Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Thursday, October 31, 2024

Kerala HC Directs Authorities To Periodically Clean Drains

Posted in: Civil Laws
Fri, Aug 5, 22, 11:30, 2 Years ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 5148
Tresa KJ vs Kerala directions to various competent authorities to clear up the drainage system and canals to prevent the inundation of the city.

It is really most pleasing to note that while speaking out most vocally in favour of citizens who have to needlessly face unnecessary inundation every year, the Kerala High Court in an extremely commendable, courageous, cogent, composed and creditworthy judgment titled Tresa KJ vs State of Kerala in WP(C)No.23911/2018 and cited in 2022 LiveLaw (Ker) 409 and pronounced as recently as on August 4, 2022 issued some most commendable directions to various competent authorities to clear up the drainage system and canals to prevent the inundation of the city. It also must be noted that the Kerala High Court further directed the Cochin Corporation and the Police to ensure that waste is not being dumped in the drains while ordering that if any person found violating these orders shall be dealt with under the full warrant of law. Very rightly so!

At the outset, this brief, brilliant, bold and balanced judgment authored by a Single Judge Bench comprising of Hon’ble Mr Justice Devan Ramachandran sets the ball rolling by first and foremost putting forth in para 1 that:
It was in sheer desperation that this Court listed this matter on 01.08.2022, when the city of Kochi was once again flooded with water. Complaints were pouring from all sources, particularly right thinking citizens, about the sorry state of affairs which led to the inundation.

Most candidly, the Bench then observes in para 2 that:
Pursuant to the orders of this Court on that date, cleaning of the drains and canals began in full swing and the difference is for all of us to see today, when the city received almost the same amount of rainfall. The difference is obvious, since no part of the city was flooded the manner it was on 01.08.2022, though they have been minor instances. This is not to say that low lying areas in the city and its peripheral areas are not being affected; but what this Court means to say is that, with sufficient effort, it is possible to avert a flood like situation in Kochi even though it is on par or below the Seawater level.

As things stand, the Bench then mentions in para 3 that:
Sri.S.Kannan – learned Government Pleader, submitted that, in obedience of the orders of this Court dated 01.08.2022, the Mayor of the Corporation of Kochi, MLA, Officers of the PWD Roads Division, Irrigation Department, Police Fire and Rescue Departments, Cochin Smart Mission Limited, Electricity Board, Water Authority and others, under the stewardship of the District Collector, had inspected the problem sites in the city; leading to the cleaning and desilting of drains to be completed, to the extent possible, in two days.

He added that the Corporation, PWD, Cochin Smart Mission Limited and the Irrigation Department, as also the Southern Railway, have been instructed by the District Collector to desilt and clear the drains in specified areas and that the same has been completed, if not are nearing completion. He added that a Committee of all the departments have been formed, to prepare a formal project, to be assisted and approved by the Disaster Management Authority.

Quite graciously, the Bench then concedes in para 4 that:
One issue that this Court has been grappling with for sometime now is the renovation of Mullassery Canal. Though certain amounts were paid by the Corporation, on account of escalation of the cost of materials, the Water Authority took the stand that more than Rs.2.54 crores was additionally necessary. I am pleased that the Government has now come out with an order shouldering the said responsibility. Therefore, the work of Mullassery Canal must now start and be completed soon.

While adding clarity, the Bench then discloses in para 5 that:
Sri.V.V.Joshy – learned Standing Counsel for the Kerala Water Authority, submitted that since the Government has now shouldered the additional financial responsibility, the tendering process for removing the water pipes from the Mullassery Canal will begin on 06.08.2022 and will be completed by 16.08.2022. He submitted that if tenderers participate, then the work can begin without any avoidable delay thereafter.

To be sure, the Bench then points out so very rightly in para 6 that:
As regards the jetting of culverts under the railway line at the ‘Kammattipadom’ area is concerned, Smt.S.Krishna – learned Central Government Counsel, representing the Assistant Solicitor General of India, submitted that an officer has been nominated for such works and an intimation sent to the District Collector. She handed over across the Bar a copy of the same dated 02.08.2022. which shows the name of the person, as also his contact number. Indubitably therefore, the work of jetting of culverts must begin without any further delay.

As a note of caution, the Bench then states in para 7 that:
Though it is too early to call victory, the change that the city has seen today certainly demonstrates that, with proper resolve, citizens can be spared of inundation every year. We cannot take the nature for granted any further and we must expect that such events will happen, for which everyone has to be ready, not at the time of monsoons alone, but even much earlier.

Be it noted, the Bench then hastens to add in para 8 that:
Though the canals were kept ready this year, the drainage system appears to have been clogged and its opening up in the last two days have worked miracles. Irrefragably, therefore, the Corporation is now enjoined to keep the drainage system clean on a periodical basis, and not through an annual exercise alone.

Most significantly, the Bench then deems it apposite to mandate in para 9 that, That said, since the Kerala Water Authority seeks time to 16.08.2022, I deem it appropriate adjourn this matter to 17.08.2022.

In the meanwhile, I issue the following directions:

 

  1. The Kochi Corporation will ensure, on a continuous basis, that all the drains are kept clean and debris removed to designated places without delay.
     
  2. Since the flow of water from the roads into the drainage is impeded on account of the vegetation growing in between, the same shall be cleared on a war-footing; and if possible, materials like cements and such other, shall be used to ensure that such vegetation do not come back in future. This is essential because, otherwise, as we are seeing, on account of monsoons, the weeds and plants grow back in days and not in weeks. A report in this regard shall be placed before this Court by the Corporation by the next posting date.
     
  3. The competent Authorities, including the Police and the Corporation, will ensure that there is no dumping of waste into drainage systems by anyone, including commercial establishments, hotels, residential houses, complexes etc.; and a continuous vigil/watch shall be maintained in this regard. Any person who is found violating these orders shall be dealt with under the full warrant of law, including by initiating prosecution. The competent Authorities will ensure that these directions are made known to citizens through appropriate proceedings, so that they will also adjust their behaviour accordingly.
     
  4. The gratings and such other installations over the holes on the roads, intended for flow of water into the drains, shall be reinstalled and repaired by the Corporation of Kochi, Cochin Smart Mission Ltd and such other agencies, who are in charge of various roads in the city; and I direct the Commissioner of Police, Kochi City, to ensure that they are well-protected through apposite means as are necessary. For this purpose, he will be at liberty to get inputs from the stakeholders as to how such installations can be protected from anti-social elements, who seem to be engaging in pilferage.
     
  5. The afore directions will not be construed by the Corporation or other agencies as a one time measure and they will continue to do so every 3 or 4 months, as per requirement; and I notify them that this will be monitored by this Court through the learned Amicus Curiae. As and when such cleanings are done, the Corporation will file periodical reports before this Court, after serving a copy of same on the learned Amicus Curiae.
     
  6. The District Collector, Ernakulam, is directed to keep an overall supervision and control over the afore activities and report before this Court if any further orders or directions are required.


Dumping of septic and other toxic waste in city

As it turned out, the Bench then reveals in the next para that:
The learned Amicus Curiae – Sri.Sunil Jacob Jose, pointed out that a video is circulating in the social media – which, he says, has been made available to the learned Government Pleader also – relating to a lorry which appears to be depositing septic waste into roads while in motion, by keeping its valves open. He added that the problem of dumping of waste in Kochi City has gained epic proportions and that if this is not controlled, epidemics are only waiting to happen.

Most forthrightly, the Bench then holds in the next para that:
The afore input of the learned Amicus Curiae certainly is of great concern and am certain that the Commissioner of Police and the District Collector must take cognizance of same and take necessary action in the said regard and also suggest measures and means to avoid this. In future the collection of waste from various parts of the city will have to be ramped by the Corporation and any person found dumping it illegally or carelessly, taken to task. This Court is aware that citizens sometimes do this under the impression that they will not be apprehended, but they have to be aware that their one action puts the entire citizenry to peril, should diseases and epidemics arise out of it, which is not merely a probability but a certain possibility, if things proceed the way it is presently going.

Furthermore, the Bench then directs in the next para that:
Therefore, in addition to the afore directions, I direct the Corporation of Kochi to ensure that removal of waste from various parts of Kochi Corporation is streamlined and effectively implemented; and the District Collector, in her capacity as the Head of the Disaster Management Authority, will oversee this and file a report before this Court on this issue by the next posting date.

Quite pleasingly, the Bench then notes in next para that:
I also record the submission of Sri.Janardhana Shenoy – learned Standing Counsel for the Corporation of Kochi, that night squads have been already constituted to avert dumping of waste in public places and that stringent action is also to be taken.

It is worth noting that the Bench then clearly states in the next para that, However, it has to be borne in mind that, in spite of this, the deleterious tendencies of citizens have not changed. Obviously, the Police must also keep a watch on this and give every assistance to the squads of the Corporation. This Court will certainly issue further orders after the report of the District Collector is obtained in this regard.

Finally, the Bench then concludes by directing in the final para that:
Post on 17.08.2022.

On the whole, it is most refreshing to note that the Kerala High Court has minced absolutely no words to make it indubitably clear that with proper resolve citizens can definitely be spared of unnecessary inundations every year. Of course, we have by now discussed everything possibly relevant on what all the Single Judge Bench comprising of Hon’ble Mr Justice Devan Ramachandran held so very forthrightly, frankly, firmly, fully and finally which has to be certainly implemented in letter and spirit at all cost so that the people at large gain the maximum relief from the unnecessary inundation every year due to the necessary action taken most promptly in this regard by the concerned authorities as directed so very brilliantly, boldly and briefly by the Kerala High Court!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col (Retd) BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Present space law framework in the country. Space has heightened the curiosity of mankind for centuries. Due to the advancement in technology, there is fierce competition amongst nations for the next space war.
The scope of Section 151 CPC has been explained by the Supreme Court in the case K.K. Velusamy v. N. Palanisamy
Co-operative Societies are governed by the Central Co-operative Societies Act 1912, where there is no State Act. In West Bengal they were governed by the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act
Registration enables an NGO to be a transparent in its operations to the Government, Donors, to its members and to its urgent community.
The ingredients of Section 18 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 are
Drafting of legal Agreements and Deeds in India
ST Land rules in India,West Bengal
The paper will discuss about the provisions related to liquidated damages. How the law has evolved. Difference between the provisions of England and India.
A privilege may not be a right, but, under the constitution of the country, I do not gather that any broad distinction is drawn between the rights and the privileges that were enjoyed and that were taken away.
It is most hurting to see that in India, the soldiers who hail from Jammu and Kashmir and who join forces either in Army or in CRPF or in BSF or in police or in any other forces against the will of majority
Pukhraj v/s State of Uttarakhand warned high caste priests very strongly against refusing to perform religious ceremonies on behalf of lower caste pilgrims. It took a very stern view of the still existing practice of exclusion of the SC/ST community in Haridwar.
This article aims to define delay in civil suits. It finds the general as well as specific causes leading to pendency of civil suits and over-burdening of courts. This articles suggests some solutions which are pragmatic as well as effective to reduce the burden of the courts and speed up the civil judicial process.
This article deals with importance, needs, highlights and provisions of the Surrogacy Bill 2016, which is passed by the lok sabha on 19th December 2018 .
Cross Examination In Case of Injunction Suits, Injunctions are governed by Sections 37, 38, 39 to Section 42 of Specific Relief Act.
Satishchandra Ratanlal Shah v Gujarat inability of a person to return the loan amount cannot give rise to a criminal prosecution for cheating unless fraudulent or dishonest intention is shown right at the beginning of the transaction..
Dr.Ashok Khemka V/s Haryana upheld the integrity of eminent IAS officer because of his upright and impeccable credentials has emerged as an eyesore for politicians of all hues but also very rightly expunged Haryana Chief Minister ML Khattar adverse remarks in his Personal Appraisal Report
State of Rajasthan and others v. Mukesh Sharma has upheld the constitutional validity of Rule 8(2)(i) of the Rajasthan Prisons (Shortening of Sentences) Rules, 2006.
Gurmit Singh Bhatia Vs Kiran Kant Robinson the Supreme Court reiterated that, in a suit, the plaintiff is the dominus litis and cannot be forced to add parties against whom he does not want to fight unless there is a compulsion of the rule of law.
explicitly in a latest landmark ruling prohibited the use of loudspeakers in the territory without prior permission from the authorities.
The Commissioner of Police v/s Devender Anand held that filing of criminal complaint for settling a dispute of civil nature is abuse of process of law.
Rajasthan Vs Shiv Dayal High Court cannot dismiss a second appeal merely on the ground that there is a concurrent finding of two Courts (whether of dismissal or decreeing of the suit), and thus such finding becomes unassailable.
Complete Guide to Pleadings in India, get your Written statement and Plaint Drafted by highly qualified lawyers at reasonable rate.
Sushil Chandra Srivastava vs UP imposed absolute prohibition on use of DJs in the state and asked the state government to issue a toll-free number, dedicated to registering complaints against illegal use of loudspeakers. It will help control noise pollution to a very large extent if implemented in totality.
Rajasthan v/s Shri Ramesh Chandra Mundra that institutional independence, financial autonomy is integral to independence of judiciary. directing the Rajasthan Government to reconsider the two decade old proposal of the then Chief Justice of Rajasthan High Court to upgrade 16 posts of its Private Secretaries as Senior Private Secretaries
The Indian Contract act, 1872 necessities significant consideration in a few of its areas. One such area of the Indian Contract act of 1872 is where if any person finds a lost good belonging to others and takes them into his custody acts as the bailee to the owner of the good.
Government has notified 63 provisions of the Motor Vehicles Amendment Act 2019 including the ones dealing with enhanced penalties
Jose Paulo Coutinho vs. Maria Luiza Valentina Pereira no attempt has been made yet to frame a Uniform Civil Code applicable to all citizens of the country despite exhortations by it. Whether succession to the property of a Goan situated outside Goa in India will be governed by the Portuguese Civil Code, 1867
In a major legal setback to Pakistan, the High Court of England and Wales rejecting rightly Pakistan's frivolous claims and ruling explicitly that the VII Nizam of Hyderabad's descendants and India can collect 35 million pounds from Londons National Westminster Bank.
Power of Attorney and the Specific Relief Act, 1963
air pollution in Delhi and even adjoining regions like several districts of West UP are crossing all limits and this year even in districts adjoining Delhi like Meerut where air pollution was never felt so much as is now being felt.
Dr Syed Afzal (Dead) v/sRubina Syed Faizuddin that the Civil Courts while considering the application seeking interim mandatory injunction in long pending cases, should grant opportunity of hearing to the opposite side, interim mandatory injunctions can be granted after granting opportunity of hearing to the opposite side.
students of Banaras Hindu University's (BHU's) Sanskrit Vedvigyan Sankay (SVDVS) went on strike demanding the cancellation of the appointment of Assistant Professor Feroze Khan and transfer him to another faculty.
Odisha Development Corporation Ltd Vs. M/s Anupam Traders & Anr. the time tested maxim actus curiae neminem gravabit which in simple and straight language means that, No party should suffer due to the act of Court.
M/S Daffodills Pharmaceuticals Ltd v/s. State of U.P that no one can be inflicted with an adverse order, without being afforded a minimum opportunity of hearing. In other words, the Apex Court reiterated the supreme importance of the legal maxim and latin phrase titled Audi alteram partem
Ram Murti Yadav v/s State of Uttar Pradesh the standard or yardstick for judging the conduct of the judicial officer has necessarily to be strict, that the public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from anyone performing a judicial function.
Judicial Officers Being Made Scapegoats And Penalized By Inconvenient Transfers And Otherwise: SC
Desh Raj v/s Balkishan that the mandatory time-line for filing written statement is not applicable to non-commercial suits. In non-commercial suits, the time-line for written statement is directory and not mandatory, the courts have the discretion to condone delay in filing of written statement in non-commercial suits.
M/S Granules India Ltd. Vs UOI State, as a litigant, cannot behave as a private litigant, and it has solemn and constitutional duty to assist the court in dispensation of justice.
To exercise one's own fundamental right to protest peacefully does not give anyone the unfettered right to block road under any circumstances thereby causing maximum inconvenience to others.
Today, you have numerous traffic laws as well as cases of traffic violations. People know about safe driving yet they end up defying the safety guidelines. It could be anything like driving while talking on the phone, hit and run incidents, or driving under the influence of alcohol.
The legal processes are uncertain. Also, there are times when justice gets denied, and the legal outcomes get delayed. Hence, nobody wants to see themselves or their loved one end up in jail.
Arun Kumar Gupta v/s Jharkhand that judicial officer's integrity must be of a higher order and even a single aberration is not permitted. The law pertaining to the vital subject of compulsory retirement of judicial officers have thus been summed up in this noteworthy judgment.
Online Contracts or Digital Agreements are contracts created and signed over the internet. Also known as e-contracts or electronic contracts, these contracts are a more convenient and faster way of creating and signing contracts for individuals, institutions and corporate.
Re: Problems And Miseries Of Migrant Labourers has asked Maharashtra to be more vigilant and make concerted effort in identifying and sending stranded migrant workers to their native places.
Gerald Lynn Bostock v/s Clayton County, Georgia that employees cannot be fired from the jobs merely because of their transgender and homosexual identity.
This article compares two cases with similar facts, yet different outcomes and examines the reasons for the same. It revolves around consideration and validation of contracts.
Odisha Vikas Parishad vs Union Of India while modifying the absolute stay on conducting the Jagannath Rath Yatra at Puri has allowed it observing the strict restrictions and regulations of the Centre and the State Government.
Soni Beniwal v/s Uttarakhand even if there is a bar on certain matters to be taken as PIL, there is always discretion available with the Court to do so in exercise of its inherent powers.
Indian Contract Act was commenced in the year 1872 and since then, several deductions and additions have happened to the same. The following piece of work discusses about the concept of offer under the Indian Contract Act, 1872
Top