Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Monday, April 29, 2024

US, UK And Canada Have No Business To Point Fingers At India

Posted in: Civil Laws
Sun, Dec 10, 23, 10:35, 5 Months ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 8157
With what face are countries like US, UK and Canada pointing an accusing finger at India without any basis?

With what face are countries like US, UK and Canada pointing an accusing finger at India without any basis? They have no business to ever raise even one finger against India as India’s track record is impeccable who has never divided any country! Where Khalistanis are openly encouraged? It is mostly as we see in Christian countries especially US, UK, Canada and Australia! How can US bat most vocally for Khalistani promoters like Gurpatwant Singh Pannun known all over for encouraging terror acts and has even threatened to attack Parliament ruthlessly on December 13? What message is the US sending by taking no action against Pannun?

Is it just a coincidence that this same Gurpatwant Singh Panun is a dual citizen of the US and Canada? Should US and Canada be proud and so also UK and Australia that just like they all colluded to divide India in 1947 into many parts and 77 years later they still are not satisfied and want to divide India further India into India and Khalistan? What if India starts propping up similar outfits to divide UK, USA, Canada and other similar countries? If India does so will they tolerate it quietly?

When it comes to USA and UK then they feel nothing wrong in killing Osama bin Laden right inside Pakistan just because he attacked WTC in New York in 2001? Why USA never targets terrorists who attack India? US former President George Bush once famously said that:
There are no good terrorists or bad terrorists. Terrorists are only terrorists. Why then USA, UK and Canada are openly promoting Khalistani terrorists? Why they are allowed to openly carry out march with flag of Khalistan?

Why US, UK and Canada never bother about India’s unity and integrity? Why they feel that partition of India was an unfinished agenda? Why they want now Khalistan also to come into effect?

Why US, UK and Canada never accept that India has tolerated quietly since a very long time? Why US, UK and Canada want to give Khalistanis a free run on its soil? Which sovereign country will tolerate all this so quietly?

Why US is busy trading charges with India just like Canada on Khalistani separatist Gurpatwant Singh Pannu? Why Pannu is not in jail? Why Pannu is not extradited to India?

Why idols of Mahatma Gandhiji are broken in US, UK and Canada? Why no strict action taken against them? Why Khalistanis make a song and dance against India in these countries? Why US, UK and Canada are not satisfied with India’s cooperation even in finding out the truth about attempt to assassinate Pannu?

Why even inspite of India rejecting Canada’s allegations as "absurd" and motivated are countries like US and UK not satisfied? Is India slave of US, UK and Canada? Is Nikhil Gupta a terrorist? Is Pannu a Mahatma?

Why US, UK and Canada are frustrated that Pakistan has failed to divide India inspite of four decades of proxy war? Why now US, UK and Canada have opened another front to divide India by promoting Khalistani terrorists in their respective countries and so also in other Christian countries like Australia and New Zealand and Germany? Should India wag its tail like a dog in front of them? Is this is not what US, UK and Canada are wanting from India?

Why US, UK and Canada want accountability from India but never want themselves to be accountable for openly promoting Khalistani terrorists? Why even UN favours US, UK and Canada as having the inalienable right to encourage Khalistani terrorists openly in their soil? Why UN never condemns them? Is UN dominated by US, UK and Canada? We all know!

Why US, UK and Canada never promote Hamas in their soil? Why promotion of only terror groups directed against India in US, UK and Canada? Why US, UK and Canada are not happy inspite of India tolerating this open mockery of India’s unity and integrity from their soil?

Why is it that Indian diplomats like Vikram Doraiswami are ruffled, heckled and prevented from entering a Gurudwara in Scotland in UK or USA or Canada or some other Christian country like Australia? Are such Christian countries not guilty of trying to divide India just like they divided us in India? Why US, UK and Canada have always sided with Pakistan and US left huge arms and ammunition in Afghanistan? What message does it send?

How long does US, UK and Canada want India to tolerate everything quietly? Why maximum demonstrations by separatists Sikhs take place in US, UK and Canada? Will US, UK and Canada tolerate quietly if India promotes such separatism in their countries?

How long will US, UK and Canada be a complete safe haven for Khalistani separatists and hardliners who favour disintegration of India? Why US, UK and Canada are least bothered about the security threat that they pose directly or indirectly to India? Why if a Khalistani separatist like Hardeep Singh Nijjar in British Columbia in Canada is killed by some other gang is India blamed directly by Canada without any investigation? Why Canada has convicted India before even any probe has begun? Why Canada favours long life for such Khalistani separatists and without any proof directly blame India for his gruesome killing? What if India also starts blaming Canada, US and UK?

In conclusion, it is high time and countries like US, US, Canada and so also other Christian countries like Australia, New Zealand, Germany and Switzerland among others must wake up their ideas and start behaving like civilized countries and stop day dreaming to divide India again as was done in 1947! India is cooperating fully in probe with Canada and USA as India has nothing to hide and India never wants to divide US, UK and Canada! Why India is still not in UN and China in UN since last many decades? It is again because of US, UK, Canada and other such Christian countries! Most disgracefully, even now these countries are showing no signs of reform! India still has always been quiet and even now agreed to cooperate in investigating into murder of Khalistani separatists and terror leaders like Nijjar!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col (Retd) BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Present space law framework in the country. Space has heightened the curiosity of mankind for centuries. Due to the advancement in technology, there is fierce competition amongst nations for the next space war.
The scope of Section 151 CPC has been explained by the Supreme Court in the case K.K. Velusamy v. N. Palanisamy
Co-operative Societies are governed by the Central Co-operative Societies Act 1912, where there is no State Act. In West Bengal they were governed by the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act
Registration enables an NGO to be a transparent in its operations to the Government, Donors, to its members and to its urgent community.
The ingredients of Section 18 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 are
Drafting of legal Agreements and Deeds in India
ST Land rules in India,West Bengal
The paper will discuss about the provisions related to liquidated damages. How the law has evolved. Difference between the provisions of England and India.
A privilege may not be a right, but, under the constitution of the country, I do not gather that any broad distinction is drawn between the rights and the privileges that were enjoyed and that were taken away.
It is most hurting to see that in India, the soldiers who hail from Jammu and Kashmir and who join forces either in Army or in CRPF or in BSF or in police or in any other forces against the will of majority
Pukhraj v/s State of Uttarakhand warned high caste priests very strongly against refusing to perform religious ceremonies on behalf of lower caste pilgrims. It took a very stern view of the still existing practice of exclusion of the SC/ST community in Haridwar.
This article aims to define delay in civil suits. It finds the general as well as specific causes leading to pendency of civil suits and over-burdening of courts. This articles suggests some solutions which are pragmatic as well as effective to reduce the burden of the courts and speed up the civil judicial process.
This article deals with importance, needs, highlights and provisions of the Surrogacy Bill 2016, which is passed by the lok sabha on 19th December 2018 .
Cross Examination In Case of Injunction Suits, Injunctions are governed by Sections 37, 38, 39 to Section 42 of Specific Relief Act.
Satishchandra Ratanlal Shah v Gujarat inability of a person to return the loan amount cannot give rise to a criminal prosecution for cheating unless fraudulent or dishonest intention is shown right at the beginning of the transaction..
Dr.Ashok Khemka V/s Haryana upheld the integrity of eminent IAS officer because of his upright and impeccable credentials has emerged as an eyesore for politicians of all hues but also very rightly expunged Haryana Chief Minister ML Khattar adverse remarks in his Personal Appraisal Report
State of Rajasthan and others v. Mukesh Sharma has upheld the constitutional validity of Rule 8(2)(i) of the Rajasthan Prisons (Shortening of Sentences) Rules, 2006.
Gurmit Singh Bhatia Vs Kiran Kant Robinson the Supreme Court reiterated that, in a suit, the plaintiff is the dominus litis and cannot be forced to add parties against whom he does not want to fight unless there is a compulsion of the rule of law.
explicitly in a latest landmark ruling prohibited the use of loudspeakers in the territory without prior permission from the authorities.
The Commissioner of Police v/s Devender Anand held that filing of criminal complaint for settling a dispute of civil nature is abuse of process of law.
Rajasthan Vs Shiv Dayal High Court cannot dismiss a second appeal merely on the ground that there is a concurrent finding of two Courts (whether of dismissal or decreeing of the suit), and thus such finding becomes unassailable.
Complete Guide to Pleadings in India, get your Written statement and Plaint Drafted by highly qualified lawyers at reasonable rate.
Sushil Chandra Srivastava vs UP imposed absolute prohibition on use of DJs in the state and asked the state government to issue a toll-free number, dedicated to registering complaints against illegal use of loudspeakers. It will help control noise pollution to a very large extent if implemented in totality.
Rajasthan v/s Shri Ramesh Chandra Mundra that institutional independence, financial autonomy is integral to independence of judiciary. directing the Rajasthan Government to reconsider the two decade old proposal of the then Chief Justice of Rajasthan High Court to upgrade 16 posts of its Private Secretaries as Senior Private Secretaries
The Indian Contract act, 1872 necessities significant consideration in a few of its areas. One such area of the Indian Contract act of 1872 is where if any person finds a lost good belonging to others and takes them into his custody acts as the bailee to the owner of the good.
Government has notified 63 provisions of the Motor Vehicles Amendment Act 2019 including the ones dealing with enhanced penalties
Jose Paulo Coutinho vs. Maria Luiza Valentina Pereira no attempt has been made yet to frame a Uniform Civil Code applicable to all citizens of the country despite exhortations by it. Whether succession to the property of a Goan situated outside Goa in India will be governed by the Portuguese Civil Code, 1867
In a major legal setback to Pakistan, the High Court of England and Wales rejecting rightly Pakistan's frivolous claims and ruling explicitly that the VII Nizam of Hyderabad's descendants and India can collect 35 million pounds from Londons National Westminster Bank.
Power of Attorney and the Specific Relief Act, 1963
air pollution in Delhi and even adjoining regions like several districts of West UP are crossing all limits and this year even in districts adjoining Delhi like Meerut where air pollution was never felt so much as is now being felt.
Dr Syed Afzal (Dead) v/sRubina Syed Faizuddin that the Civil Courts while considering the application seeking interim mandatory injunction in long pending cases, should grant opportunity of hearing to the opposite side, interim mandatory injunctions can be granted after granting opportunity of hearing to the opposite side.
students of Banaras Hindu University's (BHU's) Sanskrit Vedvigyan Sankay (SVDVS) went on strike demanding the cancellation of the appointment of Assistant Professor Feroze Khan and transfer him to another faculty.
Odisha Development Corporation Ltd Vs. M/s Anupam Traders & Anr. the time tested maxim actus curiae neminem gravabit which in simple and straight language means that, No party should suffer due to the act of Court.
M/S Daffodills Pharmaceuticals Ltd v/s. State of U.P that no one can be inflicted with an adverse order, without being afforded a minimum opportunity of hearing. In other words, the Apex Court reiterated the supreme importance of the legal maxim and latin phrase titled Audi alteram partem
Ram Murti Yadav v/s State of Uttar Pradesh the standard or yardstick for judging the conduct of the judicial officer has necessarily to be strict, that the public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from anyone performing a judicial function.
Judicial Officers Being Made Scapegoats And Penalized By Inconvenient Transfers And Otherwise: SC
Desh Raj v/s Balkishan that the mandatory time-line for filing written statement is not applicable to non-commercial suits. In non-commercial suits, the time-line for written statement is directory and not mandatory, the courts have the discretion to condone delay in filing of written statement in non-commercial suits.
M/S Granules India Ltd. Vs UOI State, as a litigant, cannot behave as a private litigant, and it has solemn and constitutional duty to assist the court in dispensation of justice.
To exercise one's own fundamental right to protest peacefully does not give anyone the unfettered right to block road under any circumstances thereby causing maximum inconvenience to others.
Today, you have numerous traffic laws as well as cases of traffic violations. People know about safe driving yet they end up defying the safety guidelines. It could be anything like driving while talking on the phone, hit and run incidents, or driving under the influence of alcohol.
The legal processes are uncertain. Also, there are times when justice gets denied, and the legal outcomes get delayed. Hence, nobody wants to see themselves or their loved one end up in jail.
Arun Kumar Gupta v/s Jharkhand that judicial officer's integrity must be of a higher order and even a single aberration is not permitted. The law pertaining to the vital subject of compulsory retirement of judicial officers have thus been summed up in this noteworthy judgment.
Online Contracts or Digital Agreements are contracts created and signed over the internet. Also known as e-contracts or electronic contracts, these contracts are a more convenient and faster way of creating and signing contracts for individuals, institutions and corporate.
Re: Problems And Miseries Of Migrant Labourers has asked Maharashtra to be more vigilant and make concerted effort in identifying and sending stranded migrant workers to their native places.
Gerald Lynn Bostock v/s Clayton County, Georgia that employees cannot be fired from the jobs merely because of their transgender and homosexual identity.
This article compares two cases with similar facts, yet different outcomes and examines the reasons for the same. It revolves around consideration and validation of contracts.
Odisha Vikas Parishad vs Union Of India while modifying the absolute stay on conducting the Jagannath Rath Yatra at Puri has allowed it observing the strict restrictions and regulations of the Centre and the State Government.
Soni Beniwal v/s Uttarakhand even if there is a bar on certain matters to be taken as PIL, there is always discretion available with the Court to do so in exercise of its inherent powers.
Indian Contract Act was commenced in the year 1872 and since then, several deductions and additions have happened to the same. The following piece of work discusses about the concept of offer under the Indian Contract Act, 1872
Top