasthan High Court Rules for Video Conferencing for Courts 2020 which shall be applicable to the proceeding of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan and all the Subordinate Courts of the Rajasthan with immediate effect.
Arun Singh Chauhan v/s MP deprecate the conduct of a practicing advocate who chose not to answer the repeated queries of the Court pertaining to the maintainability of his petition seeking issuance of a writ of quo warranto and regarding the non-impleadment of a necessary party
Dr.Mukut Nath Verma vs UoI Allahabad High Court imposed Rs 5 lakh costs on an advocate Dr Mukut Nath Verma after concluding that he unauthorisedly filed a writ petition on behalf of suspended and absconding IPS officer Mani Lal Patidar and also levelled serious allegations against state authorities and thereby misleading the Court.
Anil JS vs Kerala that instances of allegations about the police disrespecting the citizens were arriving at its doors with alarming regularity and therefore issued certain general directions in its judgment.
If there is one Judge on whom I have blind faith for his exemplary conduct throughout his brilliant career and who can never favour wrongly even his own son
Indianisation of our legal system is the need of the hour and it is crucial to make the justice delivery system more accessible and effective.
the gang war of different gangs have now reached right up to the court premises itself which are supposed to be the holiest shrines for getting justice.
It is not just for enjoying life or going for some holiday trip that lawyers of West UP repeatedly keep going on strike since last many decades.
CM Yogi Adityanath UP has progressed by leaps and bounds which one certainly cannot deny but why is it that it has just one High Court Bench only and that too just approximately 200 km away at the city famously called Nawab City
Just changing name of Allahabad to Prayagraj won't change the ground reality. It is a proven fact that High Court is still called Allahabad High Court and not Prayagraj High Court.
It is most shocking that all the Chief Justices of India from 1947 till 2000 were never shocked nor were any world famous jurist like Nani Ardeshir Palkhiwala, Ram Jethmalani, Shanti Bhushan, Prashant Bhushan among many others
Raggu Baniya @ Raghwendra vs UP has directed the Uttar Pradesh Government to instruct the District Magistrates of all the districts to re-evaluate the cases for remission after 14 years of incarceration even if appeals in such cases are pending in the High Court.
Union Minister of State for Law and Justice – SP Singh Baghel who is also an MP from Agra again in Western UP and who just recently took over has made it clear that his ministry was open to the setting up of a Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Western UP.
Anil Kumar and Anr. Vs Amit that the practice of advocates acting as power of attorney holders of their clients and also as advocates in the matter, is contrary to the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961.
Shashank Singh vs/ Honourable High Court of Judicature at Allahabad that under Article 233 of the Constitution of India, a Judicial Officer regardless of his or her previous experience, as an Advocate, cannot apply and compete for appointment to any vacancy in the post of District Judge.
It must be stated at the very outset that it is quite bewildering and baffling to see that the state of UP which Ban ki moon who is the former UN Secretary General had slammed as the rape and crime capital of India
most powerfully raised vocally the legitimate demand for a High Court Bench in West UP which is the crying need of the hour also.
Top