| 
                          
        Judgment: 
        Dr. Arijit 
        Pasayat, J 
                          
        1. Prayer in this writ petition is 
        for direction to the various States Governments and the Union 
        Territories to ensure that the mandate of Section 158 (6) of the Motor 
        Vehicles Act, 1988 (in short the 'Act') is complied with without 
        exception. It is stated that Section 158 (6) of the Act casts a 
        statutory obligation on the concerned police officers forward to Claims 
        Tribunal having jurisdiction about the death or bodily injury any person 
        so recorded in the police station. Further mandate is contained in the 
        provision about the sending copy thereof to the concerned insurer and 
        the owner of the offending vehicle. The owner of the vehicle is 
        obligated to forward the report to the Claims Tribunal and the insurer. 
        The Union of India has expressed its concern about the apparent 
        non-compliance with the requirements of the provision by letter dated 
        6.6.2006 of the Government of India, Ministry of Shipping Road Transport 
        and Highways, Department of Road Transport and Highways issued circular 
        to transport Secretaries and Commissioners of all States and Union 
        Territories IG (Traffic) police and all the States and Union Territories 
        highlighting non-compliance with the statutory requirements. No action 
        has been taken to comply with the requirements of Section 158 (6). 
                          
        2. There is no dispute that there is 
        statutory requirement to comply with the requirement and actual 
        implementation is very disheartening. 
                          
        3. Section 158 (6) of the Act reads 
        as under:"158 (6): As soon as any information regarding any accident 
        involving death or bodily injury to any person is recorded or report 
        under this section is completed by a police officer, the 
        officer-in-charge of the police station shall forward a copy of the same 
        within thirty days from the date of recording of information or, as the 
        case may be, on completion of such report to the Claims Tribunal having 
        jurisdiction and a copy thereof to the concerned insurer, and where a 
        copy is made available to the owner, he shall also within thirty days of 
        receipt of such report, forward the same to such Claims Tribunal and 
        Insurer." 
                          
        4. Rule 150 of the Central Motor 
        Vehicles Rules, 1989 (in short the 'Rules') deals with the matter. 
                          
        5. Form 54 of the Rules provides the 
        format in which the information is to be given. The Rule and the Form 
        read as follows:
 
                          
        150. Furnishing of copies of reports 
        to Claims Tribunal.--
 
                          
        (1) The police report referred to in 
        sub-section (6) of section 158 shall be in Form 54.
 (2) A registering authority or a police officer who is required to 
        furnish the required information to the person eligible to claim 
        compensation under section 160, shall furnish the information in Form 
        54, within seven days from the date of receipt of the request and on 
        payment of a fee of rupees ten."
 
                          
        6. There is substance in the plea of 
        Mr. G.N. Vahanvati, learned Solicitor General for the petitioner that if 
        action in terms of Section 158 (6) is taken, it will rule out filing of 
        false claim petitions and the job of the Claims Tribunals will become 
        easier. It is stated by learned counsel that a large number of cases 
        alleging sufficient injuries are being filed long after the accidents 
        and this is adding to the pendency of the claims petitions. If action in 
        terms of Section 158 (6) is taken, it will reduce considerably the 
        filing of false claims. It has been highlighted in the writ petition as 
        follows: 
                          
        "26. Some salient facts which have 
        emerged from a detailed study on a macro level which are relevant for 
        the purposes of the instant writ Petition may be noticed: 
                          
        26.1 As on date there are about 1.5 
        million cases pending in different Tribunals/High Courts/Supreme Court;
        
 26.2 About 4 lakh new cases involving injury/death under the Motor 
        Vehicles Act, 1988 are reported every year;
 
 26.3 Claims under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 are reported after about 
        7 months from the date of accident;
 
 26.4 Delay in reporting the claim promotes exaggeration and frauds;
 
 26.5 Delay in reporting the claim makes investigation and fact 
        verification extremely difficult;
 
 26.6 Adjudication of cases take about 3 to 5 years.
 
 26.7 Petitioners Insurance Companies suffer on account of higher claim 
        cost on account of delay in the adjudication of the claim petitions.
 
                          
        26.8 Strict implementation of 
        Section 158(6) shall ensure speedier reporting to Insurance companies 
        which in turn will ensure expeditious and efficient settlement of 
        claims." 
 7. The language used in sub-section (6) of Section 158 mandates the 
        police officer to forward a copy of the report to the Claims Tribunal 
        having jurisdiction and to the concerned insurance company "as soon as 
        any information regarding any accident involving death or bodily injury 
        is recorded or a report under Section 158 is completed by the police 
        officer."
 
                          
        8. Use of the expression 'as soon 
        as' implies that there has to be promptitude in action. To do a thing 
        'as soon as possible' means to do it within a reasonable time, with an 
        understanding to do it within the shortest possible time. [Per Dysant, 
        J. in King's Old County Ltd. v. Liquid Carbonic Can. Corporation Ltd. 
        (1942) 2 WWR 603]. 'As and when' and 'as soon as' are almost synonymous. 
        Whenever these expressions are used in respect of time and place, they 
        denote contemporaneous notion. 'As soon as' and 'forthwith' both are to 
        be normally understood as allowing reasonable time, but latter is more 
        peremptory than the former. But urgency is the hallmark of both 
        expressions. Expression 'as soon as' may be stretched to mean 'as soon 
        as' practicable. It has to be forwarded with promptitude. 
                          
        9. Since there is a mandatory 
        requirement to act in the manner provided in Section 158(6) there is no 
        justifiable reason as to why the requirement is not being followed. 10. 
        It is, therefore, directed that all the State Governments and the Union 
        Territories shall instruct, if not already done, all concerned police 
        officers about the need to comply with the requirement of Section 158(6) 
        keeping in view the requirement indicated in Rule 159 and in Form 54. 
        Periodical checking shall be done by the Inspector General of Police 
        concerned to ensure that the requirements are being complied with. In 
        case there is non-compliance, appropriate action shall be taken against 
        the erring officials. The Department of Transport and Highway shall make 
        periodical verification to ensure that action is being taken and in case 
        of any deviation immediately bring the same to the notice of the 
        concerned State Government/Union Territories so that necessary action 
        can be taken against the concerned officials. 11. The writ petition is 
        accordingly disposed of.  
                          
        
        
         Print This Judgment |