Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Monday, April 29, 2024

Vandalism of Manipur lawyers home: SC Bar Association Condemns Attempts To Intimidate Advocates

Posted in: Civil Laws
Fri, Sep 8, 23, 16:36, 8 Months ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 9379
The heat, dust and din generated by the much reported lathicharge on the lawyers by police in Hapur

It is definitely a matter of utmost grave concern which cannot be just glossed over any longer that one after the other, the repeated attacks on lawyers for one reason or the other are increasing very rapidly in our country. The heat, dust and din generated by the much reported lathicharge on the lawyers by police in Hapur on August 29 had not even subsided that a lawyer in Manipur has been targeted ruthlessly by attacking the lawyer’s home and in fact the lawyers in UP are still most agitated over it and are strongly protesting against the most brutal lathicharge of lawyers in Hapur boycotting work in courts as so many lawyers without any fault of theirs got seriously injured over which even the Supreme Court Bar Association, Allahabad High Court Bar Association, Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh and many Bar Associations of different States who had all unitedly expressed full solidarity with the lawyers of Hapur who were the prime targets and had to bear the maximum brunt of police lathicharge right outside the court premises. Now most recently we yet again read that the Supreme Court Bar Association has once again expressed its serious concerns at various news reports pertaining to the ransacking of the home and office of Manipur lawyer named Soraicham Chittaranjan for representing Kuki Professor Kham Khan Suan Hausing who is a Professor of Political Science at the University of Hyderabad in a criminal case. It also must be noted that on August 14, 2023, we had seen that interim protection was granted to Professor Hausing from coercive action for two weeks by the Supreme Court and he had been asked by the top court to approach the Manipur High Court for reliefs.

It must be certainly mentioned here that Mr Hausing who is a Kuki academic and who has been quite vocal about the alleged role of the State Government in radicalizing the Meitei community is facing a private criminal case in Imphal that had been filed by the Meitei civilians for an interview which he had given to a news website. We also had seen how it was widely reported in media that four Imphal-based lawyers fearing threat to their lives and property had decided not to represent Hyderabad University Professor Kham Khan Suan Hausing in the Manipur High Court after being threatened by the members of the Meitei community as disclosed by one of the advocates to the media. It must be noted that with senior and eminent Supreme Court lawyer Mr Anand Grover representing Mr Hausing, four Imphal-based advocates named Soraicham Chittaranjan, Victor Chongtham, Th. Zingo and A Priyokumar Sharma had also decided to assist Mr Anand Grover in the Manipur High Court. But they decided to backtrack after the massive ransacking of the home and so also the office of the Manipur lawyer named Soraicham Chittaranjan for representing Kuki Professor Kham Khan Suan Hausing in a criminal case. Chittaranjan was at pains to point out that even after the attack, the police did not provide him and his family any security, and that they are staying in a Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) guest house. He further pointed out that:
though my family members were lucky to have escaped without any physical harm, police haven’t provided us with any security. At present, we are taking shelter in a CRPF guest house. This is definitely a matter of grave concern because if lawyers are attacked so mercilessly for doing their job of defending their clients then how will they be able to perform their job most fearlessly?

It is worth noting that Mr Anand Grover categorically pointed out that:
They were facing threats and vandalism and so the lawyers assisting had decided to withdraw. In addition, we must note here that Mr. Hausing further lamented that:
First, they threatened the lawyers on Thursday. Then the office of one of the lawyers was vandalized on Friday and so they withdrew. Those who attack lawyers must be given exemplary punishment and under no circumstances should be allowed to go away scot free or let off lightly! If lawyers are not safe in our country then who will be safe?

Needless to say, we also need to definitely pay very close attention to the glaring and irrefutable fact that none other than the Supreme Court Bar Association itself in its commendable resolution titled SCBA/Registry.31/2023 and dated September 6, 2023 while strongly denouncing the most dastardly attack on the house and office of the lawyer in Manipur named Soraisham Chittaranjan has on record stated in no uncertain terms that:
The Supreme Court Bar Association has taken serious notice of news reports which have stated that the house and office of Mr. Soraisham Chittaranjan, an Advocate in Manipur, have been ransacked by some persons because he was representing his client in the capacity of being his Advocate. The Supreme Court Bar Association underlines that lawyers are free to appear for any litigant. Any attempt by any person to intimidate lawyers into not appearing for any party has the effect of interfering in the administration of justice and needs to be condemned in the strongest possible manner. The Supreme Court Bar Association stands in solidarity with Mr Soraisham Chittaranjan and it urges the State and the Manipur police to provide adequate protection to the lawyers in question and take immediate effective action against the guilty.

It is high time and Centre now without indulging in anymore dilly-dallying must definitely without fail pay heed in totality to what none other than the Supreme Court Bar Association had itself suggested while condemning strongly the brutal police lathicharge in Hapur expounding most clearly, cogently and convincingly that:
Introduce and implement the Advocates Protection Act for protection of advocates and its families against such brutal incidents.

There can be certainly no gainsaying that it brooks no more delay anymore now and must be implemented at the earliest! The earlier this is done, the better it shall be in the interest of the judicial system of our nation of which lawyers who are the officers of the court constitute the inalienable part and are also the true nucleus of the whole judicial setup which even many Supreme Court Judges have been truly candid enough to acknowledge most graciously! Of course, this must be certainly taken most seriously now by Centre and all necessary and most meaningful steps to ensure the proper protection of advocates must be definitely undertaken on a war footing!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col (Retd) BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Present space law framework in the country. Space has heightened the curiosity of mankind for centuries. Due to the advancement in technology, there is fierce competition amongst nations for the next space war.
The scope of Section 151 CPC has been explained by the Supreme Court in the case K.K. Velusamy v. N. Palanisamy
Co-operative Societies are governed by the Central Co-operative Societies Act 1912, where there is no State Act. In West Bengal they were governed by the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act
Registration enables an NGO to be a transparent in its operations to the Government, Donors, to its members and to its urgent community.
The ingredients of Section 18 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 are
Drafting of legal Agreements and Deeds in India
ST Land rules in India,West Bengal
The paper will discuss about the provisions related to liquidated damages. How the law has evolved. Difference between the provisions of England and India.
A privilege may not be a right, but, under the constitution of the country, I do not gather that any broad distinction is drawn between the rights and the privileges that were enjoyed and that were taken away.
It is most hurting to see that in India, the soldiers who hail from Jammu and Kashmir and who join forces either in Army or in CRPF or in BSF or in police or in any other forces against the will of majority
Pukhraj v/s State of Uttarakhand warned high caste priests very strongly against refusing to perform religious ceremonies on behalf of lower caste pilgrims. It took a very stern view of the still existing practice of exclusion of the SC/ST community in Haridwar.
This article aims to define delay in civil suits. It finds the general as well as specific causes leading to pendency of civil suits and over-burdening of courts. This articles suggests some solutions which are pragmatic as well as effective to reduce the burden of the courts and speed up the civil judicial process.
This article deals with importance, needs, highlights and provisions of the Surrogacy Bill 2016, which is passed by the lok sabha on 19th December 2018 .
Cross Examination In Case of Injunction Suits, Injunctions are governed by Sections 37, 38, 39 to Section 42 of Specific Relief Act.
Satishchandra Ratanlal Shah v Gujarat inability of a person to return the loan amount cannot give rise to a criminal prosecution for cheating unless fraudulent or dishonest intention is shown right at the beginning of the transaction..
Dr.Ashok Khemka V/s Haryana upheld the integrity of eminent IAS officer because of his upright and impeccable credentials has emerged as an eyesore for politicians of all hues but also very rightly expunged Haryana Chief Minister ML Khattar adverse remarks in his Personal Appraisal Report
State of Rajasthan and others v. Mukesh Sharma has upheld the constitutional validity of Rule 8(2)(i) of the Rajasthan Prisons (Shortening of Sentences) Rules, 2006.
Gurmit Singh Bhatia Vs Kiran Kant Robinson the Supreme Court reiterated that, in a suit, the plaintiff is the dominus litis and cannot be forced to add parties against whom he does not want to fight unless there is a compulsion of the rule of law.
explicitly in a latest landmark ruling prohibited the use of loudspeakers in the territory without prior permission from the authorities.
The Commissioner of Police v/s Devender Anand held that filing of criminal complaint for settling a dispute of civil nature is abuse of process of law.
Rajasthan Vs Shiv Dayal High Court cannot dismiss a second appeal merely on the ground that there is a concurrent finding of two Courts (whether of dismissal or decreeing of the suit), and thus such finding becomes unassailable.
Complete Guide to Pleadings in India, get your Written statement and Plaint Drafted by highly qualified lawyers at reasonable rate.
Sushil Chandra Srivastava vs UP imposed absolute prohibition on use of DJs in the state and asked the state government to issue a toll-free number, dedicated to registering complaints against illegal use of loudspeakers. It will help control noise pollution to a very large extent if implemented in totality.
Rajasthan v/s Shri Ramesh Chandra Mundra that institutional independence, financial autonomy is integral to independence of judiciary. directing the Rajasthan Government to reconsider the two decade old proposal of the then Chief Justice of Rajasthan High Court to upgrade 16 posts of its Private Secretaries as Senior Private Secretaries
The Indian Contract act, 1872 necessities significant consideration in a few of its areas. One such area of the Indian Contract act of 1872 is where if any person finds a lost good belonging to others and takes them into his custody acts as the bailee to the owner of the good.
Government has notified 63 provisions of the Motor Vehicles Amendment Act 2019 including the ones dealing with enhanced penalties
Jose Paulo Coutinho vs. Maria Luiza Valentina Pereira no attempt has been made yet to frame a Uniform Civil Code applicable to all citizens of the country despite exhortations by it. Whether succession to the property of a Goan situated outside Goa in India will be governed by the Portuguese Civil Code, 1867
In a major legal setback to Pakistan, the High Court of England and Wales rejecting rightly Pakistan's frivolous claims and ruling explicitly that the VII Nizam of Hyderabad's descendants and India can collect 35 million pounds from Londons National Westminster Bank.
Power of Attorney and the Specific Relief Act, 1963
air pollution in Delhi and even adjoining regions like several districts of West UP are crossing all limits and this year even in districts adjoining Delhi like Meerut where air pollution was never felt so much as is now being felt.
Dr Syed Afzal (Dead) v/sRubina Syed Faizuddin that the Civil Courts while considering the application seeking interim mandatory injunction in long pending cases, should grant opportunity of hearing to the opposite side, interim mandatory injunctions can be granted after granting opportunity of hearing to the opposite side.
students of Banaras Hindu University's (BHU's) Sanskrit Vedvigyan Sankay (SVDVS) went on strike demanding the cancellation of the appointment of Assistant Professor Feroze Khan and transfer him to another faculty.
Odisha Development Corporation Ltd Vs. M/s Anupam Traders & Anr. the time tested maxim actus curiae neminem gravabit which in simple and straight language means that, No party should suffer due to the act of Court.
M/S Daffodills Pharmaceuticals Ltd v/s. State of U.P that no one can be inflicted with an adverse order, without being afforded a minimum opportunity of hearing. In other words, the Apex Court reiterated the supreme importance of the legal maxim and latin phrase titled Audi alteram partem
Ram Murti Yadav v/s State of Uttar Pradesh the standard or yardstick for judging the conduct of the judicial officer has necessarily to be strict, that the public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from anyone performing a judicial function.
Judicial Officers Being Made Scapegoats And Penalized By Inconvenient Transfers And Otherwise: SC
Desh Raj v/s Balkishan that the mandatory time-line for filing written statement is not applicable to non-commercial suits. In non-commercial suits, the time-line for written statement is directory and not mandatory, the courts have the discretion to condone delay in filing of written statement in non-commercial suits.
M/S Granules India Ltd. Vs UOI State, as a litigant, cannot behave as a private litigant, and it has solemn and constitutional duty to assist the court in dispensation of justice.
To exercise one's own fundamental right to protest peacefully does not give anyone the unfettered right to block road under any circumstances thereby causing maximum inconvenience to others.
Today, you have numerous traffic laws as well as cases of traffic violations. People know about safe driving yet they end up defying the safety guidelines. It could be anything like driving while talking on the phone, hit and run incidents, or driving under the influence of alcohol.
The legal processes are uncertain. Also, there are times when justice gets denied, and the legal outcomes get delayed. Hence, nobody wants to see themselves or their loved one end up in jail.
Arun Kumar Gupta v/s Jharkhand that judicial officer's integrity must be of a higher order and even a single aberration is not permitted. The law pertaining to the vital subject of compulsory retirement of judicial officers have thus been summed up in this noteworthy judgment.
Online Contracts or Digital Agreements are contracts created and signed over the internet. Also known as e-contracts or electronic contracts, these contracts are a more convenient and faster way of creating and signing contracts for individuals, institutions and corporate.
Re: Problems And Miseries Of Migrant Labourers has asked Maharashtra to be more vigilant and make concerted effort in identifying and sending stranded migrant workers to their native places.
Gerald Lynn Bostock v/s Clayton County, Georgia that employees cannot be fired from the jobs merely because of their transgender and homosexual identity.
This article compares two cases with similar facts, yet different outcomes and examines the reasons for the same. It revolves around consideration and validation of contracts.
Odisha Vikas Parishad vs Union Of India while modifying the absolute stay on conducting the Jagannath Rath Yatra at Puri has allowed it observing the strict restrictions and regulations of the Centre and the State Government.
Soni Beniwal v/s Uttarakhand even if there is a bar on certain matters to be taken as PIL, there is always discretion available with the Court to do so in exercise of its inherent powers.
Indian Contract Act was commenced in the year 1872 and since then, several deductions and additions have happened to the same. The following piece of work discusses about the concept of offer under the Indian Contract Act, 1872
Top