Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Monday, April 29, 2024

No Compromise When It Comes To Dignity Of Lawyers

Posted in: Civil Laws
Sat, Sep 16, 23, 11:07, 8 Months ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 18263
most commendably the lawyers are all presenting a most united face cutting across religion, caste, community and sex as is the crying need of the hour

I am truly falling entirely short of words to describe my innermost feelings in words on seeing how most commendably the lawyers are all presenting a most united face cutting across religion, caste, community and sex as is the crying need of the hour also in demanding justice for the so many injured lawyers of Hapur numbering more than 30 who were all lathicharged as if they were lumpen elements and rioters and due to which many suffered serious injuries as a result on August 29, 2023 just outside the court premises which has shocked the entire lawyers fraternity all across the country with even Supreme Court Bar Association and so also Allahabad High Court Bar Association and so also Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh all expressing their uttermost shock, awe and disbelief! It is most horribly disappointing to see that lawyers of Hapur were most brutally lathicharged after they were returning from a peaceful demonstration demanding the withdrawal of a fake case against a woman lawyer named Priyanka Tyagi and her father after their vehicle had an accident with a vehicle of cop named Mohit and were caught totally unaware and that too right in the court premises outside chambers of lawyers and even women lawyers had to suffer injuries as a result of the ghastly and dastardly attack! But the worst was yet to come and it came when no action of any kind was taken against those who were guilty of using excessive force against the officers of the court that is lawyers which cannot be ever condoned under any circumstances and FIR was also lodged after relentless agitation by lawyers! If lawyers can be treated so shabbily then how will a common person be treated by the police is anyone’s guess! This is truly terribly and is most disappointing!

The lawyers of West UP also have been on strike displaying full solidarity in support of the lawyers of Hapur right from day one and most recently the strike has been extended by lawyers of West UP till September 15 after the meeting on September 10 with even the Chairman of Bar Council of UP Hon’ble Mr Shiv Kishor Gaur too participating in it and on September 16 a meeting will be held to decide the future strategy on this to take the fight for justice to its logical conclusion!

I am most privileged to share with my esteemed readers what one of the most eminent, brilliant and senior lawyer Hon’ble Mr Parvez Alam with decades of most distinguished experience in criminal law in Meerut Bar and who is also an advocate in Supreme Court and so also in Allahabad High Court has shared so kindly such invaluable golden information with the lawyers of Meerut in Advocates Group for which he truly deserves applauding and richest plaudits due to which I am able to contribute this humble piece about the most recent and most commendable resolution dated 10-9-2023 of Oudh Bar Association, High Court, Lucknow in which it is mentioned that an emergent meeting of the Executive of Oudh Bar Association was held under the Chairmanship of Sri Anand Mani Tripathi, President of the Oudh Bar Association conducted by Mr Manoj Kumar Mishra, General Secretary, Oudh Bar Association and all other members of the Executive Committee and due to paucity of space am not mentioning name of all who were all present today and have unanimously resolved as follows:-

1. The Oudh Bar Association is our association working since 1901 and has actively participated in protection of rights and liberties of the poor, oppressed and suppressed class. It’s the Oudh Bar Association which always portrays a role of a bridge between the suppressed class and the benches who deliver justice to them. In working for the oppressed and suppressed class we are also aware about our rights and the rights of the members of the legal fraternity.

2. It is the Oudh Bar Association which has taken initiative to stand for what is right and just, we also draw and interpret as to what is a fine line between what is just and reasonable. Working as a soldier of protecting rights and liberties, we cannot let any organization, institution or any machinery to oppress the soldiers in black robes throughout the country. Any movement which would affect the rights and liberties of a lawyer would also not go unseen by the Oudh Bar Association, Lucknow.

3. The Oudh Bar Association through its various resolution has highly condemned the brutal incident of Lathi Charge on lawyers which happened on the uneventful day of 29.08.2023. The Oudh Bar Association on the same very day in an emergent meeting condemned the action of the state machinery at Hapur vide its resolution dated 29.08.2023 and resolved that we would boycott the judicial work on 30.08.2023.

4. The Oudh Bar Association and the entire fraternity at High Court Lucknow stood in solidarity with brothers and sisters at Hapur. It was the initiation Oudh Bar Association which led all the various Bar Associations of Uttar Pradesh and other states of the country to join us in the movement, which was later joined by the parent body of lawyers here at Uttar Pradesh, the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh.

5. The Oudh Bar Association in its resolution made a clear demand for an independent, unbiased Special Investigation Team and investigate into the happening of brutal incidents which were duly recorded and witnessed by the country at large. Further, we requested for strict and stern action against the guilty personnel of District Administration at Hapur.

6. The Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh vide its resolution on 03.09.2023 resolved that the fraternity members would abstain from the judicial work for further period of three days i.e. on dated 04.09.2023, 05,09.2023, 06.09.2023, lawyers here at Lucknow fully extended their solidarity with brother and sisters at Hapur and abstain from Judicial work and all the judicial work in the State of Uttar Pradesh was put to halt.

7. The resolution dated 03.09.2023 by the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh specified the actions to be taken by the various members of the association, they were supposed to give a demand letter to various district authorities and on 05.09.2023 it was decided that a peaceful protest and burning of effigies of Chief Secretary Uttar Pradesh and Director General of Police would take place in a peaceful manner till 06.09.2023, a peaceful protest and total abstinence of Judicial work was taken by the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh.

8. On 03.09.2023 the Oudh Bar Association vide its resolution demanded that the State Government initiate strict action against personnel of District Administration at Hapur and constitute SIT with inclusive of a judicial member to make the investigation independent and unbiased.

9. On 04.09.2023, the Hon’ble Chief Justice of Uttar Pradesh took suo moto cognizance of the incidents and events and to our utter surprise a request to introspect was made by the Bench to the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh, respective Bar Association across the State. The Hon’ble High Court Allahabad asked lawyers to act in due deference to law laid down by the Supreme Court. Further were asked not to take any unpleasant steps and resume work forthwith. However, a Retired Principal Judge, Family Court was also directed to join as a member of SIT which was constituted by the State Government.

10. The lawyers and the fraternity members throughout the nation joined hands and stood by our resolution and demand letters were widely circulated throughout the nation on social media and via WhatsApp.

11. On 09.09.2023 a miscellaneous application was moved by the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh before the specially constituted bench and the hearing was held in the chamber wherein it was held the application of Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh dated 07.09.2023containing its grievances in relation to the incident be placed before a Committee chaired by Hon’ble Mr Justice Rajan Roy, Hon’ble Mr Justice Faiz Alam Khan, Advocate General, Chairman Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh, President High Court Bar Association, Allahabad.

12. In the meanwhile, the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh also held its meeting and all the elected members of the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh were present before the apex body to raise their grievances and plight of the lawyers at large in the State of Uttar Pradesh. It pains to see that through various letters and post on WhatsApp and the social media networks a state of confusion and chaos is prevalent amongst the members of the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh. The members through various posts and letters are seen clarifying their stands. The Oudh Bar Association does not appreciates the manner in which the parent body of the lawyers is functioning. The working and the pattern is based on the narration to fade the issue in hand.

13. The Oudh Bar Association always stood for what is right and just and will not shy away in saying that the stand taken by the institution and the machinery is totally ignorant with the plight and our struggle to achieve justice in the present incident.

14. It was unfortunate that the Hapur Bar Association vide its resolution dated 10.09.2023 had to write again to the various Bar Association requesting for support from them and amongst the fraternity members.

15. We have seen that the men in black robes have always stood against injustice, it was men in black robes which contributed at large to the freedom struggle and for the framing of the rule book of fundamental rights and duties i.e., our Constitution. We will also not shy away in saying that we will stand with our brothers and sisters in complete solidarity. Therefore, in the light of above said the Executive Committee and the Members of Governing Council resolves that we will abstain from work on 11.09.2023.

16. A meeting to decide further course of action is scheduled on 11.09.2023 in Oudh Bar Association at 4.30 P.M. The continuance of abstinence of work will depend upon the decision of State Government.

17. The State Government Counsels and Central Government Counsels owe a responsibility first to the members of the fraternity before becoming State or Central Government Counsels. Therefore, it is expected that all the members of the legal fraternity to refrain from working in all courts on the call of Oudh Bar Association and other Associations. All the District Bar Associations and Bar Associations at Tehsils are requested to stand in solidarity in these hours of need with our brothers and sisters at Hapur.

Under the most able and dynamic leadership of President of Meerut Bar – Hon’ble Mr Kunwarpal Sharma and so also of General Secretary of Meerut Bar – Hon’ble Mr Vinod Chaudhary, the lawyers of West UP under the banner of Central Action Committee formed in 1981 comprising of 22 districts has decided after its meeting today at Meerut to continue with strike till September 15 and on September 16, lawyers would meet to decide the future course of action! Justice must not only be done but should also be seen to be done which we are sorely not seeing here taking place in Hapur due to which the lawyers with a very heavy heart have to extend their strike forward at the cost of own livelihood because dignity comes first and is also paramount for lawyers and everything else comes later and there can definitely be thus no compromise ever when it comes to the dignity of lawyers! It is high time and State Government of Uttar Pradesh must definitely take the strictest action against all those police personnel who are guilty of using excessive force on lawyers who are officers of the court and deserve to be treated with utmost respect and not utmost contempt as we witnessed most unfortunately in Hapur and yet no action taken against those guilty men in uniform who perpetrated such ghastly attack without any valid reason! Truly most disappointing yet I am sure that justice sooner or later will prevail here also!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col (Retd) BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Present space law framework in the country. Space has heightened the curiosity of mankind for centuries. Due to the advancement in technology, there is fierce competition amongst nations for the next space war.
The scope of Section 151 CPC has been explained by the Supreme Court in the case K.K. Velusamy v. N. Palanisamy
Co-operative Societies are governed by the Central Co-operative Societies Act 1912, where there is no State Act. In West Bengal they were governed by the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act
Registration enables an NGO to be a transparent in its operations to the Government, Donors, to its members and to its urgent community.
The ingredients of Section 18 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 are
Drafting of legal Agreements and Deeds in India
ST Land rules in India,West Bengal
The paper will discuss about the provisions related to liquidated damages. How the law has evolved. Difference between the provisions of England and India.
A privilege may not be a right, but, under the constitution of the country, I do not gather that any broad distinction is drawn between the rights and the privileges that were enjoyed and that were taken away.
It is most hurting to see that in India, the soldiers who hail from Jammu and Kashmir and who join forces either in Army or in CRPF or in BSF or in police or in any other forces against the will of majority
Pukhraj v/s State of Uttarakhand warned high caste priests very strongly against refusing to perform religious ceremonies on behalf of lower caste pilgrims. It took a very stern view of the still existing practice of exclusion of the SC/ST community in Haridwar.
This article aims to define delay in civil suits. It finds the general as well as specific causes leading to pendency of civil suits and over-burdening of courts. This articles suggests some solutions which are pragmatic as well as effective to reduce the burden of the courts and speed up the civil judicial process.
This article deals with importance, needs, highlights and provisions of the Surrogacy Bill 2016, which is passed by the lok sabha on 19th December 2018 .
Cross Examination In Case of Injunction Suits, Injunctions are governed by Sections 37, 38, 39 to Section 42 of Specific Relief Act.
Satishchandra Ratanlal Shah v Gujarat inability of a person to return the loan amount cannot give rise to a criminal prosecution for cheating unless fraudulent or dishonest intention is shown right at the beginning of the transaction..
Dr.Ashok Khemka V/s Haryana upheld the integrity of eminent IAS officer because of his upright and impeccable credentials has emerged as an eyesore for politicians of all hues but also very rightly expunged Haryana Chief Minister ML Khattar adverse remarks in his Personal Appraisal Report
State of Rajasthan and others v. Mukesh Sharma has upheld the constitutional validity of Rule 8(2)(i) of the Rajasthan Prisons (Shortening of Sentences) Rules, 2006.
Gurmit Singh Bhatia Vs Kiran Kant Robinson the Supreme Court reiterated that, in a suit, the plaintiff is the dominus litis and cannot be forced to add parties against whom he does not want to fight unless there is a compulsion of the rule of law.
explicitly in a latest landmark ruling prohibited the use of loudspeakers in the territory without prior permission from the authorities.
The Commissioner of Police v/s Devender Anand held that filing of criminal complaint for settling a dispute of civil nature is abuse of process of law.
Rajasthan Vs Shiv Dayal High Court cannot dismiss a second appeal merely on the ground that there is a concurrent finding of two Courts (whether of dismissal or decreeing of the suit), and thus such finding becomes unassailable.
Complete Guide to Pleadings in India, get your Written statement and Plaint Drafted by highly qualified lawyers at reasonable rate.
Sushil Chandra Srivastava vs UP imposed absolute prohibition on use of DJs in the state and asked the state government to issue a toll-free number, dedicated to registering complaints against illegal use of loudspeakers. It will help control noise pollution to a very large extent if implemented in totality.
Rajasthan v/s Shri Ramesh Chandra Mundra that institutional independence, financial autonomy is integral to independence of judiciary. directing the Rajasthan Government to reconsider the two decade old proposal of the then Chief Justice of Rajasthan High Court to upgrade 16 posts of its Private Secretaries as Senior Private Secretaries
The Indian Contract act, 1872 necessities significant consideration in a few of its areas. One such area of the Indian Contract act of 1872 is where if any person finds a lost good belonging to others and takes them into his custody acts as the bailee to the owner of the good.
Government has notified 63 provisions of the Motor Vehicles Amendment Act 2019 including the ones dealing with enhanced penalties
Jose Paulo Coutinho vs. Maria Luiza Valentina Pereira no attempt has been made yet to frame a Uniform Civil Code applicable to all citizens of the country despite exhortations by it. Whether succession to the property of a Goan situated outside Goa in India will be governed by the Portuguese Civil Code, 1867
In a major legal setback to Pakistan, the High Court of England and Wales rejecting rightly Pakistan's frivolous claims and ruling explicitly that the VII Nizam of Hyderabad's descendants and India can collect 35 million pounds from Londons National Westminster Bank.
Power of Attorney and the Specific Relief Act, 1963
air pollution in Delhi and even adjoining regions like several districts of West UP are crossing all limits and this year even in districts adjoining Delhi like Meerut where air pollution was never felt so much as is now being felt.
Dr Syed Afzal (Dead) v/sRubina Syed Faizuddin that the Civil Courts while considering the application seeking interim mandatory injunction in long pending cases, should grant opportunity of hearing to the opposite side, interim mandatory injunctions can be granted after granting opportunity of hearing to the opposite side.
students of Banaras Hindu University's (BHU's) Sanskrit Vedvigyan Sankay (SVDVS) went on strike demanding the cancellation of the appointment of Assistant Professor Feroze Khan and transfer him to another faculty.
Odisha Development Corporation Ltd Vs. M/s Anupam Traders & Anr. the time tested maxim actus curiae neminem gravabit which in simple and straight language means that, No party should suffer due to the act of Court.
M/S Daffodills Pharmaceuticals Ltd v/s. State of U.P that no one can be inflicted with an adverse order, without being afforded a minimum opportunity of hearing. In other words, the Apex Court reiterated the supreme importance of the legal maxim and latin phrase titled Audi alteram partem
Ram Murti Yadav v/s State of Uttar Pradesh the standard or yardstick for judging the conduct of the judicial officer has necessarily to be strict, that the public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from anyone performing a judicial function.
Judicial Officers Being Made Scapegoats And Penalized By Inconvenient Transfers And Otherwise: SC
Desh Raj v/s Balkishan that the mandatory time-line for filing written statement is not applicable to non-commercial suits. In non-commercial suits, the time-line for written statement is directory and not mandatory, the courts have the discretion to condone delay in filing of written statement in non-commercial suits.
M/S Granules India Ltd. Vs UOI State, as a litigant, cannot behave as a private litigant, and it has solemn and constitutional duty to assist the court in dispensation of justice.
To exercise one's own fundamental right to protest peacefully does not give anyone the unfettered right to block road under any circumstances thereby causing maximum inconvenience to others.
Today, you have numerous traffic laws as well as cases of traffic violations. People know about safe driving yet they end up defying the safety guidelines. It could be anything like driving while talking on the phone, hit and run incidents, or driving under the influence of alcohol.
The legal processes are uncertain. Also, there are times when justice gets denied, and the legal outcomes get delayed. Hence, nobody wants to see themselves or their loved one end up in jail.
Arun Kumar Gupta v/s Jharkhand that judicial officer's integrity must be of a higher order and even a single aberration is not permitted. The law pertaining to the vital subject of compulsory retirement of judicial officers have thus been summed up in this noteworthy judgment.
Online Contracts or Digital Agreements are contracts created and signed over the internet. Also known as e-contracts or electronic contracts, these contracts are a more convenient and faster way of creating and signing contracts for individuals, institutions and corporate.
Re: Problems And Miseries Of Migrant Labourers has asked Maharashtra to be more vigilant and make concerted effort in identifying and sending stranded migrant workers to their native places.
Gerald Lynn Bostock v/s Clayton County, Georgia that employees cannot be fired from the jobs merely because of their transgender and homosexual identity.
This article compares two cases with similar facts, yet different outcomes and examines the reasons for the same. It revolves around consideration and validation of contracts.
Odisha Vikas Parishad vs Union Of India while modifying the absolute stay on conducting the Jagannath Rath Yatra at Puri has allowed it observing the strict restrictions and regulations of the Centre and the State Government.
Soni Beniwal v/s Uttarakhand even if there is a bar on certain matters to be taken as PIL, there is always discretion available with the Court to do so in exercise of its inherent powers.
Indian Contract Act was commenced in the year 1872 and since then, several deductions and additions have happened to the same. The following piece of work discusses about the concept of offer under the Indian Contract Act, 1872
Top